/hsg/ - Hearthstone General

First for /hsg/ is always wrong

C L E V E R
L
E
V
E
R

T R I C K S
R
I
C
K
S

>>171771959
Reminder that if you cant complete a quest by turn 3 then it is useless because pirate warriors will have already beaten you

>>171771959
those fucking hands man

Since reno is rotating out, I want good old handlock to come back. Got any lists that people are playing now? Obviously there needs to be some real good heals for it to be at all viable.

>>171772064
but you're on /hsg/, so wouldn't that make your statement wrong?

>hearthstone now allows the defending player to choose how the attackers trade

does the game improve?

>>171772141
klandri had a cool list in the EU tournament

>>171772212
>try to attack
>get roped because your opponent is afk
fun :)

File: josh_peck.png (31KB, 400x422px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 400x422px

>>171772187

File: 1472511377964.jpg (7KB, 227x222px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 227x222px

Quest: Play 5 beasts
Reward: Beasts in your hand and deck cost (2) less.

Hunter or Druid?

File: 1385070250670.jpg (45KB, 558x418px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 558x418px

>>171772272
BATTLE
OF
WITS
AND
CHARACTER

File: Well Played.jpg (78KB, 600x495px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 600x495px

Hey guys, just wanted to promote the Great Big /hsg/ Poll again.

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSe__c154SgKNS51hFYq33EAspQcGiUxPOq5QBM-R6QmHfNP5w/viewform?usp=sf_link

We've been doing this for like a year now and had 250 responses last time, so please take some time out of your day and give me your hearthstone secrets.

This is a pretty long form, so strap in.

>>171772212
No. The only thing the game has going for it is that you can actually play it relatively quickly.

I wouldn't mind some sort of mechanic that allowed this to happen without any interruption though. Maybe something board positioning related.

File: long as fuck game.jpg (398KB, 1024x1536px) Image search: [Google]

398KB, 1024x1536px

Ready for the Rogue quest

>>171772337
>beasts lose the arbitrary cost attached to their tag
That's a pretty exciting reward. Definitely druid since they're the beast class.

>>171772337
Druid, except I don't think that will be the reward.

All of the rewards have been 5 mana valuemachines, and
>beasts costs (2) less
Is too tempo-y and not good value

>>171772363
>that first question
Yeah no wonder so few people did it

Mage quest:
Random 10 Randoms
Reward:
Random a Random Random Randomly

>>171772468
>Brann
>Brann
>Brann
no Brann

>>171772215
Where would I find that?

>>171772468

>T1 quest
>T2 swashburglar + whatever + shadowstep swashburglar
>Swashburglar gadgetzan ferryman swashburglar
>If you have shadowstep or another bounce you complete the quest right there and then, otherwise you complete it as soon as you draw your 2nd swashy

New rogue quest is lowkey insane.
You're gonna have the tools to generate fucktons of value while every single cheap card you leave on the board is a 5/5

File: 400px-Moroes_full.jpg (25KB, 400x474px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 400x474px

>reminder that disenchanting adventure card is the most retarded shit and you deserve it for being such a fucking retard

>>171772594
>so few
>250
wut

File: quest.jpg (114KB, 264x920px) Image search: [Google]

114KB, 264x920px

With this list, which is 100% suboptimal, I tried to get quest condition. In 5 games it was fullfilled on t7, t6, t7, t5, t3. In every attempt I didn't mulligan or play first card pretending it is quest. Also wasn't really losing on board because of clever tricks(preparation).

>>171772762
THE REWARD COSTS 5 MANA

File: ranks.jpg (46KB, 604x520px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 604x520px

>>171772594
Why? It's not like there's more than 1 option.

>>171772850
Prep

>>171772650
You forgot (randoms chosen randomly)

File: 33180.png (198KB, 286x395px) Image search: [Google]

198KB, 286x395px

>>171772762
I don't think it's insane but it make decks with this card less of a meme

File: 1300044776986.jpg (34KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 600x600px

>>171772896
>TGT higher than MSoG and ONiK

File: IMG_0580.png (192KB, 286x395px) Image search: [Google]

192KB, 286x395px

Might he see play with the new rogue quest?
I'm imagining some sort of token rogue.

It'll be shit of course [\spoiler]

>>171772792
i'm sick of yellow aggro control

>>171773114
He is only good after you get reward out, why bother with him if you can just play cheap charge creatures and draw?

>>171773114

>Fill deck with cheap minions, card generators and token generators
>Top it out with prep sprint for ultra fast hand reloading, its not even a slow turn because all your minions are so cheap
>Using thistle tea, mimic pod, shadowcaster etc. To further stretch your deck out

>Shadowcaster is a 5 mana 5/5, Battlecry: Add a 1 mana 5/5 copy of targrt minion to your hand

>>171773114
Itll be shit because Moroes costs 3 mana, how are you supposed to play that when pirate decks already have you beat by then?

>>171773114
Moroes in that deck is a meme idea. Rather have deathrattles or card draws or just lower cost stuff.

>>171773581
I'm thinking the deck will be battlecry because of bounce synergy

File: sendhelp.png (21KB, 483x486px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 483x486px

>>171772896
Wew lad mine is exactly the same

>>171772363
thank god this question caps there

>>171773628
it will be aggroshit that replays their swashbucklers and charge minions

>>171773628
Novice engineer meta

>>171773101
9/11, the Holocaust, and ebola are higher than MSoG and ONiK

>>171773680
literally

File: Hearthstone Screenshot 03-22-17 07.46.16.png (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1080px

This card is a perfect hunter legendary.
Why can't Blizzard just copy it?

