Anxiety of Influence edition.
Previous thread: >>83619556
>Not sure what letterboxd is all about?
The mission of /lbg/ is to promote the intelligent discussion of film as art by providing members with opportunities for intellectual discussion, by recognizing patrician taste through examinations and by calling out embryos as they arise.
>Directions for use
Post profiles and discuss what you have recently watched, if you dare.
>Haven't got an account? Follow this link and sign up today!
http://letterboxd.com
>News
Previous thread reached bump limit.
Use >>>/tv/lbg as a link to find the /lbg/ thread.
Remember the following:
>Patricians occasionally read these generals and have posted here before.
>Patricians may pretend to be normal users asking for recommendations and when you recommend something, they laugh at you for your plebian taste
>This is a thread for patrician purposes only don't offer or expect frivolous discussion.
>QotT
Can you identify the .gif in this post?
tell me what film to watch RIGHT NOW again
https://letterboxd.com/FutureDays/
>>83635672
Right Now, Wrong Then
>>83635672
Eva Part 1: Her Very First Anal - Eva Lovia & Jean Val Jean (2017-06-05)
>>83635672
What are you in the mood for?
https://discord.gg/rhKTRB
I'm looking for the film equivalent of Dostoyevskys 'The Idiot'
https://letterboxd.com/PinHeadLarry145/
>>83635703
70's crime would be nice
>>83635821
30's crime>70s crime
>>83635672
>>83635821
Have you seen The Conformist?
>>83635560
lame ass news
>>83635855
Mauro Bolognini>Bernardo Bertolucci
why the best films come from Sweden?
>>83635855
I have actually planned to watch it for like a week now but i haven't found the right moment yet, don't think i'll see it today but i will do soon
>>83635934
Existentialist films were already done first and best in America
>>83635940
I haven't thought about it in a while but last time I checked The Conformist has the best cinematography of any film I've ever seen. Great film
Still looking for something more impressive
>>83636025
I'm talking about films, no experimental films, can you read, or it's too much for you?
>>83635934
I'm sure Bergman or Troell made it
pic unrelated
>>83636051
Citizen Kane objectively has better cinematography
>>83635934
Name one (1) great Swedish film that Dreyer or Sjostrom didn't make.
>>83636092
Sweden having the best films is objectively wrong. They have one of the worst outputs next to Nigeria
>>83636189
Dreyer is danish you fucking retard.
>>83636241
He made films in Sweden.
>>83636189
>Dreyer
He's Danish you fucking tard.
And Sjostrom is pure cancer, Criterionababby. Naming one of the worst Swedish directors doesn't help your argument
>>83636167
I remember my first year of film school
>>83636254
If Man Ray makes films in France does he count as a French filmmaker
>>83636292
They are still films "from Sweden" or wherever.
what is the lille of television and film?
>>83636279
No, first year film school would be saying The Conformist has the greatest cinematography when Bernardo Bertolucci is one of the worst Italian directors. Maybe if you said somebody like Mauro Bolognini you wouldn't have outed yourself as a pleb
>>83636315
All of Dreyer's Swedish films were garbage though. Maybe if you named somebody like Per Lindberg you wouldn't have outed yourself as a first year film school student, but even he is garbage-tier.
https://letterboxd.com/machill54/
>>83634639
John Dies at the End
>>83635821
unironically watch some eurocrime
Milano Calibro 9 if you haven't seen, or Almost Human got a blu release recently.
>>83636419
Eurocrime is cancer
Arrowsmith1931>The Conformist
>>83636450
explain one (1) reason why that is other than 'machill54 likes it and that makes me mad'
eurocrime is good!!!!
@83636340
Trash Humpers
>>83636486
It did nothing that wasn't already done in the 30's.
>>83636358
I don't give a sh*t about Bertolucci all i know is Vittorio Storaro is an amazing cinematograper
Joseph H August>Vittorio Storaro
>>83636536
they have John Saxon and Maurizio Merli in them and there is literally LITERALLY nobody as based as those people in any movie made in the 30s
why Apocalypse Now its so praised?
>>83636340
she's like 11 you sic fuc
>>83636755
Probably the difficult production has something to do with it.
>>83636786
why isn't heaven's gate praised then?
>>83636730
Clark Gable is one of the greatest macks in existence.
Lew Ayres is also better than those two marioluigis
>>83636827
>>83636755
good film
>>83636826
people haven't seen the extended cut whatever its name is but the butchered version
>>83636826
It is, in certain quarters.
