Is this theory accurate, /a/?

They put tits in it because they wanted to see some fucking tits. That's my theory.

>>150460320
No

>>150460320
>well-animated

No.

Oh just fuck off

I'm not reading all that shit.

>>150460320
Kill la Kill is a just a clusterfuck that Nakashima and Imaishi threw together every week without thinking about coherence or any meaningful themes.

They even admitted to doing so, to a certain extent.

why are tumblerfags so delusional

>all this rationalization because they like it even though it goes against their feminist credo

Must suck to be fucked in the head and not capable of just enjoying things without having mental conniptions.

>>150460320
yes

File: 1429159816987.jpg (150KB, 577x713px) Image search: [Google]

150KB, 577x713px

>>150460320
This theory is accurate... accurate in its description of intersectional feminism. Third generation feminism isn't so much an ideology as it is a paradism: it starts out with the a priori assumption that women are and always have been oppressed (much like the Marxist view of history considers every event to be a step towards the global revolution, and Whigsian history reads history as a trend towards ever greater liberty). Everything, EVERYTHING is seen through that lens.

Kill la Kill is superficial, that much is clear. It's fun, the animation is (usually) smooth, the characters likeable enough and the storytelling fast paced. But that's not enough for feminists, as this mindless fun does not fit in their paradigm. Everything, especially if it centers around women, needs to fit in their paradigm as either examplary of feminism or a shining example of patriarchal oppression and objectification. As evidenced by the fact that Kill la Kill (a show about strong female characters who are practically nude half of the time, a contradiction in the feminist mind) constantly inspires feminists to state that it's both a feminist anime and mindless objectification and sexualization of women.

This is one of those texts/images that tells us more about the author than the subject matter. Her view is, in the most literal sense, prejudiced: she had before even considering the subject matter judged that this is either a feminist or an anti-feminist anime.

You got some responses here, if you haven't seen:
>>150461257