WHERE THE FUCK IS THE RLM ROUGE ONE REVIEW?!

>>77353987

TFA took 2 days until release. Give this one 2 days.

>>77354012
er, how many days has that film been out?

rumours are that it will take 12 years to make

>>77354191
4

>>77354012
NIGGER I DONT HAVE 2 DAYS NECK YOURSELF JESUS CHRIST

Predictions? I think they'll like it personally.

Half in the bag: a week
Plinkets review: 2 years

So mike what did you think of I, Rebel

Well Jay, I loved it, I loved it I loved it, they really hit the nail on the head with this one

I agree Mike, etc etc.

>>77354482
They have to mantain a middle ground with snarky criticism, while at the same time saying it was ok. And shit on the other prequels at every chance

>>77354581

Mike didn't maintain a middle ground with TFA and the prequels are garbage.

i do wonder what they'll say about the film, going out of it my friend, who is a pretty big star wars film loved it, and I was so bored during the film that i wanted to leave half way through...

>>77354523

You forgot the fake out

>"So mike what did you think of rogue warriors?"
>"I think it sucked... that it wasn't longer!"
>Jay pulls a stupid surprise face like the faggot he is
>the fat blob known as rich evans pops into the scene
>"OH MY GAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAWD"

bump for meme magic

>>77354191
Today makes it 2 in the US

File: 1464831393833.png (48KB, 531x298px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 531x298px

They're editing it right now.

>>77356920
How dare you post that on here for these non patrons to see.

>>77357484
t. ass blasted patron donater

How much do give them per month?

great more capeshit reviews

>>77357678
Yeah who would have thought that those guys that got famous for their Star Wars reviews would do a review of the new Star Wars movie???

File: sadmike.png (271KB, 388x384px) Image search: [Google]

271KB, 388x384px

Mike didn't receive Disney's check yet

>>77354482
Mike will like it because he hates George Lucas so much. I think Jay will generally dislike it, and I think Rich will genuinely love it, since he already admitted the space battles are really the only thing that he loves about Star Wars, and R1 is basically space battle porn at the end

>>77357484
because he's not a jew

>>77356920
So when will it land?

>>77359904
Hold on, let me pull out my crystal ball...

>>77356920
I hope they actually do a Collateral Beauty review.

>>77354739
>>77354523
when i first started watching these guys in 2012 i thought they were this edgy online criticism source and now they're just boring 40somethings doing bad tired jokes and admitting they are okay with most of the junk hollyoowd puts out

I'm not sure but I think Mike regrets doing the TFA review so quickly after release because his pleb fanboy opinions were shining through and it wasn't till later he realised how shitty the film was.

By that point he'd already promised a Plinkett review to try to convince everyone the movie was great but during production the reality of it being kinda shit dawned upon him but it was too late to do anything about it other than to spend the entire review NOT talking about the film and instead bitching about the prequels, Lucas & some ring theory nobody cared about. No talk of stuff he defended like the Mary Sue accusations since he now realised its true but there was no way he could say "I was wrong, it's shit" or the RLM cult would turn on him.

I would expect it to come out in a week or so as a result so the fat shit can actually decide whether he likes the thing or not.

I don't know maybe I'm full of shit it's just the feeling I have.

>>77361189
>and it wasn't till later he realised how shitty the film was.

That Plinkett review wasn't calling TFA shitty, like, at all. It criticizes what Mike perceived to be flaws of the movie, but pretending it was an outright attack on the film is you desperately looking to reinforce your own biases.

The absolute worst thing he says about TFA is that it's safe and calculated, he admits early on that it's a good and fun movie.

>>77354254
Even though all RLM fans are meme spouting retards posting the same "it's so dense" shit on every comment section of everything they do this seems like the one quote that people are sick of the most. Largely because Mike & Jay told them to hate it.

So congrats, you've achieved heights of meme faggotry even RLM fags try to avoid

File: Mike at the weekly money drop.png (829KB, 768x510px) Image search: [Google]

829KB, 768x510px

>>77358295

>>77361274
You fucking imbecile, reread what I wrote.

