How is Cenk Uygur so based?
>Gets fired by network executives for trying to tell the truth about greedy corporations, the mainstream medias deception of the masses, and our bought off politicians who cater to the rich while fucking over the poor
>Says "fuck you mainstream media" and literally just fucking makes a news network with hundreds of millions of views, giving a totally objective view of politics and current affairs which the mainstream media fails to do
>giving a totally objective view of politics and current affairs
>How is Cenk Uygur so based?
I know this is bait but jesus fucking christ this guy is absolutely terrible in every way. I literally dont see how anyone could like him. No matter where youre at on a political spectrum
>Cenk actually thinks hes smarter than based Sam Harris
newly received or noteworthy information, especially about recent events.
"I've got some good news for you"
a broadcast or published report of news.
plural noun: the news
"he was back in the news again"
synonyms: report, announcement, story, account; More
(news) item, article, news flash, newscast, headlines, press release, communication, communiqué, bulletin;
message, dispatch, statement, intelligence;
disclosure, revelation, word, talk, notice, intimation, the latest, gossip, tittle-tattle, rumour, scandal, exposé;
"colleagues were stunned by the news of his death"
information not previously known to (someone).
"this was hardly news to her"
/lit/ is laughing at you. Ben Stiller torture man is trash long before you get to anything Cenk would have issue with. If I wanted to read someone enforcing Christian doctrine without explicit evocation of the supernatural, I could just read Kant doing it infinitely better.
>/lit/ is laughing at you. Ben Stiller torture man is trash long before you get to anything Cenk would have issue with. If I wanted to read someone enforcing Christian doctrine without explicit evocation of the supernatural, I could just read Kant doing it infinitely better.
Exactly the kind of garbage response i'd expect on this site. Never change :^)
>there are people dumb enough to actually be taken in by failed pseudo-intellectuals like Sam Harris
jesus christ you must be gullible as fuck
Because he is an idiot spreading liberal propaganda 24/7? He takes people's way out of context, uses clickbait headlines (again, headlines way out of context), has no idea what words mean and if you don't agree with him? Well, then you're apparently a bigoted islamophobic nazi racist.
>Well, then you're apparently a bigoted islamophobic nazi racist.
Oh, I see. You don't like the fact that Cenk says not all Muslims are terrorists.
Go ahead and call me a blue pilled, liberal cuck now.
Not all billion or whatever the number muslims are terrorists, but almost all terrorists are muslims. Go over the terrorist incidents last year, almost all attacks are from islamic groups.
>almost all terrorists are muslims.
True. Except for the 99% that aren't.
Just because "not all terrorists are muslims" doesn't mean "all Muslims are peaceful liberals who love religious pluralism and western values
Why else is there widespread rioting in Muslim countries whenever someone draws muhammad
Inb4 hurr durr Wikipedia as a source I don't have time to dig scholarly journal articles for some random SJW on the Internet who isn't going to listen to a word I say anyway
That pie chart was shit and you know it. Appears they are counting bodies, not attacks, and we all know how eager Euroscum governments are to sweep Islamic terrorism under the rug. Count Breivik but leave out Paris? Never understand why Liberals claim to want equalitu for gays and women and also import the people who hate them both
This one is better.
>more than 100 matches
Religion of peace.
>"not all muslims are terrorists, but most terrorists are muslims"
>gets proven wrong
>"well most Muslims still hate the West so they're just as bad. you're a cuck"
>George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Ben Franklin fight British for independence
>THEY'RE CHRISTIAN TERRORISTS
This is how dumb /pol/ actually is. They actually look at the religion of the people involved rather than the cause that's being fought.
>implying there isn't an anti-semitic religious component to Palestinian liberation terrorism
It isn't either-or, faggot. Obviously the kikes treat the palestinians like shit but part of it is a genuine hatred of the very idea of a Jewish state
>shores of tripoli is literally in the marine national anthrm
>religion of peace
They have been killing and raping anyone who doesnt suck off their false prophet for hundreds of years. This isnt some new thing.A pie chart than spans 5 years doesnt change that
A publicly traded company has a legal obligation to do what is in the best interest of their shareholders. Not doing so is a felony. What logical reason does a company or any single human being have to not be greedy?
Companies provide billions in tax revenue and donate just as much to charity. They also provide jobs. Nobody forced them to open up shop and hire people.
So you'll take the benefits they provide and then question the manner in which they provide it?
