Last time we discussed ideas for what the next Battlefield game while still debating on if WWII was even possible. Today, rather than link the poll, I will link the poll Results because apparently he ended it before anyone could put a dent into WWIIs votes.
Source Video: https://youtu.be/UVo6hH_up5Q
Source Poll Results: http://strawpoll.me/6459945/r
So today, we have a bunch of guys who actually think World War II is a probable Setting for the next Battlefield game. What do you guys think?
I think we will be seeing the American and Pan-Asian Conflict that was mentioned in 2142 playing out in maybe a 2042, or possible 2100 Game.
I would also love to hear ideas on how you guys think they can improve for future titles, it goes without saying, that not being Battlefield 3 or Battlefield 4 obviously helps.
Thread Theme: https://youtu.be/lAxJoJc7NIU
you're an autist, no one cares, go post your /x/ tier theories on reddit
come back when a company announces something or they update BF4 with another easter egg like the DICE LA camo stuff you needed to do on the new map
Sadly this. Might as well go far future make it interesting. Mechs or power armor or something.
OP here, I forgot to mention that there was a "leak" two days ago. It could be real. You guys can have a look for yourself. It does directly mention Titan Mode and Mechs being present. For >>323619830
Without Premium its terrible. The DLC is pretty great though. Wait till another sale when its like 12 dollars with Premium, or just don't buy it and wait for the next one and see if it is good.
>1942 > BF2 > Squad/PR > BC2 > BF4 > BFV > BF3 > BFMC > BF2MC > BC1 > BFH
Honestly, I can't. That's a pretty damn good list.
It's missing 2142 and 1943 though, put 2142 with BF2 and 1943 before BC1
Squad is pretty much PR in alpha and on Unreal engine, right?
Yeah, and they are full of people who paid 50 cents for the game and do nothing but cheat. Its why there are Premium Servers that don't host Premium Maps, to keep the scum out.
>BC2 better than BC1
How old are you guys? Seriously? BC2 was a terrible game. It turned the series into a CoD clone. BC was slow, had large maps and non retarded unlockables. Vehicles were also challenging to use.
The next battlefield isnt gonna be 2143, its gonna be a shitty 10 years in the future type cancer like the most recent cod games.
I bought it recently and got it refunded, its very active but netcode is still a little fucked on pc and in my few hours of playing most guns take an entire magazine to kill someone.
>BC2 and BC1
No way in hell.
The average assault rifle had 60 rounds. There was no regenerating health. The weapons had weak damage. Apaches and Mi took serious skill to use and werent nearly as restricted in BC2. You could acutally barrel roll, turn and pitch in the attack helicptors and if AA's were giving you trouble. Fly high
Shit forgot the biggest thing was the maps were enormous for consoles. I was so disappointed with Harvester Day and Oasis in BC2. They were tiny in comparison to their BC versions.
>Playing Tactical Gamer Server
>Squads all required to have leaders with mics
>Required to Work Together or bannu
>Our squad doing Snow Mobile Patrols
Its comfy, cold, and amazing at the same time.
>PR lower than BF2
>BFV lower than BC2
>BC lower than BC2
>Missing 1943 and 2142
Literally made by a 17 year old.
Be glad I even included PR. Its not even Battlefield, its a fucking Mod for Battlefield. Vietnam was shit tier. The horrible Propaganda speakers and the lack of things to do ruined it. I am talking about the actual one mind you, not the BC2 one. BC1 was shit. I did forget about 2142 and 1943 though. My bad.
Hardline has a surprisingly long single player campaign.
Multiplayer died a few months after release. Some of the concepts were good, but there just wasn't enough main content like maps and modes to keep it going.
I just picked up BF4 Premium Bullshit Edition and was pleasantly surprised. I remember playing a little at one point and it just being a rougher BF3 a couple of years ago. How much is the game getting fixed and how much is me?
>Dragon Valley 2015
>Actually sounds like music and not somebody farting into a broken radio
Shit, does this mean that the next Battlefield might go back to having real music again?
