Where do I find girls online who are: 1. single 2. at least remotely

>>18376364
well theyre not gonna be into paradox games

Conventions.

>>18376381
We don't really have this kind of conventions in my country. The conventions here are events where people go to look for a job.

Dating sites and tinder.

>>18376437
fails at point 2

>>18376445
How do you know this?

>>18376364
You dont need gf interested in videogames to be happy. You can play coop with friends or with your babies once they grow up.

>>18376498
From experience.
>>18376505
We should at least have something in common to talk about. And video games are more interesting than web development.

>>18376575
Really? You set up tinder, matched with many girls, but none were into videogames?

>>18376575
This is shortsided perspective. You need compatible life goals and personalities. If you manage to find attractive girl with these qualities, one of you will adopt some hobby of the other one to keep it going.

Dont limit your dating pool like this. You want it to be as wide as possible. You dont need your wife to play videogames to be happy. You just need somebody caring so much about you that she will support you in it.

>>18376581
No, I just mentioned that in my description and swiped pretty much everyone without a description and haven't gotten matched. The ones with description always say that they are travelers. That's 100% of the time, I'm not over-exaggerating. One even wrote that she just came from country A, is going to stay for the weekend, and its off to country B. It's probably to be expected when you don't live in a first world country, they probably have grandparents here or something. And in dating websites you can straight up see what everyone is interested in.
>>18376586
That is if we even reach the point where one wants to keep the other around.

>>18376364
also
4. Pretty

In my class literally every girl is somewhat interested in video games. Many are single, but honestly saying, not all are good looking and not even one is appealing in a sexual way. So you know.

>>18376649
Would be nice, but it's incompatible with 1 and would make 3 unnecessary since it will always be true.

chats