Explain to me why I am not allowed to eat hunting bait. It says

>>17816733
>Trump didn't even begin ruining the economy yet
>Americans already start eating hunting bait preparing for the dark future

>>17816733
It probably won't kill you, but the problem is there's no guarantee. I'm guessing " not for human consumption" means they don't put any effort to ensuring the health or safety of anything eats it, and quality is a distant concern at best. Why should you worry about purity or safety for a product intended to attract things you want to kill?

>>17816755
Trump will actually save our country since hilary was going to invite millions of syrians here. You're a dumb libfuck yurofag and should leave

File: 20161124_185628.jpg (2MB, 3303x1858px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3303x1858px

>>17816759
Some of this stuff is intended to keep deer eating for months until they are prime. Also deer are edible, so you'd want them to eat decently.

>>17816733
I've eaten fishing bait before, it's just not had the proper procedure, approved by the USDA, etc.

>>17816761
Millions of syrians, eh? Too much swine wine, I take?

>>17816800
/adv/ is full of the worst kind of people

It's this
>>17816759

Fit for human consumption is much higher standard than fit for bait. By simply slapping a notice like that to their product they avoid tons of expensive testing, permits, quality control and what not associated with real human food.

File: 20161124_185722.jpg (2MB, 3303x1858px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3303x1858px

>>17816823
I see.
What about this mineral lick then? This won't hurt me right? Surely it'd have the vitamins and minerals I need

>>17816833
It probably won't hurt you but there is no guarantee of the effects and manufacturer is not responsible when you eventually kill yourself.

File: dog.jpg (32KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 1280x720px

>>17816764
>humans sure do love this chocolate stuff
>if its good for them its gotta be good for me