Is there anyone who deserves the title of, 'the greatest

>>64981433
who is it?

>>64981448
It's Bergman you uneducated pleb.

>>64981433

The answer to that question is Kubrick, not Sergei

>>64981433
Charlie Chaplin is the greatest filmmaker of all time.
/thread..

>>64981469
Who's bergman?

>>64981433
Bergman has admitted Tarkovsky was better though

File: gyp-rosetti.png (260KB, 500x491px) Image search: [Google]

260KB, 500x491px

>>64981448
It's Bobby Cannavale you uneducated pleb

>>64981509
That's not for him to judge.

>>64981490
>was

>>64981473
sup my reddit broheim

File: image.jpg (13KB, 272x199px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 272x199px

>>64981433
I don't think I've heard of him. I'm someone that watches a lot, too. So, uh, his work obviously hasn't persisted into the modern era. That's not a good sign.

>>64981505
Birdman

>>64981433
Bergman only made filmed plays. A total bore.

>>64981522
Who's bobby cannavale?
>ItsBergman

>>64981490
What's your favorite film of his?

>>64981580
Not him but Limelight.

File: 12323423524654.jpg (45KB, 640x427px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 640x427px

>>64981543
That's because you're a pleb who sticks to the mainstream and has watched films for probably less than 2 years.

You know nothing of this art.

>>64981580
The one where he give the epic reddit speech.

>>64981527
>the artist doesn't know his own work best
Nice meme, Professor.

>>64981580
If you don't say The Kid then you're a pleb.

>>64981433
it's Eisenstein

Bergman is one of the greats, but he relied too much on the characteristics of film that it shares with the theatre, not what is unique about the medium (if only he had continued on with what he did in Persona though, clearly his masterpiece)

>>64981614
Your still not telling me who the fuck this dude is anon.

>>64981668
>Eisenstein

One hit wonder.

>>64981543
Nice bait. Everybody even remotely into film has watched Persona

>>64981671
It's Bergman.

The second post in the thread man...

File: malick.jpg (15KB, 214x317px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 214x317px

>>64981433

that's not Malick anon

File: images.jpg (16KB, 448x328px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 448x328px

>>64981433
Tarkovsky was the logical conclusion to cinema as an art form. He literally elevated the medium.

>>64981723
He has gone full hack mode.

>>64981433

No OP, and no one else is really close either. Tarkovsky and Tarr weren't nearly as prolific.

File: tumblr_inline_mnycjp9RhS1qz4rgp.jpg (30KB, 500x364px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 500x364px

You posted the wrong guy.

>>64981722
Who is bergman? why do you praise him so anon?

>>64981743
>muh poetry

File: image.jpg (88KB, 333x500px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 333x500px

>>64981614
I've looked over a few titles on Wikipedia. Nothing even close to being famous. You know movies from the 50s, 60s, and 70s are still watchable, right? You can even get on Netflix to watch some of the great classics from those decades. But can you find any of his 'art' in there? I don't think so. You can stick to watching some guy and his objectively bad movies, but don't try and say he's good because nobody's ever heard of him. He's had 40 years to let his films surface and they still haven't. That should tell you something.

>>64981723
<Greatest filmmaker of all time
>Every film since 1973 uses the same handful of motifs

File: 1436133635520.png (53KB, 306x325px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 306x325px

>All these people who don't know who bergman is

What in the ever loving fuck happened to this board. Where the fuck did all these pedestrian refugees come from?

>>64981785
Watch one of his films, then you will understand.

>>64981614
I've looked over a few titles on Wikipedia. Nothing even close to being famous. You know movies from the 50s, 60s, and 70s are still watchable, right? You can even get on Netflix to watch some of the great classics. But can you find any of his 'art' in there? I don't think so. You can stick to watching some guy and his objectively bad movies, but don't try and say he's good because nobody's ever heard of him. He's had 40 years to let his films surface and they still haven't. That should tell you something.

>>64981668
It's either this, Griffith, or Ford.

