Is it worth worrying about STDs if you wear a condom every time

>>17667114
*slutty

>>17667114
>Is it worth worrying about STDs if you wear a condom every time you have one night stands?

Uhh... What the hell are they teaching you kids in school nowadays...

Condoms are not 100% effective.
They are 98% effective with PERFECT use.
This does NOT round up.

You can STILL get STD's
You can STILL get pregnant.

In fact there is 1 out of 50 chance those can happen, each and every time you have sex.

And that number is even HIGHER if you're not using it perfectly--which some studies point to figures as high as 40%+ people don't. In fact so many people misuse condoms that the real world average efficacy is closer to 15%

That means instead of 1 out of 50, for most people that statistic is closer to 1 out of 7.

But you know what's 100% effective?
Not sticking your dick in places you're not prepared to be responsible of the consequences for.

>>17667114
condoms are only effective at preventing things that are transmitted via fluids. this mean you can still get the herp, hpv, etc. and they are not 100% effective in any circumstance

>>17667158
Why are you spewing bullshit?

> They are 98% effective with PERFECT use.
A self-reported study carried out over a year.

> In fact there is 1 out of 50 chance those can happen, each and every time you have sex.
You probably got this from the 98%, but it's not 98% each time, it's 98% over the course of an entire year. You genius.

> for most people that statistic is closer to 1 out of 7.
The bullshit train goes on.

>>17667158
That's not actually entirely accurate. Most of the studies on condom effectiveness say something to the effect of "98% of people who use condoms regularly for a year didn't get pregnant."

So there's not a 2% chance it'll fail every time you have sex, there's a 2% chance that if you use condoms regularly for an entire year, it'll fail one of the times you have sex (and she's ovulating, and you get her pregnant).