I know this sounds stupid but can I get some help on how to stop

Ease it.
Make an effort to jack off only once a day for maybe 3 weeks.
Then, when you've gotten used to that, make an effort do so it once every two days, and so on

>>18543968
you're off to a bad start if you refuse to cut back on internet usage for the simple fact that (a) you're tacitly admitting you spend too much time online, and (b) you refuse to take o board the most obvious piece of advice, which signals an unwillingness to change.

Cut back, especially in the evening, and that removes a source of temptation right there. Keep stimulating yourself and you'll keep jerkin'. Get out more instead and some exercise, you'll feel better after a week.

>>18543968
A major logical fallacy with the Epicurean Paradox is it assumes Evil has no value (the end state where it falsely concludes that by not preventing Evil God is not good or loving).

>>18544302
>it assumes Evil has no value
What is the value of evil? The only merit I can think of is to test us, which said chart covers.

File: 425103_431877366864982_1799162787_n.jpg (63KB, 398x298px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 398x298px

>>18543968
>>18543968
God damn, I can't handle that fucking image.
>Epicurus was explicitly not atheistic
>he was also explicitly polytheistic, so arguing against an all knowing monotheistic God doesnt make sense for him
>his concept of Gods is nowhere close to the type being argued against in the chart
>there are no written works of his left so there is nowhere such arguments are laid out by him to be summarized by that flowchart
>the dates say a.c, not even a.c.e or a.d, but count down to zero like b.c.


It reminds me of this other bullshit image attributed to Marcus Aurelius.
>not an image of Marcus Aurelius
>it is Carcalla
>he never said anything like that.

It's embarrassing