How is /x/ not going crazy over Thunder energies mind blowing

>>17350328
more info

source?

>>17350338
>Thunder energies
>>17350341
http://www.express.co.uk/news/science/639279/SCIENTISTS-discover-invisible-alien-entities-spying-on-us-on-Earth
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eHj3MN9Sf2A

>>17350328
because Santilli is a crazy person?

Because its fucking bullshit.

I wont even touch on the clearly obvious reasons this is total bullshit and Ill instead just say:
There is no fucking "anti-light" these guys are making up bunk ass science. Photons are their own anti-particle, these guys are complete quacks taking pictures of light smears and trying to pass if off as fringe groundbreaking science. It's bunko.

>>17350366
Interesting.

I remember seeing some videos and reports about flying organic things in the sky all over the world.

Some in mexico? can't find the vid

>>17350422
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=REf4yXL1LCE

>>17350328

>>17350406
Because it was never meant for antimatter. It was built for the express purpose of detecting those entites

>>17350422
>>17350429

There was a Stargate episode where things like these were seen, stuff from another dimension

>>17350463
read the fucking website, they say it works by seeing "anti-light" since there is no such thing as "anti-light" they arent seeing it, meaning the entire premise is flawed. Whatever theyre seeing and photographing, they have fundamentally failed to understand it, and thus their conclusions are inherently flawed.

Wake me up when they've released a peer reviewed paper and not just a youtube video proclaiming themselves to be awesome by citing bunk science as 'evidence'.

>>17350492
nigga r u serious? that's fucking shaky camera exposure 101. and a picture of an airport? GTFOH pls

>>17350366
I'm a photographer, and I can tell you ALL evidence that this youtube link showed was either fake, or shutter manipulation with moving objects. This has got to be bait.

>>17350466
Stargate has heavy disclosure.
AI hive mind androids, Draco Goauld,

>>17350503
Hey, retard, I'm on your side.

Reading comprehension 0/10 see me after class.

>>17350366
this is pure tin foil

i dont doubt the way the lens works but its a stretch to say anything observed out be sentient. its like crack heads thinking a bag blowing in the wind on a vid is a ghost

you go capture a ajin before you go talking shit. but fair warning you cant kill them

File: 098080886875.jpg (39KB, 853x480px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 853x480px

>>17350328
No single object has been misinterpreted as a 'flying saucer' more often than the planet Venus.
Even the former leader of Your United States of America, James Earl Carter Jr thought he saw a UFO once,
but it's been proven he only saw the planet Venus.

File: 123456.jpg (98KB, 1600x1102px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 1600x1102px

Venus was at it's peak brilliance last night, you probably thought you saw something up in the sky other than Venus,
but I assure you, it was Venus. Your scientists have yet to discover how neural networks create self consciousness,
let alone how the human brain processes two dimensional retinal images into the three dimensional phenomenon known as perception.
Yet you somehow brazenly declare "Seeing is believing"?

File: 99826.jpg (62KB, 665x385px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 665x385px

Your scientific illiteracy makes me shudder, and I wouldn't flaunt your ignorance by telling anyone these videos are anything other than the planet Venus

It's swamp gas.

>>17350560
Lord Kinbote told me you'd say that.

File: lord_kinbote2.jpg (106KB, 600x455px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 600x455px

>>17350572
Snitches get stitches