Can anyone help me with the following question. Its for an international

File: International law.png (3KB, 549x129px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 549x129px

Can anyone help me with the following question.
Its for an international law class, undergraduate.


Question 1

--In circumstances precluding wrongness…

A)The State in question has complied with all its obligations,
therefore there is no reason for claims of reparations

B)The State in question has an excuse for non compliance that does not equate to a breach of obligation towards another State

C)The State damaged cannot seek further reparation

D)The international court has strengthen the violation of obligation of the State in question
–-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Question 2

-Are claimant states still entitled to seek for compensation/reparation even
after the State which violated its obligation with the claimant State has successfully claimed it acted under ‘a circumstance that precludes wrongness’ such as distress?

A) a priori yes

B)usually no

C) depends on the circumstances precluding wrongness, not all circumstances entitles to reparation.
–-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Question 9

-States cannot be considered crime doers, only wrongdoers. Why?

A)States do not violate international law

B)States are incapable of actus reus

C)It is argued that States, as fictional entities, are incapable of mens rea (wrongful intention)

D) Because States are not people

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Question 10

- In order to know if a State has violated its international obligations, one needs to look at:

A) Customary law and all the treaties/conventions the State is party to

B)Treaties that the State is party to, exclusively

C)UNGA declarations and UNSC resolutions

D)In the State’s constitution