I know full well the Plinkett review wasn't an attack on TFA, it was barely a review of TFA at all! And I feel the reasons for that are because Mike realised that he couldn't defend it like he wanted to so he focused on other irrelevant shit to fill up time.

The Star Trek 2009 review defended the film while also pointing out how it was shitty in places but that was ok because X, Y & Z

The TFA review bitched about the prequels & Lucas some more and some fan theory most people have never heard of let alone considered viable. When it first leaked people were asking here "ummm when is he going to talk about the actual movie?" and the reason (at least in my view) is he couldn't because his opinions on it had changed so much that he'd either totally contradict himself or he'd be trying to sell dogshit as gold.

These guys single handed destroyed the Prequels, for which I will never forgive them. The movies themselves are dumb shit to sell toys to children and nothing they said about them are wrong, but there was so much good EU shit, videogames, comics, and novels based on them and the fact that this period will be forever ignored in favor of multicultural rebels vs white supremacist Empire fills me with endless rage

>>77361774
Want more rage?

Mike is proud of the role he played in nuking the series.

>>77361189
>I think Mike regrets doing the TFA review so quickly after release because his pleb fanboy opinions were shining through and it wasn't till later he realised how shitty the film was.
So...you didn't watch the Plinkett Awakens video? Because he never says it's a shitty film.

>>77361831
Why wouldn't he be? However meaningless in the grand scheme of things, his work has changed the world

>>77361706
>The TFA review
It's NOT a Force Awakens review, you dumbass. It's an analysis of everything surrounding current Star Wars. Force Awakens is just a small part of a much larger machine now. That's what the point of the video is.

>>77361774
>>77361831
then again these reviews come from a fat amputee serial killer they are not mean to be taken seriously

>>77353987
Nostalgia Critic has cucked RLM by releasing his review first. RLM cucks on suicide watch.

>>77361971
Who (literally)?

>>77361189
>spend the entire review NOT talking about the film and instead bitching about the prequels, Lucas & some ring theory nobody cared about.


this, shit was annoying

>>77361971

Noone would know unless you tell them.

Where the fuck was Katarn
Films worst offense was wiping out the best part of the original canon

>>77362015
It's almost like the video wasn't simply a review of TFA and was instead an essay on a larger topic or something.

>>77361971
Here's your reply.

>so what did you think about the movie?
>I loved it. It was refreshing. An action movie, in a Star Wars setting. I thought the characters were great.

>>77353987

the Disney check still didn't clear

>>77361971
So has based Stuckmann. What the fuck are RLM doing?

File: aintnobodygottimeforthat.gif (944KB, 500x280px) Image search: [Google]

944KB, 500x280px

>>77362124

>>77353987
Spoiler alert : the strong wymen and chinamen win. Cuz multiculturalism!

>>77362183
>An action movie, in a Star Wars setting.
You realize all the Star Wars movies are action movies, don't you?

>>77362269
RLM actually uses multiple cameras and edits their video and audio, as opposed to just sitting in front of a web cam and adding pointless jump cuts.

>>77362572
Why the fuck would the rebels lose?

>>77354636
TFA was honestly on their level if not worse.

>>77362675
this

NC and Stuckmann is just sitting in front of a camera, RLM has better editing and usually some kind of small skit

>>77362713
The rebels are the terrorists and the youngling slaughter of 6bbA never happened. It's a myth created by the jewdi!

>>77362269
>Stuckmann
>based

>>77354482
"It looked good, except (insert 100 Grand Moff Tarkin CGI face jokes)
But the story was shit"

File: blarghagrba.png (1MB, 1390x958px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1390x958px

>>77358295

>>77354581
That's not true. There's been tons of movies they've loved openly in their reviews, including TFA. Yes they point out the flaws, because they're critics...

>>77356920
muh editing

>>77362269

How the fuck is Stuckmann based? The guy's a timid manchild who tries his utmost to be as inoffensive as possible in all his incredibly simplistic videos.

File: beers.jpg (73KB, 1600x400px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 1600x400px

what do you think this rooms smells like?

do you think the cleaned every bottle with fresh water?

