Can you even trust people on here for dating/relationship/sex

>>18555474
No, only the person with the problem can make the call in the end. The best you can get is the personal perspectives of others which might help you evaluate what you yourself wish to do. Some people are loyal to the end, some people drop others over any conflict, some people think certain behavior can be forgiven, some people think such behavior cannot. All you get here is alternate perspective and a place to rant.

>>18555474
I am pretty normal by 4chan standards, and I don't go to /pol/ or /r9k/, at least not anymore. I chip out lots of advice on /adv/. I like to advise people on the internet, even with relationship problems and such, because it helps to train this sense on me where I approach everyone as individual, all judgements aside.

Just go ahead, OP, no need for introductions, we all anons here.

I don't really go on any other boards anymore. I've been mainly on adv for the past year. Since last October I've been going through rough shit and this board was a kind of therapy for me. Helping others while you, yourself, need help. I try to give the most honest and helpful advice possible.

I come from a culture where people who end up in relationships for years, if not decades, usually fuck on the first date, (as in this is the normal thing to do,) and going home with someone you met on a club tends to be more common than asking someone out. Having dinner together is something we do after we've slept together a few times, because sharing meals is something we do with people we know we like to socialize with, not a means to getting to know them for the first time. For this reason my advice on dating often results in me being called a manwhore, and my quality women being called sluts.

But then again, there's on average 25 homicides a year on my country, out of which about 4 is by firearm, so I'm pretty sure US standards are fucked up beyond reason, from my point of view