/scg/edg/ Star Elite: Citizen Dangerous General #190

Weak shit. Let the thread die and some not retarded do it correctly.

imagine being so assblasted about people having fun

File: 1497768080010.png (406KB, 814x760px) Image search: [Google]

406KB, 814x760px

>>186498924
NMS has nothing in common with SC or E:D except that it is set in space. SC and E:D are both First person Space Combat, Trading, Transport and exploration sims. NMS is not. And beside that, this isn't "space sim general" this is E:D/SC general. You do not getto just tack shit on because you want other games thread to to float your lack of players. You said yourself, NMS doesn't have a playerbase, and you don;t get to just demand access to our space because you don't want to keep your own open. Thats nigger tier. This is a defined general, NMS is not part of the definition. If you want to make "space games no one plays" general go right ahead.

>Helium Rain comes out today

FUCK ELITE AND FUCK DAD PEOPLE

>>186499290
>our space
holy shit underage b&

>>186499290
nms is first person and has missions,trading,space combat and exploration edg/scg has always been open for space games that don't have their own general newfag
>>186498924
bake new bread matey

>it's a "plax and his boyfriend now play nms so everyone has to deal with their faggotry" episode

>download NMS because of all the shilling here
>start the game
>the first loading screen hangs up and goes on forever
>try two more times
>uninstall.exe

yeah I will pass on this marvel of videogame design

File: Screenshot_6.png (123KB, 622x641px) Image search: [Google]

123KB, 622x641px

Gameplay and polishing aside, they haven't even finished the art assets for S42 yet.

>>186500446
The first loading screen on first launch is shader generation and takes way longer than normal. Mine took almnost 2 minutes the first time, but now it is only 10-15 seconds.

>>186500229
There's literally no reason to not include NMS in the OP.In fact it was before the release shitshow.

>>186500893
>pissing off a couple of furshits is not enough of a reason

>>186501049
>implying that your sunken cost fallacy means everyone else is a furry.
Yeah, ok

>sunken cost fallacy
What did he meme by this?

2 games for a general is already ass. NMSfags can fuck right off.

>>186501628
this tbqh

>>186498704
>didn't put /nms/ or /nmsg/ in the title

>>186502362
>>186501628

>>186502281
>creating a duplicate general almost an hour late

how salty are you chum?

>nms fags on suicide watch

>desperately pushing for nms inclusion when all discussion of it will wither away in two weeks max

Literaly a labour of Sisyphus.

I wonder how many of these outposts they want to put on the moons.

>>186502995
Two, maybe three

>>186500538
S42 is NEVER COMING OUT!

WTF Space Roberts, I get that you are trying to do some cool shit, but wtf man... this is a single player story, and you still don't have your assets finished for a game that was supposed to be released last year, and the year before, and the year before.

Should we start a gofundme for all the poorfags that can't keep up with modern space games?
There is only 3, but that appears to be a stretch for some of them.

>>186504027

There's only two because SC doesn't exist and is only a vehicle for selling people pretty pictures that cost hundreds of dollars

>>186502995
Considering the scale I'd say they could get away with a lot of them without it feeling like they're overcroweded.

reminder that /ps4gen/ is literally /NMSG/ plus some weeb games

>>186504203
I'm just saying. It's not like ED or NMS is expensive. People have hundreds in jpegs but won't spend $20 to kill some time until croberts quits masturbating over his own greatness and releases a game.
How are people that butthurt when hello is trying harder than ftroop and cig combined?

>>186504809
Here's a thought anon;
I'm playing something else entirely rather than forcing myself to stay within the same genre and play something shitty

>TFW I dont even have to tell the NMS fag to fuck off myself after making the thread, because other people do it for me.
Feels good man. No if only he'd get it into his head that the rest of the people here don't want to talk about his half assed failure of a space game and that his headcanon does not in fact define reality.

>>186500110
>edg/scg has always been open for space games that don't have their own general
Thats bullshit that you keep spewing, but repeating it doesn't make it true. This is not "whatever this faggot feel like talking about today" general. It's E:D/SC general. Games that are not E:D or SC do not belong here.

>newfag.
I've been lurking this thread since 2012. I've made at least a hundred of the threads personally. Half the Op everyone copy pastes was written by me. I'm probably not the oldest oldfag in this thread but I'm certainly close.

The was literally about two anti-NMSfags and they were new as fuck to the general. Take your shit thread down and go back to /v/. This general is dead enough as is.

Have they mentionned if the orbital truckstops will be ready for 3.0?

>>186505048
Repair/Refuel stops already exist though?

>>186504917
>the NMSfag

There were many, many people posting NMS you paranoid twat. And even those not playing it were interested in it.

>>186505156
Yeah but I'm talking about the more complex ones they were showing off in ATVs.

File: xir.jpg (296KB, 683x1024px) Image search: [Google]

296KB, 683x1024px

>literally shilling for NMS of all things
>mfw

I know /vg/ is a containment board but still.

Fuck it. CIG is delaying and lying as usual and Ftroop is about to kill ED for good, might as well let the thread die for good this time. No sense dragging NMS into a dead thread as well.

>>186505172
>>>/ps4g/

i promise they're even more desperate for your attention there. you can even discuss overwatch and other meme indie games while you're there

>>186505287
>calling /vg/ a containment board
>unironically uses "shill"

the /v/ermin invasion is real

>>186505397
It is indeed, hence the faggots talking about NMS in here

>many-many-many-many-many of us and only two of you

Nmsnigger is losing it.

File: Asof72417.png (75KB, 1294x763px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 1294x763px

>>186504898
fucking this holy shit.
NMS is a terrible excuse for a game and no amount of shilling will change that.

>>186504027
>cant afford.
Pic related, I don't spend money on shitty games, I spend money on things I either know to be good, or hope eventually will be good. NMS is just shitty coattail rider space game #28265, its whole schtick is being a half assed substitute to play because SC doesn't exist to blow it out of the water yet.

>>186504809
I have other games, that are not shit, to kill time on, I have work to do in real life to consume my hours as well. I play rising storm a lot, It is a good game and was worth the $22.50 I spent on it.
I refused to ever buy E:D because of the shittery in these very threads in the early days by E:D shills. I refused to buy NMS back when it was first funded because It was an obviously bandwagon jumper, I refused to buy it at launched because It sucked and there was no game. I refuse to buy it now because it still sucks and will never reach the point of not sucking. SC will be out before NMS is anything but a shit tier second rate game. Theres a hundred other games just like it in various settings, it's a phone game in the PC game world.

>>186505172
There are many many people telling you to fuck off dude, theres like at least 4 telling you to fuck off right now. Everytime you bring this up you get told to fuck off. Get the message. This is not where NMS belongs, you are attempting to hijack a thread because your topic cannot sustain its own, you have even said that yourself.

If you want an NMS thread, go make it, keep it bumped, maybe people will show, maybe not, If there are so many of you wanting it, what stops you from doing that?

Please stop posting NMS. The thread will die today.

>>186505048
>The team finished all pre-polish and optimization work on the exterior truck-stop pieces and have moved on to finish the interior. They are currently working on the main hub, based off concepts from art direction, developing additional pieces to add more character to the truck-stop, and completing a first pass on the side shops and corridors. Platinum Bay landing services is having its own building set made, so it looks more distinctive; and an Admin office has been created so players have a location to drop off mission related packages. The team blocked out an observation room facing the landings pads, so players can watch ships take off and land from the interior of the station.

From the June monthly report. Considering how long they've been working on the surface outposts it's probably gonna be a while until the stations are done. I wouldn't expect it for 3.0, but then again, that won't be out until like October so maybe Chris will delay the patch by a few more weeks to get them in there.

>>186506361
Yes please. If you faggots think your shilling is keeping this alive you're delusional.