File: batmun.jpg (16KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 1280x720px

>>77364088
this isn't a room

>>77364088
thats what they pay Rich for, set work and shit like that, 2 hundy a week plus whatever he makes from pre-rec

S C H L O C K

>>77361189

I know the feeling of being full of shit anon

I'm on the bus home right now from an all you can eat sushi place and its getting dangerous. My tummy hurts real bad and there isn't even room to sit down. 4 more stops help

>>77361189
>>77361706
>Lucas & some ring theory nobody cared about
I love how Mike's literally getting bucks from Disney and he tried to project this and deflect the blame back to the Prequels that it's Disney trying to make them look good.

Lmaoing at his life.

File: RLM_HitB_set.jpg (75KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 1280x720px

>>77364088

It probably gets good circulation.

>>77353987

i don't think Mike will like it tbqh, waiting 2 hours for a bunch of shitty underdeveloped characters to die all the while not really adding anything new to the story won't sit right with him

>>77361421
Mike lost a lot of weight

>>77364129
this isn't a roooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooom

>>77364088

Jack said on a Pre-Rec that he cut his foot open on the broken beer bottle glass strewn all around the warehouse. The glass was sharp enough to cut through his shoe and cut him.

So since they don't clean up I imagine the warehouse/studio smells like stale beer like sports stadiums.

>>77364500
>it's fake
Immersion ruined.

>>77353987
After how easy they went on the last star wars, I'm guessing the cheque hasn't cashed yet.

>>77365015
>jack cut his foot once, therefore that must mean that they n ever clean up ever.
The fuck kind of retarded logic is that? We've seen what their studio space looks like. If they never cleaned it, it'd look a helluva lot worse.

>>77364730
kek

>>77364500
>set is *slightly* smaller than the building that surrounds it

kek, must still smell awful

>>77356920
How long does it usually take from edit to upload?

>>77353987
>why do they only review normie blockbusters
>wheres my star wars review

make up your mind

>>77365282
It'll probably drop tomorrow

>>77365235
That's the pre-2013 studio.

They moved to a location near the airport in 2013.

They moved to another location (anons have yet to track it down) last year.

>>77354482
Both will think it's lukewarm because it was. Neither had high expectations for the film either

>>77365345
>anons have yet to track it down
ha no

>>77365527
Point it out on a map then, nig.

>>77365527
>>77365559
>"I-I'm top internet hacker and I know where their studio is!!"
>"Prove it"
>thread dies

if i didn't know where their studio is, how was i able to get my 600% accurate list of RLM's december release schedule? checkmaite, aidsmoby

So we can all agree that Jack is way better these days, right? He really scaled down on the exageration shit.

>>77367548
Jack is annoying but is still somehow nice.

>>77353987
Rogue one is the most disappointing thing since my son

>>77367548
I still hate him on principle due to his absolutely shit taste in video games.

>>77367548
Jack is an honorary RLM member in my eyes. I have zero issues with him appearing on BOTW these days, I straight up like the guy.

>>77367548
Jack is fine. I never disliked him.

Josh needs to be thrown out into the street and shot. I'm fucking sick of him shouting over everyone virtue-signalling and shrieking his male feminism whenever the movie does literally anything risque.

>>77368523
>>>/v/eddit
loser.

>>77354254
XD

>>77361189
We get it, anon. You are a prequel apologist and hated TFA.

>>77361774
neck yourself, faggot.

Do you really need more footage of Mike dickriding Star Wars?

>>77354482
They'll be mixed on it but the plinkett review next September will rip it to shreds

>rouge

>>77369599
It's a very Mike joke mispronunciation.

Will probably be a joke video.

>Half in the BAAAAG. Fuck movies!

Jay and Mike sit in silence for 30 seconds.

>So Mike what did you think of Star Wars: The Rouge Awakens

Mike shrugs.

>It was okay.

Credits.

