Can we all agree that the odd numbered generations are better

1 and 6 are the worst while 4 and 5 are the best so no

>>25083816
>Can we all agree
No, now fuck off

>>25083816
yes
3>4
5>6
1>2

>>25083816
No, Gen 2 and 4 were great
Gen 5 brings the others down too much

>>25083816
You forgot
>Now that the dust has settled

>>25083897
>1>2

So this post is meant to ironically point how retarded op's point was right?

>>25083816
Well...objective rankings coming through:

1. Gen 4
2. Gen 3
3. Gen 5
4. Gen 6
5. Gen 2
6. Gen 1
Hm, if we assign each Gen a point value (top gets 6, bottom gets 1), then clearly the even numbers are superior.

>>25084623
>objective
>gen 3 higher than anything

>>25084623
Your first mistake was putting 4 at the top with the multitude of flaws it has.

File: image.jpg (10KB, 304x102px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 304x102px

>>25083816

>>25083852
>still using the "gen VI is worst and gen V is best" meme
Kill yourself you underage. Fuck off back to plebbit.

I 100% agree.

Well, until ORAS, it made me hate gen 3

So only 1 and 5 are good.

>>25084726
>gen V
>good

Leave

>>25084726
>gen 6 game makes you hate a gen 3 game
What?

>>25084746
I can't even think about hoenn without vomiting thanks to that game

>>25084736
I'd say it's where pokemon peaked. I really hope gen 7 is another "reboot" so to speak

That's because odd number generations try to be their own thing while even number generations are just booster packs to old pokemon.

Every gen divisible by 3 is the worst.

>>25083816

no

>>25084736

you first