Here is merely SOME evidence (though DEFINITELY not ALL of the

>>17323314

(start of part 2) Curiously enough, several of the very earliest artifact discoveries display a truly extraordinary level of sophistication. In Idaho, for example, a 2-million-year-old clay figurine was unearthed in 1912. But even this discovery does not mark an outer limit. Bones, vertebrae and even complete skeletons have been found in Italy, Argentina and Kenya. Their minimum datings range from 3 million to 4 million BC. A human skull, a partial human skeleton and a collection of neoliths discovered in California have been dated in excess of 5 million years. A human skeleton discovered at Midi in France, paleoliths found in Portugal, Burma and Argentina, a carved bone and flint flakes from Turkey all have a minimum age of 5 million years.
How far back can human history be pushed with discoveries like these? The answer seems to be a great deal further than orthodox science currently allows. As if the foregoing discoveries were not enough, we need to take account of:
* Paleoliths from France dated between 7 and 9 million BC
* An eolith from India with a minimum dating of 9 million BC
* Incised bones from France, Argentina and Kenya no less than 12 million years old
* More paleolith discoveries from France, dated at least 20 million years ago
* Neoliths from California in excess of 23 million years
* Three different kinds of paleoliths from Belgium with a minimum dating of 26 million BC
* An anatomically modern human skeleton, neoliths and carved stones found at the Table Mountain, California and dated at least 33 million years ago
But even 33 million years is not the upper limit. A human skeleton found in Switzerland is estimated to be between 38 and 45 million years old. France has yielded up eoliths, paleoliths, cut wood and a chalk ball, the minimum ages of which range from 45 to 50 million years.
There's still more.

>>17323317

(start of part 3) In 1960, H. L. Armstrong announced in Nature magazine the discovery of fossil human footprints near the Paluxy River, in Texas. Dinosaur footprints were found in the same strata. In 1983, the Moscow News reported the discovery of a fossilised human footprint next to the fossil footprint of a three-toed dinosaur in the Turkamen Republic. Dinosaurs have been extinct for approximately 65 million years.
In 1983, Professor W. G. Burroughs of Kentucky reported the discovery of three pairs of fossil tracks dated to 300 million years ago. They showed left and right footprints. Each print had five toes and a distinct arch. The toes were spread apart like those of a human used to walking barefoot. The foot curved back like a human foot to what appeared to be a human heel. There was a pair of prints in the series that showed a left and right foot. The distance between them is just what you'd expect in modern human footprints.
In December 1862, The Geologist carried news of a human skeleton found 27.5 m (90 ft) below the surface in a coal seam in Illinois. The seam was dated between 286 and 320 million years BC. It's true that a few eoliths, skull fragments and fossil footprints, however old, provide no real backing for the idea of advanced prehistoric human civilisations.
But some other discoveries do.
In 1968, an American fossil collector named William J. Meister found a fossilised human shoe print near Antelope Spring, Utah. There were trilobite fossils in the same stone, which means it was at least 245 million years old. Close examination showed that the sole of this shoe differed little, if at all, from those of shoes manufactured today.
In 1897, a carved stone showing multiple faces of an old man was found at a depth of 40 m (130 ft) in a coal mine in Iowa. The coal there was of similar age.

>>17323321

(start of part 4) A piece of coal yielded up an encased iron cup in 1912. Frank J. Kenwood, who made the discovery, was so intrigued he traced the origin of the coal and discovered it came from the Wilburton Mine in Oklahoma. The coal there is about 312 million years old.
In 1844, Scottish physicist Sir David Brewster reported the discovery of a metal nail embedded in a sandstone block from a quarry in the north of England. The head was completely encased, ruling out the possibility that it had been driven in at some recent date. The block from which it came is approximately 360 million years old.
On 22 June 1844, The Times reported that a length of gold thread had been found by workmen embedded in stone close to the River Tweed. This stone too was around 360 million years old.
Astonishing though these dates may appear to anyone familiar with the orthodox theory of human origins, they pale in comparison with the dates of two further discoveries.
According to Scientific American, dated 5 June 1852, blasting activities at Meeting House Hill, in Dorchester, Massachusetts, unearthed a metallic, bell-shaped vessel extensively decorated with silver inlays of flowers and vines. The workmanship was described as 'exquisite'. The vessel was blown out of a bed of Roxbury conglomerate dated somewhat earlier than 600 million years BC.
In 1993, Michael A. Cremo and Richard L. Thompson reported the discovery 'over the past several decades' of hundreds of metallic spheres in a pyrophyllite mine in South Africa. The spheres are grooved and give the appearance of having been manufactured. If so, the strata in which they were found suggest they were manufactured 2.8 BILLION years ago.

>>17323328

(start of part 5) What are we to make of these perplexing discoveries? They cannot simply be dismissed. If even ONE of these discoveries is TRUE (and I believe that MANY if not ALL of these discoveries are TRUE), then it changes EVERYTHING that modern mainstream anthropologists THOUGHT they knew about the human species. (end)

OP more of a faggot than usual


none of this is true, thus far nothing has been discovered contrary to the theory of evolution, including your made up dated human remains

sage in all fields

>>17323339

"none of this is true"

All of this is true.

"thus far nothing has been discovered contrary to the theory of evolution"

Many things have been discovered contrary to the theory of evolution.

"including your made up dated human remains"

Those dated human remains are not made up, they're in official archaeological records.

Need some documents for this shizzle

>>17323381
>Many things have been discovered contrary to the theory of evolution.
>they're in official archaeological records.
Then I suppose you could be a dear and post the sources to these claims.

OP's retarded if they did research try would realize these are not human remains. Look up the history of hominids. Homo sapien wasn't the earliest hominid to use tools, retard. It was austrophiticus, retard.

First search on the Meister footprints indicate it was not a footprint...
http://ncse.com/cej/2/4/tripping-over-trilobite-study-meister-tracks

Op, you're an absolute madman if you think I'm gonna believe this stuff without credible sources.

>>17323314
op take your pills and go back to sleep your evidence is shit

>paleolithic stones during paleolithic

What were you expecting honestly? Paleolithic starts some 3 000 000 years ago with Lomekwian culture, no fucking shit they find tools and skeletons later.

Your later posts were all disproved, just google these cases.

>>17323314

>* A human skull fragment from Hungary dated between 250,000 and 450,000 BC

'Humans' have been around for millions of years. Anything in the genus Homo is considered human. Our species is just the last remaining one. Look up human evolution.

But there is no way on Earth humans have been around for billions of years.

Cremo's Forbidden Archaeology is a huge collection of anamolus finds. A very dry read as well. The follow-up book is pretty batshit, I'm afraid.

>>17323314
Where's your sources? And before you answer, this thread isn't paranormal as you have proof of it.

File: 1445894544903.jpg (32KB, 442x341px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 442x341px

You cannot post shit like this (especially on /x/) and think ppl will believe you without any source

OP, you truly are one dumb fuck

Funny how people here can legitimately believe in a flat or hollow earth and get less people calling them an idiot than someone saying humans existed and were more advanced earlier than we think.