Is this movie really suppose to be canon? It's riddled with

>>146301688
Is this thread suppose to be bait?

fuck off narutards

>>146301740
>saying anything I don't like is bait
>ill call things bait instead of addressing how I think it's wrong
You are the bane of all discussion.

>>146301740
Yeah looks to be, already been stated as canon so it's obvious OP is playing the stupid card. Surprised he's self aware the movie wasn't 100% consistent, not that these people follow up on what the plot holes were.

>>146301751
no, allowing Bleach the attention it got is more of a sin really. A Naruto thread on how a proper resolution to never touched upon romance is allowed.

>>146302234
First two minutes into the movie Naruto tried to do a shadow clone. He is like 6 years old at the time. He didn't even know what shadow clone was until later after he failed the exam for normal clones.

Hinata falls off a tall building and almost falls to her death because because she apparently forgot she's a ninja and and they can use chakura to stick their feet to walls.

That's just in the first ~15 minutes. Should I go on?

>>146302968
>He didn't even know what shadow clone
Do you even remember what their first test was in school? They all had to make a good looking clone of themselves.

>>146302286
>romance in battle shounen
Cancer. Never a good idea, you can get good romance in almost any other genre.

Only to the hinatards.

Basically the studio offered the deal to kishimoto, which turned into this attrocity.

>inb4 ass blastedhinatards, my waifu movie is perfect, you just salty whaa whaa

>>146304835
It's like you can't even read and you don't even remember the series.

Fuck, I haven't even finished the manga and I know more than you. Shadow clone was a forbidden skill, the normal clone skill was not, and it's what they learned in school.

>>146304835
Hinaturd apologist.

People srsly defend this piece of shit?

>>146305236
>>146305171
Salty narusaku fags

>>146301688
Yes it is

If the writer says it canon then it is canon

>>146305236
yes srsly

>>146305417
That's not really how canon works.
You should look up a term called Death of The Author.