Should I go on second dates with people who I found sort-of dull

>>18476416
give them a try it isn't like a second evening is that high an investment for an average anon for the possible tradeoff of having a higher chance of finding someone you click with

>>18476416
Yes.

>>18476416
One shot and if they miss too bad they wasted my time. Next

A lot of good people can come off as boring on the first date, because they aren't good they are nervous or bad at small talk. Considering how little of your life a second date would waste, you should go for it.

On one hand, they just might not have put their best foot forward. On the other, you could be considered leading them on.

I'm inclined to say no, you shouldn't. There are plenty of people out there who can make a good impression on a first date, why waste your time with those who can't and risk having an /r9k/ rant written about you for being a cocktease?

>>18476416
Many of the people in that photo are intellectuals, and not rhetoricians. Lumping them all together just demonstrates that you lack your own critical thinking abilities, and cannot tell go someone might know some things but not all things. Chances are, you're the dull one, and the reason there are no second dates is because no one is interested in you. Maybe ditch the fedora.