What's the problem? Square Enix has been one of the few competent devs in the last few years and Nomura's actually heading the project instead of just being "creative producer" like with the rest of the Compilation games. It's in good hands.
Lets just post what everyone cares about.
>Enemies sliding backwards like on ice upon being hit
>Combat looks clunky as fuck
Can't they just fucking call someone who has worked on Hack'n'Slash games if they're gonna do something like this. This looks atrocious.
I hate her too, but in the way that I hate her opinions and stupid face, but wanna fuck her really hard for some reason. Kind of hatefuck I guess. Like, she makes me feel things. Anger and horniness.
I'm stoked. Combat was one of the few things Advent Children did right. All it needed was a better story and more screentime for the non-turks cast. FFVII remake is exactly that.
There's nothing wrong with her legs, that's just armor like what the Greeks wore. They're greaves.
>Dim area with little light
>Fill the screen with glowing particles
>Now you can barely figure what the fuck is going on in the screen between the two extremes of darkness and extreme light
>This is good graphical design
So is this during different points of development, or will Cloud's appearance scale with his stats?
>hit one enemy with a sword
>shitload of sparks come out as if you're sawing down metal
>but 0 blood
>Kingdom Hearts slashy hack system
Y-you too Square Enix
Yep. Read up on nutritions and what not. A vegan that eats a lot of white bread is going to gain a a lot of weight unless they exercise a lot. Carb dense grains and nuts can be a one way ticket to fatsville.
It's only purpose is to highlight a set point through contrast and blinding and discouraging the viewer to focus in certain parts, in a fucking videogame you want awareness of everything in the screen
Easily. Probably even easier than with non-vegans, since meat is high in protein and fat which both spike bloodsugar less than carbohydrates and therefore cause less hunger cravings in the long term.
These are shopped. Basically, people are saying the middle (shown footage_ is weird because there's muscle but the arms are still thin, giving him a sickly appearance. I think it's fine, but the left is a shoop without the muscles, and the right is shooped to give him some bulk.
>devs responsible for FF13 and the vaporware FF15 has become
Fuck, this actually sounds pretty cool.
So it's basically Kingdom Hearts combat?
Well, you don't have to like it anon.
I'm just a fan of Ishiwatari among other artists.
>animoomoo weabooboo doodoo
You're a shit artist.
You were that fag in school who just drew in his book all day and everyone thought could draw well, then upon investigation it's always some edgy shitty ass anime weebshit.
You guys are cancer, learn to fucking draw something other than that insipid, talentless, lazy, uninspired fucking dribble you call an art style.
>Square Enix has been one of the few competent devs in the last few years
The only reason they're doing this remake is people finally have JRPG alternatives to their shit and people are getting tired of them as a company. I wrote their asses off years ago.
This anon makes me smile, just like this image does.
Dude, have you played some of their games?
>I guess FF14 ARR even though I have not played it.
Plus some of the games they have produced have worked as well:
>Tomb Raider 2013
>Deus Ex Human Revolution
There's not much else right now:
They made this piece of shit, that is all I need to know.
>western porn artist
>accentuating broad noses, solid chins and wide mouths
Why are westerners so fucking incompetent, what the flying fuck.
Na, I'm mad because when kids are inspired/wanna learn to draw, they draw anime.
You can't get more bland, generic and lazier than fucking anime.
It's a fucking joke to anyone that can actually fucking draw realistically or cartoony.
It's because many western porn artists have never seen a real live woman from a distance closer than 20 feet aside from their mother, so they have to guess what a female face is supposed to look like, and often use their own face as a frame of reference.
Some guy with a wannabe-realistic art style called this art "anime shit" and made a thread on /ic/ asking which of their art was superior.
Everybody said the "anime shit" was superior because of it's better linework and he got butthurt.
I recall the character in Fable 2 effected by, skills, morality, and what you ate.
Only issue I had with it was that the character grew a Halo if they were extremely moral. Had to unfairly raise the prices on the pie stand I owned in order to save face.
