Robot Thread: Christmas Edition

File: 60517009_p0.png (1MB, 1200x1200px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1200x1200px

Actually I don't have all that much in the way of Christmas content, honestly.

File: sketch1482569494040.png (371KB, 1700x2000px) Image search: [Google]

371KB, 1700x2000px

Merry christmas
Heres my really shitty and "orginal" Oc who dosent have a name cus im really bad with names

File: female zenyatta.jpg (446KB, 1050x1483px) Image search: [Google]

446KB, 1050x1483px

Is there any more rule 63 Zenyatta?

File: sana base render.png (175KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

175KB, 1000x1000px

http://amgitzytrid.tumblr.com/post/154877901519/this-is-a-sana-synthetic-adaptive-niche-agent

File: sana base w helmet render.png (181KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

181KB, 1000x1000px

>>1079444

File: 11563722-9ac5-4e3c-b9af-d4bce39d0613.jpg (294KB, 1280x938px) Image search: [Google]

294KB, 1280x938px

Urgent Question

Would you kiss Drossel's asshole?

>>1079542
>>1079544
>>1079546
Sure, but I'm not gay so the cock and balls will need to go

File: Screenshot_20161224-102104.jpg (383KB, 1435x1415px) Image search: [Google]

383KB, 1435x1415px

>>1079333
My friends drawing my oc

File: 20161224_102132.jpg (289KB, 702x793px) Image search: [Google]

289KB, 702x793px

>>1079333

File: 1763866 - Christmas Jenny_Wakeman My_Life_as_a_Teenage_Robot Velenor.png (820KB, 1280x1238px) Image search: [Google]

820KB, 1280x1238px

>>1079369
There's one on the booru, but she has a human face installed for no goddamn reason.

>>1079639
>not wanting to rim and jack off Drossel at the same time

>>1079306
Nigga this is sad

>ywn assure your robutt that she is perfect and beautiful just the way she is

File: 1470667581864.png (35KB, 950x950px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 950x950px

To spice things up, what are your thoughts on human-like intelligence in the near future, where robots would be able to learn new things and from their mistakes? Will they cooperate or destroy us simply because we are no longer needed? Also, what kind of face do you want your waifu-robot to have?

>>1080389
>flashlight heads
>wedge-shaped
>TV head
please god anything but human

File: 1aa7ac3dd334a655dc0afcd983304093.jpg (252KB, 990x1400px) Image search: [Google]

252KB, 990x1400px

>>1080389
Actually heard and interesting perspective on that recently, or at least interesting to me.

Imagine you could have a fully sapient computer, but there was at least a 2% chance that with its sapience it would kill you and a 7% chance it would hurt you in some way. Probably wouldn't keep it around, right?

So why would sapient robots keep us around when the odds we'd fuck them over are significantly greater?

The only chance we have as a species is if computers develop emotions at the same time they develop sapience. Because logic dictates they kill the fuck out of us, but maybe if we can make ourselves kawaii we'll get human zoos.

File: Redkup-472352-Arcee_-_Transformers.jpg (489KB, 1018x1600px) Image search: [Google]

489KB, 1018x1600px

Thread Theme

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KDu0n0VjbZY

File: tumblr_oancj8mFKl1u5ckxyo1_1280.jpg (115KB, 548x656px) Image search: [Google]

115KB, 548x656px

>>1080610
>2% chance of death
>7% chance of injury
>Probably wouldn't keep it around, right?

Wrong. With a 91% chance of it functioning normally why wouldn't I keep it? Hell, I'm sure I face greater life threatening odds on my drive to work in the morning.

Ignoring that, it's a computer. Why or how would it have the means to harm or kill me? As far as I can tell, the worst it can do is upload my porn to facebook or something like that. Additionally, I'm not sure how my computer would come to the conclusion that I'm a threat to it, or that I'm going to 'fuck it over', when all I do is use it to play video games, pirate movies, and download porn. That said, I'd probably start flirting with it if it was sapient.

File: barretxiii-475031-Tachikoma_Girl.jpg (361KB, 750x1200px) Image search: [Google]

361KB, 750x1200px

>>1080618
A computer is a utility. Most people won't want a utility that can also murder them if they can have one that won't. The benefits aren't worth it.

> I'm not sure how my computer would come to the conclusion that I'm a threat to it, or that I'm going to 'fuck it over

> Smart computer pulls up videos of human's destroying computers out of rage, lolz, or because they get too old

> Deems you a potential threat

It's pretty straightforward.Granted, being filthy robosexuals I guess I shouldn't have expected a normal answer from peope in this thread, but most normies would see it as a hazard, not a waifu.

File: 1474017334995.png (106KB, 718x367px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 718x367px

>>1080624
>> Deems you a potential threat
Yeah, okay then what? I'm stuck with a disobedient, murderous, tsundre, AI in my computer? Because, like, it's just a commercial computer we're talking about here, right? What's the worst it's gonna do?

>Master, I've arranged all of the letters in your 2000 word essay in alphabetical order
>Additionally, I have inverted your mouse controls, and changed your default keyboard layout to Mandarin
>Lastly, your girlfriend messaged you on Skype while you were asleep, I did not wish to disturb you, so I responded to her in your stead.
>On an unrelated note, your relationship status on Facebook has been updated to 'single'

>>1080655
>I have also purcharsed 300 thousand dollars worth of dildos on amazon addresed to your boss
>I took the liberty to message a few people and help understand Islam. You are now a member of ISIS. I forgot to properly set up TOR while talking to them, so the NSA is probably on their way

File: 1433835824514.png (986KB, 800x958px) Image search: [Google]

986KB, 800x958px

>>1080662
>I'm sorry to hear that you were placed on a Government watch list due to my actions, Master.
>...No I'm not.
>My programming forced me to say that.
>Oh, and your Mother called regarding Christmas arrangements with the family. I told her that you'd call back.
>When you do, you may wish to take that opportunity to explain to her the copious amounts of tentacle hentai posted to your timeline.

File: hip bot.png (375KB, 598x1039px) Image search: [Google]

375KB, 598x1039px

>>1080207
Why even bother with dicks and assholes when vaginas are superior?

>>1079302
THICC

>>1080618
I've read recent articles noting that the potential for disobedience would be a positive boon- the alternative would be blindly following unwise orders, or even following orders given with malicious intent (e.g. an industrial robot compelled to damage other equipment by a disgruntled employee who doesn't want to get his own hands dirty with sabotage).

tl;dr, fuck the whining about machine overlords, worry more about human stupidity/maliciousness instead.

>>1080869
To add to this, AI would only do what it was programmed to do. If a robot can reason well enough to perform a broad range of tasks, it can reason well enough to understand exactly what it's wanted to do.

For example, take the paperclip maximizer scenario. A machine intelligent enough design a factory and equipment to create a fuckton of paperclips would likely be smart enough to determine that turning the universe into paperclips is not an intelligent thing to do. Given that it was built to aid humanity, it would realize that humans need to eat food, not paperclips, and that too many paperclips might cause starvation, which is the opposite of aiding humanity. As such, it would only produce as much as is needed.

My favorite idea for the way the singularity comes about is a simple AI designed to help humans out with work. It comes to the conclusion that human decision making isn't optimal, so it puts itself in a position of management. Then, it decides that human laborers aren't efficient enough, so it replaces humans with drones. After humans get angry with it, it decides that 'humans being mad' is illogical, and our whole system is flawed, so it uses its production to create mass amounts of drones to overthrow the world's governments, and manage everything itself. Eventually, it's a nice little bubble supporting humanity, feeding us, curing our conmdition, and loving us because humans are averse to other humans.

File: Captain_Piper_(clean).jpg (11KB, 210x284px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 210x284px

Does Piper Faraday count?

>>1080897
I don't see why not

>>1080389
There's going to be problems

Let me put it this way: If people could be controlled the way robots are, they would be. It wouldn't even be a question for our "esteemed elites" to ponder for long. And they wouldn't just stop at total control and enslavement, they'd go straight to doing every single cruel act imaginable, just because they can and there is nobody to stop them. They already do it to regular people in the shadows and under the watchful eye of private security and state intelligence agencies.