Gamescom in a week, that round of bullshit and hype-kikery will keep us going for a couple months at least.

As I've said before if the E:D dads and the NMS shills wanna go make a thread to diddle each other in thats fine, but this is not that thread. And to be perfectly honest I don't think the E:D crowd wants you either so you're probably s.o.l there too.

Maybe you should just fuck off back to /v/ where you belong. Make NMS threads there and let the "trolls" and console children bump them for you.

>>186506789
Don't even say such things.

>>186506971
calm the fuck down chris

File: high fidelity.jpg (2MB, 10000x10000px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 10000x10000px

>>186507104
It's too late now.

File: 1474513117292.jpg (12KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 480x360px

>>186506971
>being this butthurt over what happens on a taiwanese curry recipe exchange.

File: 1341568465132.jpg (38KB, 612x612px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 612x612px

>>186507353
>being this triggered by the sound of TOLD

File: spacejew.jpg (182KB, 1600x1067px) Image search: [Google]

182KB, 1600x1067px

>>186507575
kek
Or should I say Gek

File: 1465235288403.png (252KB, 500x455px) Image search: [Google]

252KB, 500x455px

>>186507631
>we want the old thread that died every other day.
Got it mate. Message received.

File: Ehullside.jpg (463KB, 2923x1181px) Image search: [Google]

463KB, 2923x1181px

>>186507353
>being annoyed that someone is trying to shit up the only place on the entire internet where its still possible to talk about SC with people who both support the game and are critical of the kikery surrounding it where no one has the ability to silence anyone else for wrongthink.
You're damned right. This place is valuable even in its current state, because there is nowhere else. I don't want to see it get further diluted to the point where its no longer a useful forum.
SC and E:D are compatible roommates in a two bedroom apartment, and you're a third guy who neither of us knows or likes, trying to barge in the front door and demanding to sleep on our couch use our shower and eat our food becasue were all from the same town and thus are pretty much brother anyway.

With the current size of the moons/planets I'd be satisfied with one or two solar system to be honest.

Make it with a decent numbers of celestial bodies with enough features, space stations, satellites and bases and the content density will be much better than 100 meme systems with one small landing zone a half a dozen satellites.

File: No Man's Sky_20160819151730.jpg (461KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

461KB, 1920x1080px

>>186508042
>not having 18 quintillion planets

>>186508040
>discussions are diluted in a dead thread.
Logic is sound. Better keep everyone out. Can't have discussion keeping a thread up. Better to have an archive of 50 post threads where half the posts are bumps.
>I'm scared that if people talk about another game, that might alter my preconceptions.
The world is a scary place isn't it?

It's really not that people don't want to discuss nms, it's WHY people don't want to discuss it that is funny to me.

>>186508040
>shit up
You keep saying this yet there wasn't any NMS shitposting of the sort in the old thread. They were pretty chill, actually.
Maybe you just have Aspergers?

File: 1469917062917.png (768KB, 1130x719px) Image search: [Google]

768KB, 1130x719px

>>186507575
lmao

"Other game's accomplishments detract from my game's accomplishments." - this thread

"Lol let's just jumble all vaguely related games together in one super general to ensure no coherent discussion will ever be possible!"

t. NMSfag

>>186509016
>super general
Wew feller. That statement lacks some self awareness don't you think?

>>186508713
More like ''Other shitty game tries to worm it's way in a general it has no business being in''

File: Hull C (2).webm (3MB, 800x450px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 800x450px

>>186508040
Compared to how they're doing it now, having the engines on the hull series attached by some flimsy metal bars looks pretty stupid.

>>186509016
It's a small genre; a "super general" is going to be no different from the occasional anon discussing X3 is this thread.
Calm down and quit typing like a /v/ermin.

let kill this retarded op desu
>no new info on 2.4 beta
>embed embed
>However these games are not the topic of this thread.

>>186508443
adding topics to a conversation shits up the conversation.
This conversation is about SC and E:D, its will be more complicated to talk about SC and E:D if we also have to sift out the posts of another game. This is already an occasional issue with just two games, conversation get derailed now and then because someone thought the current topic was the other game and responded accordingly. Three games would make this happen a lot more, and the extra information needed to prevent this would complicate posting. This is literal my /vg/ exists.

>>186508379
>I'm scared that if people talk about another game, that might alter my preconceptions.
"I want to shill my game in your thread"

>discussions are diluted in a dead thread.
>Logic is sound. Better keep everyone out. Can't have discussion keeping a thread up. Better to have an archive of 50 post threads where half the posts are bumps.
Better a dead thread with a concise topic than a live thread with no focus or rules.


And again, what stops you from making NMSG? why is it so important that you be attached to E:D/SC? It is because like a leech, you will die if not attached to something.

>>186509356
>It is because like a leech, you will die if not attached to something.

Oh boy. I'm having /tg/ vs. quests flashbacks.

>>186509356
>nmsg can't survive on its own
same for edg/scg and the three games have a lot in common but you can keep pretending otherwise

>>186509356
>complaining about a dead genre being crowded
>calls other people "shills" for a 30 man company with a tarnished reputation
This has always been the bastard child of /spacegen/ and your blatant newness will not change that.
>>186509346
agreed

File: 1480384592863.jpg (58KB, 234x327px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 234x327px

>>186509346
I don't play E:D at all, if you want E:D updates make the new threads and add them, I have no idea what is going on in E:D land.

>embed.
Mabe next time I'll remember to fix it, maybe I won't if you make the new thread when this one limits or dies, You're free to fix it yourself. General was past bump limit so I just threw a new Op together.

The is the 75th post. There have been 50 NMS related posts.
The OP is inaccurate. This is a NMS thread.

>>186509632
both of you faggots spammed duplicate threads now i can't do shit

>>186509735
Calm down and let go, Plax.

>>186509663
You left out the part where 75 percent of NMS posts are autistic screeching about a game being discussed. Detractors are talking about the game more than the people who like it.

Let's merge with EVE Online general instead.

>>186509820
>15 unique ids
>majority are detractor(s)
Loud minority confirmed

>>186509820
Small minded people will hang themselves if you give them enough rope. A little bait and they made this the /nmsg/ by volume. The people playing the game didn't have to do shit.

>>186509924
>comparing 3rd person mmorpg to no man's sky a first person space sim

>>186509735
I did not "spam a duplicate thread"
The thread was over I checked if a new general was being made and it wasn't, so I made one.
Sit on and rotate you salty faggot. And while you're spinning reflect on the fact that the world does not exist to fulfill your desires. No one here wants to talk about that shitty game and we sure as hell don't want to sanction your shilling it.

>>186509663
Posts telling you to fuck yourself do not count.
Posts talking about NMS directly are off topic.
The conversation is happening becasue you are forcing it to happen because you are the sort of faggot who takes lack of resistance as approval, so if you suggest a thing and no one shouts it down you assume approval and start posting your shill posts.

>>186510091
>i was just pretending.
>btw I am so enlightened and euphoric that I rused you.

File: tmp_16986-images(5)2082165901.jpg (9KB, 259x194px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 259x194px

>>186510316
>>186510482
>this much butt blastedness
What do you think is going to happen anons? Two games is clear discussion, but three games becomes an undecipherable mess?
comethefuckon.jpg

>>186510578
Just stop replying to the autist and somebody make a new thread that isn't shitpost b8

>>186510578
Every topic added reduces the coherence of conversation
There are reasons to not include it.
There are no reasons to include it.
Nothing is gained, but there is a cost.

So we don't do it. Just because you want a thing doesn't mean you get it. You are throwing a tantrum and refuse to accept rejection and drop the idea. You are forcing a running argument because you think if you argue long enough the other side will tire of the conflict and give you what you want.
That is some childish bullshit anon.

