"If you can't handle me at my worst, then you sure as hell don't deserve me at my best."
How true is this? Can you still be utterly fed up with your girl when she's at her worse but love her when she's at her best? Or does the former preclude the latter?
>>18131835
'For better or worse', anon. It's completely true.
>>18131835
Being there at her worst doesn't mean being okay with whatever's going on, it just means that you won't leave her for it. You can be annoyed/pissed off
>>18131835
It's a shit test. Don't let them act dumb.
>>18131835
Depends on what someone's worst and best is
>>18131835
The word 'deserve' makes it sound like some natural truth, you can poke holes in it easily in that sense. What's actually being said though is a condition for continuation of the relationship, so it can be negotiated.
context matters
it can be used as an excuse for shitty behaviour while if you do the same, youll be kicked out before saying sorry
on equal grounds its sorta true, ppl have flaws, you cant have only the good things, well you can but then the relationship is just fake
>>18131843
>For better or worse
>Or until I get bored and take half your shit
It's the same as:
"I am a terrible person, but you can change your thoughts into thinking i am a good person."
There's some truth to the idea. That if you won't support your partner, you won't be there for the good times. However the people who post this shit rarely have anything worth noting "at their best" and are generally incredibly shitty.
>>18131835
It greatly depends on what her "worst" is. For some people, it's just annoying habits. For others, it's cheating, lying, manipulation, etc. When it comes to the latter, the quote is absolute shit because it can justify a toxic relationship.