Full frontal 12 year old boy penis was shown several times in Dragonball.
Why is this allowed?
This double standard has always confused me. For some reason, full frontal male nudity seems to be much more common in media than full frontal female nudity. On the rare occasion a woman ever does appear fully nude, her pubes always cover everything so she may as well be wearing pantsu anyway.
The problem with vaginas as opposed to penises is that you can't readily tell if they are sexually stimulated (ignoring the fluids).
That's literally why penises are allowed and vaginas are not.
>This double standard has always confused me.
Meanwhile, in the French animation industry...
Not the same way, though.
>France is passingly mentioned
>Butthurt with the intensity of a thousand suns
Burgers will never cease to amuse me.
Penises are super interesting.
Perhaps this is a better picture. As you can see, the girls are shown fully naked as well. Adults of both genders are clothed with only the women exposing their breasts.
Just a reminder that Goku penis is shown in every episode of GT.
isn't there a scene in dragonball where Goku tries to sleep between Bulma's legs, with his head on her crotch, but removes her panties and it shows her slit? I might be remimbering it wrong
Life is unfair. Just imagine this webm with a little girl in the men's bath.
Because sexual characteristics do not imply sexual context
Male sexual characteristics in particular more than females' since it is a difference perpetuated by associating the female characteristics with sexual contests more often than with males
For an easy analog, think about men and women chests, but one is covered, the other is not, despite both being for all intents and purposes sexual characteristics, because only one of the two is more often associated with a sexual context
Plus, a not matured, not erected penis has a greater difference in form and look to its analog in a sexual context (mature and erected) than the one between a prepubescent vagina and one in a mature and sexual context
It's a matter of common associations, not actual reasons
Why is this thread allowed?
>ITT: retarded Westerners getting triggered by non-sexual depictions of genitalia ang getting buttmad Japan doesn't care about their retarded value systems
You're just as bad as the faggot who wrote that article bitching that loli porn wasn't banned in Japan. Japan doesn't and shouldn't have to care about your values, stop being the retarded moral universalists trying to force your precious values on everyone Western progressives have become. L2cultural relativism, just ebcause over-zealous Western values liberal and conservative think something is immoral doesn't mean that it's a universal truth other nations should have to abide by.
Lolicons around Dragon Ball's time had the old Doraemon anime with it's occasional "Shizuka in the shower/nude" scene.
Even Japan isn't that lewd anymore on daytime TV as they were in the 80s.
>Why is this allowed?
It was the 1980's you stupid idiot.
Dragon Ball aired at 7pm Wednesdays in Japan. You can't tell me that aired outside of the dead of night like most anime these days.
>Full frontal 12 year old boy penis was shown several times
I'm impressed you counted
No. Shota penis is all right to show.
Hell, even KLK has shown it multiple times. The And VD is as lewd as it can get without being full on porn.
The only thing that really got killed hard is lolicon.
What happened to Dragonball? What happened to anime?
>Lolicon is dead.
Don't say that. Don't even think that.
>her pubes always cover everything
to be fair her dad painting her in the nude was sketchy even in Japan but ti got hand waved mostly because it was prior to the establishment of the fan habits we know now and because it's FF and what are you going to do, tell a hit author you won't run his surefire success?