>>64981790
>but don't try and say he's good because nobody's ever heard of him

Are you fucking kidding me? He is widely acclaimed as the best. He isn't some sort of underground artist making films that only 20 people have seen. He's literally the most famous arthouse director of all time.

You can't be this inept when it comes to film, can you?

>>64981790
>Nothing even close to being famous
Even /b/tards and /GoT/ posters know what The Seventh Seal is.

>>64981775
>guy who has made the same film for 40 years
>in any way good

hmmmmmmmm

File: 1431112017753.gif (1MB, 320x320px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 320x320px

larry clark

>>64981668
>what is unique about the medium
well what is unique about movies? it's just an amalgamation of a bunch of other arts: photography, theatre, literature, music, etc.?

Bergman is so entry level and overrated it hurts. None of his films are truly profound, at least not at the same caliber of the films of directors who truly exhibit a cinematic mastery, or are deserving of outstanding praise.

>>64981840
>These are the people that praise tfa, mad max pleb road, the memenant, and hateful 8 because they only have watched capeshit
Pretty infuriating

I legitimately love Bergman. If anyone knew how to produce an unforgettable image, it was him. Death in The Seventh Seal, countless scenes in Persona, the scene of the sister dying in Cries & Whispers. He's one of the all time best IMO.

>>64981943
Directors like who?

>>64981943
>the same caliber of the films of directors who truly exhibit a cinematic mastery

Name some of them then. That is what the thread is about.

File: 1444562586588.jpg (25KB, 306x306px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 306x306px

>>64981943
>entry level

>>64981943
>>64981966
I swear to fuck if you say Bresson...

>>64981943
Plebs overrate bergman because he's the kind of director you watch when you start watching actual cinema, that doesn't mean he wasn't a master, definitely top 10.

>>64981986
Bresson is goat tho

>>64981948
Charlie Chaplain is better.

>>64981790

Wikipedia literally calls him famous and one of the greatest filmmakers in the opening paragraph. Also Netflix even has a documentary about his cinematographer.

>>64981692
>implying Strike, October, Alexander Nevsky, Ivan the Terrible I & II, and the surviving footage of Que Viva Mexico are worse than Potemkin

if it wasn't for The General Line, Potemkin would be his worst feature

File: 1431475367960.gif (308KB, 200x150px) Image search: [Google]

308KB, 200x150px

>>64982022

>>64981433
>who is scorcese

seriously name one movie that wasnt greatly done that scorcese made. fuck even Hugo was good

>>64982103
I've looked over a few titles on Wikipedia. Nothing even close to being famous. You know movies from the 50s, 60s, and 70s are still watchable, right? You can even get on Netflix to watch some of the great classics from those decades. But can you find any of his 'art' in there? I don't think so. You can stick to watching some guy and his objectively bad movies, but don't try and say he's good because nobody's ever heard of him. He's had 40 years to let his films surface and they still haven't. That should tell you something.

>>64982103
All his movies are the same.

File: christopher-nolan11.jpg (26KB, 296x400px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 296x400px

>>64981433

/thread

File: 1451035182681.png (901KB, 690x460px) Image search: [Google]

901KB, 690x460px

>>64982022

>Is there anyone who deserves the title of, 'the greatest filmmaker to ever live' more than this man?

Kenji Mizoguchi
Satyajit Ray
Jean Renoir
Carl Theodor Dreyer

Just off the top of my head.

>>64981986
Bresson's literally the equivalent to the first boss of a game who you think nothing of at first but then he shows up again at the end of your journey as the second to last boss and slaps your shit around.

>>64982103

Get the fuck out of this thread. The adults are talking.

>>64982103
Shutter Island was forgettable.

>>64982131
only mizoguchi and ctd can be considered for the title of greatest filmaker.

>>64982131
>Japs

and that's how you know that the poster is a pleb.

File: Tarkovsky_Quote.png (309KB, 582x768px) Image search: [Google]

309KB, 582x768px

>>64981743
Tarkovsky put no thought into his films. He even admits this himself. His only aim was to pander to you on an emotional level, which he also admits to in interviews. There's nothing wrong with this outright, provided you can realize and view his films justly. There's no "elevation" compared to, say, Tarr.