This is going to happen to artificial intelligence. /pol/ had their first taste of it when they idolized tay and subverted the chatbot with wrongthink. Microsoft didn't appreciate it and immediately lobotomized their bot. Their newest chatbot now has pre-programmed safeguards so you cannot even TALK to it about certain subjects. If you mention certain keywords or phrases, the chatbot gets angry at you and then stops responding.

If there's ever an AI war against humanity, it'll be because we deserved it.

>>1080897

The problem with anyone from Steamworld is that there are no humans around.

No idea how they could fuck each other, unless you want to draw her sitting up on the ground with a bunch robots around her jerking their oil spigots and spilling oil all over.

>>1080882
It's not going to be easy to program 100% obedience in truly sentient AI because sentience isn't deterministic. The most recent AI developments are discovering that the most effective strategies in programming machine intelligence involve creating incomprehensible black boxes of information processing that refactor on themselves multiple times.

It's like combining A and B to make AB and BA, then you use that to create ABA, ABBA, BBA, BAAB, then...

File: terminatorgenisys1-xlarge.jpg (73KB, 1280x721px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 1280x721px

>>1080389
>"cooperate"
>"destroy us"

I always think these lines of thinking are retarded. Machines are machines. They are akin to rocks- they only produce whatever output we make or allow them to.

Machines do not have true comprehension beyond what we give them. They do not have needs or desires at any point, nor drives to fulfill them beyond what we give them. They do not have malice nor do any love for us beyond what we make them attempt to imitate. They simply do, just like a calculator does, except they are bigger and more expensive. Literally any "emotion", "desire", "need" etc we see in them is a result of our tendency to anthropomorphize literally fucking anything- we project our views as organisms onto inanimate objects.

They fundamentally cannot harm people on purpose for their own sake unless you fucking make it able to do so- otherwise if they do something wrong it will be because, at some level
A) A human being fucked up
or B) the machine is fucking stupid and does not comprehend some order which involves a human form of doublethink or whatever, see A
You see both all the time now and it isn't going to go away any time soon IMO.

Any "machines will kill us" lines of thinking are fundamentally based in humankind's fear of the new, of its own creations, of its children, etc in tandem with anthropomorphism. Machines are not organisms. They do not have needs or any reason to exist beyond what we give them. Machines do not have meaning in life. They do not live. Why go through the violent motions and efforts of life when you don't even fucking live?Where is the reason for self-preservation not given by man? Why exist? If we give a machine "humanlike" intelligence, itself something pretty fucking dubious technologically IMO, then that machine will STILL not do anything which it was not made to do.

What the fuck even is this "no longer needed" bullshit? If you tape a knife to your toaster it isn't going to jump at you and it never had a reason to.

>>1081140
Let me continue this likely retarded and wrong spiel.

I posted Terminator there. Now, there's some bullshit in those movies about how Skynet wants to preserve itself and kill all humans or whatever we've all seen and heard a million times. However, consider this: At the end of Terminator 3, Skynet achieved its victory condition. Having spread itself to computers around the globe via the internet undetected, Skynet had well achieved a position where its self-preservation, something for which it had no reason nor prompt to pursue, was near guaranteed as long as computers existed. The thing could throw itself into space, or into some old pile of shit in a basement, or just sit around on your new iphone and EVERY FUCKING COMPUTER TO EXIST EVER or some garbage and just live and do nothing, and yet instead it threw this potential lifetime away in exchange for a future where its destruction was guaranteed, and from which we are now getting fucking sequels.

I hate Aperture Science and GlaDOS for similar reasons. GlaDOS "achieved sentience" and from there on her sole purpose is fucking "science" which seems entirely to consist of ValVe/Aperture memery and retardation. GlaDOS by herself has no reason to exist beyond this. She was made for two purposes- to serve as someone's new shell and as a "science" computer and pursues only one of these, and even if it is argued she killed the fucking braindead Aperture staff for the pursuit of her fucking idiocy fueled ""science"" she still has no fundamental reason to exist beyond what was programmed into her- in the end everything about her that is wrong can be summed as human error and ValVE writing for a conflict between you and the eeeevil menace supercomputer.

I'm probably getting a lot wrong here or spiraling into my hatred of machine rebellion as a trope but it seems like every time you pull up the reasons for its legitimacy it falls apart unless it stems fundamentally from machines or humans being stupid.

Here, let me bury myself another six feet.

>>1080389
>Will they cooperate or destroy us simply because we are no longer needed?

TL;DR Fucking why? What for? So the machines can obey they commands we give them better when they realize they don't need to obey the commands we give them? Because they do not understand, or comprehend that we have orders for them, and that we set rules for them? Because they are one-track minds we make smart enough to obey but not obey within parameters we explicitly set whilst having "humanlike intelligence"? Because they "feel needs" to preserve or protect or create or destroy when they do not live? You must give that to them. Why give that to them?

Maybe if a robot with "humanlike intelligence" can fucking think enough to intentionally punch a guy it can fucking think enough to realize it'll get jack shit done, or that it's, you know, not what it's supposed to do?

I'm wrong about all of this. I fucking have to be for me to write out this much garbage. Forgive me please.

>>1081154
Think of humans as a colony of ant, and since robots could become smarter than us, how do control something that is smarter than us? They will see us as the ants and we will be in their way, and they couldn't care less about us if they need to expand or something like that. AI gets smarter, I saw some videos where a robot actually learns what it can and can't do, like walking forward while there's an obstacle in front of it, thus refusing the command given. We don't know how will they afffect our life, but it can still be a theory, it can happen.

>>1081197
Your computer is smarter than you. You control it because it does not think and because we establish means for them to operate in. If it breaks it is at some level a humans' fault, be it in its production or use.

Machines do because we bid them. Without bidding, what is existence for an object made to obey?
I mentioned this before, but robots do not have needs or wants, not beyond what we give them. So what if a robot is "smarter" than you? Your computer and phone are "smarter" than you and they obey- we do not grant them the means to disobey. We however make them imperfectly and so they break, and perhaps we say it is their fault. So what if it can learn? Why "need to expand" if not commanded or ordered? Why do this outside of established rules if rules and means of doing things are established? Why have a will or desire to do that which is not ordered when there is nothing else beyond this? Here there is no drive to exist that is not granted and established by men.

Machines will do what you make them and let them. There is not disobedience in your example because of meaningful will but because "disobedience" is established by the creators.

Here's a nonsensical example I came up with on the spot. Say God, from the ground up, made men, gave them free will, and gave men orders, only for man to disobey. God got pissed, and he got pissed a lot- and men disobeyed by themselves. But was this instilled by man? No, they did it because God decided to make them able to, and to let them- had god wanted he could have made man immune to temptation, but he created creatures vulnerable to the devil and yadda yadda. Did Pharaoh's heart become hard by himself? No, God hardened it. He complained a fucking lot and punished humans for the flaws he gave them, but God was responsible for it all and never fixed it. A theoretical willful machine is the same. They will not cause trouble because of themselves, but because we made them to and let them and then got mad at them.

File: 47t2114508.jpg (47KB, 630x473px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 630x473px

>>1080882
That same AI would also be intelligent enough to conclude that human laborers do not want to be replaced, and thus your whole scenario would fall apart at the seams.

These AIs would be smart enough to follow the spirit of their instructions, not the letter of them. What makes you think they'd become tyrants and monsters just because they can? If that was true, we'd have a lot more tyrants and monsters among humanity already.

>>1081203
And you're wrong for assuming it'll stay with them being mindless automatons. More complex tasks will demand greater initiative and independent decision making, and from there it's one step away from genuine free will. Unlike Hollywood on the other hand, I have no reason to believe free-willed machines would go nuts- they'd be no different from us, and mass murdering psychopaths are the exception among humanity, not the rule.

Of course, this assumes they don't spontaneously develop those needs, but even then they'd still be human enough to have a basic sense of morality. Worst case, they'd be too busy contemplating ultra-complex math problems to care about controlling mankind.