>>83636755
See >>83636612 >>83636786 IMO
Good atmosphere, but not as good of a film as the conversation.
Has Coppola made anything worthwhile apart form these and Godfather?
>>83636419
I should watch eurocrime, Milano calibro 9 is one of the only ones i have seen and i loved it. Tried to find a torrent with seeders for Almost Human some months ago but i didn't find any. I have heard good things about it so maybe i'll buy the blu ray.
>>83636887
Confersation
>>83636887
Yes, his late career has good films.
>>83636887
Dracula
>>83636911
Eurocrime is not interesting
>>83636827
>better than based Maurizio
I don't think so buster
>>83636911
Watch the other two films in Di Leo's milieu trilogy! I think I prefer the second to the first even
>>83635690
seconding
>>83636826
They're both shit.
>muh epic western
>muh Vietnam expedition
All done better by The Covered Wagon and The Lost Patrol
>>83636945
but it is
>>83636976
dumb Muh poster
wahoo it's coffret season boys
>>83636989
>tfw this post wasn't even me
letterboxd.com/albion
why's jessy lanza so comfy bros
https://youtu.be/D88fLHQh3NU?list=PL37B422LEsJ8mh2-k9EgmVgHiosJaA930
new information has surfaced that confirms dropout_bear to be globalist
cease all communications with him at once
>>83636887
>has Coppola made
What did that spaghettinigger do that wasn't taken from Mario Puzo, Werner Herzog, and Gordon Willis
All of his other flicks are shit (Finian's Rainbow, Peggy Sue Got Married)
>>83636887
One From the Heart and Rumble Fish are great. People also say his Dracula film is good but I don't care for it
>>83636612
Joseph H August>Vittorio Storaro
Learn what actual good cinematography is
>>83637238
>One From the Heart
>good
If it was so good why'd it flop, revisionistbabby. There's a million better musicals. Even in the 70s alone. And you only suggest Rumble Fish because it got a Criterion release. I find it funny how they'll release Rumble Flop but they won't release Lullaby from 1929
>>83637023
Nice nonexistent counterarguments, monkey
>>83637515
Muh is not an argument
>>83637658
Naming films that did the exact same thing better decades ago is. I'd say get better taste, but you can't fix bad genes
>>83637700
Originalism is not an argument
Taste is not an argument
>>83637796
New=good. Criticism 101 babby. ut of course you don't know that since you don't write reviews let alone decent ones. If you're not looking for something new you're just watching the same shit with a different coat of paint. The only thing is nobody has seen nearly as many films as me, so when they watch something unoriginal first they dumbfoundedly think it's special (i.e. you)
>>83637906
Generalisationism is not an argument
>>83637966
Made up words are not an argument. Learn English first before you try to make one.
>>83637393
>>83637239
give me kino or give me death
>>83638036
Dismissalism is not an argument.
>>83637906
>>83638051
take death, please.
FORM
>>83636976
>reducing entire films to "western" or "expedition" so that you can force your shitty opinion
It's like you are not even trying.
krusty ass
>>83638152
krusty ass >>>>>>> d.w. griffith
>>83638038
>>83638083
Nice reaction images. And no I won't use less words in my sentences for you. If you want to challenge me, you can at least try to come close to my level. Though, I know it's challenging for you as it is with everybody to reach my godly stature.
/lbg/ theme
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JmR0DAjKjL0
>>83638149
It's not reductionism if they're already that simple to begin with
>>83638071
Learn English.
/lbg/ theme
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CWnYIb2lqpo
>>83638299
Liguisticism is not an argument
>>83638337
How about you name a single good thing about Apocalypse Now. This anon already recognizes it's shit >>83636755
>>83638299
It is, because they are not.
>>83638377
Slippery-slopeism is not an argument
>>83638337
Don't even fucking talk about Luigiism I know for a fact you are not as well versed in this subject as me and for this reason I will insult you into the fucking ground you God damn dog dick pleb babby faggy
>>83638453
>t. Luigi, grring
>>83638309
Tied for first for best song. I like that brown girl in the dress.
which one of you is this
>>83638390
>babby thinks Apocalypse Now isn't simple as shit
The plot is literally
>we need you to kill this guy
>he goes and kills him
>the end
>>83638514
You could do that with any film
Not an argument.