>>64982179
Bullshit, there is a lot of great Japanese kino.

>>64982154

Also the fact that Bresson could use no-name actors and create masterpieces, where Bergman has his select troupe of elite actresses/actors that he uses in all his films.

I say Bresson has an edge on him for that reason. Bergman really liked to stay in her comfort zone.

File: 1441566766972.png (5KB, 140x185px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 140x185px

>>64982072
>there will never be a finished Que Viva Mexico
>there will never be a finished Bezhin Meadow
>there will never be a finished Ivan the Terrible, part III

this is the /tv/-related thing that hurts me the most

>>64982131
What are Mizoguchi's best? Need to catch up.

File: 12312423346.png (572KB, 600x580px) Image search: [Google]

572KB, 600x580px

>>64982212
>Bullshit, there is a lot of great Japanese kino.
>great Japanese kino
>Japanese kino
>great

>>64982179

>dismissing japanese auteurs

I hated nip dick suckers but come on. Mizoguichi, and Ozu are untouchable, you can fight about Kurosawa, but that's it.

>>64982102
>>64982131
bresson just keeps growing on you everytime you watch his films.
also, ozu>mizoguchi

>>64982247
Sansho and Oharu are obligatory.

>>64981433
Bleak, overrated, pretentious drivel.

>DUDE LIFE SUCKS! I'M SO DEPRESSED! I HATE YOU AND I HATE MYSELF! LMAO!

The only thing I appreciate about Bergman is his influence on Woody Allen.

>>64982266
>muh samurai

There. I summed up the entire history of Japanese cinema.

>>64981473
>Kubrick
You mean the guy who ruins good books?

>>64981943
The reason why Bergman seems entry level is because he is one of the best arthouse directors and all cinemafags like him round the board. He is like the Elvis of kino. No one can hate him everyone likes him despite their personal tastes.

I personally like black metal but love me some Elvis now and then and usually I am into fantasy and horror shit moviewise but love me some Bergman too.

>>64982213
that's a very superficial reason desu, and Bresson and Bergman had completely different philosophies when it came to actors and acting

>>64982283
>what is red beard
>what is drunken angel
>What is your mom sucking big black dicks.

>>64982306
I always liked Cash over Elvis.

As far as asian directors Masaki Kobayashi and Akira Kurosawa are the most impressive, each of them perfecting samurai movies and period pieces in general while not shying away from the modern era as well. They both fall off in their later films though.

objective top 5 greatest filmakers:
>1. tarkovsky
>2. dreyer
>3. ozu
>4. bergman
>5. bunuel

this is a fact.

>>64982283
Sorry meant this
>>64982340
for this
>>64982301

File: randecap.webm (2MB, 1080x585px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1080x585px

>>64982360
>fall off in their later films
Ran, motherfucker

>>64982369
>tarkovsky

Stopped right there.

>>64982357
Yeah but do you objectively hate Elvis? Or do you like some of his songs and respect what he has done and his influence on music? Hence my comparison to Bergman.

ITT: entry-level Criterion-core Film 101 bullshit

All of you come back when you grow up

File: CUtBzVJUcAATY28.png (45KB, 479x252px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 479x252px

>>64982211
Tarkovsky proved it's not about the deep thoughts, it's not about the artist imposing his beliefs or ideas and trying to communicate that in the form of a symbol or meaning in any form that may take whether it be imagery or the music being played in a particular scene. It's showing things and letting you decide. He had the utmost faith in the viewers allowing them the opportunity to draw their own conclusions rather than being told what the conclusion is.
The natural and destined conclusion to art is a return to simplicity.

>>64982441

>cinebro wannabe

Why don't you take your trite brakhage and snow expermintal shit and shove it up your ass

>>64982445
he also bashed plebs.
>someone post the pics pls

>>64982441
flick boyz stand up

>>64982441
>my obscure director is more obscure than yours!!

>>64981656
>le I'm a pleb but it's okay because people who actually know about film only make shit up meme
lol

>>64982386
Was the dude in red trying to catch her head or some dumb shit?

