I was sitting next to my girlfriend the other day when she got

>>17898770
>he just replied with a picture of his cock(it was huge). Now I thought this has to be a prank and I did an image search on the picture but there were no results

let's see what his dick looks like
also it's pretty easy to grab a huge dick pic from any thread from /b/ or /soc/ without them being shown on google image. Same with nude of girls

>>17898802
I'd show you it but this is a blue board.

Not going to lie it was huge that's what makes me think this is fake.

>>17898770

Errr, it sounds like she handed her number out to some guy and he ended up texting her. I'd be wary if I was you. If it was completely random how would he know she was a girl, he was given that number one way or another.

As for the messages, just tell her to block him and move on.

well if he knows her name it makes me think he might be a stalker. I think that for now just ignore the creep and move on but if he contacts her again you should talk with the police.

>>17898823
That he was given her number doesn't mean that she gave it to him. It could be a salty orbiter or ex wanting to annoy her, or a girlfriend finding the idea hilarious. And make no mistake, there really are guys who develop a crush on someone from afar then go through great lengths to reach them without asking for their contact information.

He was sitting next to her, it's very doubtful that if she was surprised by this while he was right there and had not expected to be called by him (at that time), she would in no way show that she was flustered/embarrassed.

And OP, there's little you can do. Police can't do shit about this and if you reach out you're the yapping boyfriend who feels threatened and needs to hover around his girl. All you can do is ask her to tell him that that's fucked up and she wants nothing to do with him before blocking him, but honestly by his actions I think that would just make him laugh.

>>17898770
why did she feel compelled to respond? why didn't she just delete?

Anyway, you can bet the conversation would have been very different had you not been sitting beside her.

>>17898838

If we're talking grade school then yeah your examples could possibly be the reasons. I just think for an adult to receive such a message is a bit strange, especially if the person knew her name and the image couldn't be internet searched (meaning it's authentic). So that rules out a girlfriend playing a prank or an ex (because she would recognise the dick).

>>17898770
she didn't block that number

>>17898770
Personally id do nothing. Bitches get this shit all the time. My girlfriend gets this crap now and then, too. Its up to your gf tho. If shes really hurt, contact the police (psa, use the non emergency number). Theyll see this as harrassment and contact the number. They probably wont pursue charges, but theyll warn the guy and rattle him and hell think twice in the future.

If you really wanna fuck his life up, though, put his number on the internet and explain what happened.

Trolls will ruin his life. We did this on facebook to a dude who went off on my gfs sister about being a retard and a cunt when she said she didnt want to sleep with him.

Dude went viral and saw himself shared on facebook in 20 minutes. and called her crying and begging for forgiveness.

Shits beyond cruel but hilarious.

>>17898843
>why did she feel compelled to respond
I can imagine the situation
>omg that dick is so gross

>moist

>>17898770
>will eat her pussy
girls,

Does this turn you on a lot?

>>17898853
Reverse image search engines only show results from what's publicly online. It could be in a paid only section of a porn site. If it's a girlfriend she could easily be forwarding a dick someone sent to her, happens all the time if you do online dating.

Yeah sure it is, but it does happen. One of my friends is ridiculously popular and she got guys like this multiple times. Those weren't pranks, either, just guys who figured out her number through university/work or by pressuring a third party.

lol wow could have been a random hook up she had years ago that popped up out of nowhere or someone pulling a prank. got some girls number from facebook through a friend at the time, then made a fake account on some social media site, got that number spammed with dick pics and such. the pug (the girl's nick name we pranked) deserved it tho.

>>17898859

You just know part of her was curious who the guy was and what it would be like.

It's like receiving a picture of a perfect ass or tits from a random number asking if you're single.

>>17898864
If he actually does it then yeah. But it's become meaningless because every guy promises to and barely anyone ever does. (Talking hook up dirty talk, not within a relationship.)

I loved it when my ex-lover told me he was going to do it because I knew he would follow up on his word. Some random guy, no, it instantly gets translated to "I want to fuck you and am saying stuff to get you to fuck me".

>>17898872
No it's not. Most women are not aroused by random bodyless penises whether they are big or not. It's also very crude, more comparable to a shot of a spread open vulva than to tits/ass.

You know the whole thing that many guys have where they love curves and love the feel/smell/whatever of pussy, but don't particularly care for the bare looks of a vagina? That's also really common for women.

>>17898874
that doesn't explain why she responded if it was unsolicited

>>17898874

If you think a girl doesn't like the look of a big cock you're kidding yourself, you've been spoon fed absolute bullshit. Girls aren't these prissy and innocent beings you think they are.

>>17898880
eh I think you got the order wrong, from OP
>She said gross goodbye and he just replied with a picture of his cock
cock was sent last, after that their communication ended.

>>17898880
You can spin it any way you want, if she hadn't responded you could've said "why not tell the guy off then if it's unwelcome?? she's going to text him back later when she's alone!"