>>186498704
Can't we fuck off star citizen as well? It's a glorified tech demo with barely any gameplay and won't be out for at least another 5 years.

>>186510935
>throwing a tantrum

might want to look at your own behavior before calling others childish, bro.

I'm honestly surprised people even have faith left in Star Citizen anymore.

>>186511162
I've got faith that it'll be done. Eventually. At this point, it's too big to fail.

Whether or not it'll look anything like what's being promised, to say nothing of what's being theory crafted, ehhhhhh.

>>186510935
>Every topic added reduces the coherence of conversation
Until there is no conversation because this thread is about 2 dead games.
>There are reasons to not include it.
Poorfags are poor and hate that other people are having fun. It's ok to be broke. Happens to all of us.
>There are no reasons to include it.
Except that the thread is not self sustaining, and won't be for quite some time.
>Nothing is gained, but there is a cost.
Something is gained though. We have a thread. Which is more than SC or ED could ever expect even in the same thread together.

Don't play the game, idgaf. But don't act like SC and ED are good enough to sustain a thread, because the last 2 months disagree with you.

File: 1441989556959.png (77KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 500x500px

>>186511345
>At this point, it's too big to fail

Anon...

>>186511081
If E:Dg wants to make their own thread thats totally fine.

>>186511162
The question isn't whether it will be completed, they certainly hired enough talent to do so. I do wonder if the community is burned out by the time it releases though and the "oh, it's the game that took X years while selling digital spaceships" reputation might prevent people from buying it then.

I heard SC had a cult-like following but jesus christ.
inb4 E:D is suddenly "problematic"

>>186511496
As in, there's too much invested in them to say "Well, we fucked up and can't deliver. Star Citizen is canceled forever"

>>186511795
Because that's totally never happened with a crowd-funded game before. Elite has proven that deadlines can easily be made. Even Sean fucking Murray fixed his game.
>too much invested
And that's what I'm worried about. All it takes is one filing for bankruptcy for everything SC related died. Maybe Chris will at least pull a Tim Schafer and give the source code before telling everybody to fuck off.

>>186512024
It wouldn't surprise me if amazon gave them whatever funding they needed in exchange for the engine modifications they developed, considering that it's pretty much *the* lumberyard game.

>>186511489
Yes you're right this thread is about two(2) dead games. Not three.
>The totally ungrounded -literally not an arguement- statement implying that we don't want NMS included because we don't have it.
>thread isn't self sustaining.
It keeps rising from the grave, and coherence is more important than 100% uptime.

>something is gained.
For you and you alone, you get to ride a general that is more capable of sustaining itself than NMS. You get a thread that you want without doing the things that must be done to keep a thread alive. You get to bandwagon on someone else's momentum, limited as it is. Hey would you look at that, just like the game you're shilling. Meanwhile the long running 2 game general has to bear the cost of your gain while gaining nothing. NMS is not going to improve the thread. It will make it worse than it is now.

Your gain, our loss. This is a voluntary union, you have no right to demand inclusion and your inclusion costs us and benefits only you.

>>186512265
>I speak for the entirety of the thread

Keep telling yourself that, faggot.
>hey guys I found a planet
>REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

Literaly make your own general NMSfag, why you care so much about /scg/?

O B S E S S E D

>>186512265
>coherence is more important than 100% uptime.
sure it is pal. A coherent dead thread is better than a actual thread with posts in it.
>>186512396
Because we are all SC backers and want a convenient thread you turbofaggot. Same reason SC was included in the ED thread to begin with. We have been talking about NMS for 5 days now and you lot just started up today. Fuck off newfag.

>>186511692
I am simply defending what exists and works well. I don't like E:D, I do think that at some undefined point in the future the generals will split again. What I will always oppose it the constant demands to add more games to the general just because someone here has gotten into some other vaguely space flavor vidya. The merge between SCG and EDG was mutually beneficial and minimally controversial, even though there is a long history of trolling and shitposting between the generals.

The same is not the case here, this is one or maybe two people demanding that the game they are playing currently be included on the sole grounds that they want to talk about(shill) it in this thread. NMS has nothing to do with SC or E:D its as a much a survival game as anything else, has more in common with subnautica. It's not about defending or culting SC its about keeping the /vg/ thread a /vg/ thread, Meaning a thread with a narrow focus on a specific topic and not letting it slide into /v/ tier incoherence.

>>186512618
>Because we are all SC backers
>SC was included in the ED thread
You're just pulling retarded statements out of your arsehole.

>>186512727
>I am simply defending what exists and works well.
That is cognitive dissonance, anon. This thread dies constantly without being bumped and the only real discussion we have had in months is about NMS.
This general is dying. If it is going to die, then fine. Don't shit on the people trying to keep it going since none of the games here is good enough to survive on their own.

File: 321321321321.jpg (56KB, 460x215px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 460x215px

IT'S UP!

>>186512618
>we
you.
>convenient
for you. Inconvenient for everyone else.
>sc was included in E:D
SC and E:D Merged. Sometimes E:D is ded and SCG keeps it going, sometimes E:D leads becasue theres nothing to talk about in SC. It flows back and forth. Neither game carries the other, for the time being neither games general survives the night without the other.

Being an SC backer does not entitle you to include whatever it is that you want to discuss this week that isn't SC in the SC thread.
Make your own thread. Why is that so unreasonable to you? Why are you unwilling to make your own thread? Why do you think you have the right to force what you want on to what other people have made?

>>186513113
>Explore the vast emptiness of space.
LOL

>>186513075
Well the purpose of the general is to have a quality discussion not just for a general to exist at any cost. Crywolfing won't change anything, if there's nothing to discuss or no one to participate in the discussion then the general is not needed.

That's what you furfaggots are not able to get.

>>186513245
It's actually not about exploration at all but about kikery.

>>186513212
>>186513437
Where have you faggots been for the past five days we have been discussing NMS? Why is this a problem now? Do you not participate in the thread daily?

>>186513592
Wow why not make your own general then if it's so popular?

>>186513719
I've been here every day. You're the new guy.

>>186513808
Proofs.

>>186513592
iirc dads had sudden realization that nms is going to replace e;d in no time and now are going full DEFCON

@186514026
kek plax you're so desperate

>>186513867
>>186036025
Been talking about it for the better part of a week now. You should check in on the thread every couple days and try to keep up.

>>186514127
>check the thread
>same two shills shilling it while everyone else tells them to fuck off
>nobody actually discusses the game
Hilarious.

>>186514126
wrong bogeyman dad im jared

>>186513592
we've been waiting for you to fuck off with your off topic shit. When you had the nerve to demand you be added to the OP without even going to the effort of making it yourself, I made the new Op with you specifically excluded.

I have been here all along. Been through weeks and weeks of you trying to shill NMS into the general. Been here for years of people trying to shill other games in too. Over and over you or others like you have demanded that we include your interest in our thread which does no include it on the sole grounds that you want it. That is not grounds for inclusion. When are you going to get the message. Your princess is in another castle Mario. This is neither NMS general nor "Generic Space Games general" no "Surival Games in a Sci-Fi setting that sorta includes space ships general".

This is the Dual Game Elite:Dangerous/Star Citizen general. That's it. Other games belong in other threads and are offtopic.

>>186514317
>shills

you need to go back

>>186514362
oops forgot my nametag

File: 1486252551630.png (303KB, 871x626px) Image search: [Google]

303KB, 871x626px

>>186514412
>I was here the whole time too. I just didn't say anything because I was waiting for you to leave.
This gets better every time.

I seriously hope they start from scratch with the 300 series rework.

The scale is wrong, the silhouette is boring, the boxed-wing is a nice idea but poorly integrated into the design.

