I need some academic advice. I'll be starting an intense

I'm not from the US so I don't know if that's a lot, but why can't you spread these courses out over an extra semester?

>>17453466
Load it all up as you are only young once. Knowledge is power. I'm also on the same boat as you fighting for my engineering degree.

The path we have chosen is difficult if not punishing. But you have to create balance and work ethic. Dont work so hard you wont have a bit of time to play too. The mind snd body require rest.

>>17453466
They're level 200 and 300 courses, stop tripping. If you got an A in your 100 courses, and you apply yourself in the upper courses, it'll work out.

The course content doesn't really matter, as the higher the course level becomes it just focuses on areas you've already built a foundation on.

>>17453469
I have to decision to spread them over 2 semesters or 4. So I can either finish those courses in a year, or two. The sooner I finish those, the sooner I can take the engineering courses. Honestly, if it becomes too difficult, I can drop some of those courses and spread it over an additional year. But, I just want to know how difficult will it be to maintain a decent GPA.

>>17453473
I'm afraid I won't be playing anymore with this course load. Which path of engineering have you chosen?

>>17453476
There are generally two crowds to this. It's 200-300 level courses, so I should worry my ass off. Or it's 200-300 level courses and if I did well in my 100 courses, I'll be fine. I mean I'm a bit optimistic, but, just a bit nervous that I'll somehow flunk one of those courses.

As for the 2nd part of math applied physics (laplace transforms, fourier analysis, complex analysis), would it useful for a ME student, who might branch out to aerospace? Or to lighten the load should I replace it with optoelectronics?