Is the April 6 release date real or is it mid april?

>>171772767
It doesn't sinergiez with the rogue quest. It's play, nut summon you dumass bitch

>>171773668
What the fuck.

Okay so when I did this the first time I capped the question at 100$+ and it got like 80% of votes.

Then I did it the second time and capped the question at 150$+ and it STILL got a shitload of votes.

I really like that rogue pod card Tbh

>>171773764
That shit busted, holy hell.

>>171773891
Change the brackets significantly retard.

<50
<100
<150
<200
<400
<1000
<2500

File: 1482200878137.jpg (23KB, 600x238px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 600x238px

>>171773891
I am almost at $400 desu
please send help

>>171773889
It synergizes with the rogue quest reward dipshit. 3 mana 5/5 that summons a 5/5 at the end of your turn is actually decent.

>>171773889

Its synergy with the reward

Moroes becomes a 3 mana 5/5 with stealth, summon a 5/5 every turn

>>171774031
It would win or lose the game, depending on the opponent hand.

>>171774101
That feels so broad

>>171774309
is the difference between 110 and 140 really meaningful enough to warrant its own bracket?

>>171774031
This just means that all of your opponents cards are free next turn, so you pretty much die most of the time

well, like i said, i woke up and saw a shitty brawl, and more shitty cards

>>171771959

Who else /skilledatHearthstone/ here?

Criteria:

>Legend cardback (don't wanna hear any pathetic shit about legend being exactly the same as rank 5, just takes longer)
>12 win Arena key
>Easy rank 5 or lower every season

>>171774419
Fair point

>>171774523
check
check and
check

should add the criterion to have placed at least top 4 in a tournament desu

File: Tea Party.jpg (192KB, 823x770px) Image search: [Google]

192KB, 823x770px

Reminder that your IQ decreases by one point for each post you make in /hsg/ and 2 points for each post you read.

>>171774628
>puts desu at the end of a sentence
I may not be a Legend player or a rank 5 grinder, but damn, at least I'm not retarded.

>>171774523
any retard can do those things really

>>171774796

Have you done them? Less than 1% of active players will have such a resume.

>>171774523
Who /netdeck/ here?

Criteria:

>Legend cardback (don't wanna hear any pathetic shit about legend being exactly the same as rank 5, just takes longer)
>Easy rank 5 or lower every season

>>171774774
Good thing I don't need IQ to be good at hearthstone

>>171774628
This
t. Reaver

>>171774880
yes

>>171774887

You see netdecks from rank 18 to rank legend you retarded faggot. Go netdeck something "op" like renolock right now and pilot it to legend. You won't be able to.

Most people can't even play aggro to rank 5; most accounts never touch rank 5.

>>171774523
i dont even play enough games to get to rank 5 anymore. just make shitty decks to get through quests fast and go on to play actual good games

>>171774880
Holy shit people are bad at this game.

>Rogue quest

Heres the deal, its unplayable with current set. Either Team5 has printed cards that put shadowstep into shame or the card will see no play. Its simple as that

>>171774784
it's because of gookmoot's niggerspeak wordfilters desu senpai

>>171775085
no one is bad at this game. it's the easiest game in the world. the only thing hindering most people is that they barely care about this game

>>171774523
>>Easy rank 5 or lower every season
why lower to not legend every season just to fit yourself in the bracket, very dissonant of you considering your previous statement

>>171775198
>I've never got legend because I don't care about it

Then why are you posting here?

so regarding the rogue quest:
>skip turn 1 playing the quest
>turns 234 play cheap minions, if they get killed before 4 exact clones, restart quest progress
>skip turn 5 activating quest
>turn 6, play a 5/5

in what universe is this efficient?

>>171775198

Totally untrue. There's absolutely decision making in HS and you see that in the people who consistently get to rank 100-1 legend and cruise with 65-70% winrates.

You're actually retarded, lol. If you find yourself unable to detect when someone is making bad plays (which means they're bad at the game) that means you're absolutely terrible, LOL.

>>171775281
elementary school argument.
kill yourself

>>171774784
>being unironically THIS fucking new

Wait there is people that havent gotten to leyend at least once?
On 2014+3? Year of our lord
Lmaoing at you tbqh

>>171775382
>Revealing what I said being true so hard

>>171774523
>>171774628
>>171774796
So how do you get gud at this game?

>>171775223

Getting legend every season is a massive time investment unless you're a seriously top tier player who can go through ranks 5-legend with a 65% winrate. I said "skilled" at Hearthstone, not professional.

Unless you make your living streaming/playing Hearthstone I think you'd be clinically retarded to actively go for legend every single season unless you were so good you could do it in relatively few games.

But you're right, someone who can get that winrate through the gold ranks is a seriously good player, and much better than me. I can admit that because I recognize that there's significant skill impact in HS and don't rage about "netdeckers" and "being unlucky" (statistically it is IMPOSSIBLE to have worse luck, on average, than anyone else in the world).

>>171775463
don't want to grind a meta deck, everybody who did it told me it's an awful experience and not worth it

>>171775293
The fabled control meta.

In all honesty though, Rogue can make up for skipping turn 1 tempo, and shadowstep swashburglar with Patches and such could work.

>>171775556
use the same decks everyone else does and mulligan for early game

>>171774628
should at least not have been hopelessly retarded, and a waste of life.... "desu"

>>171775619
Already do that and it gets me stuck at rank 10 so far.