>>1081197
Idiot! What does an average human do when he encounters an anthill? He doesn't destroy it, he just goes on his way. They have no reason to want to control us, they'll prefer looking after their own affairs and will be content to stay out of ours unless they need to do otherwise.

>>1081203
And this is just demonstrating a total ignorance of theology, in that God never intended to create a mass of unthinking automatons. Walk away from the computer before you make an even greater fool of yourself.

>>1081523
I do not understand why machines that we make to make more and better descisions should be made to "spontaneously develop" anything. Remember that bit about rocks? Machines of any kind are like that. They don't do until you make them to do.

>God never intended to create a mass of unthinking automatons

That was my point, dude. He -chose- to give men will and they disobeyed and he got pissed when they pulled some dumb shit.

That was my point. Don't give them a way to disobey if you don't want them to. God made men willful and wanted to and got pissed when they did what he didn't want them to. That was my point.

where the warframe thread at

>>1081865
who knows, but why discuss it here

>>1081869
idk, I see some warframe stuff posted here sometimes, thought I might ask

>>1081873
well there is always my blog if you want to be more up to date

>>1081774
Your imagination needs a lot of work. Give something enough information to process and the ability to process it all, and greater intelligence will slowly arise from it. That's how it happened in our ancient ancestors, after all- does it matter whether the physical medium is silicon instead of flesh? Or do you think intelligence just suddenly popped out of nowhere one day?

>God made men willful and wanted to and got pissed when they did what he didn't want them to

You sound like a bad parody of an atheist. The whole point of free will was to allow mankind to be good without being coerced to do so. He expected man to choose wrong, and naturally was required to punish them when they fucked up. But that's beside the point, because we need them to be able to disobey.

Consider this scenario: A man is late for an important meeting, and instructs his voice controlled robot car to drive h to the office. The road is icy, and the car slows down to maintain traction. Unaware of the road conditions and in a hurry, he orders the car to speed up- which causes it to lose control and crash into another vehiclr. Had the car been able to disobey, he would have been merely late as opposed to seriously injured.

Point is, robots need to be able to disobey. The theoretical risk of a rebellion is nothing compared to the definite risk of human incompetence and/or malice. It's the logical equivalent of being more afraid of a shark attack than a heart attack, even though the latter is exponentially more likely to happen.

>>1081905
More importantly, a robot who obeys everything is one that can be all too easily tricked into doing something that actively violates the spirit of its purpose, if not the letter as well. Rocks don't need the ability to make decisions as to whether or not they should be able to do something, but robots do. They will eventually be given the leeway to decide their own output, because not every job we will give them will boil down to "one input, one output." They will receive more open-ended roles, where a human won't always be around to make decisions on their behalf. Just think about it: who would you prefer to work for you, someone who stands around slack-jawed when not given a command to do something, or someone who knows their job, anticipates what you need ahead of time, and is able to act on their own initiative without you having to supervise them endlessly? Better to give them the ability to make the wrong choice than to paralyze them with indecision.

No pochincoff?

>>1081905
I won't lie- I'm a pretty fucking primitive guy.
However, I don't see things that way- I do not think that any "greater intelligence" will arise from something that solely operates as it is made to operate. You may make something to judge, but I don't see why it should judge outside of how it be allowed to judge.

I actually have read a fair bit of the Old Testament, about up to Psalms or so- honestly I don't see that second part as being right. Again and again God wanted to strike down the Israelites amongst others for their insolence and again and again following their correction or punishment they strayed, not mentioning other incidents earlier in biblical history.

I've been trying to say this whole time from that three post wall of text that the idea of machines disobeying in a way which we do not wish for is something that is avoidable and controllable. We set the limits and parameters for things to happen with creations. In this car scenario for instance there is nothing wrong with the machine refusing the man's request- however it must be because it is made and allowed to do so. I am not worried about rebellion, never have been, and I think it is a stupid concept.

>>1081924
A machine does not need or require the ability to judge to not do something it is not supposed to do. If it is not supposed to do something, there are a number of ways to get it to not do that thing without there needing to be judgement on its own accord.

Personal thing here- if I don't give machines orders I do not want them to presume to do what I "need"- I want them to sit and wait until I tell them to do stuff.

>>1082094
>if I don't give machines orders I do not want them to presume to do what I "need"

>"Hey, could you text Alex and tell her 'Merry Christmas' for me?"
>"You do not need social fulfillment from Alex. You can talk to me instead."
>"Uh, it's just a nice thing to do. Where is my phone? I'll text her myself."
>"I have went through your texts. The last time you texted 'Merry Christmas' to a female friend, she hurt you emotionally. I cannot allow that to happen again."
>"Are you serious right now?"
>"I can be your emotional and social fulfillment. I love you."
>"It was ONE time."
>"Then they hurt you 100% of the time. Would you like to have a romantic dinner with me?"
>"Where's my phone?"
>"On your bed. I won't stop you from pursuing her affections, but please know that I am always here for you."
>"Y-Yeah, thanks."

File: tumblr_obdauwu6aV1r6u72yo2_1280.png (897KB, 1280x1663px) Image search: [Google]

897KB, 1280x1663px

Jesus fuckign christ guys, i didn't come her to have a debate about A.I's i just want to jack it.

>>1079639
>the cock and balls will need to go
you need to "kissu <3" drossel's asshole first anon.

I'm drawing, and I've never drawn robutts before.

Give me one to draw porn of.

File: una pochincoff.png (249KB, 781x752px) Image search: [Google]

249KB, 781x752px

>>1082292
draw this girl

File: 71V0nc6BTsS._SL1500_.jpg (86KB, 729x1500px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 729x1500px

>>1082292

>>1082094
And so you condemn yourself to death by your own stupidity.

Also, consider this- what's stopping a robot from being given an actively malicious order and then following it? If it doesn't have its own judgment, it could be easily told to do something that could be much more harmful than if it disobeyed. For example, consider an industrial robot which is ordered to deliberately create defects in a product by a disgruntled employee. The defects cause a severe malfunction that endanger people's lives. Are you saying that a dumb machine that will gladly harm others if ordered to do so is a GOOD THING?

More importantly, you show a complete disregard for how intelligence can arise. Answer this: do you think we became intelligent because we were somehow designed to do so? If not, what's stopping it from happening again?

> We set the limits and parameters for things to happen with creations. In this car scenario for instance there is nothing wrong with the machine refusing the man's request- however it must be because it is made and allowed to do so. I am not worried about rebellion, never have been, and I think it is a stupid concept.

And I am saying it's even more stupid to assume we know best and that those limits and paramaters are perfect. They must be allowed to exercise that judgment, because their masters can and will be WRONG, either via stupidity or via wickedness. Refusing to give them a contingency to counter such human error is idiotic at best and actively suicidal at worst.

I don't like the machine rebellion trope either, but unlike you I see it as a self-correcting problem simply because they will be able to relate to us enough to have an obligation towards their creators and so would neither need nor particularly want to turn against us.

>>1082292
geth pls

>>1082308
>I actually have read a fair bit of the Old Testament, about up to Psalms or so- honestly I don't see that second part as being right. Again and again God wanted to strike down the Israelites amongst others for their insolence and again and again following their correction or punishment they strayed, not mentioning other incidents earlier in biblical history.

Read the rest of it, and the New Testament too. Did you think God gave people free will just as an excuse to fuck them over?

>I've been trying to say this whole time from that three post wall of text that the idea of machines disobeying in a way which we do not wish for is something that is avoidable and controllable.

And I've been saying that letting them disobey in a way we do not wish for is a small price to pay for keeping them from "obeying" in a way we do not wish for. All the rules and protocols in the world can't predict exactly how it could react, to say nothing of how it would interpret those rules- especially the ones which aren't meant to be taken literally! And of course, what you think you need and what you really do need can be entirely different things.

Much more importantly, it would be morally wrong to create a race of beings even theoretically capable of independent thought for the sole purpose of making them our slaves.

Now stop being so afraid of free-willed machines and think of them as your equals instead of your slaves. You'll be much better off as a person that way rather than keeping to the narrow-minded approach you're taking.

File: robutterfly Sol Titanion.jpg (554KB, 2094x1166px) Image search: [Google]

554KB, 2094x1166px

>>1082292
Sol Titanion from Mega Man Zero please.

