So, what are /a/s thoughts on Josuke and Okuyasu's Excellent Adventure, anime adaptation?
8/10 it's ok
Would've been good if not for all the filler garbage.
>>158730423
I want a spinoff manga that's just Josuke and Okuyasu doing Josuke and Okuyasu things
a friend showing me Part 4's first opening is what got me into Jojo
>>158730493
8/10 is ok for you?
>>158730531
There's not filler in JoJo.
>>158730844
We all know that 7 is horrible, 8 is okay, 9 is good and 10 is literal perfection. Anything less than a 8 is literally unwatchable.
>>158730966
Well I guess dubs don't lie
>>158730966
Pretty much
>>158730493
>>158730844
>>158730966
Why dont we just fucking rate things 1-4 then?
>>158730423
Fucking shit, could have turned out well if every character wasn't so shit, not have any resolution for about half the plotlines and actually have a good threatening vilian that actually poses a threat ever to anyone we care about instead of a blind woman who can't recognise the body of a stranger.
Also not ruin jotaro with a retarded retcon, joseph with diaper jokes and amnesia sometimes and bring the worst jojo, jouske. An unlikable monster who literally made his enemy live forever in pain and loses any semblance of sense whenever someone mocks his hair, which is the worst plot device in jojo.
In addition introduce the worst supporting cast of all times with: an annoying worthless midget that gets a deus ex machina whenever he needs one, a blabbering retard that LETS KIRAS DAD FUCKING ESCAPE FOR NO FUCKING REASON, And Shigechi, the objectively most annoying jojo character.
With Arakis worst cases of amnesia that ended up in wasted great concepts which include but are not limited to: The baby, Okuyasus dad, whoever is the protagonist of the story, kiras character, alien boy, kira being cared about by anyone other than Rohan.
Also the worst stands which include: healing, lightning, water, explosion, bullets, food and lock.
3/10
>>158731947
Don't forget about the time travel