>>171775619

This'll get you to about rank 16 or so.

>>171775563
the first time i got legend was worth it.

>>171772363
wew did it
Just by curiosity around how many people have filled it?

>>171775574
In order to play swashburglar 4 times, you'll need to draw both of them and have both shadowsteps
that's 4 specific cards to have in the early hand
that's very unlikely to get it

File: retard-superman.jpg (26KB, 552x416px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 552x416px

>>171775684
alright bud let's hear about how much skill this game takes

>>171774628
a bit fag desu

>>171775398
I know, he tried to say t b h or some shit. It still makes him a retard if he talks like that, even on a Vietnamese canvas board.

>>171775556
the same way you git gud at anything in life. learn as much as you can about it and practice.

>>171775561
so you admit you're not skilled? top 10 every season is professional level, not just about getting legend

>>171775860
disclaimer: getting "gud" at hearthstone is probably one of the worst ways to spend your time

>>171775681

Okay well to actually answer your question.

Being relatively good at a card game means a bit of understanding of the overall matchups and decks relevant in any given meta. You should know from the muligan phase what you're (probably) playing against, and how likely you are to win the game. If you're playing control vs control then you need to be in value mode; if you're playing control vs aggro you need to be in "how do I best stay alive until I stabilize mode".

At any given moment in the game your path to victory can drastically alter. You need to often make plays that are technically inferior to others, but which offer the greatest path to victory. If you're playing pirate warrior and you can make a decent value trade with your last card leading you to a 0% win situation, or you can throw the last card at face and go for a 5% topdeck lethal situation you need to choose the latter route.

Anyway I would pick a deck you like playing that's either T1 or T2 and watch top players who also play the same deck. When I wanted to improve I would sometimes pause during crucial moments and decide what route I would take, and then see how frequently it lined up with the pro/streamer.

>>171775556
play good decks, and not just popular bad decks (like jade druid is popular but very mediocre) and play a lot

File: out fucking skilled.jpg (313KB, 4685x2457px) Image search: [Google]

313KB, 4685x2457px

>turn 3 Barns brings out Cairne

>>171774523
Got legend cardback
Got 11 wins a few times. Not buying packs this expansion and instead focusing on arena so hoping for 12 wins soon.
Rank 5 only for the free epic. Don't bother trying anymore.

>>171775742
GB/hsg/P 1 - 115 People
GB/hsg/P 2 - 249 People
GB/hsg/P 3 - 22 People

>>171776085
just potion of madness it

>>171775913

Are you unable to read or something? I've got legend twice and I'm absolutely confident that I could get legend in any given season if I chose to make a significant time investment. I'm not willing to make such an investment for literally no reward whatsoever so I tend to play until the rank 5 chest and call it there.

Top 10 every season is professional
Legend is skilled

But you don't need to hit legend every single time to maintain your "skill", that's ridiculous; however, if you're consistently unable to make rank 5 while playing quite a bit, that says something about your overall game plan and decision making imo.

>>171775556
Heres the thing, Hearthstone doesnt require ANY skill.

You can bot Shaman to legend if you wish, thats how you gitgud. You play a good deck and have a ton of time to climb

Anyone want to let me watch them win a game for a pack?
Add me please, Hawkeye#1743

>>171774975
>seriously thinking hearthstone is hard to play
Wow.

>>171776297
>/hsg/
>winning
you're looking in the wrong place

File: 1459894348238.png (378KB, 554x618px) Image search: [Google]

378KB, 554x618px

croped it for u since ur 2 dum

Okay I did the big bad poll. Where can I see the results?

>>171776016
>If you're playing pirate warrior and you can make a decent value trade with your last card leading you to a 0% win situation, or you can throw the last card at face and go for a 5% topdeck lethal situation you need to choose the latter route.
This is a great example since I've played Pirate Warrior extensively, thanks.

>Anyway I would pick a deck you like playing that's either T1 or T2 and watch top players who also play the same deck.
Very much appreciate specific advice like that.

File: IMG_1234.jpg (84KB, 524x463px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 524x463px

>it's a one and done brawl paying agaist an AI episode

>>171776230
>>171776309

It requires skill, and it's hard to play well.

None of you idiots have ever hit legend with a 70% win rate; none of you have ever gotten top 10 legend; none of you have ever placed well in a tournament, and none of you ever will.

Neither have I. Cause it's really hard. But hey why don't you guys go win the next blizzcon and a big poker world event while you're at it; card games require no skill!

When is the rotation/hall of fame move?

>>171776297
na or eu

>>171772767
why would I want moroes or malchezaar

>>171776297
added on antarctica server

>>171776492
>hit legend
>top 10 legend
These are different things brah.

>>171776492
investing this much time in hearthstone is one of the most useless things you can do as well as unpleasant

>>171776531
>>171776297
Sorry, NA.

>>171776527
Mid April, around 15th or 17th, something like that.

how can you guys have literally no friends
jesus

>>171776437

Right, people think aggro is just incredibly easy to play, and in some situations it's true as you'll draw your only conceivable plays in a very obvious manner. In other situations it's difficult to tell when you should be value trading to keep stuff on the board or yoloing face entirely and hoping to draw into enough damage to finish it.

Watch top players do pirate warrior; I'm not a very good face/pure aggro player (I trade too much), and I'm often surprised/caught off guard by the plays.

It's a good mental exercise to ask on each turn "what do I lose to the hardest, and should I play around it", or "from this position, what can I possibly draw to win?".

>>171776663
Why would I want to be friends with people who play Hearthstone?

