im looking for advice on being bi curious. I havent had sex with

>>17484762

Your view of women is childish.

If you're attracted to men, explore it.
If you're thinking having sex with men is some kind of solution to the fact that you're a fucking sperg who has a 12 year old /r9k/ users knowledge about women I can promise you its not easier.

A gay man will be able to see your idiocy just as much if not more efficiently than a woman will.

Before you start making decisions about your orientation just do a little bit of growing up and swallowing less of the /r9k/ red pill propaganda. It will help you with both women and men.

>>17484770
so you're saying that most women dont have high standards and dont expect guys to keep them excited? do you have any experience with women. never read the red pill nor went on r9k, my opinion are based on real life experiences and statistics. average looking men barely get matches on tinder for example, and most women find the average guy unattractive.

Bi person here. I don't understand why any BI person would want to end up having a serious relationship with the same sex. Experiment around with them maybe but long term?

If I get in a same sex relationship that means I never have a son or a daughter with my genes in them. It kills the family tree that i'm responsible for creating. By dating a guy I would be ensuring my son never gets born. Which ensures my son's son never gets born and so on and so on. It kills generations of your future family. I can't have that on my conscience.

And raising a child with a same sex relationship doesn't seem like it would work without doing psychological damage to the kid. The role a female has in being a mother could not be replicated by a guy trying to be the mommy.

>>17484780
I wouldn't bother responding to that person desu.

>>17484832
op here. i dont really want anything serious with a guy, just someone to have fun with and experiment. i wouldent see the point in anything serious with a guy, they would basically just be good friends i fuck. thanks for expressing yourself anyway, it was a good read.

>>17484762
>my problem is that i find women so much more attractive than guy but i know it would be so easy if i got into gay sex.

Ok but this isn't actually a problem.
I mean, aside from the fact that you think same-sex casual sex is somehow easier or simpler, as though you won't be dealing with intelligent human beings anymore or something.
But anyway, what exactly is the problem? So you lean more toward heterosexuality than homosexuality. So what? Why is that a reason not to go for it?

>>17484762
if you want to fuck a guy go do it idiot. damn you faggots and trying to twist shit around. for fucking ever you stayed in the closet and now no one gives a shit and you still won't come out

>>17484780
Your "statistics" are shit men made up or skewed to justify their empty ass lives.

I've dated every kind of woman. From beautiful to homely, sex starved freaks to damn near sexless nuns. If your judgment goes only as far as how makeup impacts looks and the attention they get, you are a child. You could be 80 and you'd be a child.

But go ahead champ. Act like your reasons are scientific. If you want to suck dick, do it. Don't project your issues on an entire gender.

>>17484895
problem is basically that i dont even know if i will enjoy gay sex and i might just be compensating because im quite shit with women. i jack off to gay porn and i have had webcam sex, i just dont know if the actual act will be enjoyable.

>>17484900
some people are still quite judgemental about it tbf. i would only do it discreetly anyway.

>>17484903
you are correct anon. OP is gay but has been fucking women because he is afraid to admit he's gay and why he's pulling all this shit out of his ass to justify fucking men instead of women. Crazy

>>17484931
>problem is basically that i dont even know if i will enjoy gay sex

Do you usually avoid trying new things because you don't know whether you'll enjoy them? I hope not.

>>17484881
> they would basically just be good friends i fuck

That's what a fucking relationship IS you moron

>>17484939
you cant start a family with a friend.

>>17484970
Yes, you absolutely can. Your wife/husband should be your *best friend*, too.

File: marcus_aurelius_on_manliness_by_americandreaming-d7pj3it.jpg (241KB, 1191x670px) Image search: [Google]

241KB, 1191x670px

>>17484903
no argument. only anger.

>>17484975
a relationship and a friendship is different though. i was obviously saying that i couldent get emotionally intimate and fall in love with a guy.

off topic, when perceive someones thinknig as incorrect, why do you call them a moron? that is only going to diminish your point, dont you think that is quite rash. if you make a good point while being understanding, the persons is obviously gonig to be more likely to listen.