Still more people keep talking about it in here than MGS V and Witcher 3, even though the latters are on multiple platforms and came out months after BB.
REAL CURRENT STATS
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt - 189
The Critics' Picks - 135
The Readers' Picks - 54
Fallout 4 - 42
The Critics' Picks - 30
The Readers' Picks - 12
Metal Gear Solid V: The Phantom Pain - 24
The Critics' Picks - 24
The Readers' Picks -
Bloodborne - 20
The Critics' Picks - 18
The Readers' Picks - 2
Life Is Strange - 10
The Critics' Picks - 10
The Readers' Picks -
>Most of the "bloodborne discussion" is actually not about the game, but about its exclusivity.
The general on /vg/ does nothing but talk about the game, keep making shit up though.
>Still not being able to play the game
>Still shitposting in denial after almost a year
ign gave witcher 3 the lowest score out of mgs and fallout and they still give it GOTY. i agree witcher is the best game of the year but ign is such a fucking stupid site
i played the game a couple of times, stopped many months ago because it's literally not an RPG, just an action game. can't play an action game for a year unless you're an autistic fanboy.
Every retard that play a game for more that 100 hrs is autistic and is in total escapism.
That being said, I had hundreds of hours with each souls game, ranking is DaS=BB>DS>DaS2
I keep trying to tell myself Witcher 3 must be a good game - Everyone but me likes it and thinks it's the best thing ever. I liked the story/lore. It was interesting. But did everyone find some magical way to ENJOY the combat system? Because that shit was fucking god awful. Literally the worst gameplay I've seen in YEARS.
Am I just the minority, do people actually have -fun- playing it?
>Dota 2 is the best game on Steam
ASSFAGGOTS haters BTFO
>comparing series over 21y old with a long established big fan base and modding society backed up by experienced developers to a trilogy that started with low budget W1 in 2007 made by amateurs that was sold mostly in Poland
Is this that famous retard anon ?
This is bait, but on the off chance someone takes it seriously: all the Souls games had discussion for a long time after release. There's still a Souls general, seperate from the BB general
I think The Witcher 3 deserves to be where it is but I don't get how F4 can beat MGS5 and Bloodborne. It's such an underwhelming game. If the game was not called "Fallout" it wouldn't even be in the list, I wager .
The depth you mean. Every other game discussion that extends for more than a month ends up being about waifus (see all witcher threads and general) and/or cosmetics. For much that I hate souls threads the anons in them at least write about the mechanics of the game (weapons, armors, bosses, shortcuts) and the lore or npcs.
No, it's not. And I stand by the statement that Witcher 3 has the worst combat system of the decade. Prove me wrong.
Even fucking Tales Of has more enjoyable combat despite god awful AI, absurd hit boxes and your camera being stuck in a wall half the time. And they KNOW their shit is fucked up, Witcher 3 pretends what they made is 'good combat'.
>a conversation simulator won GAME of the year
kek, I guess TLoU really did deserve its award afterall
Witcher 3 made me realize how fucking shit Fo3 was with regards to GFX and optimization and various other things.
It's actually fucking nice traveling around huge landscapes and cities/buildings all beautifully detailed with little to no loading screens, holy fuck I feel as if my pc's power is actually being used, it's a beautiful fucking game at times.
Witcher 3 may have its shortcommings but holy fuck it makes FO4 look amateurish at best.
Come on, Anon. You know they made plenty of sales at GOG.com