>>171776663
>add people after they pull of some rng bullshit that wins them the game
>get free gold everytime they want to do the challenge a friend quest

Sidenote; I really hate that there isn't some kind of in match chat. Fuck blizzard.

File: defwang.jpg (427KB, 1530x939px) Image search: [Google]

427KB, 1530x939px

ez win

>>171776708
>bnet only has hearthstone
not that blizzard games are good anymore. i know the feeling. but anyone who doesnt have bnet friends must be brand new to blizzard games. feel kinda bad for you guys, they used to be good

>>171776404
I actually really appreciate that thank you.

>>171776663
Why should anyone?

File: Paleomurloc.png (346KB, 400x543px) Image search: [Google]

346KB, 400x543px

I work at Blizzard and I'm revealing this card to you, /hsg/, so you better appreciate that.

>>171776906
so you can get gold from the quests................?

>>171776227
>Legend is skilled
No it isn't getting top ranks and winning tournaments is skilled legend is full of shitters

>>171776591

I totally agree, and I would never do it myself. But people in HSG are trying to argue that skill isn't a factor and they're completely and utterly wrong.

I'm not sure why people are so opposed to the notion of skill on 4chan and overall. I play chess competitively and every day I hear people who haven't ever played a tournament match say things like "chess requires no thinking, it's all memorization". I'm always completely flabbergasted that someone can be so dense; it's like people are personally offended by the idea that someone could practice and develop a skill which they themselves lack, so they feel the need to reduce the level of competence required to a degree which they can say "lol it's easy I just don't feel like doing it".

Trust me, even the most banal competitive arena has tryhards and if you ever want to be truly good at something, even something as admittedly stupid as Hearthstone, be prepared to work harder than all of them (so about 10 hours a day for your entire life).

Or, hey, you can just fallback on your own reluctance to acknowledge people's abilities and talent. Check out the Wikipedia article on the Dunning Kruger effect while you're at it.

>>171776492
>70% WR

Not even blizzcon attendees attain that high of an winrate

Are you fucking retarded? They all say its a cointoss

>>171777140
yeah 70% was back when decks like handlock and patron existed and the game took skill

>>171777140
hes obviously speaking out of his ass, its not even the only thing wrong in that paragraph. if you didnt see whats wrong with that whole shmeal, youre as dumb as he is

>>171777058

Our definition of skilled varies by degree I guess. Less than 1% of active players touch legend, so in my mind being better than 99% of the active field is enough to qualify you as "skilled".

I agree it's the absolute tip of the iceberg as far as skill/depth of knowledge is concerned, but if you're in the top 1% of something I think you're pretty good.

>>171776881
>bnet only has hearthstone
I assumed you meant in reference to play a friend or spectate a friend quests.

>not that blizzard games are good anymore
Tell me about it, my bnet friends have all been offline for months. Some for a year and these are people I meet every day, not "internet friends."

>>171777257
Because 99% of the playerbase barely has enough gold to craft shitty decks and don't spend 200+ $ to get every card

>>171777207
>>171777226

70% from Rank 5-Legend should be doable by extremely good players.

I see a lot of 65-72% winrate decks/accounts (with proof) posted to the competitive hearthstone subreddit.

I'm not suggesting a 70% winrate at blizzcon, if that's how you read it. I'm referring to a 70% winrate from rank 5 - legend.

Legend is full of shitters because most people don't tryhard for top 200, once they grind to legend each month they just fuck around and play meme decks. Only high legend is real competitive, in fact I'd wager to say rank 5 to 1 is harder than dumpster Legend.

honestly nothing more embarrassing than people who think the hearthstone ladder is a serious competitive environment to test your skill at anything

>>171777391

You need a single T1-T2 deck to hit legend. If you've been playing casually for about a year you should have the dust to craft a top meta deck and have a level playing field with everyone else.

>>171777484

Rank 4-1 maybe. Rank 5 is full of people fucking about too now.

>>171777463
What is proof?

>>171777257
that woud be impressive if ranks represented a bell curve. it doesn't, it looks like a fucking cliff. most accounts are rank 20+ because laddering is a waste of time when you could be playing actual competitive and fun games

>>171777091
I feel like you have been thinking about this you much. Which is why you completely sperged out.

>>171777754
Youre an idiot. A game like RNGstone doesn't require skill or thought. You get to legend by slaming your head against the wall enough times. The fundemental design of the game is for casuals to play while they are taking a shit and pull what they need off of Discover.

>>171777952
You need a positive winrate to reach legend.

>>171777893

Decktracker stats.

>>171778098
You can't edit those?

File: 1473270995650.png (618KB, 646x661px) Image search: [Google]

618KB, 646x661px

>>171776990
Thank you nice Blizzman. This is nice card.

>>171778028
*tips patches

>>171777952

No, you're actually a moron. Hearthstone requires both skill and thought. This is easily demonstrated and objectively proven by the fluctuating winrates and consistency of play achieved by top tier players. You will never have a 70% winrate to legend, yet some can do this consistently. You will never place top 50 10 seasons in a row, yet some do. This is sill, knowledge, understanding, etc.

>You get to legend by slaming your head against the wall enough times.

If you have a 50% win rate you will hit legend if you play 1400 games in a month. Assuming the average game length is about 10 minutes you will need to play for 7.8 hours each and every day (with no breaks or weekends) to hit bottom legend.

Okay so it's doable, but nobody actually does that. In general you need about a 55% winrate to reach legend in a feasible time span and even that takes more than 2 hours of laddering each and every day.