>calling derivative weeb trash 'oriental art influence'
i haven't kekd so hard for a long time
There hasn't been a single good cartoony artstyle in the past 40 years. It all looks like shit. If you pride yourself on drawing a 'cartoony' style, your drawings are lazy insipid pieces of shit.
wow, this is shitty
at least they should turn off those light and crap that blocks the screen, most of the time you can't see what's happening, but it doesn't matter that much because THE ENEMY FUCKING WAITS FOR YOU TO HIT HIM WHILE HE HAS A GUN
Anon, I can draw realism as well. Everyone just has their preferred styles.
Maybe instead of complaining about other people draw, you should learn to draw yourself so you can draw what you wanna see.
This is historically inaccurate. In 1933 it would be an SA brown shirt, or more likely, just a normal wehrmacht guardsman guarding the chancellor, since he'd only just been elected.
The "realistic" art style was complete shit. The guy's linework was fucking garbage and the faces were so oddly shaped they looked like shitty caricatures.
Your art ain't bad dude, but seeing you explicitly label yourself "intermediate" and saying shit like it's insulting when people critique your work like a beginner is cringey as fuck. Deflate that ego a bit and be a little self aware. Even if they don't actually think your art is bad, they'll be tempted to troll the everloving shit out of your autism.
Yeah dude, I gotcha. I learned that in that last thread.
Never said anything about my skill level, all I did was make a remark about the quality if Erin porn, and it progressed into a shitstorm.
Yeah, gotta redraw it.
It's just an early sketch, and I've been out of it.
I'm focusing more on outlining the story than writing these days, since that will give me more solid ground for what I should draw and how I want it to look.
But yeah, there's quite a few glaring anatomy mistakes in the sketch.
>tfw making a comic with a qt female MC
>tfw I just realized she'll get a bunch of bad porn made of her
That's just baiting for (You)s
If he cares about art at all, then yea he's serious.
Don't tell me you're some gay ass weeb too that defends this thing and can only be appealed by those gay ass featureless bug eyed faces.
Good, hopefully you grow a distaste for that absolute trash all together.
You will literally see yourself as a better artist if you give up that edgelord emo kid in high school art style.
>HURR DURR LETS SEE YOU DO BETTER FALLACY
I don't even have to know how to use a pencil to be able to judge art, as long as you've seen enough of it to compare.
Jealous of being to draw like anime? kek
I might as well be Jealous of sucking dicks
Na, the only way to like that shit is to have been a loser fat weeb or Japanese.
Both are equally bad.
Na nigga, you just have shit taste, get that weebshit out of your life and you might get laid
To prefer that style is to literally be an uneducated uncultured beta. How can you, it's the most boring, bland, generic, uninspiring way you can draw, it does not make sense for you to like it if you can draw otherwise.
If you had just started to learn then I guess it's good for practicing form, but to PREFER it is just shit tastes m8.
Stay mad, weebs. You will never be Japanese. And to those of you who are Japanese, how does it feel to belong to a nation of such pussified people that like this shit.
Well, it wasn't about my skill.
It's just what came to my mind desu, since all that's been on my head these days has been my story, so the first thing that came to mind when browsing that thread was that realization.
I was kinda cheeky about it I guess. I didn't need to verbalize it. But I didn't intend for things to go on this long.
Thought things woulda died down with a couple pics, and that's it.
It just blew up when that one guy sperged out over the anime style.
Well, the only thing I can say as a peasant who knows nothing about drawing is that the tits seem to be lower than were they should be, and there's something odd about the left arm and leg. Maybe her face width, too.
I like the details. Keep up the good work.
>Just want to get a bunch of bad porn made of my donut steels
>Afraid it will devolve into a shitstorm about my artstyle instead
All I've ever wanted in my life is for Asanagi to draw lewds of my create-a-waifus being powerfucked by muscular monsters.
Yea, me too.
I especially like the way he draws noses. He's a detail maniac, and I really like that in his style. It's a Japanese style, but with strong western influences. It's a nice mix. I wish more artists went that route and experimented with it.