>>186498704
>>186499290
>>186502883
God bless. Fuck the retards that were shitting on me yesterday for essentially saying the same thing.
>>186506971
Are you really gonna act like ED doesn't belong here when it's been a part of this general for so long? >>186508040 gets it right.

anyone that plays eve here?

File: 350r_flight_visual.jpg (160KB, 2000x667px) Image search: [Google]

160KB, 2000x667px

>>186515124
To be honest I hope they dont change the shape much, I like it. It could either get smaller, use its space more efficiently and fit more into a "BMW/Astin Martin-flashy sports car" niche or get bigger More roomy, with more amenities to fill the "Mercedes/Rolls-Royce-Luxury car" niche, but I do agree that the scale is off. Its too large and bulky, with too much internal spaces to be taken seriously as a performance hull and too small and cramped to be a real luxury hull.

I own a 350r so this actually rather important to me. If the 300 rework is very good I might keep it, but If not it's getting CCU'd.
TFW I got my 350R+LTI Lightspeed package for $40 from a friend who lost patience after spending $135 and just wanted to cash out

File: Screenshot_3.png (290KB, 695x881px) Image search: [Google]

290KB, 695x881px

>>186515718
Well, it's probably gonna end up looking like the 85x and 600. I hope you like white.

>>186515443
Hilariously, >>186506971 and >>186508040
are both me. I'm not agitating for E:D to leave, as Ive said, at some point, when SC is a game and E:D is very dead, I imagine the generals will split. I'm not pressing for that I'm saying I assume thats what will happen eventually.

What I was getting at is that IF the E:D people here want to split from SC and Pair off with NMS instead they are of course free to do so. No one is bound to keep the dual thread together, we do it because it is mutually beneficial and agreeable. Like I also said I don't think the E:D people want anything to do with NMS shill than I do.

There was some discussion either last thread or the one before of an E:D/MNSg, which seemed to have some interest, significantly more interest than adding a third game to this general. I was simply saying that I did not object to that idea, as there is nothing more than mutual agreement binding SCG and EDG and such agreement can be disolved as easily as they were made.

>>186509184
I dislike the hanging thruster pod design, yeah it looks like a stray shot can cripple a ship but mostly because I like the idea an engine room where thrusters can be maintained and repaired while in flight. Without going EVA.

>>186515615
>>186483459

>>186516053
Hate the 85x passionately, so I'm not holding out much hope for the 300 rework, I'm just gonna hold onto it until I see enough to know if want or do not want.

The CCU to a Freelancer DUR is $0, my very first pledge was a lancer but that lancer is a StarG now and I'm kinda inclined to get a lancer back.

File: 1376678623432.png (475KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]

475KB, 900x900px

>>186513113
This shit is literally a crossbreed between Pioneer and Litcube's Universe, so far so good.

>>186516406
The 85x looks like a toy. Way too bulbous. I really hope they find a way to make ships with more aggressive silhouette with that visual style.

My original package came with the 300i, but I ended up upgrading it to a Herald. I'm not the brightest man around.

>>186516192
I gotcha, that sounds a lot more reasonable.

File: 1492786648679.jpg (462KB, 2975x1675px) Image search: [Google]

462KB, 2975x1675px

>>186509184
>>186516338
I like the whole "engines on gimbaled gantries" look and the maneuverability that might have offered. But I'm not so attached to it that I'd trade my bulk freighter away.

I do mourn the loss of "MISC = Articulated engines" being replace by bi-directional Xi-an Ayylmao engines. How ever this is all at least somewhat compensated for by the fact the the hull series are now going to be gigantic *hundreds of meters long* perfectly formed phallus ships now when folded. I will at least once and probably more than once. Use my Cock-E to ram-trigger sjws and others who would be disturbed by such things. Maybe I can paint it fleshtone, with an angry red nose and name it two shades darker.
The new engine pod looks kinda like a nutsack on a real cold day.

File: 1499194045571.jpg (122KB, 790x575px) Image search: [Google]

122KB, 790x575px

>a Chris Robber (incomplete) game
>pre-alfa game is released in 2021 and CIG cease to exist
>13 years in the future modders will actually finish it

Best damn space game ever! Dreams, Dreams happen NOW!

is elite: dangerous easy to play with mouse & keyboard or do i need a flight stick for it?

File: 1488951271593.png (578KB, 788x739px) Image search: [Google]

578KB, 788x739px

>>186518620

File: Harold.jpg (73KB, 1126x692px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 1126x692px

>>186516886
Harold is better than a 300i for sure man. It will have a specialized role to fill and will be one of only a couple options in the role. The 300i is a generalist with the Capabilities of a cheap ship but the cost of a more expensive one. The Avenger Titan and Aurora LN both shit on it in terms of everything but speed and flash.

IMO the only 300s worth having are:
The 315P as a long range, jump capable, low profile runabout or long range scout.
The 350R for Gotta go fast value or bling.

The 300i is just totally outclassed at its price point and the 325a is a BMW with missile launchers strapped to it. the SC equivalent of a "Bond Car" but without all the cool gadgetry.

Meanwhile Harold, as I've said before Is basically Sam Fisher's personal NEET camper. "Data Runner" is a nebulous term without clear definition, but with all those sensor arrays and computers and data management tools, combined with bed and other amenities means it will make a top tier ELINT platform, useful for spying, infiltration and other cloak and dagger type stuff. Not "electronic warfare" in the jamming and spoofing sense, but information warfare in the hacking, eavesdropping and data theft sense. RIP asymetry though, I traded mine in when they made it all lumpy. I only own ships I like, aesthetically and in terms of role, actual stats and minmaxing are less important to me.

>>186518241
Now we wait and see if darkie shart starts getting "leaked info" again.

File: 1481098064945.png (807KB, 1280x729px) Image search: [Google]

807KB, 1280x729px

>>186518807
NEETvan is great, but I wouldn't get one with actual cash money, considering how little we know about its intended gameplay and functionality outside of marketing blurbs written by Ben.

Is there any chance of E:D getting an offline mode once it's ran it's course and they move on to their next game? Really don't know if I want to pay 60 shekels for a game that's going to become literally unplayable once it's done it's run.
>muh solo mode
fuck off, it's still connected to the servers

>>186518715

KB&M is 100% fine

KB&M + pedals is actually the most effective control scheme imo

File: ckL1M.jpg (75KB, 800x450px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 800x450px

>>186518807
>>186519026
I'd like it more if it's main thing was "giant engine with cockpit attached, oh and it has a few other things that can be connected". Really do not like hacking minigames.

>>186519303
So trade it for a Cutblack, its only like $15, and the cutlass is gonna go up in price soonish, gaining you a little more trade value on top. It'll have the same internal aesthetics as the Cat and Herald, but a more generalist focus.

DESU the (post rework)Cutlass Black is the Best deal in the game right now.

>>186518620
No. Once the funding stops CR will start laying people off, realize he'll never be able to finish it, and either take publisher money (along with their harsh deadlines) to get it out the door or give up, sell the IP, and commit seppuku to return honor to his name.

File: caterpillar labels 1.png (357KB, 906x586px) Image search: [Google]

357KB, 906x586px

>tfw they removed the funny warning labels the Caterpillar had in PTU

>>186520238
>once the funding stops.
funny meme.
If CIG is still drawing and selling Jpegs in ten years, people will still be buying. Sure some people will cut bait and go home, but I think more and in particular more affluent(whales) will fall for the sunk cost fallacy and keep paying.

>>186519208
E:D is like WoW, it'll only be enjoyable in its early years

>>186519208
MMOs cant do offline worlds, because huge amounts of behind the scenes number crunching is done server side. You're client is a tiny part of a much larger program and your PC simply doesnt have the juice to run the server. I don't know what kind of hardware the E:D servers are mounted on but I promise you it's multiple powerful purpose built servers with triple digit ram and multiple CPUs per machine.

