Yo /x/ I just saw the new It movie and I must say I'm quite spooked and having a hard time going to sleep.
Can you guys help me out by posting funny and cute videos/stories/pictures?
Much appreciated
>>19589893
I find your post and the contrast that makes with rest of this board amusing
This ain't the best board for that kind of nonsense, brother. Maybe find another board?
did you see the original it movie before
>>19589921
that's actually kind of creepy in how human the gesture is
>>19589930
Nope.
>>19589945
I'm fairly sure it's physiologically impossible for me to consider that GIF creepy in any way.
>>19589893
have you tried not being scared of a movie meant for children? kys.
This is [NOT] cp
>>19589971
I cannot deny my inner child nor my gaping sandy vagina.
>>19589893
Which pennywise is creepier? 2017 or 1990?
>>19589893
reported for obviously being underage.
>>19590015
1990 version. The new version is played horribly. The guy naturally has a face of a child molester but aside from that, everything else he does is utter garbage. He doesn't have the voice or even that acting chops to play that sort of role. Every time he opens his mouth, I can't help but cringe and get annoyed by how fucking awkward he is. You can obviously tell he's trying desperately to put on some kind of weird voice and it fails miserably. It's not scary, it's retarded. Tim Curry on the other hand played the role where he could not only be zany but still manage to be genuinely creepy and unnerving at the same time. The voice sounded like it would come from that mouth.. and speaking of mouths.. The old version didn't need a fake as fuck looking CGI mouth. I swear the amount of CGI in the new film is obnoxious.
>>19589893
Have a hug anon
>>19590052
>scarier
>WA-HA WA-HA WA-HA WA-HA WA-HA
So it was good?
try /an/
>>19589893
No, because this is /x/ and we don't do that kind of thing.
>>19593970
>>19590015
2017, I think it's his inflection, how he talks to Georgie is unsettling. That one scene made me like that portrayal more than the mini-series goof.
>>19591606
>KISS ME FATBOY
[spoiler] hopefully they do this bit in the next movie, they did "beep beep ritchie" [/spoiler]
>>19594078
wait what did i do wrong with my spoiler?
[spoiler] fuck [spoiler]
>>19589979
I'm not asking for sauce
But sauce
>>19594209
dido
>>19594084
they don't work on every board
>>19589893
>Yo /x/
Are you a nigger?
>>19594078
Spoilers don't work on /x/. And while I enjoyed this movie, King's writings don't translate well to screen, which is why his best adaptions are the ones that stray furthest from the material. A lot of the horror in King's writings come from the internal monologue of the characters. Especially the villains in his tales. King does well at making irrational, malevolent minds understandable. As in "I still think this character's motivation and plans are sick and harmful, but I understand why the character has this motivation, and made this plan."
We don't get the inner fears and voices of Ritchie, which makes the "Beep beep" part actually terrifying rather than in the movie where it's a throwaway callback to the book and not touched beyond that. We don't get the repetition of what a "good girl" is and does in the mind of Bev's father, making the horror of his proximity and dealings with Bev a lot more "typical."
That said, I really enjoyed 2017 Pennywise. Tim Curry's take was like a demon who adopted the image knowing what it was and how people reacted. 2017 Pennywise seemed to me like a totally alien creature using the clown image like a bug using camouflage - knowing it works without really knowing WHY it works. It gave me the impression that Pennywise could ONLY see fear, as in the words IT said wasn't communication, but audio mimicry; that Pennywise "talked" a language of fear, and the words we hear are the mind interpreting the sound into audible fear.
>>19593335
It was try hard garbage.
>>19594084
Fuck off newfag
>>19594679
Agreed on the 2017 version sounding like an autistic creepy alien who can hardly socialize with humans.
Compare how Pennywise talks in the opening scene of the TV film vs the new one; he sounds so much more bizarre and inhuman
>>19595111
New Pennywise is shit. I think this anon >>19590052
said it best.
>>19589893
Stay safe anon
>>19594679
good penis
>>19590052
he never had a chance... Tim Curry could go from Dr. Frank N Furter to the demon of Legend without skipping a beat.
>>19589893
The film wasn't even that good. Just cheap jumpscares all the way through. It's not scary if they show the entity 10 times just in the first few minutes of a movie. Also, the actions of the kids seemed illogical and it strayed from the book all the time. The book is way better. It was kind of a disappointment to be honest.
>>19589893
here
>>19589893
that reminds me, kek
Are you serious? How old are you 9? And did you not watch the original?
>>19590015
Definitely Tim Currys 1990s Pennywise,
IM THE TRASH MAN
>>19590052
To be fair it's too early to judge the remake since it only tells the first half of the story. I think the 2017 film is on par with the first half of the miniseries. I thought the 2nd half of the miniseries was more emotionally satisfying. I can see Chapter 2 (2017) being better than the 2nd half of the miniseries if done right.
>>19598169
I CAN SEE YOU NOT BEING A COMPLETE FAGGOT IF DONE RIGHT.
>>19599649
I second this.
>>19590015
Im not going to say the 1990 version of Pennywise was the end all be all, but the visuals of the 2017 Pennywise just stink of modern cliché horror clown tropes. He's painted to look unambiguously evil. The look of Tim Curry's Pennywise was a tad more unsettling, because he looked like a regular generic clown.
>>19597208
Papa Nurgle Bless.