Anyone can give me tips on how to fucking win a match in BF1942 in 100% difficulty? The AI of your team is useless, so even if you capture a point they lose it in half the time it took me to take it
Also, why is it that all the modern combat stuff in BF2 still feels so much cooler than the games that doubled down on the setting?
I want properly designed maps where infantry and vehicles fight side by side in perfect harmony. and less levelution gimmick shit.
also would it kill them to add some fucking gore? when i bodyshot some jarhead with a tank shell i want him turned into pink mist.
I liked it, but I hope they atleast go far enough to have Mechs and Titans otherwise I will be a bit upset.
They said the reason they didn't for Battlefront was because they wanted to focus on the Competitive Aspects, so I could see them (hopefully) doing the same thing.
> not wanting another Vietnam battlefield with choppers blasting 'it ain't me' on the ride to objective B with updated gunplay
One can dream
Maybe in select parts of the single player and trailer
What? BF4 doesn't have any filter, unless you turn on post-processing, or shit like that, then it's your own fault
>Dice will never make bad company 3
>tfw if they did it would just be bf4 le comedy edition
And the things I mentioned aren't real?
The engine doesn't run that well.
The game doesn't look great with all the retarded filters and lens effects
The netcode runs like ass, and always has in BF games.
>inb4 muh tickrate servers
Not every server runs on higher/maximum settings, which they should.
>The engine doesn't run that well
Every game I have played on the Engine runs at 100+ FPS. Every single game. I have a 970
>The game doesn't look great with all the retarded filters and lens effects
Lens Flare I will give you, but other than that? It looks fine. I used SweetFX to make it less Desaturated, but other than that, looks fine.
>The netcode runs like ass, and always has in BF games.
This meme has been going on for months even though the problem has been fixed for months because almost ALL SERVERS on the PC run at 40 to 120 now. There are not very many, that get traffic, that still run 30. Stop this shit meme.
>Not every server runs on higher/maximum settings, which they should.
What the fuck do you mean by this? Servers can only control PostFX and Depth of Field.
Last thing I heard about Sweetfx is that the game would kick you or report you for modding and thus ban you.
Except it isn't. 40 is still laughably low, and there's plenty of servers at 35. On the other hand I see plenty of 100+ servers completely empty. Either way, the game needs to standardize a high tickrate, not have a huge varying of options to run at.
>What the fuck does this mean
Well if you could read, you might be inclined to think I was still talking about netcode and tickrate.
As for the OP, I think it's abit funny that WWII has the largest votecount considering the weapon and vehicle customization that's ridiculously large in BF4 will be small/non existent compared to a WWII game. Besides, you'd think people would be ready for 2143.
They banned people for it in BF3 for about 2 weeks. Then the backlash got so big they fucked off. Not only that they don't even use Punkbuster anymore, they use some other shit that isn't a buggy mess and actually bans cheaters.
I would give them this. It would be the least expected. It could also be really nice if they did it right, but I just don't see why they would set up Naval Assault and all the Easter Eggs in the Final Stand DLC if it was just to go back to IT AINT ME.
Loved it. Still do. Problem is EA sucked dick at marketing it (one of my friends thought it was dlc) so no one bought it. No dlc servers on PS4, so if you were dumb enough to buy Premium like me, you're fucked. PC is a ghost town. It's a shame too, because its really fun and makes a lot of great improvements to Battlefield.
I actually think it was done on purpose so they can just repurpose those employees to DICE LA and have them do Side Content for the next Battlefront/Battlefield Games.
This guy is a worthless retard, ignore him. The REAL problem is that the vast majority of servers are conquest and like a handful of rush and team deathmatch. Want to play any of the other 10 or so modes? SHIT OUT OF LUCK
The game also has a huge problem in that no battle ever feels close. It's always a one sided stomp that at some point might flip yet plays like a boring turkey shoot or a hopeless grind.