I honestly can't understand how people are so blind towards what is happening in the world. Look in Europe, cities are run down and people are getting raped by "poor and peaceful" refugees every single fucking day, yet people go out of their way to fucking apologize for them. Yesterday I read about a boy getting stabbed by a "refugee" because he tried to defend a girl from getting raped. Is this what people want in America? I'm from Norway and I'm getting scared for my country and Europe in general, unless something drastically changes.
I actually hope more terrorist incidents happen. Not because I want innocent civilians to die, but because I want people to open up their eyes so terrorists attacks don't happen in the future so more people don't die.
to be fair, I do often agree with some of the things he says about money in politics and lobbying etc, but even when I do he always finds a way to shoehorn in some irrelevant PC progressive bullshit that has nothing to do with anything and it just goes right out the fucking window
2bh I haven't actually even watched a whole video in about 2 years. I only go there for the truly marvelous comment sections. some of the trolls there are legitimately hilarious, especially when the edgy teenage SJWs keep losing their shit at them
remember the time muslim immigrants (terrorists) went on a murder killing spree in california and the young turnks man started yelling and screaming
>FUCK WHITES ARE KILLING OUR CHILDEREN THEY'RE KILLING US!!!. FUCK MAN PEOPLE DON'T WAN TTHE TRUTH IT'S WHITES WHO ARE THE TERRORISTS! THEY'RE KILLING US I'M BRAVE ENOUGH TO SAY IT IT'S WHITE PEOPLE AGAIN AND AGAIN.
Dont believe the globalist lies. You must convince your countrymen to stand up for their nation. Be heard and be loud. Many weaker people just need a strong person to rally around
>Legit in any fashion
Even that cunt Cenk is more legitimate than her.
every video I watch of theirs over the last year or 2 almost always has 50/50 likes to dislikes, with many having far more dislikes especially when its a 'hurr poor muslims' one. granted I only watch maybe one a week if at all, but its a fairly glowing indictment, and they obviously can't all be trolls
is getting so many dislikes on a regular basis genuinely harmful to them (like in terms of strikes or suspension), or does it really make any difference?
He is a fucking cockroach.
>/pol/tards think -even believe- that being edgy and having contrarian views is still this great accomplishment that needs to be blurted out at any given opportunity
Imagine being this sad.
Retard. Go back and look at the posts. You didn't prove anyone wrong. The majority of terrorist acts committed in the last year were by muslims, which was the claim. You posted a reddit meme image that didn't was for europe before 2013. Fuck off retarded cuck.
>A publicly traded company has a legal obligation to do what is in the best interest of their shareholders
This is so broad as to be essentially meaningless. Companies are largely free to operate their business however they see fit.
I highly recommend watching Cenk shit himself screaming fascism as he watches trump steamroll the country.
No. If shareholders' interests are not being properly represented, they will replace management. Typically the larger shareholders sit on the board of directors and have direct power over management.
What was Rust shooting at? Was this scene meant to be some meta bullshit like he was shooting at God?
Like all Turks he's Alpha as Fuck.
Say what you will, ultimately they are true Alphas, wolves among men.
Do I need to walk you through this? A company can act morally without putting it's shareholder's interests wholly and exclusively before any considerations to society at large.
The original poster I quoted was claiming that legal operation of a business was in direct contradiction to any moral/ethical guidelines. This is fundamentally untrue, but idiots like to parrot it constantly in order to handwave all the fucked up behavior you see as a result of unrestricted greed.
If a company decided to start giving away billions of dollars, yes, they would be legally responsible. I'm not sure what you're getting at since you are being very vague like a good liberal and not actually citing specific examples of "greed"
>A company can act morally without putting it's shareholder's interests wholly and exclusively before any considerations to society at large.
Companies exist only to return money to its shareholders (the owners)
remember that time TYT edited that SUV vs bikers footage to make it look more damaging to the SUV driver
and don't forget "certain" homogeneous societies do work but not European ones...
I work for a very successful company thats been in business for over 25 years with over 1000 employees in a very competitive market.
It's employee owned and the top leadership is on a first name basis with all of its employees right down to the lowlyest new hire. They have investors to answer to, but they dont completely dictate the direction of the company.
You can put people over profit and be successful.
Oh, i should mention it's US based and does business in multiple states and 3 different countries. Everyone is an employee, and we consistently receive profit sharing bonuses at the end of the year and first quarter when they close the books on the previous year.
It's capitalism done right.
>harris says that mormonism is objectively less likely to be true than christianity, because mormonism is just christianity + some stupid stuff
>uygur says it's just as likely to be true: 0.0%
who is right?
Harris is right in the sense that it's more likely there's a rhombus drawn by reptilian aliens on the surface of mars than a square.
But since the probability of either is essentially zero, the difference is entirely academic.