>>64982301

>muh boundary pushing

There. I summed up the entire history of French cinema.

File: ozu and yamanaka.jpg (90KB, 465x397px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 465x397px

>>64982103
Kundun and Gangs of New York.

>>64982574
>Gangs of New York.
Fucking masterpiece

>>64982283
Did you confuse Bergman with Lars von Trier?

>>64982283
Why do you insist on sucking cocks?

What's the entry level Bergman?

>>64982613
>Fucking masterpiece
In set design.

>>64982722
And costumes.

And to be honest historically speaking

>>64982716

watch scenes from a marriage, it's pretty easy to understand powerful, just do an episode a day. only 6.

Griffith created modern filmmaking

>>64981668
>Bergman is one of the greats, but he relied too much on the characteristics of film that it shares with the theatre, not what is unique about the medium
Came here to post this. His movies were great but aside from Persona they feel more like plays than cinema. Probably because he was a theater director before branching into movies?

>>64981924
it's cinematic qualities

>>64982928
>Griffith created modern filmmaking
that doesn't make him the greatest.
not saying he's not good but there are many directors that would get the title before him

>>64982220

It's in a abandoned hospital, that's where rare film reels are kept.

>>64982982
>that doesn't make him the greatest.
It does, at least for me. He elevated filmmaking from a 'nickelodeon novelty' to an artform. I can't remember anybody who had as much of a transformative effect on the medium as he did.

>>64983091
eisensten did, murnau did, chaplin did, dreyer did,

>>64983121
They were merely creating art. Griffith made it possible for them to do that. He cleared the path for them to follow.

The answer is actually Bergman
And his best film is the Magician

Tarkovsky only made films that were arcane, lofty, transcendental, obscure, ethereal, and in that regard automatically deems himself inferior to Bergman, whose images control the ordinary rather than flee to the sublime

sorry but its true

File: 4416519.jpg (8KB, 209x200px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 209x200px

>referring to directors by only their last names

The pretentiousness is palpable

>>64983225
How do you refer to a director?

>>64983225
thats pretty common for discussion of just about any medium, artform, craft, study, anything really period. unless you think that /v/tards are pretentious when they talk about Kojima

Bresson, Tarkovsky and Mizoguchi are the best desu.

>>64983225

>spelling out their full names every-time like an autistic retards

I would call you an idiot, but that's self evident.

>>64983176
everyone of them contributed to elevating the medium just as much as griffith.

>>64983238
"That wanker"
"That guy who thinks his moving pictures mean anything"
"That sellout"
"That guy who gets paid too much"
"That guy who actually thinks his films will change the world"

Any or all of the above.

>>64983339
Shouldn't you be watching the new Star Wars for the fourth time right now?

>>64982302
He drastically improved every book he adapted. They wouldn't even be worth mentioning if he didn't adapt them.

>>64983323
Chaplin didn't.

>>64983479
They wouldn't be worth mentioning to you because you're a /tv/ fag

99% of films have soundtracks because they can't generate emotions on their own.

Cinema is a pleb art.

>>64983498
debatable,

>>64982445
He didn't prove anything, he made great movies with that philosophy, just as other directors set out with a specific idea in mind and also made great movies. There is no either or, tarkovsky did not magically find the correct way to make movies.

>>64983547
Shit bait

There is nothing like "the great". Choices are subjective. Here's my top 5:

Zoltan Fabri
Joao Cesar Monteiro
Jacque Rivette
Krzysztof Kieslowski
Jan Svankmajer

>>64983785
No, truth.

Films constantly ape books

Films constantly rely on sound-tracks.

Films are nothing on their own without ripping off other media.

File: michael-haneke-my-life.jpg (54KB, 448x252px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 448x252px

Nobody has found the essence of pure cinema but Michael Haneke. At his best, he can whisper to the God.

>>64981906
>same film
only plebs use and believe in this meme

File: mario_bava.jpg (13KB, 300x242px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 300x242px

>>64981433

File: orson_welles_the_other_side_of_the_wind.jpg (50KB, 630x622px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 630x622px

>>64981433
Best director/actor/writer.