>>77369749
>implying they won't have someone dress up as Vader and come barging through the set, destroying everything
10/10 kino

ROGUE
ROGUE
ROGUE

ROGUE
ROGUE
ROGUE

ROGUE
ROGUE
ROGUE

R O G U E
O
G
U
E

IT'S SPELLED
(((R))) (((O))) (((G))) (((U))) (((E))) YOU ILLITERATE FUCKSTICKS

>>77354482
They'll end the review by recommending it

>>77370248
>"So Mike, would you recommend it?"
>*face twisting and squinting slightly* "Yyyyeeeeeeeaahhh, I guess?" *nodding emphatically*

>>77364500
This feels like looking at forbidden knowledge.

>>77353987

IT'S UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

>>77367548
I like Jack. I never bought into the memes.

The only member I don't really like is Josh. He manages to keep his sjw bullshit views out of BotW and his commentary on the movies is decent enough so I'm not annoyed by him being in videos.

Why do you guys care so much about what someone else thinks of the movie? Watch it and make up your own mind. It's not like you basement dwellers are going to pay for it anyway.

>>77369822
They wouldn't put that much effort into a spoiler joke.

>>77370467
>He manages to keep his sjw bullshit views out of BotW
It always leaks through though. Whenever anything happens in the movie, a single breast exposed, whatever, he's the first to start screaming "NO MOVIE THAT IS NOT OK NO", so desperately projecting what a "safe" white knight he is to everyone else in the room and all the viewers. It gets pretty tiring.

How can Jessi stand having sex with Mike?

>>77370518
She couldn't. That's why they broke up. You don't see her on Best of the Worst anymore, do you?

>>77370517
I suppose, its just not very obvious or annoying to me. Like I said, I can't stand the guy outside of RLM videos but he is tolerable (At least for me) in any videos he appears.

>>77370517
Only an autistic faggot that combs through his twitter and is actively looking for things in their videos to be irritated by would actually notice that shit. The problem clearly isn't with Beardfat, it's with your creepy obsession with him.

>>77370859
I don't even touch twitter so sounds like you're sitting on a pile of shit with that assumption, m8.

>>77353987
If HelloGreedo hated it, Mike definitely will.

>>77370480
/tv/eddit can't form an opinion on anything unless their lords and saviours from RLM spoonfeed them

>>77370922
>Mike
>hating nuSW
Where were you for the TFA review?

>>77370960
Greedo loved TFA too but nitpicked the fuck outta it because it had "unnecessary fanservice" and too many "prequel references"

>>77353987
Its ROGUE you illiterate fucking nigger.

>>77353987
He's busy reviewing Slapstickstuff content
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bbgf5BC_s-4

>>77371028
Whereas Mike barely had any criticism and just said it's great and that he loved it

>>77370905
Of course you don't.

Tomorrow

>>77369749
i remember this post from last year

>>77371059
Just fucked my post up. Meant to say Greedo liked TFA but nitpicked R1 to hell and back.

>>77361971
>Nostalgia Critic
I don't think there are many people under the age of 12 that would take anything he says seriously...

>>77359199

They won't like it because the first 90 minutes are so rushed and jump to so many different places that you never see a single character for more than 6 minutes at a time so no one ever gets developed. The lead actress was one of the worst actors I've seen in a lead role and her "inspiring" speeches were Anakin "I hate sand" Skywalker tier because she looks like a twelve year old playing dress up.

The male lead was also bland as fuck and nearly put me to sleep within the first 40 minutes.

>>77362269
Stuckmann's videos are literally just a manchild giving vague criticisms of a movie in front of a webcam for a couple minutes whereass RLM have a studio they need to go to, their discussions take a quite a bit of time (probably over an hour) and they use multiple cameras.

>>77367548
Jack took some warming up to, but his optism and energy is a nice contrast to the rest of the crew.

Josh however...

>>77370201
Someone doesn't like rouge. How's the dialouge btw?

>>77365118
Priority one for cleaning shit is to make sure the ground is at least safe enough to walk on.

I'd love a collateral beauty/office party review with rogue one relegated to a throwaway joke at the end

>>77371827
>his optism and energy is a nice contrast to the rest of the crew.
why do you even watch rlm