How much of a turn-off is it for most women to have a bf into

>>17592637
whats even more off putting is the fact that you save smug pepe's of a woman that cheated on her husband to go up the ranks of a populist party - and after that even left her husband and children for the guy she cheated with desu

>>17592645
I don't really know much about her, I just think she's cute so I have reaction images of her.

>>17592652
It's fine, even the posters on pol that worship her are often unaware of most things surrounding her.

As for your fetish: Depends on the girl

As a girl, yeah, kind of a turn off.
I mean, I could accept it in a form where a guy doesn't droms his masculinity, it's just I'm higher above him.
Like, you know, roleplaying super manly royal guard and a queen or something.
But no "oh yeah take that sissy" stuff.

File: 1473080202029.jpg (27KB, 394x395px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 394x395px

>>17592666
>Like, you know, roleplaying super manly royal guard and a queen or something.

H O T

>>17592666
Well I didn't mean sissy/crossdressing stuff. My main fantasies are:
1. female professor/male student
2. bitchy radical feminist
Also just generally getting verbally abused and slapped around

As a girl, yeah, kind of a turn off.
I mean, I could accept it in a form where a guy doesn't droms his masculinity, it's just I'm higher above him.
Like, you know, roleplaying super manly royal guard and a queen or something.
But no "oh yeah take that sissy" stuff.

>>17592687
>>17592666
really makes you think