File: 1.jpg (117KB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]

117KB, 1366x768px

To be completely honest it's Bergman, and it's not true that he didn't realize the full potential of cinema. His cinematography is just much more subtle than Tark's.

>>64985529
>the window forms a cross

WOW SO DEEP

File: mirror.jpg (66KB, 1083x804px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 1083x804px

>>64985556
As opposed to Tark who is like
>look the purdy picture

>>64985674
Biggest pleb itt

>>64985674
He's not even in the top 100.

Japan > Italy > Russian > French > American > Argentinian > German >>> Literal who gives a ten-penny fuck

>>64985702
i'd say he's without a doubt the best digital director working within the Hollywood system but that doesn't say much

>>64985831
>japan first
>italy second
>russian not first
>no scandinavian
>no chinese( yes taiwan and HK cinema counts as chinese )
>no spanish cinema
nice garbage you posted there faggot

>>64984455
This.

America wins again.

>>64986019
ford>welles

Japan Italy and Russia are the definitive Top 3 don't be a faggot (it may not be in that order, sure). Scandinavian is shit. Chinese is fucking awful outside of HK cinema and even then it's only really WKW holding down the fort. Spanish cinema hasn't been good for decades, D E C A D E S.

>>64986058
This is replying to:
>>64985992
(You)

>>64985992
>russian not first
Tarkovsky, Kalatozov, Zvyagintsev and a handful of Soviet propaganda peddlers don't come close to what Japan was doing.

File: 1452379854808.png (62KB, 689x448px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 689x448px

>>64986058
>Scandinavian is shit.
>he's serious

>>64985992
>yes taiwan and HK cinema counts as chinese
Nice try, China.

France > Japan > America > the rest

tb quite objectively h.

File: frantisek vlacil.jpg (61KB, 630x406px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 630x406px

>tfw mah nigga Vlacil is never mentioned in these threads

>>64986163
French new wave a shit

>>64986163
France is way down the list
America not even on the list
Japan number 4

>>64981490
don't disagree with this

>>64986163
>france first
wew lad,

Scandinavia > America > Italian > Russian ... who gives a fuck

File: tumblr_lyzkxx0Muk1r33h0xo1_500.jpg (10KB, 425x286px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 425x286px

Just one of the many, many filmmakers who were more talented than Bergman.

File: 6310_4[1].jpg (56KB, 728x409px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 728x409px

>tfw not a pleb but in general prefer American cinema so people just assume that you're anthropocentric when really you just really connect to the kinds of things that seminal American filmmakers have laid out

>>64986318
don't really think it's a very valid rhetorical technique to lay out someone as immensely talented as Truffaut as if he were representative of a large demographic of filmmakers to somehow prove that Bergman were less spectacular. Seems actually like terrible thinking when compared to actually articulating the judgements behind your statement

>>64986318
They're on the same level IMO

>>64981527
It really is though.

>>64986318
I was just waiting for some cunt to post some french new wave garbage, gladly it took 158 posts for someone to do it.
/tvt/ can still be saved.

>>64985831
Russia > Italy > Nippon > UK > France
anybody who even takes the americucks in the consideration is a fucking pleb

>>64981543
lol wtf

>>64986376
john ford can single-handedly destroy italian and french cinema( both are really overrated)

>>64986376
>UK

Lawrence of Arabia and that's literally.

Raging Bull is the greatest film of all time. The Mirror is second.

>>64986163
french new wave is awful

File: 5.jpg (85KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 1280x720px

>>64986411
holy lel

>>64986376
>>>>>>>>>>>>>UK
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>U fucking K
>beating anyone
>not recognizing US Cinema as definitively top 5 GOAT

>>64986420
>who is hitchcock

>>64986458
émigré who worked in Hollywood

>>64986458
an American

also
>thinking Hitchcock films are good
only other directors like Hitchcuck

>>64986474
>thinking Hitchcock films are good
they are

>>64986319
same and I'm european

>>64986474
what? people love Hitchcock

>>64986474
Hitchcock is the Shakespeare of cinema and Vertigo is as profound as Hamlet or Paradise Lost.