>>83638556
You can't summarize Intolerance like that
>>83638511
>South American
>weeb
>gamer
I don't recognize anyone who fits the bill
>>83638511
>>83638511
>s americans
>having an iphone
lel, nice shop
>>83638401
Are you going to name anything good about Apocalypse Now because if you're not you're basically saying you have no argument other than your emotional feelings toward the flick
>>83638511
>chile
https://letterboxd.com/swimmingpool/
>>83638514
>muh narrative
kk pleb
>>83638514
It's about the psychological journey and the way the films visual language changes as the men get closer to the Heart of the jungle. I always liked the scenes like the Playboy performance and the army unit defending the bridge (from non existent enemies) because it's a depiction of the war like people hadn't seen before.
I find it to be generally overrated but that doesn't mean it's a waste of a film. If I had a choice between more movies made like Apocalypse Now and more movies made like The Mummy (2017) or the Avengers I would choose Apocalypse Now every day
>>83638660
Every single film has a good aspect.
ex: The fact that the film didn't reach across the screen and kill you is good.
>>83638683
wtf I hate swimmingpool now
>>83638720
Oh we're gonna talk about form now?
Alright name a single formal thing Apocalypse Now did new.
>Superimpsitions
Griffith
>Intellectual montage
Griffith and Eisenstein
>helicopter shots
Planes same thing Wings
>>83638868
chef boyardee did ravioli first tb.h we shouldn't cook ravioli for people anymore
>>83638729
>Isolationism and descent into madness
Already done better in 1934
>>83638514
I think you just accidentally discovered why the film is good.
You're right. There isn't much to the movie. The plot is bare and their mission to kill Kurt is utterly pointless and a waste of time, life, and resources. A doomed mission. A mission that doesn't change a single thing even if the characters succeed or fail.Just like the Vietnam war;^)
>>83638868
i thought you hated einsenstein
>>83638619
>Tumblr
I'm not even surprised, Bruce
>>83639011
i dont see reddit there
>>83638969
>really makes me THINK
War makes money. Killing Kurtz wouldn't make any money, hippie faggot
>>83638979
Find a single quote of me saying I hated Eisenstein. I put Eisenstein there because Strike is where Coppola got the idea to put the bull sequence in. It's not the first instance of intellectual montage however.
>>83639120
>find a single quote
Why don't you just say 'No I don't" like a normal guy
Rate.Thanks mega autist for the pape
>>83639157
No, you want to say I factually hate him then pull a quote out of the archives. What I said I hate about Soviet flicks was the lack of the calm human moment. It's all presto and flash throughout the entire duration, no subtlety or compassion. They're also all largely inane propaganda stories. Griffith is on the opposite spectrum and knew how to balance both the long take and the instinctive cut.
>>83639120
>soviet montage clique
worst Russian filmmakers, get better taste, pseud
No. The only reason you, as well as other modern youth, prefer Einstein and Soviet montagists, is because since the 80's with MTV and music videos, films have progressively opted for a music video approach with frenetic editing. Whereas in the 60's and 70's long takes were preferred and taken from the theories of Andre Bazin and the French new wave. You consider montage modern but in actuality those still alive from the 60's and 70's consider it outdated and a regression. Montage doesn't take skill or participation from the director nor the audience. That's why many young people bemoan films from the 60's and 70's as being "too slow" and "boring"
>>83639043
in the notifications
>>83639358
And not a single mention of the word "hate". Pathetic attempt if you can even call it an attempt to disprove me.
>>83639055
I can't remember for sure if money was discussed in the opening scene where they give Willard the mission. But the crew he gets assigned definitely don't know what they are getting into. They are recruited under false pretenses and the chief has a major conflict with Willard about that.
Also, the Vietnam war was right on the cusp of the military industrial complex rising to power. So I don't think anybody really made a big profit off the war except for independent defense contractors. The US spend the equivalent of about 900 million dollars on the war and lost 60,000-300,000 soldiers so Vietnam costs more than anyone likely profited off it so I don't think money was a necessary area of focus for Apocalypse Now.
The making of the film also mirrors the war a lot. Big American film crew goes to the jungle, gets their asses kicked, the production costs spiral out of control, their tactics didn't work, and they had to send a lot of crew home sick/injured
Interesting to think about
>>83639372
oh thats just another gay ass r/funny ad
r*ddit is awful, only go for emly pix or something
>>83639466
>A film with a meta plot that metaphorically mimics the war it's centered on
Even if what you're suggesting is true it was already done better in 1934 >>83638925
>>83639581
>done better in 1934
yeah and dog shit flew in the fucking sky
why buy houses when mud huts came first.
houses do nothing new. sraraouge.