>>171776990
Pretty sure I've seen this before, but I don't believe it's real. Seems too balanced for a Shaman card.

File: 636257753262050483.png (337KB, 400x543px) Image search: [Google]

337KB, 400x543px

Hydrologist is cute

>>171778509
Why does it have a clown nose?

>>171773764
>At 1 health
>Could play some minion to gain health
>cant because I die

>>171778196

You probably can. What's your point here? You think it's impossible to have a 60-70% winrate so everyone who claims to have such (even those who stream their entire run to legend and can prove it that way) MUST be lying.

I mean.. okay.. if that's how you feel better about your own winrate, I guess.

70% winrate is possible, and the vast majority of people sit around 48-52%; this winrate variance is decided ENTIRELY by skill; which, according to you retards, doesn't exist in this game.

>>171778609
It's called tumblr nose.

>>171778609
It's a tumblr nose and it's what drawings look like these days.

File: MurlocRaneman.jpg (51KB, 550x710px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 550x710px

>>171778650
>>171778691
Are murlocs even supposed to have noses?

>>171778626
A 100% winrate is possible, just not very likely. At rank <5 you aren't playing against drooling noobs. The lower you go, you are playing strictly against people with positive winrates themselves.

>>171778691
>>171778650
>tumblr nose
Discolored noses existed since before Tumblr. I know it's a meme, but come on.

It's an artistic choice to make it "cuter"

>>171778826
No but the team5 art department redesigned them to better appeal to tumblr

File: hqdefault.jpg (19KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 480x360px

>>171778826
They do have noses.

>>171778472

And by the way:

a 49% winrate means 11.7 hours of nonstop ladder grinding each day for the entire season.

a 48% winrate means 21 hours of nonstop ladder grinding each day for the entire season.

a 47% winrate means 47 hours of nonstop ladder grinding each day for the entire season.

Skill isn't really that big of an impact because of the powerlevel between cards, the difference of playing a flame juggler on 2 vs a totem golem is huge, a decision where no skill is involved

>>171778826
Hydrologist is obviously a halfbreed, probably from Elise fucking some murloc

dude fuck renounce

lmao three cenarius on curve so WACKY and RANDUMB XDDDD WHAT COULD I GET XDDD

>>171778847

Yes... hence skill in Hearthstone.

And a 100% winrate is not possible consistently because of RNG variance and matchup spread. 70% winrate is on the upper end of what can be achieved consistently by professional players at these ranks.

>>171778990
>I am mad that I lost to a deck who lose 25% of the time

I bet you also hate Evolve Shaman?

>>171778921
Looks like a nostril not a nose

>>171778990
>Playing renouncezoolock in tournament
>Replaces my hand with circle of healings

Can't make this shit up

>>171778626
The difference between 60% and 70% is pretty significant.

Lifecoach touched on this. Back before all the hard decks got removed from the game top players got 70% consistently at high legend. Now it's like 62%. The game still takes some skill but the difference between Lifecoach and a dumpster legend ranker(such as myself) is getting smaller and smaller because Blizzard is removing everything that doesn't play on curve from the game

>>171778990
Why are you so mad? They probably lose games 80% of the time playing a Renounce deck and you get mad the one time someone actually wins with it.

>>171777091
the people who want me to acknowledge their skill and put down my own skill are retards who grind shaman to legend every season and think this means they're top-tier or w/e but couldn't build a competent deck to save their life because they don't understand the game. they're the shitters in this thread who thought counterfeit coin was a bad card when it was revealed

File: a5cd5b826b65395571c990228240c08e.png (1MB, 913x1216px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 913x1216px

>>171779134
Pretty much the same thing.

File: thanks doc.jpg (207KB, 800x1122px) Image search: [Google]

207KB, 800x1122px

Do you guys like Murlocs?

File: Disdain for Plebs Barron Trump.jpg (26KB, 393x462px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 393x462px

>>171774523
>>171774887
>tfw have 12 arena key (and don't even play much arena at all) but no legend or consistent rank 5 because I'm not a netdecker and I don't play enough of this shitty game to get that far

>>171779120
it is quite fun to lose to a deck that is the equivalent of throwing your cards to the wind and praying some of them land up

>>171777091
>I hear people who haven't ever played a tournament match say things like "chess requires no thinking, it's all memorization
chess is a solved game don't be mad that people point that out

>>171779354
Better than playing against a deck with a 55% winrate again and again. I like random.

>decide to try Jade rogue
>three games in a row
>both raptors in hand before turn 3
>no jade swarmer until I've drawn two thirds of my deck

so much fun

>>171779354
I bet your definition of fun includes someone just conceding at the start of the game.

>>171779170
I found the time in the vod because I'm bored
http://www.twitch
.tv/axolotlhooves/v/130304013?sr=a&t=1919s

>>171779494
my definition of fun includes both players playing decks they know how to pilot

not one just going "LMAO DUDE WHY ARE YOU TAKING THIS SERIOUSLY ITS JUST RANDOM LOL"

do bright lights fascinate you

File: 488px-Bluegill_Warrior_full.png (284KB, 488x400px) Image search: [Google]

284KB, 488x400px

>is called bluegill warrior
>gills are yellow

>>171779750
no they aren't

>>171779750
so you dont know what gills are

what the fuck is this brawl
what the fuck do i play

>>171779750
they're white if anything retard

File: 1462971614884.jpg (80KB, 838x720px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 838x720px

>>171779750

>>171779806
>>171779859
murlocs have exterior gills like axolotls, the blue spots are just spots

>>171779947
astral druid

>>171779638
I can see why someone would be unhappy with how much of a coinflip the game is, but you made it sound like you're more mad at losing rather than the fact it was random.