>All this hate against Harris
Why? I only read his muslim stuff and it's quite coherent and something that is hard to disagree with. He is one of the needed voices to counter the parasites like Cenk or Reza Aslan.
You clearly don't know what an ad hom is you disgusting redditor.
An ad hominem would be him saying
>this guy's argument is shit BECAUSE he's a cuck, don't listen to him
Instead. he's saying
>you're wrong, btw you're a cuck
which is an insult, not an ad hominem
No one is going to win this argument you know. Everything here is pure butthurt.
>redditors think -even believe- that being a cuck and a liberal is still this great accomplishment that needs to be blurted out at any given opportunity
Imagine being this much of a faggot
He's basically the inverse of liberal fedoratippers who inordinately focus on Christianity and Judaism while ignoring or capitulating to Islam. He commits the same fallacies of association and paints with the same broad brushstrokes.
>giving a totally objective view of politics and current affairs
Well, to that anon's credit, his is european while yours is worldwide. A huge percentage of islamic acts of terrorism happen in the middle east because of the sectarian conflicts there.
probably intertribal violence in Africa or somewhere else with strong tribal roots. the attacks probably look the same, with combatants specifically targeting civilians to inspire fear in the opposition.
Go preach Christianity in Saudi Arabia and tell me how it works out for you.
it is officially more likely for bernie sanders to become president than donald trump in spite of him receiving far less coverage than trump
muslims can coexist with people if they modernize their forms of government and economies. their society is fucked because of all the totalitarianism and poverty in the middle east, leading to joe muslim having a fucked up view of how society should work relative to ours in the west. if we could just get them over the hump they can start developing and having more modern sensibilities.
It's more like momentum with half of the conservative base to be honest.
Half of the conservative Republican base is evangelicals, while the other half is just nationalist types. Although they do have some overlap.
Trump doesn't do too well with the evangelical crowd.
Completely incorrect, he is one of the "we need to uplift moderate muslims" types, who believe it is perfectly posible for muslims to integrate, just not under the current interpretation of the Quran. All his attacks are not on the muslim population, who he claims are mostly peaceful, but the muslim faith. There are no "broad brushes" because he does not generalize. And he is wrong. Muslims can't coexist with anyone, not even other muslims.
both fucking petrify me with their insanity sometimes. nationalists are often outrageously hawkish, and the evangelicals literally want to apply their fundamentalist rhetoric to us law. both should fuck off. a more moderate republican approach would honestly give them a better chance of winning, a la george bush (both of them).
>want to promote modern government and economies in the Middle East
>prop up Saudi Arabia and Jordan
>undermine Iran and Pakistan
how did this even happen
because of earlier conditioning when they grew up in middle eastern society telling them that its okay to do whatever thing we find appalling. their views mirror western views from three centuries ago because their society essentially mirrors ours from three centuries ago. i think that modernization and ample resources allowed the average person to develop a capacity for social justice in america, and that it would do the same for the middle east.
>a totally objective view of politics and current affairs
>Cenk "The Armenians had it comming" Uygur
>Cenk "It's always rape, unless it's a hoard of refugees" Uygur
>Cenk "Death to America" Uygur
>Cenk "I know these are supposed to rhyme idc" Uygur
>Cenk "Death to all Infidels, unless they are black opressed trannies " Uygur
Plenty of arab cities are modern because of petrolleum, yet they are populated by retards who still can't behave like decent human beings by the West standards (see the arab millionaire who "fell" into a girl's vagina and accidentaly raped her).
It's not modernization that liberalized the West, but the illustration period that started in France. It's cultural, not financial, and it can't come from the outside. They need to find the way by themselves. Look at the arab spring movements: not a single country in which the opposition was supported by the west ended up well. Giving them a "hump" would only increase their problems because that money wouldn't go where you want it to go.
Wait so he started a new news channel? Because The Young Cucks was extreme left pandering bought and paid for by that annoying bitches daddy.
Then he got his chance at big news. Drew no crowd. Threw a hissy.
So he started a new news atfer that? Or you have your timeline mixed up and mean TYC?
>It's a reddit took over /tv/ and you didn't even notice, the board that not so long ago had daily threads shitting on "last week tonight" and the libtard views presented on the show, now circlejerks around the biggest delusional sad excuse of news channel that is Young Turks, /tv/ has become a bunch of muslim terrorism appologists who will vote clinton this year episode. Now wonder we have daily bbc cucks threads
sm︂︂h t︂︂bh f︂︂am
>giving a totally objective view of politics and current affairs
The guy is a wannabe cult leader.