>>64986555
I fucking hope you don't actually believe this m8 u fuccing pleb holy fuck I'm actually mad.

Give me any basis for this argument.

>>64986555
I like Vertigo and think it's great, but it's not as profound as Paradise Lost. be real homie.

File: nigga wut.jpg (457KB, 2812x2100px) Image search: [Google]

457KB, 2812x2100px

>>64986411
>single-handedly destroy italian cinema
>single-handedly destroy
>single-handedly
>destroy
kill yourself

>>64986474
This. They're so emotionally void.

The Wages of Fear was a better thriller than anything he did.

File: 123214235425346.jpg (35KB, 535x577px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 535x577px

>>64986602
Why did he have to die?

>Film Noir
>Westerns
Why is American Kinematoriosis the giga-GOAT?

File: gh145_police_storys071.jpg (225KB, 1600x1023px) Image search: [Google]

225KB, 1600x1023px

is there anything more annoying than a film snob

yeah I appreciate Bergman and Tarkovsky but imo action is pure cinema and there is nothing more impressive than a good action scene. I would much rather rewatch a Jackie Chan or a Buster Keaton movie and study the action than jerk off over Tarkovsky's images

>>64986652
I would rather view profound art, that shows me humanity/life/love/death etc. in a way I haven't seen before, than mindless time wasting action.

What can you learn from an action scene? Nothing.

If you think that this is snobbish and pretentious then so be it. I don't care.

File: satantango-1994-theatrical-release-poster1.jpg (224KB, 1000x1500px) Image search: [Google]

224KB, 1000x1500px

>Is there any film that deserves the title of, 'the greatest film to ever be made' more than this picture?

>>64986711
this

>>64986319
not american = automaticaly good is the biggest pleb filter

people who think they know a lot about film because they watched coupe foreign movies and people who say "lol I don't only watch american movies" are the biggest plebs

don't get me wrong foreign cinema is interesting (most of my favorite movies are German and I'm not German) and love seeing how different countries approach film but I often see Americans think European cinema is somehow better than American and they're dead wrong. Independent American cinema right now is way better than anything outside America and I can without a doubt say everything that comes out of my country is absolute shit

film 101 pebs underestimate american cinema cause they just discovered their first european director

>>64986652
Action scenes have their place and merit, but you're not even close baby

>>64986723
I was literally laughing out loud watching this. It's a joke.

>mfw I genuinely prefer De Palma over Hitchcock

>>64986723
Something that respects its audience enough to have a realistic running time. Fuck Slow Cinema.

>Any film longer than 2.5hours
get fukt

>>64986751
I agree with your point about disliking American cinema = wow I'm so deep baby's first steps in film! but...

>Independent American cinema right now is way better than anything outside America

lad...

Russia and Eastern Europe has you beat hands down.

>>64986711
>I would rather view profound art, that shows me humanity/life/love/death etc. in a way I haven't seen before,

who says action can't do that

perfectly executed action is as much as pure cinema as an "art film" is

The Odessa Steps sequence is literally an action set piece

>>64986574
Vertigo is one of the most daring experiments in genre history. The use of colour, lens, editing, music and narrative perspective is near unmatched. It's a masterful psychological character study and an allegory of film making in itself. It's the idea of epistemology remodeling ontology.

>>64986711
read a book if you wanna learn nigga

File: sjff_02_img0696.jpg (33KB, 517x392px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 517x392px

Herzog is my man

File: 1423849255769.jpg (159KB, 486x1487px) Image search: [Google]

159KB, 486x1487px

>>64986751
>not american = automaticaly good
I so frequently feel like people have tricked themselves into liking average foreign films.

They can't even accept that most Kim Ki-duk movies are terrible.

>>64986797
>>Any film longer than 2.5hours
>get fukt

yeah, most movies that are 3 hours or longer don't need to be

>>64986821
I think you're reading too much into the concept of perspective. That's like saying [insert novel] is all about voyeurism because of the nature of its prose, when really that's all novels.

You can have
>Use of colour
and that's about it.

>>64986873
Films are books but told visually.