>>83639466
I guess I meant to say, the United States had top dollar military/economic investments in Vietnam prior to the war (like decades before) and the conflict could be seen as a way to protect those investments. They werent making any money from the war, you could just make the argument they were only defending future profits that integrating the country would provide. Its slightly different than the situation we have now where massive weapons deals and natural resources are the cause for proxy wars which I think is what you were thinking about
>>83639637
>babby can't into repressive acting machismo and isolationist minimalism
WHAT'S UP HETEROSEXUALS
>>83639733
What you meant to say was that I'm right and superior to you in every feasible facet.
>>83639733
vietnam war was done under the guise of stopping communism and helping france retain their power in the region
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=PgIr9ZLV_wk
>>83639581
I don't give a shit if you think The Lost Patrol was done better that's your opinion. You or someone else asked what makes Apocalypse Now good and I gave my opinion too. I havent seen the 1934 film but I'm going to go out on a limb and say it's a completely different tone or atmosphere and the setting adds a different element as well. I don't even think they are comparable but it sounds like I'm dealing with someone on the spectrum so by all means keep being a faggot about it
>>83639960
>I don't even think they are comparable
True. Lost Patrol is leagues ahead of Apocalypse Now.
Also
>admitting Apocalypse Now is vastly overrated
>gets furiously mad enough to write a 3-space paragraph when suggested a film that's better
Stay mad, babby.
>>83639845
That's what they told us and it was fundamentally true. But the United States had begun widespread construction projects with the South Vietnamese in the country by at least 1960. Building roads, trade routes, canals, ports, airfields, and possible military bases. We pumped millions of dollars into the country before we ever got involved militarily. I think our government was a little chaffed that they were initially ignorant to the rising threat in the North and thought they could integrate the country with or without the support of the communists
>>83640133
>But the United States had begun widespread construction projects with the South Vietnamese in the country by at least 1960. Building roads, trade routes, canals, ports, airfields, and possible military bases. We pumped millions of dollars into the country before we ever got involved militarily
[citation needed]
letterboxd.com/OriginalName3
https://letterboxd.com/a7xfan/film/scary-movie-5/
Where the fuck is Blackhat's director's cut?
>>83640196
>Giving 3 stars to Fritz Lang
>Giving 4 stars to this queer faggot
Found the pleb
>>83640101
It's overrated yes. The Godfather is overrated too. In fact, Coppolas entire career is overrated. But is Apocalypse Now bad or somehow lesser because of this? Not at all. I will defend the film because it's better than 90% of the films being released today and the fact that it turned out watchable despite all the trouble making it really speaks to the material. It really doesn't matter if you say a 1934 movie did it better because that wasn't the question in the first place.
>>83640370
give queer the data.
>>83640311
on my dvr :-)
>>83640555
pls upload it nosaj
>>83640381
What you meant to say was that I'm right and superior to you in every feasible facet.
>>83640190
Just go look up United States South Vietnam relations. We had been putting our dick in the area since at least the mid 1950s after the parallel in the country was drawn up. Very similar to Korea.
You can look up the Michigan State University Vietnam Advisory group too. That will give you a broad idea of our goals at the time. Basically support Southern Vietnam economically through contracted groups in an effort to naturally edge out the communists without resorting to anything physical. We all know how that eventually worked out
reminder that i will fricken k*ll you if you keep posting at nosaj the way you are poating at nosaj
>>83640598
How do I rip it? I don't think I'll be good at removing the commercials anyway. All I have is a cheap laptop and Handbrake.
>>83640665
Dude, I'll do it for you. Please!
>>83640665
i don't fucking know :(
>>83640798
my mom said I can't have friends over until I do the dishes
>>83640665
Wait, I'm the first. Just upload it raw, it's better for working on it.
>>83638051
Kino is not free.
>>83640907
I don't know how to rip from the DVR and I doubt I have any of the equipment needed. Too scared to Google.
I am about to watch Inland Empire
>>83641178
I am about to watch Emily Jean
>>83641132
Are you shitting me or do you really have the thing?