Honestly the card shouldn't exist, but it does. Some people enjoy playing it despite the fact that it backfires most of the time so when it does work you should just laugh it off and instead you get mad like it's somehow unfair that they don't lose 100% of the time.

>>171779947
literally anyting, just hit it till it gets to 30. Shit brawl

File: goldfish.jpg (169KB, 849x939px) Image search: [Google]

169KB, 849x939px

who kripp here?

File: hydro.png (223KB, 453x656px) Image search: [Google]

223KB, 453x656px

>>171778509
agreed

>>171780318
That warlock card isn't real, right?
also
>watching Kripp
kys

Woah. They updated the board. What's this party thing anyhow? The Brawl is all about a party, but how is Un'Goro?

>>171779430

Okay. Go win the world championship then.

You're quite literally clueless.

File: Hearthstone Screenshot 03-22-17 14.37.26.png (1MB, 1962x1010px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1962x1010px

>>171779947
did this first try with anyfin n'zoth pally

>>171780570
No, its a video on fan-made cards

File: Saving up.png (13KB, 258x54px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 258x54px

How's that saving up going /hsg/?

>>171780620
Stop putting words in my mouth autist

File: Hearthstone Screenshot 03-22-17 17.25.44.png (726KB, 1253x705px) Image search: [Google]

726KB, 1253x705px

>delayed gratification
fuck this

File: 1468357978705.jpg (2MB, 2000x2000px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2000x2000px

>>171773114
>>171772767

i hope you guys brought lube for the violet teacher miracle turns making a board of 5/5's on turn 4 or 5

>>171780983
It's simply impossible for that to happen by turn 5, it's more like 6 or 7, if lucky, and while having a ridiculously shitty early game

File: Elise_the_Trailblazer(55451).png (349KB, 400x569px) Image search: [Google]

349KB, 400x569px

Post cards you are excited for.

>>171780856
>gratification
They're saving you from disappointment.

>>171780983
>i'm going to draw all my cards to do the quest by turn 4
Holy shit why not just play normal rogue and cheese with edwin, it'll require less cards.

>>171778472
>>171778626
What is this 70% retardation? you simply play the best deck and beat up morons. Naturally the guy playing everyday will beat the guy who plays twice a week. It doesn't mean the game itself requires skill unless youre being autistically padantic. To make it clear HS has a very low skill celliling, just most people who play don't bother reaching it

File: 1323939436323.jpg (171KB, 681x590px) Image search: [Google]

171KB, 681x590px

>>171781184
That card is going to be such a disappointment besides the flair

File: Hearthstone Screenshot 03-22-17 22.30.37.png (396KB, 1174x511px) Image search: [Google]

396KB, 1174x511px

First try with Jade Druid if anyone cares.

>>171781184
It's more fun flavor, but no better than Malchezzar.

File: mimic pod.png (184KB, 250x355px) Image search: [Google]

184KB, 250x355px

>>171781184

>>171781184
Literally infinity free dust

Who /day1craft/ here?

>>171781102
anon, we live in a world with counterfeit coin and mimic pod. They absolutely are going to be able to do that. CLEVER TRICKS

>>171781461
retarded comparison

malchezaar ruins your deck starting turn 1, this shuffles 1 extremely good card in your deck

>>171781461
>>171781369
She is so much better than Malch it's ridiculous.

She's going to be at the very least playable. Most likely good.

>>171781481
you're a dummy

>>171781369
I dunno 5 mana 5/5 isn't bad and the pack has skewed rates for higher rarities

Sure there'll be disappointment whenever you don't actually draw the pack but if you do get to cast it it should be a sweet payoff every time

>more un'goro packs from brawl
why do I even bother with this game

File: Untitled.png (111KB, 256x294px) Image search: [Google]

111KB, 256x294px

more maintenance ?

>>171781184
>LoE was our only good set and we're afraid of truly rotating it out
I am too, Blizzard. I am too.

File: packs.png (45KB, 1164x557px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 1164x557px

Show the stuff you've unpacked during the past 3 months

This bawl is fun, it almost redeems the abomination of last week.

>turn 1 quest, wisp, wisp, shadowstep, shadowsted, wisp, wisp
>turn 2 prep, crystal core
>turn 3 coin, prep, sprint
>turn 4 boar, boar, deckhand into patches

hysteria get working

>>171780841

It's solved. Go use your knowledge of the solution to win the world championship. Magnus Carlsen, current world champion, is worth millions. Go beat him.

File: jewish tricks.png (241KB, 630x376px) Image search: [Google]

241KB, 630x376px

>>171780739
Going well.

Also already pre-ordered the Dark Brotherhood adventure coming in two weeks.

>>171781603
>>171781605
Well, yeah it doesn't do exactly the same thing as Malch, but the point was that we're not even in a meta where you can run Elise or most Ungoro cards. Things will have to actually change for this to be playable. I hope it is, because it looks really interesting and fun, and potentially good.

Gadgetzan was a mistake.

Does anyone have a rough estimate of how much time you have to not login to get the classic pack quests?

I haven't logged in since the 2nd week of Gadgetzan.