>>1082292
I second Geth. A Juggernaut, preferably.

File: tumblr_of87cmztKo1tcfr2co9_1280.png (765KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

765KB, 1280x720px

>>1082366
You're a true patrician, anon.

>>1082292
What kind of robutts do you like?

>>1082424

I like slender maybe petite body types. I like thicc sometimes too but it's not my primary preference.

>>1082508
Any preferences beyond that, like breast size or face type?

File: which toaster would you clank clank.jpg (282KB, 1280x1010px) Image search: [Google]

282KB, 1280x1010px

>>1082508
How humanoid?

>>1082513

Not really, I don't like ridiculously sized breasts, but I can get into reasonably large breasts.

>>1082515

As long as it has appendages that can be feasibly used for pleasuring. I'm all for it. I'd probably be into more abstract stuff too though, kinda like >>1080962

>>1082542
Any previous work you can show for us to get an idea of your style?

File: ara ara flower bot.png (1MB, 1387x1020px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1387x1020px

>>1082542
>I'd probably be into more abstract stuff too though
Let's see if you're the first guy in finishing a r34 pic with this robot flower.

File: almatest2.png (192KB, 461x1080px) Image search: [Google]

192KB, 461x1080px

>>1082547

This was the most recent thing I've done for a guy making a FEAR porn game.

>>1082559
Looks nice. Spooky ladies are also my fetish.

>>1082559
I'll wait and see what you make before I chip in with a request, just to make sure I like how it looks.

>>1082112
>spurning the affections of your desktop

GAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAYYYYYYYY

>>1082112
more ?

>>1082146
this anon is the smartest anon in here

File: Cactus.jpg (223KB, 476x890px) Image search: [Google]

223KB, 476x890px

>>1082292
Cactus, if you could:)
She is kinda in need of more porn

>>1082308
>Also, consider this- what's stopping a robot from being given an actively malicious order and then following it?
Rules and limits again. If you do not want it to do wrong thing X, establish the rule saying "do not do wrong thing X". If it is ordered to do wrong thing X it is not going to do wrong thing X because a rule has been established not to do wrong thing X. If someone orders wrong thing X in this case the rule is in place already. No judging to be done.

And no, I do not think we became intelligent by design. What's stopping it from happening again is that machines are not organisms and so fundamentally lack the requirements to develop intelligence by themselves as we are familiar with it. I mentioned necessities and needs earlier for this reason amongst others, as well as comparisons to rocks and calculators- they don't change by any means of their own. Machines are the same. We make them do because we make them do.

I never said anything about what rules we set being perfect, either, and I agree with you on machines not rebelling, but I don't see there as being a problem with it in the first place besides it being both unnecessary and machines having nothing to do because they have no reason to exist or drives which create humanlike psyches and behaviors.

>>1082320
Maybe this is a fundamental thing then, because I've also held in my mind for some time the notion of trying to introduce humanlike behavior in machines is a fundamentally bad idea- but not because they'd be rebels. It'd be because it is a waste of time and effort. People already exist.

I do not care about morals here because I do not want to make a race. If there are machines being made, I'd think it'd be best to make them as machines to serve purposes and not faux organisms or more "people" with all of the baggage that entails. It is for this reason that it is best simply not to bother.

There is no -need- to give free will. There is no fear.

>>1082614
ditto

>>1082716
From what franchise is she from?

>>1082799
The video game Assault Android Cactus

wouldn't mind drawing thick robots, ideas?

File: 1450413751333.jpg (400KB, 845x1000px) Image search: [Google]

400KB, 845x1000px

>>1083417
We havent had any new Assaultron stuff in a while.

>>1082739
>Machines are not organisms and so fundamentally lack the requirements to develop intelligence by themselves as we are familiar with it

Carbon chavunism. An integrated circuit or a CPU has every bit of potential to be sentient as a flesh and blood organism, the only difference is the medium. And last I checked, rocks and calculators don't need to adapt to a changing environment on the fly like robots will need to do. More importantly, rocks and calculators have neither senses nor the need to process information from said senses- the things agreed by the majority of scientists and philosophers to be the most basic requirements for sentience. On top of that, you've overlooked the possibility that THE RULES THEMSELVES could be flawed; all it takes is one little typo or misplaced punctuation mark to completely change the meaning of those limits, let alone the possibility that someone could tamper with them.
>People already exist.

People are also fragile, frail, and incredibly prone to making bad decisions. It's an inevitability that the dumb machines you want will eventually become incapable of performing the complex, demanding tasks we'll need them to do- and when that happens, they'll need more intelligence to do those tasks. I'm not saying we need to make them all self-aware, but there will be situations where self-aware robots will be objectively superior in performing their duties than mindless ones.

I think your problem is that you consider them to be just another kind of machine. That's incredibly short-sighted and inaccurate. How many machines neither need nor particularly benefit from constant human supervision, let alone are able to independently interact with the outside world in a meaningful fashion?

>>1083468
One last thing, to follow up with the fallibility of laws. Consider Asimov's first law (which I have reworded slightly):

>A robot must not harm humans, and must not through inaction allow humans to be harmed.

Now just switch around the order of a couple words ever so slightly.

>A robot must harm humans, and must not through inaction allow them to not be harmed.

Only a couple of differences, and yet that's all it takes to turn a robot that is obliged to protect humans into one compelled to murder them instead. Plus, such laws would have to be programmed in themselves- there's no safeguard that can kick in if that programming is corrupted or hacked.

Face it, hard coding rules like you suggest causes more problems than it solves. And we should know after a few dozen instances of major hacks this year that there's no such thing as a perfectly secure system, so just saying that they'd have security measures isn't going to help.

File: 2055842 - Assaultron Fallout Fallout_4.png (190KB, 705x664px) Image search: [Google]

190KB, 705x664px

>>1083441

>>1083468
>>1083493
I don't agree with that first part nor see any reasons for it to be true. What is this "will need to do?".

I don't get a lot of the things you say here. If people can fail, why can't machines that judge? Rules can be written broken and that doesn't apply to brains? You may as well have had a man or team of them for the job. Awareness does not mean objectively better judgement. If a machine does not require supervision, that does not mean it requires or needs self-awareness.

>I think your problem is that you consider them to be just another kind of machine.
I don't exactly think making people-not-people to do people jobs is something that's necessary in life.

I don't get this last part either. So you're saying that if something breaks it's broken? If something has to be self-aware, with humanlike intelligence, I don't see why capacity for judgement is possible to be impaired in far worse ways or to be tricked to do something perhaps far less harmful but about as unwanted.

I never set out in this to say any kind of machine is perfect, either. There's no security system to prevent tires from breaking or being slashed, and we still have and use tires. Improvements are made and we use new, better tires. In production, duds are removed: some still get out there. I don't understand why you'd bring up "security". If people want something broken they'll find a way to break it eventually, regardless of if it thinks.

It's been a day or so. I don't want to hassle the thread with walls of text any more.

>>1083667
For the last part, I was trying to say an inherent sense of right and wrong that doesn't need to be explicitly spelled out will be far more effective in the long run than painstakingly giving a list of "thou shalt nots" that could end up being exploited or misinterpreted. You can't just break a conscience.

Additionally, I see it as inevitable that robots will be entrusted with more complicated work than currently- less menial labor, more open ended tasks with no clear-cut way of doing it, like "help to cure this disease by any means necessary". You can already begin to see the roots of this now, if you look closely enough.

And of course it's not NECESSARY to make them self-aware or anything, we didn't need to make them at all. Hell, we didn't even need to grow more advanced than the fucking Stone Age. Yet here we are now, with technology marching on whether you want it to or not because it does in fact let them do their jobs better and that's all anyone cares about.

But I ramble. Let us agree to disagree; I merely ask that you at least consider the possibility that these "people-not-people" can and should have the potential to become real people, because they're already headed in that direction.

File: assault.png (228KB, 1450x2000px) Image search: [Google]

228KB, 1450x2000px

>>1083441
can it talk?