He asked if she was single, that's an unwelcome question but still a fairly normal one. At that point he could've still been a normal, not that smooth guy. So she killed his hope. Then he texted her his dick and she expressed that not only that does not convince her, she's put off by him now.

>>17898885
I understand the order, it was when she responded and had she not perhaps no dick pic. I still want to understand why a woman responds if the text is unsolicited or they do not know the person

>>17898884
I am a woman and I have been friends with women my whole life. Just because women can be fucking perverts (hell, I watch fetish porn multiple times a week, I am well aware that women aren't princesses) and have a sex drive (at least most of the time) doesn't mean this particular thing arouses them on average.

A hard cock of an attractive man in their bed? Of fucking course. A random picture of a close up of a random penis? That's an entirely different story.

Do you really think that all the jokes about pushy guys who send gross dick pics are pulled out of thin air?

>>17898887
why not just delete the text? simple unless her curiosity gets the better of her wondering who this mystery guy is and potential interest

IRL would she parry with a guy that tried to chat her up? Bet she would

>>17898893
Not a femanon but ive got enough promiscuous female friends who are very open and honest with me who have told me plenty dicks are pretty gross.

Youll always find an exception. A few girls who likes that shit isnt proof what this femanon is saying is wrong. It just means those girls are different.

>>17898904
*unsolicited dicks

>>17898902
Right, because if she wanted to make sure to stay in touch it works better to tell him off then go back on your word as opposed to simply making your boyfriend think you're not going to answer and getting back to it later.

And once again, if someone is just asking whether you are single it is a more effective way to nip it in the bud to just tell them no than to delete the text so they will send another text to remind you to answer. Someone who got your number from another source than you is not just going to back down because you're not responding a single time.

Honestly I think it's some serious paranoia to think that her telling a guy "I'm taken" and then "gross" is a sign that she's going to cheat and she was dripping wet.

>>17898893

Women circulate the dick pics that are sent to them among their friends, and laugh at the small/average poorly taken pictures. They joke and play with the idea of the huge ones.

>>17898911

However you look at it replying only validates the behaviour, she was curious to some extent, otherwise it's extremely easy to dismiss and block the number, a "I'm taken" is unnecessary and the dude probably knows this if he also knows her name.

>>17898918
Obviously if you have to get a dick picture, one that looks clean and big etc is more likely to elicit some amount of positivity than a shitty picture of a small one. Doesn't mean that most women are dying to get unsolicited pictures of nice big dicks. There are plenty of nice big dicks to find online that women don't care for because they don't particularly like looking at big dicks. Which is why after all the tries of the porn industry to reel in a female audience, women still don't nearly equal men in porn consumption and actually often opt for lesbian porn.

What women find attractive differs from what men find attractive. Are there women who like to look at dicks of unknown men? Yes. Are there women who like to see them even if it was sent to them without context? Yes. But those are not the majority. It is not remotely the equivalent of sending a man ass/tits they love so much they're already looking at it all the time by their own volition.

>>17898931
Different fag here.

Sounds like you really want to go out of your way to believe and prove all women are cheating sloos.

>>17898931
I know that speaking for a single person doesn't matter much in the scale of things but for the record, I have rejected plenty of men in my life and I have never once started out ignoring someone. After it's clear that they're not going to respect your rejection, sure, but only after stating lack of interest.
This wasn't out of curiosity but a sort of optimism - you are -hoping- that this is a normal person who will just take a no as a no.

I can see your point that any kind of reply is a good sign (better than no reply) and some men absolutely do reason like this. But plenty of women don't and it's also hardly irrational to think that someone will be discouraged by an explicit denial.

>>17898918
aww you poor thing.
*hug

>>17898911
what the fuck? just delete and block, simple

or respond and engage which she did

>>17898956
see >>17898945

>>17898956
Also wanted to add that turning tables, would you really, honestly feel like a woman was "engaging" you if she was telling you to get lost?

Again yeah, there's a minority of men so douchy and thick that you could tell them to go fuck an electrical outlet and they'd just say you sound nice and feisty. But most people do not think "ohh she responded, she must like me" if someone tells them "eww gross" after a come on.

Thanks for all the responses, sorry for the late reply I'm at work.

She asked him how he got
The number and he said "I found it on a coaster at Boston pizza" which is probably a lie. Also his opening text was " hey is this ******, the super hot brown girl". I really doubt my girlfriend would consider cheating on me for a big cock considering we have great sex, she is madly in love, and I make six figures.

>>17899039
>brown girl
lol dropped

>>17899039
she has a good idea who this guy is

>>17898770
You can take it to the police.
Don't try and confront him yourself because A) you will stammer and cry then B) suck his dick before C) he cucks you.
Have her block the number, get the police involved if you like, the worst thing you could do is accept it and let it happen.