How true is this? Does the male average is really 3? Does

What advice could you possibly want from this thinly veiled r9k post

>>17852799
I want female opinions.

Fuck off

>>17852801
Here's some male advice

Statistics and graphs are a poor excuse for legitimate human contact. Go talk to some females if you want their opinions.

>>17852822
the study and data seems legit.

I do also think is true, since when I leave my house and I see the average male on the street, he's ugly as fuck.

>>17852795
>Does the male average is really 3?
>Does this mean a 6-7 male is on the top 10% male percentile?
You haven't read the graph properly. It shows that an average man gets a rating of two, average woman just over three, and an average person three. However, that's on a scale of one to five, not one to ten.

>>17852836
>he thinks is hard to multiply by 2 to make the scale 10

>>17852841
Your reading comprehension is on a par with op's ability to interpret the graph. Go and read the post I replied to again, and see if you can understand why you've just made yourself look like an idiot.

>>17852849
>the male rating of two is the same as a rating of 4 in a 10 scale
>average women receive a rating of 3 which is 6 in a 10 scale
OP is correct, he's simply using the 10 points scale.

U seem unable to understand basic high school math.

>>17852795
Ok, let's be entirely honest here:
- Women are usually cuter and prettier than men.
- Women are often vaguely bisexual.
- Therefore, women will consider attractiveness across genders.
- Therefore, men end up with ratings that are lower on average because women are subconsciously also comparing them with women, who are prettier on average.
- High-test men with good skin and facial bones can still rank highly, but this is a small minority.
- Meanwhile, men have higher sex drives and aren't as picky about looks, as long as the girl isn't fat or deformed.
- Thankfully, looks are a smaller contributor to attraction, for women.
There you go, OP, I solved the problem.