If people in the 3d world want to create 2d waifus, wouldn't

Because to them, they're also in the 3D world.

Duh.

File: 5080980.jpg (2KB, 651x272px) Image search: [Google]

2KB, 651x272px

this is my 1D waifu

What would a 1D waifu look like?

What if I'm some 4D otaku's waifu!?

>>144217504
You are and his name is God

>not having a non-euclidean waifu

>>144217486
I dunno, I think that's a trap, m8. See that pixel at the end?

>>144217603
Even better.

>>144217504
>>144217548
this explains so much

>>144217486
That's still a 2D object still it has two points

A 1D object would have no shape at all

>>144217751
So what could be considered a 1d object? A thought?

>>144217751
yes and no
if something only has 2 points, then it is 1D since it only has length
however, even if you draw a line, it ends up being 2D since it'll have a length and a width

>>144218280
And still some non-zero depth, so actually 3D.

>>144217376
Anime characters live in 3D world.
We just observe them though 2D plane.

>>144218615
So are you saying that 2d waifus don't actually exist because on the other side they are in fact 3d?

>>144218673
If I tell you that whales are actually mammals and not fishes, does it mean they don't actually exists?
Also don't use waifu as a synonym for cute anime girl, retard.