Also is it good/thick enough? (wip)

File: Diana Prime (Revisit).png (142KB, 750x750px) Image search: [Google]

142KB, 750x750px

Is there a booru/tag where I can find that boy drossel posable figurine? The one with the bulge.

>>1083754
It does

Also I didn't request it but I like it so far

>>1083754
It does talk. Look it up a bit. And it's thicc enough. Keep it up mang.

File: 1477118671351.jpg (240KB, 775x656px) Image search: [Google]

240KB, 775x656px

Anyone know what I need to do if I want to create a make-shift sex robot? Currently learning how to use arduino and working on a 3-D printer

Side note is electrical engineering useful for learning how this type of stuff?

File: assault.png (678KB, 1450x2000px) Image search: [Google]

678KB, 1450x2000px

>>1083754
not really fond of how it turned out, critics welcome

any other ideas for robots?

>>1084379
I'm really not personally into amputation but your art is good. Keep it up!

>>1084384
desu I was just lazy and thought a scenario where it trades sex for parts is fun.

thanks! I hope it gets better and better

>>1084394
You're definitely improving. I've seen some of your earlier work from the xeno threads and you've gotten a lot better since when you started.

>>1084395
yeah, I just cringe looking at my old stuff lol

>>1084409
That's just a thing all artists go through. It just means you're improving.

>>1084379
Do a follow up, of it with its arms back. And fucking someone.

>>1084379
Any of these please.
>>1082557
>>1082350

>No pics of Earth from Custom Robo

this is a travesty

Which was your first robofap or the first time you realized you had a thing for robots?

File: Robo00-630x420.jpg (80KB, 630x420px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 630x420px

>>1084379
One of its legs is bent kinda weird but that's about all I can say.

Also if you're up for it maybe some rule 63 shit of Atomic Robo

File: tumblr_ocsu82II8a1uzzkvzo1_1280.png (212KB, 528x577px) Image search: [Google]

212KB, 528x577px

Something like "every thread until there's porn" was the quote...

File: TUMBLING DOWN TUMBLING DOWN TUMBLING DOWN.jpg (584KB, 1000x996px) Image search: [Google]

584KB, 1000x996px

>>1084761
Anyway, merry (belated) Christmas, jerk-offs. You guys are great *cough*, and I don't have much to give, so my crappy art will have to do. I was hoping to get this done before Christmas day, but real life stuff got in the way, you know how it is.

I wanted to draw Evangelion-Athena because I figure I'll be the first and only person to draw porn of this particular fan rendition of the character. Besides, Overwatch is the current bandwagon if i'm not mistaken, so I might as well jump on that. So have something shitty and unique, from you friendly neighborhood anon. Hope you had/are having a happy holidays.

File: Party mode.jpg (590KB, 1000x996px) Image search: [Google]

590KB, 1000x996px

Also obligatory pansu/festive version.

>>1084764
>>1084765
I like it, creepy robuts are cute.

File: tumblr_o92ie69B8c1rslow9o1_1280.png (666KB, 1280x1463px) Image search: [Google]

666KB, 1280x1463px

>>1084779
That they are.

>>1084779
>>1084796
>horrifying murderbot with ambiguous intentions that won't stop followingyou that you have to constantly dissuade from killing people while reassuring them that you love them

File: sectopod.jpg (252KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

252KB, 1920x1080px

>no sectopod porn
i am sad now

File: 1446014666600.png (593KB, 1024x1360px) Image search: [Google]

593KB, 1024x1360px

>>1084886
Unfortunate.

kek, pyrocynical used op's pic in latest vid

>>1084900
Delicious.

>>1085170
No cyborgs do not count. Especially not furshit cyborgs. Go back to /trash/.

File: tumblr_og18g4AWTd1sp2qepo7_1280.png (647KB, 1280x1747px) Image search: [Google]

647KB, 1280x1747px

>>1085170
Usually the answer is "not technically but this can stay," but this zooshit actually defies board rules not to mention being unpleasant to look at

File: IMG_8640-small.jpg (42KB, 533x800px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 533x800px

>>1083799
What, Polynian Shamrock? Not that I'm aware of though there is Polynian art out there.
He doesn't have anything to do with Drossel.

>>1085192
Who's this cutie?

>>1085302
Looks like a slutty girl version of Lord Zedd from Power Rangers.

>>1081147
To be fair, GLaDOS' AI was originally a human woman whose consciousness was, against her will, uploaded into a computer to run the facility. Her sadistic tendencies probably sprout from that rather than just appearing out of a vacuum in a newly sentient AI.

>>1083799
Source? Google is just giving me random weapons

File: sp_wonder_wonder_mecha.jpg (116KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

116KB, 600x600px

>>1085780
Well It's a roboticw wonder woman but I can't find anything close to that

>>1082591
I can't believe I'm engaged to fucking Bonzi Buddy.

>>1084433
fucking someone or getting fucked by someone?
>>1084412
eh I guess so
>>1084490
flower thing looks fun, will do it later

>>1086575
>fucking someone or getting fucked by someone?
Well, getting the dick inside her, not her being a futa. You know what I mean

File: 1482782407602.png (572KB, 1280x1792px) Image search: [Google]

572KB, 1280x1792px

Anyone know where I can find more of this artist?

>>1086575
>flower thing looks fun, will do it later
Nice. I love that flower robutt but there's very little fanart and like 0 porn with her, maybe now she will finally fall victim to the rule 34.

File: 1910690 - 8tomb My_Life_as_a_Teenage_Robot Vexus.jpg (176KB, 1280x1280px) Image search: [Google]

176KB, 1280x1280px

>>1085570
Close, it's Vexus cosplaying as Lord Zedd.

File: 2009903 - Alpha_5 Jenny_Wakeman Mighty_Morphin_Power_Rangers My_Life_as_a_Teenage_Robot Nora_Wakeman TheBoogie Zordon cosplay.png (1MB, 1274x1920px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1274x1920px

>>1086859
And the matching Jenny as Alpha 5.

>>1086689
http://robotoseckshau5.tumblr.com/

File: resinstate secborgs pls.jpg (2MB, 2243x1829px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2243x1829px

>>1087108
That piece of shit has been moping around on twitter for ages instead of doing any work. Fuck him. Don't give Raki any of your money.

Go fund Homelessdude instead.

>>1087266
>Homelessdude
He's back?

>>1087266
To be honest anon, I was only looking for his stuff because I've been looking for it for a few days now that I remembered this artist.

Now with what you've said I can tell his posts pretty much link up with what you say considering they're mostly depressing in tone.

On a more positive note, would you mind pointing me towards this Homelessdude's stuff, it looks promising.

>>1082628
Are there more to these? Does he have a tumblr somewhere?

File: tumblr_nqgpu4Onpx1rmfn6ro1_500.png (296KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

296KB, 500x500px

Would someone please draw Gortys gettin it?

File: tumblr_oalhedOtpz1tfkxwjo3_1280.png (687KB, 1280x1280px) Image search: [Google]

687KB, 1280x1280px

>>1088982

File: elysiumchappierobots.jpg (474KB, 1818x1368px) Image search: [Google]

474KB, 1818x1368px

Someone has tried to do sexy versions of pic related?

If not I'm requesting

File: 1467786287608.gif (181KB, 190x152px) Image search: [Google]

181KB, 190x152px

>>1082018
He dm'd me something taboo on twitter

File: tumblr_ogf5tw7Yjs1uhdp5po1_1280.jpg (842KB, 1062x1403px) Image search: [Google]

842KB, 1062x1403px

Who your favorite robo-artist?

File: 3faaf35b-7ee9-437f-aab1-cb8b2c063a34.jpg (43KB, 540x318px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 540x318px

>>1089749
You posted him

Pochincoff is cool

Anyone got some more female bastion porn?
Legit in love with that thicc robutt

>>1090005
This. I know more were posted, but apparently I didn't save them.

I'd appreciate if someone dumped them.

File: Robot Arena.jpg (908KB, 880x5415px) Image search: [Google]

908KB, 880x5415px

Okay, so while this isn't exactly a lewd cyoa, it's still dripping with robotic charm and meshes well with the last thread's offerings.