>>83641211
>le Look at that Booty face
>>>/hr/2928213
answar maaaaay
>>83641267
>>83641267
I shit on You
>>83641480
What model do you have?btw is it good? I've been holding on watching the film because I heard of the DC
>>83641562
HR-44 500
It was a top 15 of 2015 for me. I don't know exactly where I'd place the DC, maybe a spot or two higher.
gg fag you killed the thread
>>83642446
Name one instance after Cain killing Abel where killing was anything new.
>>83642446
Sorry
>>83642525
top lol
>>83642446
Sorry
>>83638619
Is there a lot of good content on Full screen? Apparently I can get a free 1-year subscription
>>83642757
no clue
Can anyone recommend a well shot actually good movie that has a cute girl I can fall in love with in it?
https://letterboxd.com/brenx923/
>>83643591
Birdmaan
>>83643923
Watched it, don't care for it that much.
I'd like to see a slow paced drama with some realistic emotion.
>>83643986
Satantango
>>83643591
Respire
>>83643591
Carnival of Souls
griffith EXPOSED
hi frens
just locked myself out of my apartment. i'm very hungry and have no keys and no food! are there any movies about getting locked out?
>>83647466
is morvern callar really that good?
>>83647466
u my fren
>>83643591
the double life of veronique
a girl walks home alone at night
>>83647502
i loved it! dreamy, drifting, ethereal.. it's right up my alley, so anybody else's mileage may vary!
>>83647541
you too :-)
Come home kinophiles
https://letterboxd.com/Smoothhands/
>>83648035
kill yourself
>>83648087
one day the good lord will take me.. but neigh not by my own hand, for it is not mine to take
WHEN WILL THEY HAVE THE ANDROID APP!?!?!
How's it hanging /lbg/?
>>83648035
Let he who knows kino cast the first stone
>>83649103
Emma.
>>83648270
JoJo (pbuh) guide me through the Valley of Flickth
>>83648315
Never but at least you can change your pronouns! :-)
>>83643591
possesion
out 1
CINEMOS WHEN
C I N E M O S
I
N
E
M
O
S
N E V E R
E
V
E
R
How do I get an invite to a private tracker ?
>>83651154
Invites are closed in the good places
>>83651154
chances are you will never ever get one
>>83643591
Sun don't shine
>>83651586
I'll buy one then fuck you
>>83648939
it's hanging good..
got some food with a friend while waiting. my landlord called back an hour later and came and let me in. all is well! how are you?
for reference i am >>83647466
About to watch a flick of my own encoding. Wish me luck, pals!
>>83648939
me
>just cleaned my apartment
>walked 1 mile
>about to go fill up on gas and cigarettes
you
>just spent 2 hours watching a movie
>no life
How's it feel?
>>83651154
i could get you into one....... for a price
>>83652096
you
>smoking cigarettes that obliterate your lungs
me
>eating healthy and staying active while watching movies in my free time
how's it feel?
>>83652096
s-screw you!
>>83651898
have fun getting permabanned from the site
>tfw on kg, the best site on the internet other than 4chan
>>83652096
walks are lame, shoulda jogged. cigarettes are garbage i feel bad for ya. wow a CLEAN apartment u say? wow i keep my sh*t clean year round wow this dude CLEANED part of a building that he pays for every month for precisely zero equity. litterly informing us all of two detrimental life mistakes tryina act smug lol 'the f*ck outta here who goes out just to fill up on gas lol u goin to work after that ma dude? lmao yea ya are brosef i am famous, i am adored, i am sought-after. i get accolades you load stacks of printer paper onto pallets at eight in the morning. you are nowhere near my level. don't kid yaself
Imagine being Megaautist for a second. Sorry to darken your day. But yeah for real, Megaautist, you should kill yourself.
I wonder how PUNQ's wife reacts when all their picasso paintings have been replaced with those of nigger babies
>>83635672
Stalker (1979)
>>83635672
Stalker (1979)
https://letterboxd.com/sylvydra/
D.w. Read
>>83635672
Stalker (2010)
>>83635760
Akira Kurosawa's The Idiot
Wait
We should have a /lbg/ on /soc/ someday
Bruce Melvin told me we need to keep this thread alive because he's got a big surprise for all of us when he comes back.
