Happening?

I hope.
But Gamefreak is probably going to not mention this...

not legendary looking enough....

>>33185153
because that pic is fake. The person who made that pic overdid it on trying to make it look "leaky"

>>33185198
People said the same thing about the unova starters and the alola starters

Until its debunked its a happening

>>33185153
I like that design a lot, kind of looks like something straight out of Gen 1 but with a modern touch
Which is probably why it's fake

What if this guy found a way to revive fossil mons to their original form (not rock types).

Where this pic came from?
Is real or fake?

>>33187169
It's pure fake, don't worry about it.

>head is literally just lairon's head
at least try you fucking idiot

>>33187211
>just a photoshopped little mac

File: descarga.jpg (9KB, 271x186px)

9KB, 271x186px

>>33187106
>Grass water Lileep

>>33187218
God you're an idiot.

File: 1367190116280.jpg (223KB, 620x874px)

223KB, 620x874px

>>33185198
>>33187173

I remember over four years ago when X/Y was announced people thought that Gamefreak introducing a new type was fake. Whenever you mentioned Fairy, shit like pic related would appear because people thought it was outlandish...

Though desu I still find this image hilarious.

File: 1500477791989.jpg (18KB, 479x479px)

18KB, 479x479px

>>33187106
>fossils getting primal reversion

>>33187243
HOL' UP

Sauce on image?

>>33185153
fake, looks too much like an actual pokemon

>>33185208

So out of literally thousands of fake leaks, because 2 of them were real, it means everyone should blindly believe anything?

>>33187243

>couldn't have both been drawn by the same person or 2 people working together like the the trio of fake starters with the bear/lizard/goat

>>33185208
>being this new
go back to school summerfag. I believed the alola starters were real from the beginning because they were plausible and believable. This, on the other hand, is very visibly fake and gay. inb4 several autists make videos about these being actual leaks. people are fucking stupid.

File: IMG_20170529_154223.jpg (38KB, 733x493px)

38KB, 733x493px

>>33187830
Nice bait. You know this is real.

File: 1500732482785.png (146KB, 305x267px)

146KB, 305x267px

>>33187243
Bullshit but I believe it.

None of this is shit I care about. I just want a good Battle Frontier, because no reasonable number of new areas will salvage the garbage of Alola as a region.

I don't know anymore. The Kalos and Unova starters(even though I wasn't around for Gen 5 pre-release hype) says to keep an open mind atleast. Issue is though 99% of leaks still end up being fake anyways, and then you have those faggots who probably didn't believe the old leaks in the first place suddenly heel turn and say they actually always did because(paraphrasing the cunt) "they were plausible and believable"

>>33185153
>Same gen
>New Pokémon
lol no

>>33188111
it's fake dude the art isn't as polished as the current stuff (still sugi right?) The shine on the belly of it would be a circle if it was official, it's high effort but it looks rough and wavy like a painting, unlike the digital art we've seen for the past 3 gens

>>33188138
Ah, so I guess the new Necrozma forms and hat Pikachu are "new Pokemon" too?

>>33188152
Those are forms, this thing is called Primisect so it would need a new dex number

we need it to completly btfo patternsfag

Can't wait for the denialfags to get btfo again. When will they learn?

>>33188168
you're really dumb

>>33187418
It most definitely is. Whoever made these is pretty smart knowing that /vp/ loses their heads over shit like this and most of the time and isn't going to put two and two together and realize they were both made by the same person a few people working together. This isn't the first time /vp/ fell hard for a well-made fake leak

It looks kinda off

>>33185153
>>No one can debunk this artwork
It looks like it was drawn on a sketchbook, colored with markers and then photographed by some shitty phone camera.

>>33187106
What about when in the anime they go under those caves and theres kabutops and omastar?

File: 0e6.jpg (7KB, 260x194px)

7KB, 260x194px

>>33189228
>anime

>>33185153
Its sad how people expect some sort off Juarasic park area when in reality it will e just few patches of grass in an area thats looking like Lush Jungle (hence why its next to it) and you'll be able to find 'revived" fossils in the grass

>>33185153
How to fool /vp/:
>Step 1: Draw Fakemon
>Step 2: Post it as leak
>Step 3: ???
>Step 4: Profit.
You people are fucking retarded.