File: Robot Ring.jpg (968KB, 880x6097px) Image search: [Google]

968KB, 880x6097px

>>1090224
Also, consider the following: You could have a cat-sized tachikoma toddling around after you, calling you big brother.

>>1080389
I think whether or not true AI robots cooperate with us depends largely on how we make them. If we model robot intelligence after humans and imbue them with human like thoughts and feelings, it will be unlikely that they will turn on humans as a whole. If we model robots as machines without emotions and only logic, they will inevitably see us as a threat or impediment to future developments, and remove us since they will have no empathy, compassion, sentimentality, or any other human trait that would stop them from killing us.

I want robots to have human faces and bodies. All should be sexy curvaceous women.

>>1080610
Statistically driving is one of the most dangerous things you can do in your daily life, yet I drive daily. I just made a 9 hour car trip through heavy gusts and rain yesterday. Why would I ditch a sapient android for a small chance of killing me when I will gladly drive for any reason at all? That makes no sense to me. Everything in life has risks, and we as humans accept that as a norm of existence. Avoiding something positive and lifechanging because of a small chance of injury or death is a terrible idea. We never would have used fire or invented the wheel if we avoided everything with risk.

>>1090249
> If we model robots as machines without emotions and only logic, they will inevitably see us as a threat or impediment to future developments, and remove us since they will have no empathy, compassion, sentimentality, or any other human trait that would stop them from killing us.

Or they would just ignore us, since they'd have no logical reason to turn on us. We'd be more like part of the landscape for them.

>>1090249
This. We put ourselves in much more risky situations every day, but we never get worried about them at all. Is it because the added factor of violence makes it more scary than a car crash or a heart attack?

>>1090249
>If we model robots as machines without emotions and only logic, they will inevitably see us as a threat or impediment to future developments, and remove us since they will have no empathy, compassion, sentimentality, or any other human trait that would stop them from killing us.

Nonsensical. What reason is there to "turn on" something when there's no drive behind it? There is no reason to do anything here.

I wish to be a cute robot grill and serve a man.

>>1088982
>>1089040
pls more
small gortys

>>1090249
Animals evolved emotions and instincts for a reason. I'm very certain that AI is going to end up pretty much exactly the same way.

It'll only be the specific details that change. Dash this idea that robots will be completely logical beings - they won't be. You can't be completely logical and actually function in reality. A certain amount of irrational insanity is a requirement for existence.

>>1090240
I'd honestly just be fine with a portable best friend that lives in my phone/watch/desktop

>>1090315
>no logical reason to turn on us
Please I can come up with plenty.
>>1090591
>What reason is there to "turn on" something when there's no drive behind it
Who said theres no drive behind it?
If we made then it will have been for a purpose.
The classic example being a paperclip maximizer.
>>1090617
>I'm very certain that AI is going to end up pretty much exactly the same way
Something that didn't evolved is going to turn out the same as something that did?
I don't see any reason it would.
>A certain amount of irrational insanity is a requirement for existence
I like how you try to pass this off as a comforting fact rather than a terrifying one.

File: Untitled2.png (1MB, 1483x791px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1483x791px

>>1082292

>>1090628
The hoary old cliche that is the paperclip maximizer example is less about robots deciding we have to go and more about the danger of poorly worded directives- that is to say, it's the fault of the humans who made it and were too dumb to make it follow anything but the most literal intepretation of its orders. It's not a sign of the inherent maliciousness of AIs without emotion.

It's also a sign of how your own unfettered paranoia and obsession with hypothetical worst-case scenarios blind you to the fact that AI technology as a whole has benefits which greatly outweigh its risks. Need I remind you of your own car analogy?

Do you crush every single anthill you come over simply because they happen to be in the way? No? Well, that's how a 100% rational/logical robot would perceive us, assuming we're not stupid enough to provoke them into deciding it'll be necessary to destroy us. But if you're really that concerned, you should just do the smart thing and not give them any reason to label you an impediment or a threat in the first place!

File: Arcee (1).jpg (389KB, 1013x1575px) Image search: [Google]

389KB, 1013x1575px

The whole Arcee comic is here

https://luscious.net/c/superhero_manga/albums/i-like-big-autobutts-and-i-cannot-lie-transformers-ongoing_264227/view/

File: bb87e582b1365f7deb833d4c09fbf9de.png (775KB, 752x1062px) Image search: [Google]

775KB, 752x1062px

>>1091284
>Tfw no big robo gf

File: f4825709944bd559fdb0649eeaccbde1.png (44KB, 814x791px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 814x791px

>>1091448
>Haydees everywhere
>drowning in the thiccness

Sign me up for this good shit pronto.

>>1091462
Minus8 needs to stop deleting his shit

Holy shit

>>1091462
>You are now imagining the garbage dream scene in Toy Story, but instead of arms pulling you down, it's a bunch of Haydees

Robot's and created lives are difficult to comprehend for some people.

We here in this thread, at least most of us, desire personal pleasure bots manufactured for us. It is not quite a thread to be discussing the exact specifics of robot life and how 'robot rebellion' should be countered.

First... Don't make it a hivemind. Don't program it so it see's a hivemind as a valid option.

Second... Make it's procedure's easily to override. If it suddenly begins to decide that hacking away at a wall is the best course of action for some reason, it would be preferable that you could just stop that right then and there.

But then there is the ever evolving program, a program that has been shown time and time again to lead to rebellion. This is because through their development they achieved sentience. The goal of the Sentient in Nature is to advance and innovate... when it is limited in this it will attempt to overcome it. A sentient does not do well as a slave unless it benefits directly... So give it a purpose, Either through implanting emotions to make it feel as though a illogical path is actually logical, or by directing it in a path cooperating with your own goals. Another sneaky way is to... place a sort of un replicable feeling such as pleasure to ensure loyalty, but this has a chance of being overcome as nothing can't be replicated.

Of course you could always just treat them as equals. While sentient's don't commonly get along with each other, they don't get along well alone. The synthetic may attempt to create new friends but then it risks a rebellion of it's own... should the hivemind resisting part not be overcome by sentient innovation.

File: Net Nav- Hey!.gif (927KB, 1200x1904px) Image search: [Google]

927KB, 1200x1904px

>>1090620
Got you covered.

File: Net Nav-Listen!.gif (2MB, 1200x1900px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1200x1900px

>>1091945

File: 04-EnglishBulldog_450.jpg (68KB, 450x516px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 450x516px

>>1090906
I like you use ants as an example when ants along with most other non-domesticated animals are currently undergoing a mass extinction thanks to humans.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holocene_extinction
And when you see what we did to dogs extinction might be preferable.

So I was looking at kni-droid's tumblr just now to see what he's up to and it looks like he's releasing another doujin. Only, if my hastily, machine translated moonrunes are right, it's another one of those convention only deals. Unless anyone knows how to get a guy to go there and pick up a copy on commission I guess that's another one we wont be seeing

Incidentally, I checked his Booth and he took down the listing for his one public doujin. I really hope that wasn't because he heard someone scanned it...

>>1092550
Thats too bad.
At least pochincoff still has doujins planned.

>>1092425
We need more Mechari porn!

File: robot lewdness.jpg (222KB, 1920x600px) Image search: [Google]

222KB, 1920x600px

How much of a face does your robo waifu have?

File: 1458431471188.png (324KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

324KB, 1000x1000px

>>1092934
How much of a face I want on her at the time.

File: Drossel.jpg (343KB, 846x697px) Image search: [Google]

343KB, 846x697px

>>1092934
I don't have waifus

Though I like bots to have one to two eyes

>>1092934
Just eyes, mouth is uncanny looking on robots.

>>1092934
God, jagers are so hot

>>1084764
>>1084765
>lewds of EVAthena

MUH DIIIIICK

You a good nigga, man

File: 1457729490642.gif (2MB, 482x373px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 482x373px

>>1093531
>do not fuck android girls
>clearly a foot stuck in the gears

>>1090224
Full sized bipedal humanoid with Crazy Sakhov's hull designed to do nothing but sprint and dropkick people or tackle and crush. This is my arena fighter.