>>186521682
Piss off, Chris.

>>186522450
If anyone that would be sandi and ben not chris. They're the ones behind the mass scale kikery and hype marketing shit.

File: 1480597808268.png (1021KB, 981x1286px) Image search: [Google]

1021KB, 981x1286px

>>186522119
They can, but obviously you'll not be calculating the entire world. Only a bubble around your ship. That's how a lot of multiplayers focus game are done.
This is a side product from server already unloading calculation anywhere a player isn't.

File: eJwNxUEOhCAMAMC_8ACKtFDwNwQJmqgQqCfj33fnMq96xqlWtYv0uQJsx8xtbHpKG6kWXVurZ0n9mDq3C5JIyvtVbplg2fngmf8Zi94QgY24cPSOPQUkEyPCQoEdonORDelV_X9AMH9IpU.zvellimTx5sD19JM8t5ezdks_qA.png (62KB, 486x332px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 486x332px

>>186518807
They better not let you open that shit while flying in atmosphere.

>>186524174
they might as well.

given the amount of technomagic excuses (mostly relying on "but dude, thrusters lmao") they use I don't see why aerodynamics would suddenly start mattering.

File: 1480963670342.jpg (753KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

753KB, 1920x1080px

>>186524619
I play too much ksp to not expect it to rip off because i forget to retract something.

File: ScreenShot0398.jpg (411KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

411KB, 1920x1080px

>>186524174
It's ok, those things are sturdy.
Yes, you can actually open them in the hangar and they lift up the ship.

File: 1489939505611.jpg (257KB, 1920x1076px) Image search: [Google]

257KB, 1920x1076px

>>186524174
>>186524619
>>186525029
Aerodynamics in Atmo are mitigated by your shields. The same way we can have lumpy ass ships dropping into atmo at high velocity without burning up, be can have scanner arrays deployed in atmo without being torn off. I image if you go too fast with them deployed they'll take damage, the same way the hull has a max safe in atmo speed, based on atmo density, hull aerodynamics and shield strength. Which is why many combat ships are spaceplanes, so they can fly faster in atmo and engage it trans atmospheric combat at high velocities without burning up as soon as they lose shields.

I still wanna know how they're gonna handle ejection in atmo.
No word whatsoever on like, parachutes, grav chutes, inertial anchors or anything like that.

>>186524807
this picture is shooped right?

>>186525981
What makes you say that?

>>186526232
Chris looks slightly smaller than he is supposed to be. I thought he was taller. Almost missed it.

>>186525981
yes its shopped, ben isn't hodor(though he does seem to be trying), look at the scale of the couch and vs the chair, they're two items from the same set of furniture. Also you can see particularly on the legs of the chair where its been cropped and enlarged.

File: podracing.webm (3MB, 710x400px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 710x400px

SO whats the "big reveal" gonna be at gamescom besides the third sale of 3.0?

They claimed to have something new, very big in a physical sense to show off, so maybe some cap ship we haven't seen yet? I may be setting myself up for dissappointment but in all this time theres gotta be something actually new they're holding on to, because if its just another recut of stuff we first saw more than a year ago and still can't play with its gonna be a shitstorm, and they've gotta know that at this point. A blind man could see the boil over that is happening in the community. Even reddit is posting lots of negative comments, but more telling is that those comments are getting voted and the more blatent cult posts are getting pushed down.

Optimistic me says its first look at a new UEE cap, like a cruiser or something. Pessimistic me says its a completed truck stop or a shubin mining station. Realistic me says its a closer look at either the Mauler Cruiser or Kingship.
Could also be the Orion.

Also why does ATV not have cool shit like WEBM related lately. wtf. Every time they put something like that in an ATV it was a big shot of confidence on the level of Citcon and Gamsecom hype.

File: cargo.png (66KB, 1596x525px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 1596x525px

Some info.

>>186528115
The "big reveal" line was just some random ship artist on his personal facebook.

>>186528115
>big reveal
Whatever it is, it will never live up to the hype they are trying to generate over this.
Titan suit, <insert KS ship>, a new system, SQ42 in a year. There is literally nothing CIG could do that would be worth getting excited over. Vanduul ships are still in grey box, 3.0 is months away, how could CIG have anything worthwhile to show?

>>186528115
>more than a year ago
don't you mean exactly a year ago?

Friendly reminder that anything even remotely appealing that Fdev hypes at gamescom will be not actually happen. All will be "rebalanced" the day they get back in the office.

>>186529586
Hopefully Sandro will be in a terrible accident where he is not harmed in any way, but it makes him question what he has done with his life so he leaves for tibet to be a monk and takes half the dev team with him.

https://robertsspaceindustries.com/schedule-report
Most of the features they still haven't finished won't be done until Sept. They still have features planned they haven't even started on.

File: 10322627_794591390686609_7260339667645753961_n.jpg (55KB, 720x719px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 720x719px

>>186530570
>ETA is TBD

>>186530808
What do you expect? There will nothing significant done until after gamescon, if even then. All hands have to be on deck at this point to get the demo for gamescon out on time.
We know how busy they are, they showed us last year. The only problem is everyone is getting the demo out instead of 3.0.
They fixed less than 5 bugs since they filmed AtV days ago. This shit is going nowhere fast.

So, I liked more the viper mk III than the diamondback scout for bounty hunting. Should I trade the dbs for a viper mk iv?

>>186531706
If you have the money go to the vulture. You can carry two class 3 hardpoints.

>>186531821
I'm planning to get the vulture after that, I just don't know if it's worth trading the dbs for a viper mk iv right now. I think I have about 3 mil selling the dbs and all mods.

>>186532035
I'd get the mk iv and get out of the diamondback

>>186532035
Give up 2 utility slots for the same ship with more cargo?
Yeah, do it.

File: AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA.jpg (50KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 250x250px

>Continuing to fix and polish bugs, but we are also working to implement an extra few missions that we did not previously think we could accomplish for 3.0.0.

File: chris on the way to the bank.gif (219KB, 630x480px) Image search: [Google]

219KB, 630x480px

>>186533303
>he already got yo money.

>>186532440
Hardly the same ship. The V4 is much tougher but has crap maneuverability in comparison.

>reading this thread

Jesus fuck what a storm of autism

>>186537243
+Rep

>Fixed an issue where exiting Star Marine and joining a Crusader instance would cause the character to spawn as a ball.

Ok now that would be a good Bugsmasher episode.

File: 170818_Production_Schedule_Update.jpg (169KB, 1342x387px) Image search: [Google]

169KB, 1342x387px

Heh, this shit is gonna end up being late December and even THEN it'll be buggy as shit and run at 6 FPS even if you manage to play 'offline'.

>>186541249
I love their y-axis on that graph

File: ETA is TBD.png (3KB, 124x29px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 124x29px

>>186530808
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

>>186516886
>>186516406

Game needs a single seat disposable small craft with quantum drive capabilities.
Thats certainly not it.

>>186541486

>a cheap one

Forgot key word.

>>186541486
>>186541609
The real question is, could it punch above its weight?

>>186516406

Eves dead m8. Its averaging around 20k players and plex is off the roof.

>>186518620

3 to 4 years tops.

>and it shall be so

Whats the ship closest to a sniper in ED? Basically I want to attack from the longest range possible and not give a crap about maneuverability, even though some straight line speed would be good to run away.

>>186541736

Ofc not. A miserable s1 mount at best, or nothing at all.

Actually it would be better be nothing at all with a max size 2 shield and decent speed. LIke I said, it should be disposable so that, for example, some fag finds a ship somewhere that he can take, goes on that small craft, leaves it behind and takes the other with him (stuff like that).