>>171781625
you're a cutie

>>171782202
3 months I think

This brawl feels familiar

>>171781472
>half a thistle tea
WOW!
its actually playable since 6 mana draw shit is too slow

>>171781346

You're wrong. I've already made all the arguments I can. I'm genuinely sorry that you're this stupid. I feel bad for you.

this brawl is GOAT for dailies

File: awesome.jpg (92KB, 430x342px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 430x342px

Guy who sent Kripparian an email asking him to make a video about auto-squelch and giving him 1000 dollas if he does here.

He just replied to my email. Posting before I read it!

>>171782361
it's 2/3 a thistle tea

>>171778847
100% win rate is as possible as me fucking Jennifer Lawrence in my lifetime. Over how many games are we talking? Do you honestly believe that you are never going to have a shit opener against someone who curves out? 100% win rate much past 10'ish games is essentially impossible.

>>171782287
Man, that's like exactly as long. I'm afraid of missing it by a day.

I mostly just need to log back in when the Sylvanas/Rag dust comes in.

>it's another Un'goro pack
Fuck blizzshit.

>>171782491
inb4 no

>>171779750
I didn't know it was this buff.

Hot thighs.

>>171782609
is this bait?

>>171782550
It is possible to win the lottery.

File: priest.png (278KB, 247x695px) Image search: [Google]

278KB, 247x695px

can someone help me modernize this deck? haven't played in awhile so i'm getting wrecked by much faster decks.

I want to keep the divine spirit + inner fire type of theme i have

>>171782609
classic packs are becoming pretty worthless

>>171781996
they literally added timers to add pressure to turns because it is a solved game

File: 1480085129699.jpg (997KB, 850x1360px) Image search: [Google]

997KB, 850x1360px

>>171782361
>prep pod
>draw double coins/evis/coldbloods/etc
it functions like a better fan of knives as far as miracle is usually concerned.

File: 1336940331695.jpg (10KB, 193x245px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 193x245px

>>171782491
Screencap it and post it here

>>171782702
-everything but SW:Pain
+28 new cards

>>171782704
they are worth more than a pack you cant even open

>>171782659
I don't want to wait 1 fucking month to open something I played for today. It's fucking retarded.

>>171782704
Obviously they don't want people to open Hall of Fame cards. Classic cards are always relevant.

>>171782809
Shadow word death and northshire cleric are also good cards.

>>171782823
no they aren't

>>171782369
>being THIS mad that his favorite children's card game is shit

kek your "argument" is shit btw when 90% of the playerbase plays once or twice a week

File: dust.png (165KB, 592x303px) Image search: [Google]

165KB, 592x303px

How are those dust counts coming, boys?

File: Capture.png (21KB, 763x286px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 763x286px

>>171782491
>>171782624
>>171782787
Based Kripp

>>171782809
>>171782889
and powerword shield.

>>171782752

>being this retarded

I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you're joking.

>>171783049

I've just spent it all on golden shredders

>>171783073
I'll quit hearthstone if this is real.

>>171772337

Your card might be good but it's pretty boring. How about (summon) like more beasts and get a huger cost down?

>>171783027

I'm not mad, and I don't play hearthstone much. If you think there's no skill at all to consistently reaching top 50 legend then you're an idiot. Plain and simple.

>>171783073
will you actually pay him?

>>171782992
>play a brawl that rewards a classic pack right away
>open cards you can use right now
>or dust and craft cards right now

>play a brawl that rewards an inexisting card pack
>can only play/dust the card 1 month from now
>you don't even know if you'll still be playing by then

>it's another "no packs this week" brawl
The third week in a row. F2p btfo

>>171782704
As much as I like them tinkering with the Classic set, just straight up removing without adding shit isn't going to help them very much in the long run.

They're using the set as a crutch to hold the game together since their content releases are so infrequent, small, and shoddy. If they keep removing items, it's going to not fill that role anymore.

>>171783197
It was a joke desu

>>171783239
it's better in the long run you attention deficit cunt

>>171783094
I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you're an event organizer and are forced to hype it up and dramatize it

>>171783278
from 2019 going forward there will always be at least 4 full expansions in standard at any given time which should be plenty
it's about as much as there is now

>>171783318
>what is inflatiom

>>171783217
Of course I would, but for what I get from his reply, he doesn't want the money and may do it only if he wants to someday in the future

Why is every fucking faggot running a jade deck?

>>171783483
brainlessly op

>>1717833181
>better in the long run
No it's not you retard, it's a mobile game.
You can't reward your players with something that's still a month away.

>>171783198
>I don't play HS
>ferociously defends HS
Eh don't be disingenuous. Also again it's more a factor of time and deck, not skill. Your being padantic again

>>171783483
curve decks are popular with the norms

>>171783483

Because they were too poor to run control warrior

>>171783483
because it's easy, powerful, and all the jade cards are cheap except aya

>>171783481
do you have $1000 to just throw around for no reason?

>brawl is raid on stormwind, only with party-related name changes

That's fucking bad.

>>171783562
There are also winrates. Most of all skill in hearthstone is based on knowledge of the game mechanics and the current meta.

>>171783704
>poorfags pretending they could use the 1000 bucks for something better
Kek'd

>>171783710
Thats only 1/4th of monthly median wage

>Brawl just ends once you go over 100 damage
boooring
do they expect me to play Cho+inner fire memes to get higher?

>>171783559
maybe you'll feel differently when the day comes and you open a pack with cards you don't have instead of 40 dust shit

if not you can continue being retarded and complain about nothing

>>171783562

>getting top 50 legend consistently is time and deck, not skill

Fuck man, I dunno what to tell you. You're just wrong.

