Is it better to have a tattoo if you hate tattoos or have the

>>17717889
Prolly better to get the tattoo removed. It's just a matter of having the lesser of two evils at that point.

Why the fuck would you get a tattoo if you hate them, is my question?
Were you that retarded as a kid to get one because of the passing fad and not consider your future? In which case, you have to atone for your dumbassery and endure your fucking mutilation.

>>17717895
Ease up, people make mistakes. OP is just questioning hat the best course of action is to correct a mistake.

>>17717895
temporary insanity. I had the idea that I could defeat pain by accepting it. It didn't work out.

>>17717897
Yeah, and when people make mistakes they have to live with them. OP made a dumb shit but permanent decision and now he has to live with it.
>>17717906
Well, statement stands. You fucked up, now you have to accept the responsibility. Honestly, for your pride, I'd either keep it, or get a cover up tat that you can possibly respect, if possible. When you have that shitty remnant it just tells everyone "I was a moron and couldn't even pretend to own up to my stupidity". At this point the best course of action is just to own it.

>>17717912
But tatoos aren't "permanent". They can be lazered off, and that's what this thread is asking about. OP isn't forced to suffer from his past mistakes out of principle.

>>17717889
Bleached

There's probably even a treatment to make the bleached skin match the rest better afterwards
Go for it

>>17717889
get rid of the tattoo