>>186542006

>disposable intra system shuttle

Thats the term. Btw where the fuck is the so fabled titan armor? The fuck is that in the first place, some mech?

File: Feel2.png (2KB, 225x225px) Image search: [Google]

2KB, 225x225px

>>186533303
Y dey do diz??
More cuntent = more shit = more shitty bugs.

File: rubs hands.png (15KB, 1591x103px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 1591x103px

OY VEYYYY

>>186528115
basic 3.0 gameplay that is magically at 60fps+ with 2-3 players pretending it's not a super controlled server running on 99999999gb of ram and quad SLi'd 1080tis on an industrial 6mhz processor with 999999 SMT cores

it'll be fake as hell thats all i know. and i have pretty close to the rig mentioned above

>>186541953
Courier with three long range modded railguns.

>>186542592
Buy now!

>>186542592
If that's the 600i, they must be making it fucking huge. Most were expecting anywhere from between a Freelancer and Connie to a bit bigger than a Connie.

File: HmPepe.png (2KB, 37x36px) Image search: [Google]

2KB, 37x36px

>>186542592
400/435 bux for a spess shep with 2 variants.
I'd be surprised if that's gonna be the 600 jump as I imagine they would charge 600 bux for that like they're chargin' 890 bux for the 890 jump.
So if not the 600 jump... da faq could it be??

>>186543202
Will the inflation of prices, it's hard to guess size from price now. Have to wait and see.

No disrespect to SC backers, but I believe it's something of an open secret that with the exception of (((CRoberts))) and his immediate associates, the (((employees))) of (((RSI))) are paid actors and the stills/videos of the game and its development are in fact lightly-doctored stock assets.

Furthermore, even a novice forensic accountant could tell you that given what is publicly known regarding (((RSI's finances))), it's fairly obvious that the SC campaign is being used as a vehicle to launder money that was misappropriated in the aftermath of the 2015 Bulgarian gas crisis.

Note that (((Roberts'))) involvement with the (((Bulgarians))) dates back to the early 2000s and that Roberts acknowledged as early as 2003, during a sworn deposition, that "(((he))) didn't run this (((establishment))), but that (((he had))) an understanding with the (((people))) who did," in this case, (((Bulgarian))) organized crime.

I think the facts speak for themselves.

>>186542592
...that's the ''big reveal'', right? Another overpriced jpeg.

I was bracing myself for disappointment but I guess it won't be enough.

>>186544302
I guess that explains the exceptional reaction to NMS posts.

>>186543947
You think you're joking, but there was that one time where Derek Smart claimed CIG was a money laundering scheme connected to "a gangster named Fat Steve" in the Swedish mafia.

File: 40 unfinished keks.jpg (48KB, 600x528px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 600x528px

>>186544654

>>186544654
fahk ovv plaxinov

>>186544853
Hi /v/-kun. Have you played any space vidya today?

>>186544951
No, but I know the soft spot now. It's like you secretly like it but don't want to let on so I'll keep going. I got u senpai.

>>186545113
Thanks, friend. What's your favorite soft spot in space games?

The problem with 3.0 is that it's effectively the release of Star Citizen. 3.0 is the minimum viable product, though it didn't had to be. Everything that comes after will come in small content patches. One year and a half in the making and man did they hype this up.

The pressure must be immense on CIG, they absolutely cannot fuck up this one. I'm sure it'll be fun, but I don't expect for content to come pouring in after 3.0 releases. I don't think we'll ever breach 20/25 players and 30fps either.

>>186545248
Right now the trio of the Has Been, the Never Was, and the Never Gonna Be are keeping me entertained until Rockstar makes a actually fun game set in space.

Say what you will about no man's sky but it launched with planetary landings and space legs

>>186545808
true

>>186545713
>Post GTA-5 Rockstar

Anon...

>>186545808
Careful, anon. I'm not sure you're ready for the screeching coming down the pipe for saying something nice about NMS.
>>186545916
Screw you hippie, that's not any crazier than anything else around here. Rockstar at least has the money to make a AAA game without KS or needing an army of forum dads to create it. Not that they ever would, but holy shit if they did.

File: PS_Messages_20170811_195846.jpg (570KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

570KB, 1920x1080px

God damn, Wolf Rayet Stars are scenic as fuck. Are there any ones near Colonia?

File: Rockstar.jpg (182KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

182KB, 1920x1080px

>>186546183
RDR2 and Bully 2 are going to have these and you damn well know it.

>>186505572
>can hop in ship and fly down to a planet and land
>can do missions both in space and on any planet
>can build bases on any planet
>can do trading if i really wanted
>has space combat and can upgrade my ship without spending more shekels and even buy a freighter if I wanted

Meanwhile in SC you can stare at some jpegs and kill people in a couple of empty areas with some asteroids and space textures so calm down on the autism.

NMS is a chill game and should be added to the pastebin if it hasn't already.

>>186546584
What do you think UEC is, dumfuk? CIG is going to sell UEC for money the exact same way RS is once ship sales are stopped. Where do you think they got the idea?

>>186546794
They already are selling it, just with a daily and account max atm.

>>186546760
I agree completely and have been playing the shit out of NMS as of recent, but you''re going to get screamed at and called a shill by certain individuals. Wait till later tonight when they get tired and go to bed. Until then let's continue with Chris Robert's anal rape of currency.

>>186546794
>once ship sales are stopped,
They'll never stop selling ships. They said they would at the beginning, but they're no way the (((vp of marketing))) will end a money-making gig this lucrative.

I'm 100% sure they'll carry on with the concept sales, and maybe even the anniversary sales.

>>186546760
There isn't anyone flipping the fuck out. Must be some burger dad that only gets on at work. Most everyone is chill except some mega whales on east coast day shift.

File: 1496574861851.jpg (76KB, 553x553px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 553x553px

>>186546794
>once ship sales are stopped

>>186547175
Nah, they will have to as soon as UEC comes online and aUEC is gone for good. The whole reason to sell currency and nothing else is to peg the minimum value of in game currency so the game economy doesn't hyperinflate. Everything in this game is a money sink to take it all back.

>>186547178
You need to read the start of this thread, dude. It was a shitstorm right from the flamebait title.

NMS doesn't belong here.

Make /nmsg/ if you want to discuss it so badly.

>>186547345
>What are UEC used for?

>Imperials can be used to purchase items that are available in the game. For the initial launch of the Hangar Module this includes a modest selection of hangar decorations, posters, weapons, and the Greycat Personal Transport Vehicle.

I'm going to buy ten posters of Chris.

>>186547395
Look at what time the thread opened. US east coast burger office time. That's why it went to shit right away instead of the previous 5 days of chill.

File: BarCitizen2017.jpg (85KB, 1024x576px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 1024x576px

>>186547556
Too little too late, man.
>>186547517
Us burgers are known for our sharp shitposting senses.
Also, the dude on the right seriously needs to start lifting.

>>186547240
>>186547532
What is going to change is CIG is going to lift the restrictions on buying UEC once it is in use. You will be able to buy as much UEC as you want, so selling the ships directly won't be needed.

>>186547395
Yea I saw. It's pretty sad, and from the looks of it it's mainly the people that have thousands of dollars worth of "concept ships".

This general was open to pretty much any space game hence the pastebin. Calm down and fly some fucking spaceships.

Go on Social Club and start adding Shark Cards to your cart and see if Rockstar puts a limit on it. You could spend $20k on GTA if the credit card clears.
Explain why CIG will still sell ships directly?

File: SoaSERebellion-1.jpg (88KB, 1280x719px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 1280x719px

>>186548051
I agree. Let's post some ship porn.
You think they're mad about NMS making more progress than SC? For free?