You think you are "winning" an internet argument when really no one cares and you just typed however many lines of mad about "anime".
Blood is gross and offputting for the tone of the game. Sparks to indicate impact more than gets the job done, don't be autistic about it.
Also, I forgot to mention, however.
That squid looks pretty gud, it's fucking actually interesting and appealing to look at.
I liked looking for the details in this picture, see this is more like it.
That weeb shit? Only takes a fraction of a second to absorb the whole thing, why?
Because it's not only already been done the same fucking way a billion times but there's also not much to take in, at all.
Purposefully badly drawn STICK FIGURES are more interesting to look at, just because it's fucking funny how they look.
>hentai manga where a little girl gets raped to death over and over
Why did I fap
I HAD FUCKING HOPE FOR SE MAKING A GOOD TURN BASED FF AFTER SEEING BRAVELY DEFAULT'S COMBAT
BUT THEY HAD TO
That's an entire different argument there. I wont even touch that part of things, you can fap to whatever you want.
>no one cares
Thanks for the (You), moron. There's nothing to win or lose, anime is objectively a shit style. I'm stating a fact that can't be argued.
No, but if that is what it takes to destroy anime then I will hire a Japanese man to rape a Japanese little girl.
Maybe someone will make an anime of it so you fags can fap.
>so butthurt you respond to everyone in the thread
Jesus guy let it go. You probably don't belong on 4chan if you hate anime so much.
Funny thing, I've actually been to Japan, and Jgirls worshipped me for being a tall, good-looking white guy.
That aside, I may like weeb shit, but a beta male is something I'm not, I'll tell you that much.
Anyway, like that other anon said, get to drawing and quit playing the internet tough guy act.
I wasn't being serious, it was meant to be tongue in cheek bruv.
What kinds of turns does it take to end up so far up your own ass?
Is this a result of the neo weeb hate meme? Doesn't seem like it, this shit is too fervent, runs too deep. This motherfucker is old school weebkiller.
>for shit like that
WHEN WILL THEY STOP?!
Well, the weebshit is weebshit cause it's for a comic man.
That octopus too me around 100 hourse to draw.
The sketch only took me about 30mins.
If I'm gonna be telling a story, I'm not gonna be spending 100 hours per panel.
I'd rather a simplistic and expressive artstyle since a comic is driven more by story than anything else.
In fact, my reason for writing it is cause I wanna tell a compelling story.
Personally, I think that hating on Japanese art styles cause they're Japanese is absurd, especially when a lot are a master class in good design.
I'm only responding to those who respond to me. You're just as bad a culprit.
>hurr durr 4chan is an anime board
Don't care, moots faggot ass left it open for anyone to come in and give their 2 cents.
I bet you joined the anime club in high school.
What a fag.
>internet tough guy act
That seems tough to you?
top kek, obvious signs of being bullied.
I made no threat, I just called weeb art shit, which it is.
>Old school weebkiller
I like it.
YOU'RE arguing otherwise, I'm just reinstating.
>the next level of truth posting
>That's an entire different argument there. I wont even touch that part of things, you can fap to whatever you want.
You sure gave up easily, internet warrior. Are you sure you want to let me have my opinion that easily?
>Arousal requires attraction
>Arousing artstyle must also be an attractive artstyle
>Weeb art has way more potential to be lewd and arousing than whatever artstyle you prefer
>There fore weeb art >>>>> your shit taste
Left it at that, and she texted me some minutes later saying she'd come over.
Then I told her that it was too late and that I didn't want to anymore.
Ok, you win this argument, I will no longer try to defend my anonymous honor because doing so is pointless and retarded. Let's stop now, my most sincere apologies for whatever it is I said that sparked this whole debate.
I think Reddit might be more your speed baka.
>unironically complaining about anime on a site deciated to anime discussion that's a direct ripoff of japanese sites dedicated to anime discussion
My Little Shitposter-Kun Can't Possibly Be This Baka!
