I wrote this but don't know if anybody will approve. Constructive

EDIT: Please ignore the typos. English is not my first language. -Bump

>>18304175
So why are you posting ?

>>18304182
Opinions

>>18304175
Uhh. You are sort of mixing up physics and philosophy and throwed there question about what is free will.

Try posting this in
>>>/lit/

And your claim about
>you cant do anything wrong
are very bold and imho untrue.

>pro tip
Never ever be sorry for your english. Dont let your low confidence to affect your life.

Sounds like a bunch of new age bullshit someone with no understanding of physics might spout.

>Energy is the single most powerful force in the universe.
Energy is not a force.

>>18304256
What of consciousness is a force? Like when you decide to do something

>>18304175
>Energy is the single most powerful force in the universe

Energy isn't force. Force is mass · acceleration. If you are talking about fundamental forces, energy isn't one of those, either. Rather, forces are what convert between potential and other forms of energy. And FYI, the strongest fundamental force is literally called the "strong force," and it's what holds the protons in the nucleus together against their repulsive force.

>The human experience is an interaction of this divine energy.

Define "divine." The "human experience," or "consciousness," is a range of phenomena that arise from certain arrangements of matter. Because the brain processes that cause them use energy, I guess you could say that consciousness is an interaction of energy. There isn't anything spooky about this energy, though. It's the chemical, thermal, kinetic, electrical etc. energy in your nervous system.

>You can't change that which is, just like you can't keep yourself from being who you are.

Define "change." Are you trying to say that nothing can undergo change (which is obviously false), or that the law of identity can't be broken (which is true, but trivial)?

>Just like waves in the ocean which spread out in a specific pattern, you are the part of this universal pattern. Your existence is not an coincidence but rather an interaction of that which is the essence of "being".

Can you tell us what the "essence of being" is? Something's essence would be its set of jointly necessary and sufficient conditions (a necessary and sufficient condition of being "water" is being made of the molecule H2O; anything that is H2O is water, and nothing that is H2O isn't water).

Because, without being more specific, your metaphors don't really illuminate much. In what way are humans like the waves in water?

>>18304175
Is this a sales pitch or something? there are some major flaws in your both your rethoric and hypothesis

>>18304492
>The only universal law you have to obey is that of your own, to be, that which you already essentially are.

It seems like you're trying to jump to a normative conclusion without any normative premises (is-ought fallacy). How does any of what you said bear on what humans ought to obey?

If by "universal law," you do not mean normative rules, but physical laws, then it seems pointless to talk about whether one should "obey" them or not, because it is impossible to break the laws of physics.

> Everything you do is that which is already perfect. You can't do anything wrong. If there is one message the universe is trying to convey to us it is the essence of "being". There are no words to describe knowing, knowing is the end result.

You haven't even established a theory of "right" or "wrong," so your statements about perfection and not being able to do wrong aren't grounded in anything, they are non-sequiturs.

Terms like "trying to convey" suggest consciousness and agency. Is there any evidence that the universe as a whole has either of those properties, let alone that it has anything that it is "trying to convey" to people?

I think you just strung a bunch of words together that you think sound profound. Try reading actual philosophy.