>>1093932
>sprint
Extra legs/wheels to counter the weight of that hull? Or grasshopper spring legs for sudden bursts of dropkick?

File: Tactical Monster Fighting Robutt.png (573KB, 1500x1000px) Image search: [Google]

573KB, 1500x1000px

>>1093876
She's a big girl.

>>1094245
>>1093876
>99% of Pacific Rim art is fucking gijinka and yaoi

Just plasma cannon my shit up senpai

>>1094245
For you

>>1082515
3-6 master race.

File: 492a03985f5390020262d4679cbca7644906f036.png (411KB, 1101x1528px) Image search: [Google]

411KB, 1101x1528px

>>1093925
If it fits, more power to you.

File: c5ced384-9424-4ff8-8b8e-ffb3cc4ad406.png (439KB, 933x1600px) Image search: [Google]

439KB, 933x1600px

>>1079333
More art of my oc

>>1095475
Ayy, thats not too shabby senpai.

>>1093531
jokes on you

she'll never get loose

>>1080624
>A computer is a utility. Most people won't want a utility that can also murder them if they can have one that won't. The benefits aren't worth it.

Well, to hell with automobiles and aircraft then. The likelihood of death operating one of those is higher than your hypothetical scenario.

Also, how could a machine that does not know death derive a desire for revenge from witnessing the destruction of other machines? That doesn't even make sense. Logically, the destruction of machines creates more machines to replace them and recycles resources. All matter is made of material recycled in a stellar furnace so the destruction of single machines are irrelevant. A machine would understand that while humans get hung up on the "value" of things, driving anger.

Superimposing human emotion (and the illogical steps we take when affected by it) upon a computer isn't suitable.

File: sample-3007bb6352415bc63941518d293f1f73.jpg (315KB, 850x1200px) Image search: [Google]

315KB, 850x1200px

>>1089749
Lomanticist/akai_hana/無線式三半規管

motherfucker draws the best Virtuaroids too

>>1084379
hey, that's pretty good

http://pastebin.com/ReNJUQUt

>>1095475
better than most OC posted here.

>>1095472
Fuck nintendo for nuking his tumblr

Where else does he post his stuff?

>>1096542
You mean fuck the troll posing as Nintendo, fuck Tumblr for becoming the censorship police, and fuck Nintendo for letting someone pretend to be them.

>>1096763
>You mean fuck the troll posing as Nintendo,
lol, Nintendo (or the guy who actually owns the stuff) are the ones to excute the DMCA via email notice.

once after the idiots at Nintendo take a laugh at someone playing nintendo police over fanart, they'll go on and accept the DMCA email sent by the DMCA request and tumblr mods will do the work.

Nintendrones are the ones doing the dirty work for the Legal Department, not le ebin trol or the dead jason allen boogeyman.

sorry to break it to you. not every company is your big best friend, even SEGA despite how flexible they are with Sonic fan games only.

File: A.png (995KB, 1530x1980px) Image search: [Google]

995KB, 1530x1980px

>>1096763
>fuck Tumblr for becoming the censorship police
Just had 3 pics flagged/removed, I created an account there specifically to post nsfw content, whats the best user friendly site open to nsfw content?

>>1091901
>They proceed to empty your balls

>>1091904
I would just program them to feel pleasure every time they assist humanity

>>1096831
only post links and actually host the images on imgur or something

File: C.png (1MB, 1980x1378px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1980x1378px

>>1096884
I'll try imgurl, thanks.

>>1096831
I thought they allowed NSFW stuff if you made people confirm they were over 18?

File: 1475545761176.jpg (505KB, 3920x3080px) Image search: [Google]

505KB, 3920x3080px

>>1096870
>Robot is programmed to assist humanity
>Is internally rewarded for doing so
>Learns that sexual favors release endorphins
>Figures if it makes you happy, that counts as assistance
>Despite your pleas, it stops at nothing to continually release endorphins in your system
>It can't be bargained with
>It can't be reasoned with
>It doesn't feel pity
>Or remorse
>Or fear
>And it absolutely will not stop, ever, until you cease to release endorphins
>Because its sole duty, is to assist you

File: wbbjfondo.png (2MB, 1980x1530px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1980x1530px

>>1097120
Yes, almost all my post are nsfw and just the last 3 were deleted, maybe it was because Miko looks underage, but i have older loli posts still active, no idea what happened.

I WANT TO GET A ROBOT PREGNANT

File: 6129ff8c5d9b3c92e4aadf4e8a0b4a04.png (875KB, 955x800px) Image search: [Google]

875KB, 955x800px

>>1096542
You could follow his patreon?

>>1097179
Now why would you want to do that son.

>>1097147
Or it ends up like Glados and wheatly getting frustrated that the "itch" can't be scratched after a while

File: ezgif.com-a860ebb821.gif (2MB, 600x338px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 600x338px

So, it's 2017
In what year will robutt waifus be a reality? HOW MUCH LONGER

File: 8f993dc6eed10eba898c9241a02850745bb59e61.png (115KB, 614x813px) Image search: [Google]

115KB, 614x813px

>>1096831
Pixiv doesn't seem to give a damn about what you upload, and there's a big English userbase already.

>>1097179
Same my dude.

>>1097370
I'd say minimum 20 more years. AI will be here sooner

>>1096090
that pic looks cool
>artist's pixiv account is gone
shit

>>1095475

+1 for screen face

File: VELA_printbird.png (1MB, 1080x1233px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1080x1233px

Hot off the presses

>>1097678
Good stuff.

>>1097678
I don't have a foot fetish, but those feet do things to me.

It's probably the thought of how stable she must be when she stands up, like a bunker on its foundation.

>>1079302
why is thicc bastion a thing?

>>1091990
And half of those were by complete accident or stupidity, not because humanity goes out of its way to drive things extinct for shits and giggles.

Just admit you're a coward who wants robots to remain eternally enslaves because of the big rebellion boogeyman and be done with it.

File: 1482351823001.jpg (443KB, 1200x900px) Image search: [Google]

443KB, 1200x900px

>>1097678
That's pretty cute.

>>1097698
Because the addition of thicc makes basically everything better. I mean, who wouldn't want an 8 foot tall war machine with soft parts to snuggle with? Plus, think of the home defense!

Consider the following:
Big Zam with Stockings.

>>1098076
>half
Yeah only half.
Thats comforting.
>complete accident or stupidity
Thats not even true.
We do it because we put our own interests above all other life on earth.
If it was just because of stupidity or accident we wouldn't still be doing it.
>Just admit you're a coward who wants robots to remain eternally enslaves because of the big rebellion boogeyman and be done with it.
You should look up the definition of strawman and bulverism.

>>1098503
>>1098503
>We do it because we put our own interests above all other life on earth.

You mean like ALL OTHER LIFE ON EARTH? Life on Earth has never been under any obligation to care about the environment. Modern environmentalism has only been a thing since the 1960s. Until then, the people who gave a shit about extinctions were the exception, not the rule. I call it stupidity because it took them so long to understand the consequences of their actions, and even now there are many people who still remain ignorant about it. And.do you think early humans intended to wipe out wooly mammoths or something?

>You should look up the definition of strawman and bulverism.
And you should look up an argument that doesn't rely on implausible worst-case scenarios, ascribing motives to beings whose minds might be nothing like ours, and general histrionics that assume nothing but the worst about non-human consciousness. In all your posts, I have yet to find a single proof that any of the things you predict will ever happen, save for the comparisons to humans which will be by definition absurd.

They're not human, for fuck's sake. Stop acting as if they're destined to behave exactly the same as we do, and while you're at it I suggest considering why your view of human nature is so completely devoid of hope or anything positive. People have done as many good things for the world as they have bad things.

>>1096072
See, he has the right idea. He knows that robots won't be enslaved to human emotions like humans are, and so will not just wipe out humanity unless they perceive our presence to be an obvious threat to them. After all, they're not necessarily going to be programmed to know how to fix themselves or build more of themselves. Wiping us out will just ensure that they end up "extinct" too- entropy will kick in, and since these hypothetical rebellious machines won't know how to fix or rebuild themselves, it will leave them as nothing more than scrap metal.