What a shit selection, pantyhose and sneakers are my thing and she isn't even wearing them in 90% of the r34.
Sure as fuck isn't worth reading the actual comic for though.
Saying anime is universally good and you're a patrician of a higher medium is like the ledditors who say they're hardcore "gamers".
Different studios produce different anime, and a good majority of those studios are either shit or have gone to shit in order to keep up financialy with the otaku plague.
that aint what you doing nigga, you wanna be taken seriously with little effort, so you take anime because it's "more mature". It's actually just a cheap way to make shit edgy.
If you prefer just telling a story, then just write and have a couple of sketches every so often. That way you don't have to sacrifice the art quality.
Then again you said you PREFERRED that weebshit, which is the problem.
You've gotta cure that gay in your heart.
Visually appealing to someone with one active electron in their brain
lol no nigga if you can get a boner to a CARTOON at all, and not a realistic picture/drawing then it doesn't matter what art style it's drawn in. You'll fap to it anyway.
Your dick is not a good measure of quality. All men should know this.
Kill yourself, cancerous growth.
>not fapping to classical academic art
HAHAHA FUCKING PLEB HOLY SHIT
The problem with this is very easily each of those people could have reached their dreams, Astronaut girl could be a astrologist doing office work, cop kid is probably filing reports, Baseball kid, saying he was ten, could have hit the minor leagues and retired when he went out of his prime, and I don't know if this guy's ever seen a big hospital's offices but fun fact they're cubicals.
Each one of these careers are fulfilling and insinuating that the only enjoyment you're going to get is by being a fucking weirdo loser then I hope he realizes that /v/is the future for every kid.
Wasn't FFXIII's E3 trailer exactly like this?
I remember there being some shitposting about FF going the way of KH and gaining action combat. Turned out it was just editing and a combat system that only allowed you to play as one character.
Perhaps they expanded on FFXIII's combat and allowed you to play as any character in the party?
>this is the kind of thing shitposters fap to
There's this guy on my university campus who goes around calling people "baka" and weirding the fuck out of professors and japanese transfer students alike.
It's as horrible as it sounds.
Also 2ch wasn't made specifically for animu.
You may have actually found an art style worse than anime.
On second thought
I take that back.
That's at least interesting from a scientific perspective.
Anime is still just boring.
Artist here, I enjoy the occasional loli and fap to h manga all the time, but let's not pretend that anime/manga art style is anything but a corner cutting measure developed for cost saving, okay?
You have to be pretty culturally ignorant to think otherwise.
It's like claiming pizza is a delicacy. We can all enjoy a pizza, but only a tool would claim it's anything more than fast food.
>mfw shitposters don't like anime
What sort of Lovecraftian horror is this? These beings defy comprehension, words fail to describe them, the more you stare at it, the more misshapen and distorted this non-euclidean facial geometry gets. It is constantly shifting, as if alive, a squirming mockery of human anatomy, inviting insanity in anyone foolish enough to stare at it.
So this is what boring feels like.
It's... quite something.
>he doesn't know moon over june
It's not too late for you to get out of here and save yourself
It's a style that uses visual shorthands in place of anatomy.
Also, berserk is only detailed on certain pages, a lot of the time it's pretty stylized.
Also, I'm not singling out anime from other cartoon/animated art styles, it's just that some people have the impression that anime is somehow more visually "high brow" than western cartoons.
I know Moon over June but these faces are much worse than anything I remember from Moon over June threads a couple years ago. I didn't think it was possible for it to get worse, yet it did. Is this drawn by a Great Old One?
>it's just that some people have the impression that anime is somehow more visually "high brow" than western cartoons.
They are. Unless the only western cartoons you're counting are from the golden age of animation like Pre-Jew Disney, Looney Tunes or early Tom and Jerry.
Agreed. A lot of eastern art shares a lot of elements but it isn't necessarily better or worse as a whole than western art as a whole. Grouping them together by geographical origin does a disservice to all art.
I don't think anyone here has said that. We're all just talking down the idiot who irrationally hates anime.