>>186548268

I only plaayed SC very briefly, but they are very different games.

Nms is essentially a mining game. Cant find any better description.

>>186548425
>Nms is essentially a mining game
Idk, I'm doing Atlas missions and I keep getting warp cells at each point, so I only had to stop once in 8 jumps or so.
It takes more time to name the planets.

>>186548425
You can buy most shit at space stations now. I only land on planets for missions and potential upgrades.
>You have learned the Korvax word for "cocksucker"

>>186518807

That ship essentially steals other peoples bookmarks. Thats it. No fancy shit ewar, no NEET caravan who occasionally pew pews, no nothing.

And that sucks because even after stealing said locations, even if you arrive before the target you cant take shit with you because "no cargo roflmao", so it is really a shit ship.

File: sins1.jpg (101KB, 600x250px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 600x250px

>>186548268
Phallic ships are especially sexy.
Speaking of which, to those who have played sins, what would you guess the crew number of a titan is?

>>186548595
>>186548818

Find a system with varied basic resources, build a base, get an exocraft, profit and buy better ships. Thats it.

All this while mining tones of minerals for the effect.

>>186548989

I meant only for >>186548595

>>186548989
That's not very accurate, but to each his own. You should at least give it a pirate with 1.32.
>buying ships
lol no
Transmission Towers are programmed to always lead to a better ship assuming they don't send you to a useless fucking crashed freighter instead.

File: No Man's Sky_20160818153737.jpg (346KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

346KB, 1920x1080px

Asymmetrical ships in e:d and SC

NEVER EVER

>>186548989
The missions seem to be string themselves together so I'll probably keep going since I have enough for the next Atlas station at least, and if the next quest point is just another station, I can probably make that too.

>>186549301

You get more of a challenge facing star rated pirates or bounties at the start of the game. The only combat tactic is watching for your weapon overheat, shield and stick to the ships tail. Theres still a lot to be done in terms of combat though.

Im not trashing the game. I had some fun, but holy fucking shit, that grind! It can drive you nuts.

>>186549396
>What is Drake Caterpillar?
Dumbass

>>186542592
>600i is 400 bucks
D R O P P E D

>>186549396
I've got like two fucking asymmetrical ships in my entire playthrough.
>>186549536
I agree completely with the combat. Although I think you can get different weapons than those shitty photon lasers. Right now the game desperately needs a patch for the fucking local mapping system

>>186549441

Nothing of the sort. Make sure you have a good system with at least a barren planet rich in plutonium and thamium (these usually have no athmosphere). The system should have at least 5 planets including one or two moons. Either yellow or red star.

Start the base right away.

>>186549562
>What is Drake Caterpillar?
A shit.

>>186549784
15 dudes with rail guns in the cargo hold and you open the side doors and they all shoot broadside, and that doesn't make you erect?
I don't know who you would shoot at with the whole server on one ship, but it would still be cool.

>>186549754
I literally just passed a system with 5 planets and one airless. Guess I'll go back.

File: sp2KqjY.gif (509KB, 1000x268px) Image search: [Google]

509KB, 1000x268px

>>186498704

>>186547778
>that squadron 42 shirt

I've seen this large, pony-tailed man before.

>>186550117

Assuming you are on survival, as long as it has plutonium you are fine.

>>186550001
>implying any of us on here have 15 friends

>>186549396
Asymmetry would make it harder to fit through the letter box.

>>186550589
I'm an idea guy, guy.
I leave logistics up to other people.

>>186550589

Thats actually the most important criticism regarding this game. It seems to favor multicrew a lot! Thats a bad approach.

>>186550707

Everyone is an "ideas guy". Everyone wants to be the pilot. Everyone wants to be the FC. Everyone is right and everyone wants to do whatever they wishe instead of following orders.

And thats why capital ship fags and specialist ship owners are fucked.

Are SC and NMS the only games out there where I can make a comfy and mobile space-house? I don't really care for the star trek experience, but rather the cowboy bebop experience. I want to live in my ship.

>>186551072
SC will have beds and some ships are set up for living in. I don't know how would that work in NMS.

>>186551072
KOTOR(1/2), Mass Effects, and SW:TOR

File: NMSFreighterInterior.png (3MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1920x1080px

>>186551221
It's already in Freighters. Of course you have to buy it in order to get to the building part of the ship.
I'll see if I can find a list of the shit you can build.

>>186550861
>capital ship
I just don't how viable that's going to be. They are either ships o the main in space and blow each other apart point blank, or they are Star Wars set dressing and one blows up randomly as the story progresses, but otherwise don't do anything.

>>186551293
Can't fly the ship directly in any of those. Don't we all wish we could though.

>>186551427
Just wish the Freighters weren't filled with aliens.

>>186551293
>Mass Effects
I only briefly played the first when it came out. Doesn't the ship aspect get dumbed down with each entry? Or is that just a /v/ myth?

File: MISC-Mining-Vehicle-PIECE-3.jpg (994KB, 4015x2000px) Image search: [Google]

994KB, 4015x2000px

Why does it have a spoiler?

I have it from a good source. New ship will be 300 to 335 bucks. 2 Variants.

>>186551765
Downforce, duh. Why does anything have a spoiler?

>>186551765
>>186552096
It has two spoilers, both top and bottom, so aerodynamic forces cancel out.

>>186552304
It's a spaceship. It has to fly upside down, so it would need spoilers on both sides.

>>186552304
This really activates my avacados.

File: No Man's Sky_20160819152607.jpg (359KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

359KB, 1920x1080px

There is literally no reason no man's sky shouldn't be posted here

>>186552590
Shut up, faggot.
You'll summon him.

>>186552590
I don't mind it considering it has more content and variation than both SC and E:D combined.

The fuck is a sabre raven?

File: imageproxy.jpg (265KB, 1172x488px) Image search: [Google]

265KB, 1172x488px

>>186553262
Probably a better Sabre. Its name was seen in some video a while ago.

>>186553262
Its a stealth sabre.

>>186553369

But wasnt the sabre supposed to be stealthy in the first place? lol

File: Screenshot_3.png (191KB, 1605x487px) Image search: [Google]

191KB, 1605x487px

Imagine doing the ICC mission 1600 times

>>186553924
I cleared 100k aUEC once. I laughed at myself. I cried a little. Up until now I sure as fuck never told anyone. I don't really feel as bad by comparison.

>>186553505
Its a stealthier sabre.

>>186553369
Literally just a sabre with more black textures.

>>186554527
The new ultra-hexagon super dark matter armor plating brah. Matte black brah. STEALTH BRAH.

File: 1490067202991.gif (2MB, 450x450px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 450x450px

>>186554606
>ultra-hexagon
It has to STOP!

Zane causes delays

>>186555385
Zane looks gay

File: 1496588325049.png (307KB, 596x574px) Image search: [Google]

307KB, 596x574px

>2.0 came out 616 days ago

>>186557854
Think about how long we would have been playing 3.0 for now if they had not made all those demos, including the ones for next week.

>>186560095
I'd really like to know how much the sudden appearance of the procedural planet tech has pushed back both SC and Squadron.

>>186560507
Which part? The bespoke wreck or the sand worm or the landing zone that has been totally renovated by now?
How about the sand people on the dragonflys? All the work that made that happen did nothing to move the game forward. They would have been better off making a tech demo for backers than an on rail show that we have seen for 2 years, and still can't play.

File: NAnhf42.jpg (249KB, 1539x732px) Image search: [Google]

249KB, 1539x732px

>>186554810

It will be so by attachment. Prepare your anus then.

>if only the lancer max had decent missile payload
>using oversized thruster to make up for heavy armor
>wont happen, fuck this gay hearth!

>>186561030

Nvm. The thrusters responsible for agility are set apart. It would be a brick.

