>mfw PSVR is $299

File: 56345.png (47KB, 448x360px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 448x360px

>vr on ps4 hardware

>Being so poor that you can't afford every console

top kek

>>322899157
better yet, tape your smartphone to your face for $1 and enjoy better quality than the PS4 can manage

>>322899286
>treating consoles like toys instead of supporting the better hardware and promoting real competition through which shit improves.

>>322899231
It has that WIi-thing that it will help. if they can get games that look like the new Ace combat then they are fine. atleast its not 599

>>322899647

>Not having the money to treat them like toys

>>322899231

This.

The weak ps4 will not be able to render visually appealing vr games twice at 960x1080 running at 60 fps interpolated to 120. Rift is too expensive though so in this case I hope another manufacturer steps up to fill in the gap. PSVR is a gimmick and I want vr specifically for games like gta and battlefield without pulling any visuals.

>>322899157

>ps3 game
>movie
>souls 3 (never beat 1)

>>322899992
This isnt good enough ?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aIqAS4avNsE

>VR on the PS4
>PS4 can barely run last gen games at 1080 and 60fps
>thinking PSVR is worth even $100

VR will be a shobby gimmick for another 5 years.

>>322899157
Sony friends are going to get BTFO when PSVR requires a PS4 and still costs $400-500.

>>322900295

There's a few problems with your post.

1. The vr portion can be drastically downgraded and that video will be how it looks without vr as in the way it's regular played. Looks more cinematic than seeing actual vr gameplay

2. Until someone tries the vr and starts posting screenshots on what it looks like, there's no reason to believe them.

3. I want a full gta game in fucking vr. Ace combat games aren't that intensive overall and are fun but I want more from VR than just that.

File: 1410383775581.png (53KB, 225x225px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 225x225px

>>322900490
>requires two PS4s and two copies of the game on both consoles