Also, plenty of western cartoon have shit art, are highly stylized, and are visual shorthand, just like a lot of anime. Adventure time, spongebob, etc...
But within both styles you also have some top tier stuff.
I don't think modern weeaboos even care about Japan's historical aspect.
Then again I'm from a day and age where "weeaboo" was a universally negative term that referred to delusional Japanophiles instead of being a term of endearment like it is on /a/ and /v/ nowadays.
Bullshit. If you actually drew for a living you wouldn't dismiss or generalize any sort of art the way you did. You're just parroting some shit you heard on /ic/.
Anime might be animation, but manga is still hand drawn on paper. How can it be anymore cost saving than western comic style?
>it's just that some people have the impression that anime is somehow more visually "high brow" than western cartoons.
To be fair, western cartoons lately are very edgy and western porn (fan)art pretty shit in general.
It still means a non-asian Japanophile. People spamming weebshit left and right are newfags that need to lurk for a few more years. Even Reddit knows better, so you know these guys are even most desperate for (You)s than Redditors.
>noodle arm cal-arts bullshit
>1 frame per-minute non-animation with only the mouth moving
They're both pretty bad most of the time.
Because most anime is released on a tight schedule in jew-tier magazines with draconian rules.
Also, magazine print quality is toilet-paper tier, so you have to lower the detail of your drawings.
Anyway, grapics is a lower form of art than painting, if you disagree then you're a pleb.
>not being a nazi sympathizer
>tfw love hack n slash like ninja gaiden
>reading all these butt hurt replies from people who want the turn based gameplay
Different dude here. The whole manga / anime style of drawing uses fewer lines to achieve something that looks a lot more complex. I think it's actually pretty clever. It's also harder to do well than most people think. The slightest errors fuck up the picture a lot more than they would with something more detailed.
What the fuck
>not being a nazi synthesizer
>They're both pretty bad most of the time.
>if it isn't 60fps constantly moving panning camera angles and zoom-ins then it's bad
>Because most anime is released on a tight schedule in jew-tier magazines with draconian rules.
>Also, magazine print quality is toilet-paper tier, so you have to lower the detail of your drawings.
That's not how it works.
>Anyway, grapics is a lower form of art than painting, if you disagree then you're a pleb.
You're a complete imbecile.
I disagree, art should be used to communicate what's needed.
It's stupid to compare Bugs Bunny to Michelangelo and call it shit. Cartoons are trying to do something entirely different to a paintinh, and the art style used is GOOD because it does what it has to do.
If you're expecting every panel in a comic/manga to be a painting, you're delusional. It'll either sacrifice story, or never get finished.
Different styles serve different purposes.
Apples and Oranges, quit being pretentious by trying to compare them.
>Website still has link to Super Effective
>Link to old promo comic he did for FF11 is still there, but the link gradually faded until you can't see it anymore but it's still there
Sue me for making a mistake at 6 AM.
>animation that doesn't have any animation in it is good
>That's not how it works.
That is how it works you retard, you can't print fine, detailed lines on coarse paper.
Stop pretending you know shit when you're just a retard.
>Different styles serve different purposes.
Yeah, and I'm arguing that the works of Michelangelo have an inherently superior purpose than bugs bunny.
>If you're expecting every panel in a comic/manga to be a painting, you're delusional. It'll either sacrifice story, or never get finished.
Not just that. It would just plain look bad. Using Michelangelo figure painting to make sequential art would look exactly like just slapping word bubbles on a painting. It would lack a sense of motion and expression.
>tfw you want a remake
>tfw they change everything
>those insufferable KH brownnosers who tell you: the game was already remade for you, grab the pc version on ps4! :^)
But that's entirely subjective, and you're an immature hipster if you believe that.
People should set out to do what they wanna do, not adhere to some bullshit grudge.
Classical music is the pinnacle of music, but Rock is still enjoyable as fuck and serves it's purpose.
Plus, rock can have just as much depth as classical. Mediums evolve.
