hi adv,
i decided to apply for a job. amazingly the employer got back to me very quickly, but they were asking if my resume was complete. ive only worked 3 jobs so far (20 years old) and i only decided to include 2 of them because i felt the 3rd (working at a juicing company) wasnt relevant. this is my first serious job (ie full time) so im not sure what i should be replying.
>>18600547
If your resume takes up a full page, say that it's complete, but doesn't include your full work history.
If it isn't jammed full at 1 page, then it's not complete.
>>18600553
how do i pad it then? include the other job? i kept it consise but i guess thats a bad idea?
>>18600575
It's supposed to "appear" concise, like you're struggling to keep all your accomplishments and interests under a page in length.
Here's a pic of an old one of mine, with relevant identifying stuff stripped.
>>18600619
And what would a person that isn't a complete badass put down?
>>18600624
Mild exaggerations of your talents.
Tell us the nature of the job you're going for, places you've worked, and a little about yourself
>>18600624
The only job of note in my resume is the Power Plant Operator job. The other job was literally pressing a button and getting a machine to peen metal parts, which the Quality guy would check off, assembling school planners with wire spool (pic related), and working at a plastic moulding facility, where I would press a button to start a machine, then take the parts it shat out, and stack them in a cardboard box.
>>18600619
i mean thats pretty good and all but ive worked 2 mcjobs and been self employed as the third (it consultation). i easily wrote about the self employed one because its relevant to the job but the other 2 i can only really list basic skills
>>18600633
im op but not the guy you replied to list above