>cutlass blue has less cargo than the black
>lancer max has less cargo than the base
>lancer dur has less cargo than the base

Why cant I carry all these lemons with a good ship?

>>186561317

>*I meant lancer MIS instead of max

>>186560507
>calling it Squadron
t. CIG employee.
Thanks for jerking us around over the ship sales. You at least had the self awareness to remove the dates before going into the show so you didn't have to hold a release window over for a sale for the third time.

>>186561317
The Connie is the same way. Base model Taurus is highest cargo.

>>186561582

What sort of fool will fly that solo?

>>186561797
Milk runs in high sec.

>>186561903

Yeah but thats the Taurus. The other one is armed for lowsec but not so useful solo.

>the luxury one is fucking retarded

>>186562162

I know it! Luxury ships are places where chinese virtual currency sellers meet with their potential clients. Its brilliant!

>>186562162
I can't help but think that only NEET tier gamers are going to get the most out of working together on a ship. You can't get randos to do basic shit in any game, how are they going to get a ship functioning when the crew combined has effectively a 50 iq?

File: F42 vape.jpg (123KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

123KB, 1920x1080px

>>186528115
PVP capship battle above a jungle planet which evolves into a ground battle where the two teams of humans band together to fight off Vanduul AI who jumped into the system on a kingship screencap this

>>186530726
>Physiology effect of prolonged exposure to multiple gravitational zones on human musculature
>for idiots!

That's a mighty thick book for idiots.

>>186541486
It would be silly, you need to feel like some technology can't be miniaturized.
Me I just wish you could carry more snub fighter over a fighter pad.
You just know what I have in mind
6 Merlins in an Idris

>>186528115

It is a glorious Vanduul ship that nobody can buy! Capital size.

File: 1476295798695.jpg (374KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

374KB, 1920x1080px

>>186550740
>Thats actually the most important criticism regarding this game. It seems to favor multicrew a lot! Thats a bad approach.

No, no, that's only if you believe the dad admiral who think you'll need 5 players of your family to crew a Starfarer. The game is built to include 90% NPC, it include npc-crew, Christ ranted about having social interaction with them.
The multicrew feature grow out of a way to bring friends into the same spaceship and keep them busy.

Just so you know: they said you'll need npc to have a player teleport in your ship taking his place.
I wouldn't be surprised if NPC became a commodity for orgs-play. A continuous money sink for the ability to respawn into any ship +cannon fodder (hell, they intend us to carry food for crews, complete match)

Well it took me 2 fucking hours but I've unlocked Broo Pew Pew and ground him up to Grade 5 with a Type 6's pulse lazer.
Efficient beams here I come.

>>186561317
>Nvm. The thrusters responsible for agility are set apart. It would be a brick.
You are wrong, that's the best placement for them. It should be agile

File: NMS 2017-08-15 22-06-30-61.jpg (294KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

294KB, 1920x1080px

/scg/ is just bitter that NMS was considered dead on arrival abandon-ware, yet has still gotten more content updates in the last six months than SC has.

Enjoy your overpriced origin ship/money grab sabre variant/unnecessary land rover or what ever other concept sale they do for gamescom instead of releasing 3.0.

>>186568517
Baiting people is just going to turn us into /fog/. Let "them" sperg out and don't given them their (You)s.

>>186561317
At least the MIS and DUR use that space for things you'd actually want. Most Cutlass Blue owners would rather rip the useless cells out of their ship if they could.

And CIG is still being quiet about the how much of the cutlass' "modularity" actually survived the remake until after they increase the prices on all the variants even though they'd have to know by now

>>186561797
No snub ship, hardly any missiles, weaker shields, and only one forward facing turret with pathetic fire power.

What's the point of adding additional crew to that?

File: starforge.jpg (26KB, 460x215px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 460x215px

Reminder that this will remain the eternal emperor of the genre. Just name another space game with a helicopter.

>>186569095
didn't this get removed from steam because of how many negative reviews it got

File: 1497939742731.gif (163KB, 360x655px) Image search: [Google]

163KB, 360x655px

>>186525981
It could be, or not.
>>186568149
This picture better not be real

>>186568517
Basically this

>Let's spend 90% of our time and resources redesigning and reconfiguring existing content and adding meme modules like an in game FPS.

Scam Shitizen in a nutshell.

>>186570089
Nah, that's just /scg/ propaganda. Literally never happened.

>>186570608
I remember checking this and it was "overwhelmingly negative".

I think I got it super cheap somewhere a long time ago, and then it just disappeared from the steam store.

>>186571240
Actually, they made so much money that they said "fuck it" and made it free. Based as fuck and actually gives a shit about the people who helped them rise to fame.
http://www.starforge.com/
Check it out; it's DRM-Free!

>playan ED
>decide to become a suicidal faggot and explore
>grind out bounties to fit a cobra mk3 for exploration
>embark upon a wondrous journey through the stars whereupon i find out how the fuck to actually explore 3/4s the way through tonights session
>fly back to sol to sell my data
>22m credits
im rich, reddit

>Find Coprite
>Get excited and mine the fuck out of it
>Read description
>It's literal animal shit

t-thanks sean

>>186572360
If you really need to early game farm, just farm emeril and gold.

If your ship has a laser beam you can shoot at resource deposits to farm it faster without getting out of your ship, just bring plenty of fuel.

I got about 200k worth of gold in about 5-10 minutes using my ship.

>>186571950

exploring is comfy but eventually the jump sequences really start getting annoying

also why did iClippers go out of style, the thing still rapes dadpythons like theres no tomorrow

>>186572360
>>186572558
Just wait till you get a base, the farmer you hire will genetically engineer you some plants that literally fruits animal shit.
Also its supper important for mid-game farming as a component in crafting lube, the most valuable commodity you can farm per hour. I have a set up that produces almost 3,000,000 units every 20 or 30 minuets; I explore a solar system, teleport back to base craft 4 living glass and sell it in the next system.

>>186572831
Would you reccomend getting a ground base ASAP or wait until I get a mobile freighter base?

>>186572992
If you goal is getting money, which you will need to get a freighter, I would say ground base first. If you set up shop on a frozen or irradiated world you will be able to grow frostwort or gamma root out side respectively which is a savings. Also you need to go through the "story" quest for each of the base NPCs to unlock the crafting recipes you will need to build stuff for your freighter.

>>186573719
Alright. Last question. Can I make my freighter feel like home? Like, what kind of stuff can I build that isn't plants?

>>186572810
Everyone who had the dadbux bought one when they were available without rep requirements, back in 2015 I think. Makes sense that people got bored of them and upgraded to Cutters.

File: Untitled.png (3MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1920x1080px

>>186574142
I don't have a freighter yet, I am waiting to find a cool model. That said I do know that there is the lower docking bay, the forward bridge area and then there is an section aft of the bridge where you get to do your custom building. So the building is designated to one area. As for making it homely there are a lot of krimskrams that you unlock in base building; beds, chairs, desks, banners, boxes, consoles lights, etc. For reference you can use a lot of those props you see in alien outposts. Pic related is my money printer.

>waltz onto frontier forums because why the fuck not
>content suggestions
>dads want cockpit bobbleheads and space car wash

jesus christ I sometimes forget how bad the ED community is

worst of all devs actually listen to these assholes

>>186572810
im just doing road to riches and just jumping to systems stuffed with slightly less HMC/Water/EL planets than dicks your mom takes each night, after getting my bullshit together and figuring out how to make exploring work right i knocked out only 10 systems, however each one was almost entirely valuable planets and scanning the full system would take almost 20 minutes

Do the crashed freighters in NMS do anything?

All of the ones I've find have been mostly in the ground with no way to access anything. Can usually only fix one washing machine.