How are you supposed to know what you like sexually? People

>>17775615
You sound like the type of person who only eats chicken nuggets and refuses to even try any new food

>>17775615
Watch porn, and you'll know what you like, ya faggot.

>>17775617
Oh, I know the kind of person you're talking about, I know a few and I hate that stuff.

But I recon black olives are easier to get rid of than black dick, if you find it unpalatable.

You can't just make a face and pour a would-be sexual partner in the trash and expect no protest.

>>17775633
What kind of porn?

>>17775638
If you don't already know, you're probably asexual, or some type of lgbtq spectrum.

>>17775615

try everything that interests you then.

if your answer is
>BUT WHAT IF I DONT LIKE IT?

then you need to grow up. if you are curious and have an interest, give it a try. worst case scenario, you wasted in afternoon.

>>17775652
I'm interested in holding hands and art history. Now what?

>>17775638
The fuck is wrong with you? How do you not know what you like? Jk. But seriously, if you look at something and like it... you probably like it. You can't ask us what your preference should be.

File: 49837248923.jpg (1MB, 1155x1600px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1155x1600px

Why do you need to know OP?

You do not have to try everything. Why would people say that?

>>17775615
Well, I mean they're right. But you also are to some degree too.
I'd like to think of myself as pretty open minded sexually. I'm willing to at least try most things. However, there are some things I refuse to even try. Just through thinking long and hard about it, and watching a bit of kink porn, I've kinda narrowed down WHY those things are things I won't even try, and it usually boils down to I refuse to try things I think could possibly damage my body(even minor)/get me sick, and of course things that could land me in legal trouble.
I don't want to do anything involving feces, piss, or blood for sanitation. This means I will not do hardly any kind of butt stuff, the only exception I'd keep open to is pegging, since I won't be touching anything, just the plastic dick attached to me. I wont do water sports, I won't do any kind of blood play.
Not even try. I refuse. And that's ok. It's ok to have boundaries that you won't even humor. But at the same time, if you even have a desire at all to be a little flexible (which sticking strictly to vanilla missionary sex is fine too), you gotta be open minded to trying things that seem just a little weird to you. If you don't like it, it's not the end of the world. You can quit whenever you want, and you can also find compromises in between.
Like I had an ex into mud. I didn't want to get mud anywhere near the vagoo because to me that just sounded like a way to fuck up my ecosystem and get some UTIs or yeast infections. But I was willing to get mud above the waist. Did I like it? No, not really. But I didn't hate it either, and I enjoyed seeing my bf get excited.

But, TL;DR >>17775633 This. Open up Porn hub, click on the categories, and just watch a couple vids from each one. You don't have to partake in any thing, just watch others. See what you think is hot, what does nothing for you.

>>17775731
If that's so, then I really don't know what's wrong with me.

>>17775734
Because if I want a boyfriend or just hang out with a guy, I'm going to have to put out eventually.

Being completely isolated is getting boring, so it'd be best to make it as painless as possible.

>>17775744
*Also I'll note it's possible there will be things you enjoy watching but would never participate in yourself.
Like I sometimes like to watch 3somes or orgies, but I would never do one myself, because that would just be a strain on my relationship. Also, I'm fine watching girl on girl action, but I cannot do it myself because I was raped by a woman as a kid. If it were happening to me, I'd probably be triggered and just have a bad time.

File: 4327482734.jpg (326KB, 806x1074px) Image search: [Google]

326KB, 806x1074px

>>17775744
Pornography subverts sexual desire and taste. It is the absorption of artificial spectacles. If you do not fantasize on a specific sexual encounter, whatever paraphilia or kink, yourself, then it is probably not your desire, but the enactment/mimesis of spectacle.

>>17775749
I would advise you to "explore" sexuality with your boyfriend and try to put your curiosity to rest for now.

File: 242v9xg.jpg (158KB, 1600x900px) Image search: [Google]

158KB, 1600x900px

>>17775788
Sorry can you rephrase that in a way someone dumber can understand? I have no clue what you're getting at lol.
Sorry I'm retarded.

>>17775788
I don't have a boyfriend because I don't put out.

File: 432978489234.jpg (15KB, 236x362px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 236x362px

>>17775807
Pornography is not an innocent medium through which one can "explore" one's sexuality because, firstly, it bears little to no relation actual sex and could rather be rephrased as a negation of sexuality in and of it being an "overexposure" of sex. Actual sex necessitates something hidden but searched for and expressed. Pornography is exhibited sex, a profanation. Listen to Baudrillard here

>The very obscenity inflames and consumes its object. It [the image] is seen too close-up, you see what you have never seen before – your sex, you have never seen it function so close up, and indeed, happily for you, not at all. It is all too real, too close up to be real. And this is what is fascinating – the excess of reality, the hyperreality of the whole thing

Secondly, pornography is neither fantasy nor real sex, but a prepackaged commodity designed to inculcate your sexual desire - which tries but falters to find real sex - with the industry that produced it.

Also, the reach of professional pornography to culture and to people's private bedrooms sort of discredits amateur pornography to ever be able to give a "radically" different representation of "filmed sex", but then again, perhaps the problem lies in the actual form, the distance between object and subject, producer and consumer.

Do you "explore" what kinds of food you enjoy by watching a cooking programme, people eating, on tv?

>>17775837
What do you mean you do not "put out"? Are you perhaps asexual?