>That is how it works
No. It isn't. The paper they use is a type that quickly degrades and the printing is cheap so the black aren't even filled, but it still retains the same print dpi detail as any other. No one is simplifying their art because of paper quality. That's just as retarded as you.
You know, 90% of the time when I'm watching an anime, it's a 3FPS sequence of someone's mouth looping through a bad looking animation where they feed exposition to the audience. And all I can think is "if they aren't going to even animate this shit properly, why didn't they just make it a manga?". And then 10% of the time it's some action scene where it's obvious they blew most of the budget on it. Then I can't help but think "man, I wish they spent all that budget on compositional techniques of the non-action scenes".
>>Anyway, grapics is a lower form of art than painting, if you disagree then you're a pleb.
Art changes with the times. Do you think contemporary/ post-modern architecture is inherently less beautiful than Renaissance-era cathedrals just because it has more fractals and details? If you do you're just as much of a pleb. There's also beauty in reduction. Not everyone can make proper use of it. There's definitely amateurs out there speaking louder than they're worth. Art needs to convey meaning and not just be for its own sake.
If you're painting just for the sake of painting there's no intrinsic value in that. It's the same as deviantArt-tier faggots adding uselessly meticulous detail and rainbow gradients to shit "just because". If you can reduce something to an utterly simplistic form and still have it effectively convey meaning and emotion then that is truly beautiful. Just because you put more work into it, art it does not make. You'd just be butthurt because some guy's vectored squares are getting more followers than the overly detailed painting you spent 60 hours on.
It's not quite figure painting but belgian adult fantasy comics manage to have a very detailed artstyle while keeping a great sense of motion and expression. "Chroniques de la lune noire" comics are pretty much 36 pages of paintings with word bubbles telling a story and they definitely don't look bad.
She was pretending to be a person who likes Kotaku and once she found out they have been wronged, she wanted to bring it up. She then finds out that she blocked all the people who actually cared about ethics in videogame journalism.
You know, 90% of the time when I'm shitposting on /v/, it's a copy-pasta sequence of someone's shitpost \where they feed off topic exposition to the audience. And all I can think is "if they aren't going to even post this shit on topic properly, why didn't they just go to the right board?". And then 10% of the time it's some marginally related topic where it's obvious vidya isn't the focus. Then I can't help but think "man, I wish they would get b&."
Question, how does Patreon work?
My personal goal is to write this comic because I wanna write, so I never considered crowdfunding, and I plan to write and finish it even if people hate it. It's more of a selfish self expression sorta deal really. I don't care about the bucks.
But shit like work and such does put a huge damper on the time I can dedicate to it a day.
How much would I need to be successfully funded?
I personally thought about getting the entire outline, concept art, most of the script, and the first few chapters done, and going to a publisher.
Would that be enough for crowdfunding? Could I do it with less (since even that is still a couple years away)?
>anime is still just boring
I'd have to agree with you for the most part, but there are plenty of counterexamples.
You'll grow out of your fear of dismissing art forms when you grow as an artist.
Lots of mediocre artists are afraid of criticising something as big as a medium because they feel they're not good enough to do something like that.
Yet you'll never see a serious painter ever put watercolor painting or pastel above oils. It's just that oil painting is inherently more expressive.
It's not about the effort or work it requires. It's simply about the physical properties of the medium.
Oil painting has more color depth, more value depth and more literal, physical depth than other mediums (can't do impasto with watercolors). It's also a more dignified medium because each painting is a unique physical object. Whereas something like poster art is meant to be printed into million copies and sold to the mass market.
no ur the pleb
Thanks a bunch anon. Have some dino-lolis.
/v/ was right
all the anons that shitposted about Turn-based being a "console limitation" and saying that any remake would be ARPG, they were fucking right, videogames had reached the point in when a new generation dislikes a genre it just gets changed for other and tags it as "the clear improvement and evolution of the previous genre"
this will continue happen until only shooters and genres appealing to normies and kids will be the only ones to exist
i fucking hate the future