>has an in law (17) who is a baby mama and whore living with

>>18278742
Discuss it with your fiance maybe.

Pics

>>18278742
Are you her legal guardian? Not sure what legal responsibility you have towards her.

>>18278813
Moral responsibility is a thing, you know. When you marry someone, their family comes along with them, unless they're estranged.

And even if OP doesn't feel any moral responsibility, her fiance probably does, which is why this girl is living with them in the first place.

>>18278817
Woah I didn't know moral responsibility was a thing. Thanks for the lesson you faggot. If OP is asking if "we" should kick her out I assume her fiance is also finding her troublesome.

>>18278819
OP said 'we' because they live together, you moron.

>>18278821
>tfw can't kick her out until she's 18
>should WE really wait until she's 18?

The first line implies some legal responsibility to the minor. Her dilemma is not contingent on her age as a moral issue but it seems to rely on her status as a minor. That was the reason I asked what her legal status in regards to the girl was.

Second line states "we" as a party making the decision to make the girl leave before she turns 18. This would imply her and her fiance are acting together in expressing their grievances towards the baby mama drama. Your conjecture that "we" simply denoted only the living situation isn't reading between the lines.

>>18278742
Suggest she go visit another relative for a while. Do that with enough relatives and November will come soon.