>you live in a CURRENT YEAR where a remake of Twilight Princess is a thing that's happening
Where did the time go?
It means nothing.
Nintendo will be remaking Skyward Sword in two or three years.
It could be considered a "definitive edition" to be honest. As of what we've seen so far, the changes are not on the scale of the 3D remakes of the N64 games and the HD remake of the Wind Waker. This could change of course, but don't count on it.
I hope that picture isn't meant to support your argument. It looks like a 2007 PS3 game.
But it's all about the artstyle right?
It is a bad thing when they cost the price of brand new games these days. At least Sony's ports include 3 games for the price of one and have good visual upgrades and I fucking hate Sony.
At least post decent screens fucking hell
if i'm not mistaken, all nes games cost 5 bucks, all snes games cost 8 bucks, and n64 games cost 10 (or was it 12)
they used to rerelease metroid and zelda and shit for the gba as well, and they were way more expensive than that.
>Twilight Princess will be 10 years old in November
2006 feels like yesterday...
>and n64 games cost 10
We're not talking about Virtual Console emulation, we're talking rereleases.
>Make zelda albw
>make stacking zelda
>make 2 hyrule warriors
And STILL haven't released Zellda U. Fucking development hell. Time to get rid of anouma
>Wind Waker HD completely changes the graphics and runs on a new engine
>Twilight Princess HD is literally the same graphics but the resolution was bumped up just a bit
Literally the worst remake ever.
You're giving WWHD too much credit.
It was equally shit. The environments and character models were unchanged, most of the textures were unchanged. The only difference is now the lighting isn't cellshaded but just bloom.
It's not a good "remake" at all.
Game also fucking runs at 30fps. Which is unacceptable for a GC port.
they're far from garbage, unless you put the camera as close as you can to a wall. It could definitely benefit from more complicated textures and shit but it looks better than any game I can think of from the last console gens
>mfw the dev team that made Funky Barn is handling the Twilight Princess port
That's because the game engine is programmed to run only at that framerate. If you mod it to run at 60 fps the game doesn't work. Also, some of your claims are frankly not true. Almost all of the textures are changed. There would be no reason to change the character models and environments, so I'm not sure why you're even mentioning that. And what exactly is cel-shaded "lighting"?
Your pathetic, unsourced argument would fly with most /v/ users, but not me.
>Graphics don't really dictate how good a game is
>a fucking REMAKE doesn't need to have good graphics
Them why not fucking pay 20 bucks for the original instead of 60 for the exact same shit?
seriously, what the fuck. I remember standing outside all night waiting for the Wii.
If I knew Nintendo would get more disappointing each year after that I probably wouldnt have bothered
As much as I love XCX, this guy is right, it does look extremely lacklustre in comparison to current PS4/PC games.
Even late PS3/360 games look better than the wiiu.
This is a fact.
I know Nintendo hates putting in any effort into things but I think it would be pretty cool if they remade a gameboy era game for the WiiU.
Would be interesting to see the world recreated in 3D
How long did TP take? Remember the early shots of it being a "realistic" OOT remake? Remember the early shots where it looked even darker and that one fucking promotional shot with the fire golem thing that was everywhere for years?