File: Surprised-Koala.jpg (58KB, 500x667px)

58KB, 500x667px

>>33187243
HO SHIT

Someone post the original artwork of dream world so we know for sure that imprint is legit.

>>33189208
>It looks like it was drawn on a sketchbook, colored with markers and then photographed by some shitty phone camera.

according to /vp/ this is all the exact criteria of a legit leak

File: 1501713299318.jpg (122KB, 948x760px)

122KB, 948x760px

>>33189499

>>33189520
>Some faggy artist gets a hold of this pic and draws something that looks like it could be the little head in >>33187243
>make sure to upload his drawing to /vp/ to make it look like there's no source
>samefags in his own thread to make it look like people are believing it and the real idiots start falling for it
>starts spamming the same thread for days

>>33189520
It's bullshit

Everyone go home

I would love for this to be real because the fact that Game Freak hasn't said anything about a non-modified Genesect bothers me. It clearly exists given the lore behind it in the games.

That, and the original dragon.

>>33187408
yes thats what OP is saying

File: image.jpg (417KB, 1936x1936px)

417KB, 1936x1936px

>>33187243

>>33189559
game freak never does anything with their implied mons. baby kangaskhan? original dragon? original beasts? shellder's slowpoke form? nothing. it's dumb.

>>33189570
what about of munna?

>>33185153
It looks too simple.

File: Genesect.png (227KB, 420x420px)

227KB, 420x420px

This is Genesect

>>33188150
this, the limbs look crudely drawn, especially the right arm and right leg.

>>33185153
we'll never see Complete Kyurem or original Genesect

>>33189520
how do people not see everything that makes this picture a blatant fake..?

>>33187106
That would be interesting honestly. Basically the same idea as regional variants but then with fossils. I dig it. Only problem os Aerodactyl has a Mega.

>>33189397
> being able to chain fossilmons
> a bad thing

Why?

>>33185153
We understand you made this shit design and feel the need to spam it all over the place like that Roothoot memeshitter, but don't make two threads at once.

>>33188229
Whoa! Easy there big boy.

>>33189602
What about it?

File: Disinterest.png (248KB, 456x684px)

248KB, 456x684px

>>33187269
I hate you people and how you keep trying to use this as proof
"you said X was fake but actually it was real"
what you fail to mention is the 20 other """"leaks"'"" that were fake as shit,it's not peoples fault that they aren't gullible shits who believe every leak and happen to be right on 1 of those 20 """"leaks""""

>>33185153
I'm a huge fan of Jurassic Park so that addition alone would probably shoot USUM up to my favorite game of all time spot.

>>33190482
not to mention that the fairy type is something far more vague than a couple of pictures that have uneven proportions/bad perspective and are staring you in the face as being fake

>>33189541
I bet he'll pretend like he totally fooled us to after he posts his shit to deviantart. Looking you, zerudez

>>33188111
sorry you suck at identifying fakes, anon. stick around longer and youll get better at it.

>>33189559
>>33189570
>There will never be a Primal Kyurem because GF gave up on mega evos in favor of the even shittier but easier to implement universally Z moves
>If there are going to be any original versions of fossil pokemon, they're probably going to be Alolan forms even though that title wouldn't make sense
You ever wonder what this series would look like in the hands of a capable dev team?

also the original beasts were just normal ass pokemon, likely the original three eveelutions since those are tied to each other and fit well enough

Look at all theese denialfags being proven wrong and BTFO again...Will they ever learn?

>>33185153
>Believing two shit fake images (though I like the fake genesect) mean that we're getting a huge expansion in a sequel we know nothing about.

>>33192074
>they're probably going to be Alolan forms even though that title wouldn't make sense

That title can be fine as long as the lore is that they were allowed to survived on part of the island all those years without going extinct like in other places.

>>33194014
Well, I guess
But "Alolan form" implies that it evolved differently on Alola compared to anywhere else, and not dying but otherwise staying the same doesn't really fit that bill to me
It would be like having an alolan form rockruff