/wg/ trends discussion thread

Thread replies: 20
Thread images: 14

Anonymous
/wg/ trends discussion thread 2016-02-03 16:25:20 Post No. 6465908
[Report] Image search: [Google]

File: 1450495105660.jpg (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1080px

/wg/ trends discussion thread Anonymous 2016-02-03 16:25:20 Post No. 6465908 [Report]

I feel like /wg/'s tastes have been developing lately. I think the vaporwave threads have influenced some new wallpaper styles, more digital and with eye for composition.

Post recently picked up papes and discuss recent trends you've noticed!
But try to avoid phrases like 'all this new garbage is pretentious shit'

Anonymous 2016-02-03 16:25:44 Post No.6465909
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2016-02-03 16:25:44 Post No.6465909 [Report]

File: 1451000689147.png (116KB, 1920x1200px) Image search: [Google]

116KB, 1920x1200px

>>6465908

Anonymous 2016-02-03 16:54:17 Post No.6465932
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2016-02-03 16:54:17 Post No.6465932 [Report]

File: image.png (535KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

535KB, 1920x1080px

my tastes have gotten pretty sophisticated dog

Anonymous 2016-02-03 16:59:35 Post No.6465934
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-02-03 16:59:35 Post No.6465934 [Report]

>>6465932
They have, I'm proud of you anon.
[spoiler]does anyone actually use those? [/spoiler]

Anonymous 2016-02-03 21:25:33 Post No.6466102
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2016-02-03 21:25:33 Post No.6466102 [Report]

File: image.jpg (836KB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]

836KB, 2560x1440px

>>6465908
Really into landscape and stuff I can stare at for details

Anonymous 2016-02-03 23:39:21 Post No.6466259
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2016-02-03 23:39:21 Post No.6466259 [Report]

File: 1417202491206.jpg (1MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1920x1080px

>>6465932
I made some dumb piece of shit OC for one of those threads in less than 5 minutes and people actually saved it. I have no idea what the appeal of that shit is. Vaporwave's pretty good though, so long as it's not too over the top. I wish we'd get more movie stills though.

Anonymous 2016-02-04 00:06:19 Post No.6466303
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2016-02-04 00:06:19 Post No.6466303 [Report]

File: 1449728871098.jpg (833KB, 3240x1800px) Image search: [Google]

833KB, 3240x1800px

>>6466259
What's this kind of style called? It's charming, in a way.

Anonymous 2016-02-04 00:38:05 Post No.6466334
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-02-04 00:38:05 Post No.6466334 [Report]

>>6466303
not sure which one you mean, but...
black&white film still
or
80's graphic design

Anonymous 2016-02-04 02:24:51 Post No.6466397
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-02-04 02:24:51 Post No.6466397 [Report]

>>6466259
I can see why they saved it, nice contrast, both strong lines as well as figurative stuff, the image is vague and suggestive but not enough to obscure the characters.
You can accidentally make a gem in 5 minutes, and I think recent vaporwave and digital corruption threads have made it more appealing for people to try it.

Anonymous 2016-02-04 03:06:48 Post No.6466416
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2016-02-04 03:06:48 Post No.6466416 [Report]

File: 23640636524_d27d4cdee6_k.jpg (1022KB, 2048x1365px) Image search: [Google]