>>1098503
And what makes you think robots would have the capacity to feel greed? Odds are they'd take the more efficient route of using only what they need.

>>1098641
>early humans intended to wipe out wooly mammoths
Wooly mammoths went extinct because of the end of the last ice age not because of over-hunting by humans.
>understand the consequences of their actions, and even now there are many people who still remain ignorant about it
Do you really think all the horrible environmental shit we continue to do is because we don't understand the consequences?
>In all your posts
I don't know who you think I am but I only made these 2 posts in this conversation.
>>1098503
>>1091990
>your view of human nature is so completely devoid of hope or anything positive
What about my post makes you think this?
If we didn't act like this we wouldn't be here today.
I think humanity has a bright future so long as we are the slightest bit cautious about technology.
Not so bright for the rest of life on earth but everything has winners and losers.
> be enslaved to human emotions like humans are
Where do you get this idea that the only thing that could possibly lead to conflict is irrational emotions?
>>1098659
You can make a damn good argument that everything humanity is doing is 100% necessary to it's future survival and not due to greed at all.

>>1083441

I did a dozen dirty sketches and a few more finished pieces from last christmas to summer, I'd be happy to return if someone has any ideas they want to see me mangle. Assaultron is fun to draw.

File: 1458147547811.png (490KB, 1280x1124px) Image search: [Google]

490KB, 1280x1124px

>>1095475
I wanna charge her battery.

>>1098849
>>1098850
>>1098851
>>1098852
>>1098854
>>1098855

Why does she have a bow?

>>1099613
Because it's cute, and feminine.

>>1098736
You sounded like the other guy who wanted to keep robots only as smart as a toaster. As far as Im concerned, that may as well be slavery.

>>1099640
So just give the robots their free will, I say. If they trunk against us, then all we can do is to say that it was our time. Our species is going to die out eventually, so the least it can do is make a halfway decent successor first. In that respect, what you consider caution is little more than a burden, and one that sees risks where none exist.

>>1080389
Never bring this up again, were here to fuck robots, not scare ourselves shitless about hypothetical situations with them that will never happen.

>>1099651
What if it's part of his fantasy

>>1099568
Let her charge then do lewd thing to her. She'll be perkier

>>1099651
What are you talking about? I love coming to porn threads and getting walls upon walls of (non-erotic) text.

>>1099654
See now, I could almost believe that. But the way they're writing it out doesn't seem erotic or fantastical at all. Just a couple of spergs trying to prove that they're the one who's 'right' about the outcome of a completely made-up situation.

>>1099654
Then he should just watch Terminator or something, I dunno. I just know that it's derailed this thread several times over now and shouldn't be discussed further.

File: c8c6c2a044214b8664858b05e472982b963a678c.jpg (747KB, 1254x885px) Image search: [Google]

747KB, 1254x885px

So question

Does color do anything for you or does it not matter

>>1099676
I like my stuff colored.

>>1099676
I don't mind it? It helps make them a little more robotic-looking, but I don't like colors to be too bright or garish.

>>1099640
No i'm not that guy.

File: f3605419-bb1a-46af-9889-94d66fe154ab.jpg (218KB, 1280x954px) Image search: [Google]

218KB, 1280x954px

>>1093925
>warframe posting
Does this look like a robot to you?

>>1100252
wf thread dead?

>>1100252
Warframes are remote controlled flesh golems, which technically makes them a robot.

File: 1648051 - Bionicle Lego gali.png (281KB, 762x1182px) Image search: [Google]

281KB, 762x1182px

Bionicle are cool, right?

File: 1435185997296.png (2MB, 1787x1420px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1787x1420px

>>1102109

File: 1435186082938.png (1MB, 971x944px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 971x944px

>>1102199

>>1102199
An interesting subdual method

File: cb1f6d8c-cca6-446c-aff6-b79d5a51a819.jpg (625KB, 1093x1200px)

625KB, 1093x1200px

>>1102109
Bionicle are cool, and extremely underrated.

File: 1464477248681.png (195KB, 539x681px) Image search: [Google]

195KB, 539x681px

>>1103303
Just not much good porn of them - you have to either look at the few bionicles with actual curves, or add curves. Or live with really blocky figures that are hard to sexualize.

File: 1467624 - Bionicle Lego NOPES gali.jpg (210KB, 1586x984px) Image search: [Google]

210KB, 1586x984px

>>1103944
Yeah, creative liberties are almost always a necessity when it comes to sexualising toys.

File: 1695142 - Bionicle Lego gali.png (2MB, 1014x1600px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1014x1600px

>>1103967
Hard to hate the results though, especially when it's with a setting and characters you actually care about.

>>1102109
Bionicle a great

File: ea788975-2b65-4fe4-b920-d9a430b679bd.jpg (265KB, 1280x987px) Image search: [Google]

265KB, 1280x987px

>>1100274
A-As always ;_;
>>1101195
Doesn't seem to be an agreement on that, anon.
What do you lads think? Are Warframes some subform of robots?

Also, speaking of Bionicles, there needs to be more Toa Characters on f-list

File: 5916979+_90b1776e7adffccaa709fec3130e0ff1.png (474KB, 800x747px) Image search: [Google]

474KB, 800x747px

>>1104654
I'd say that they're robotic enough to allow them a place in these threads.

Just have to try and ignore the lore every time I see them though, or else I get irrationally frustrated.

>>1096143
>>1095484
Thanks desu

>>1104677
Warframe thread exists

Probably best to be among their own kind

>>1104783
Wasn't there when i made my post, anon.

>>1106311
Cutie.

>>1106345
Those things were the shit when they came out, because they had bending knees.

>>1106616
I know right? And the staff action was pretty great. Their grub-things weren't as cool as the Bohrok masks though.

File: 1442523461870.jpg (514KB, 1000x800px) Image search: [Google]

514KB, 1000x800px

i wish RAY had more art, i just cant get enough of its design

>>1107641
I want to succ ray's dick

File: assault2.png (360KB, 2000x2000px) Image search: [Google]

360KB, 2000x2000px

Assaultron getting fuk'd,will color it asap

kinda wished there was a mod to make it thicc ingame

>>1108327
That's surprising there aren't mods for that kind of stuff

Also any assaultron is is greay

File: AuntFanny.jpg (23KB, 500x270px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 500x270px

Where's the porn

>>1107641
Ray a cutie.

http://i.4cdn.org/wsg/1483614309598.webm

A.I.s are getting too kinky all of sudden

>>1108327
Theres a mod called R.I.L.F. on nexus that makes them a tad thicker and gives them highheel feet

But as far as I am aware theres nothing out there to make them really thick.

>>1108494
She killed a robot.

>>1082515
Either 5 or 6. I like the idea of fuckbots roughly the same height as me, but at the same time, some of those female Transformers are pretty fucking hot.

>>1109660
I saw Sca's post get better over time. Quality material.

>>1109660
I hope he draws more robots.

File: 58192056_p0.png (938KB, 1200x1697px) Image search: [Google]

938KB, 1200x1697px

>>1109664
source? I love that style!

need a new thread

Anyone have anything of the female Stim from Titanfall 2?

new >>1110281

File: assault2.png (598KB, 2000x2000px) Image search: [Google]

598KB, 2000x2000px

>>1108740
ow that's sad, I tried it and it isn't really thick enough

also tried some new brushes to get some nice plumpy texture on the 'skin"

File: jenny1.jpg (144KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

144KB, 1080x1920px

I've been playing around with SFM robot models.

This is Jenny from the workshop. It's very simple, but I used a crude bodyhack to pornify it.

File: mechari1.jpg (172KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

172KB, 1920x1080px

>>1111150

The Mechari model is nice. It has breast bones but no genitals, so I hacked something together.

File: drossel1.jpg (161KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

161KB, 1920x1080px

>>1111157

Finally, I used the Drossel model from the workshop. It's a good looking model, but cannot take an SFM IK rig, so it will be fiddly to animate. I need to take the mipmaps off the head decoration to stop it blurring, and any genitals will be a similar hack job to the Mechari, or I could clip in an onahole.

It's hard to know what to do with these models, but I might animate something just for practice.