>>83654697
make the thread
>>83655382
No you
>>83655973
Make thread on /vp/
Bullying is the part and parcel of coming to /lbg/
>>83656683
bullies are a diamond dozen here
Hey I know this is no place to ask but I'm looking for a horror film I saw many years ago when I was still a kid, I've trying to find it using the parts I remember to no avail, considering the recording quality it must have been something produced in the late 80s or early 90s, it had to do with a guy living in a flat that has a thing for his hot neighbour but spooky things start happening and he ends up finding lots of baby skeletons hidden in a hole in the wall in her living room, I can't remember for sure but I have the notion that she was some kind of flesh eating witch or something of the sort
Any help would be greatly apreciated
>>83656750
Drive
>>83656750
A very Brady sequel
>>83656750
>>83656891
this, source: I've seen it three times already
What is the significance of the avant-garde film? Not the art film, the avant-garde that has nothing to say and is essentially random images (i.e. home movies with slightly more formal concern)? Do they merely act as installation ""art"" and the equivalent of cinematic paintings? Then their concerns for the audience are strictly emotional in the same vein as popcorn entertainment. How do you rate such things?
>>83657249
That's where you fucked up. You implied film was an intelligent medium. What if it is just an emotional one
>>83658063
yes it is
>>83657419
doesn't film have the capacity to operate in both an emotional and intellectual mode? potentially even at the same time?
>Favorite Movies
Star Wars, Mad Max Fury Road, Children of Men, One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest, Seven, Christopher Nolan films, Deadpool, Pee Wee's Big Adventure, Four Lions, Bronson, Her, Arrival, Logan
>Favorite TV Shows
Breaking Bad, Better Call Saul, Game of Thrones, Firefly, Fargo, True Detective S1, Daredevil, Westworld, Hannibal
>>83658511
not true
>>83658511
whom
tfw it really is coffret season
>>83658785
has anyone ripped Taipei Story yet? i'm interested to see it.
>>83658934
I've only seen Revenge from the set (it was on the MOC set), it was really good, although Dry Summer was the standout of that first set for me
Excited for Mysterios Object at Noon and Taipei Story, heard good things
>>83659253
Mysterious Object is good. kinda wish i had waited for the bluray to get ripped to see it, though.
>>83658504
How can film offer an intelligent discussion and argument when the superior medium already exists for such a purpose: the written word
>>83659443
film is more capable of simultaneously evoking an emotional and intellectual response than literature due to the immediacy of images
>>83658785
>>83658934
>>83659253
>>83659303
Why do people watch Criterion shit?
>>83659488
Because they release (generally) high quality versions of films that seem interesting and would not otherwise necessarily get a release at all
where do I watch this movie
>hindi remake of NWR's film
>>83659486
What intellectual response? Why do you think universities still type papers as opposed to making video essays? Because the written word is plainly superior when trying to stir intellectual discourse. Also, emotion and intelligence do not mix otherwise you get tepid sentimentality and useless empathy. The manipulation of editing and presentation makes sure to draw the most emotional response and it's all cheap tricks.
>>83659524
>watching films digitally
Found the neet betavirgin that doesn't live near a private screening studio
>>83659524
>high quality versions of films that seem interesting
There's not a single film in the Criterion Collection that's interesting. Maybe Rules of the Game but that's a stretch.
>still watching flickering images
>>83659486
words are images and far more powerful than a lame ass capture of outside world.
>>83659607
You are right that I don't live near a private screening studio
>>83659642
in your opinion
>>83659839
Words are superior when it comes to stimulating intellectual discourse but inferior to painting, lithography, theatre, and corporeal mime when it comes to eliciting emotional response.
>>83659914
could you stop reposting you fucking autist
>>83659873
>in your opinion
Perhaps, but factually there's not a single formally inventive film in the Criterion Collection, and using that intellectual basis, it's all verifiably unoriginal lethargic shit. You need to both get better taste and actually learn a semblance of film history before speaking with sweeping statements.
>>83659942
>babby can't into actual artforms
>>83659974
>but factually there's not a single formally inventive film in the Criterion Collection
I don't care about that, and neither does anybody else in this thread except for you, the person who every indication seems to suggest you have severe brain defects and lead a hugely unfulfilling life
>>83659974
and you need to gas yourself bel
>>83660368
>I don't care about that
And that's why you'll always be intellectually inferior to me
>>83660427
If you're going to take a half hour to make a pathetic attempt at insulting me you should at least spend that half hour coming up with something original to say as opposed to drooling with your mouth agape.
cum
>>83659582
respond pls
Yo, I've made a list of all the movies I've seen. Without realizing that there is a section just for that. Is there a way to move them over or am I just going to have to bite the bullet?
>>83661308
Fixed