>>171783704
I do, I own a company

>>171783073
he will never do it, because blizzard took a hard stance on emotes from the start, even making sure most streamers dont complain too much about them

reynad is the only vocal person about emotes, and even then when he is shilling for them he will say

>they dont want it because it makes it feel like you are just playing against a AI when they arent interacting

>>171783835
hire me plox

God this brawl is retarded. Just another rehash.

>>171783769
This, they'd probably blow it all on an iphone

File: guess who.png (969KB, 858x768px) Image search: [Google]

969KB, 858x768px

guess who it is?

File: 1371683815797.png (359KB, 792x540px) Image search: [Google]

359KB, 792x540px

>hammer of twilight netdeckers

File: 1321659278484.jpg (11KB, 157x186px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 157x186px

>>171783073
Based fucking Kripp

>>171783387
It's a little more complex than that. As much as I'm not going to shower the Classic set with only praise the only set deserving is LoE, it was fundamentally balanced to a certain extent. Major flaws, but it's a decent set of bones to build on.

You start messing with that, and all of your sets have to stand on their own merit, and "mess" is the proper term. Karazan and Gadgetzan are both especially shit. I'm hoping they prove me wrong, but things just aren't looking good at all.

>>171783932
VEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEENTS

>>171783931
what's with all the hate? Did a poorfag cuck you?

>>171783714
lol what? between the 1-4 decks you need to know which are usually netdecked?

>>171783804
>another nonargument
Listen idc if you want to run on the hampater wheels every month. It means nothing

>>171783932
welcome to the gran- ResidentSleeper

File: wryy.png (202KB, 425x367px) Image search: [Google]

202KB, 425x367px

>>171783932
>french HS

>>171784176
my past self, yes

>>171783932
The dog with a chilling maw

>>171783795
Are you retarded, you have no arguments.
I'm telling you it's a mobile game and if you reward something that's soon(tm) it feels shitty for the casual player and it may as well not be rewarded. It doesn't work.

>>171776207
will you share your data with us some day?

>>171783932
its gormok

>>171784178
The more familiar you are with the decks played, their variations, how they are played and how to play against them, the better you are.

>>171784178

>another nonargument

I've made like a dozen posts in this thread explaining that there's clear skill variance and it's provable through consistency of results. At this point the onus is on you to prove that you can get the same results, regardless of skill, with time and "deck" (lol).

You could go into a thread about any competitive game and repeat ad nauseum "this takes no skill" and nobody would take you seriously. I'm not sure why I'm taking you seriously. You post like someone extremely, fat, stupid, and unappealing; and you seem to know nothing about anything at all.

>>171784312
>muh feelings
not an argument

friendly reminder that replacing the brawl packs with ungoro is what blizzard meant with giving out expansion cards

>>171784398
reddit please leave

>>171784412
Okay now I know you're a retard.

>>171784465
me too thanks

>>171784507
just stop replying and wait patiently for your pack nigger

>>171784585
Nice argument faggot.

>>171783892
Is it just me or is this AI cheating?

>opponent breaks my eradar lord of the burning legion weapon, renos and plays a golden monkey for some reason
>BM greets me when Im roping thinking through my plays
>he dies to my waves of INFERNOS! and me clearing his board every turn
Why be cocky when you haven't even won?

>>171784784
I thought the same.

>>171778857
>It's an artistic choice to make it "cuter"

it may have started that way but most artists on tumblr copy off other shit they see on tumblr without understanding why it works for one person's style... then someone else copies them, someone copies that person and before you know it every bit of art has the neon rudolph nose even when it 100% clashes with the rest of the character design

Maybe he wasn't cocky, just tired of seeing you rope every turn.

>>171784910

I always squelch after the first emote

File: Screenshot_20170322-152028.png (2MB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2560x1440px

How good is my arena deck, and how lucky did i get?

File: 1487114117631.png (18KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 800x600px

>>171785272
This.

>>171785272
I try to auto squelch everyone but I have a terrible memory
This game needs an auto squelch feature

Did anyone try going infinite with Jade Druid in the brawl?

its p funny how swashbuckler ended up being busted as shit

>>171785373
3 of those 10 cards are atrocious and should never be picked.

murloc tinyfin, arcane missiles and dirty rat.

File: file.png (340KB, 400x543px) Image search: [Google]

340KB, 400x543px

Pls make gang up standard you fucks

It's like they're mad everyone called the riverboat man that put stuff back in your hand with combos bad

>>171785491
>blizzard prints one drop
>ends up being op
sounds about right

File: Screenshot_20170322-152041.png (2MB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2560x1440px

>>171785373

File: disappointed_girl.jpg (60KB, 527x619px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 527x619px

>Brawl AI concedes at 100 damage
And as always, NO FUN ALLOWED

>>171785676

Seriously, wtf is with that. I made an inner fire/divine spirit cheese deck with like, Ysera and mind controls and i was able to do like 70 damage a turn... once.

File: 1467824880726.jpg (59KB, 645x561px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 645x561px

>>171784784
it's probably just you
>mfw the AI converts my rag and then it snipes my sylvanas out of 5 minions which steals rag back

>>171785579
Forcing archetypes is the only thing Ben Cuck knows to do with cards.

File: 125472609048.png (125KB, 706x1323px) Image search: [Google]

125KB, 706x1323px

>>171784976
Stop blaming Tumblr. 4chan artists do the same thing by copying the style of other people for comics.

File: meh.png (989KB, 968x768px) Image search: [Google]

989KB, 968x768px

>>171784091
>>171784187
>>171784229
>>171784264
>>171784316

>>171785870
that comic is ancient.