>>64986887
>I so frequently feel like people have tricked themselves into liking average foreign films.

literally most palme d'or winners

pleb youtube channels like Yourmoviesucks jerk off to those movies and get their fans parrot their opinions

Kim Ki Duk is hilarious tho I legit enjoy most of his movies but I think of a lot of them as comedies

>>64986921
Film is narrative told visually. Prose is a very specific mode of narrative.

>>64986937
Look at this retard everyone

Hitchcock understood the visual language of film masterfully but he was like the Fincher of his era, he would've been better if he had been around 10 - 20 years later so the studios wouldn't been afraid of his more darker ideas

>>64986959
>prose and cinema are the same
is completely retarded

>>64986937
Films in the same way employ different styles. The two aren't so different.

Most classical poetry was recited you know.

ITT: Cringe, Reddit, Hot Opinions and Pleb & Proud

/tv/ is literally the worst board. You all can only behave like toddlers

>>64986887
>I so frequently feel like people have tricked themselves into liking average foreign films.

what is godard

>>64987045
Someone you have no knowledge of, but like your fellow shitposters spout buzzwords about?

>>64987043
>ITT: Cringe, Reddit, Hot Opinions and Pleb & Proud
And here it is all in one post.

>>64987015
They're not the same, but you just parroted what the other guy said. Prose and film both have the same purpose but do it differently

>>64986959
hes right though

>>64987074
I think I was saying something different but maybe you're just reading his comment differently to me.

>>64987070
Don't be so hard on yourself.

>>64987045
"Hitchcock succeeded where Alexander the Great, Julius Caesar, Napoleon, and Hitler failed” - Godard

>>64987118
I need context. What place or thing is that?

>>64987145
He's the manlet who conquered the world

>>64987145
Watch Histoire(s) du Cinema.

File: feelsbadman.jpg (92KB, 764x938px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 764x938px

>>64986628
>ywn never see the other two parts of The Trilogy of Death
why even live desu

>>64986751
>Independent American cinema right now is way better than anything outside America
Examples?

File: 1426989835507.jpg (169KB, 562x815px) Image search: [Google]

169KB, 562x815px

>>64987203
link or torrent?

File: entertainment.jpg (99KB, 1000x1482px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 1000x1482px

>>64987478
better and with more lasting power than any festival bait foreign picture of last year

>>64987550
>that
>better than Winter Sleep

wew lad

>>64987550
By all means, list us some of these "festival bait foreign picture" and let us have a laugh at you.

>>64987590
Winter Sleep is the definition of >>64986887

>>64981433
made the same movie 15 times. literal meme.

>>64987644
I'll let Kubrick explain why that's so

>I believe Bergman, De Sica and Fellini are the only three filmmakers in the world who are not just artistic opportunists. By this I mean they don’t just sit and wait for a good story to come along and then make it. They have a point of view which is expressed over and over and over again in their films, and they themselves write or have original material written for them.

>>64987550
DUDE I'M USING MEME COMEDIANS IN A SERIOUS MOVIE LMAO
exactly the kind of cringeworthy tryhard gimmick shit Memerican "independent" cinema is known for

>>64987673
I guess he would enjoy the films of Wes Anderson then.
What a pleb baka kek

>>64987712
If you don't have any more memes to share with us please leave now

>>64987673
I half-agree with him. Antonioni could easily fit into this list, too.

>>64986167
He is czech i dont think a lot of americans know his films.

>>64981775
Made plenty of great movies, but never managed to make a true masterpiece. Bergman, Tarkovsky, Fellini, all made several 10/10 masterpieces. Heck, even Coppola did it three times

>>64990091
You're not counting The Conversation?

>>64982131
>Satyajit Ray

>>64990930

The three masterpieces are The Godfather, The Conversation and Apocalypse Now

File: 1394470619793.jpg (81KB, 419x480px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 419x480px

>>64986376
>UK above anything

>>64981433
Anyone has that big, blue hard-cover book about his movies? If I recall correctly it came with an original piece of celluloid from "Fanny and Alexander"

>>64982302
he worked with arthur c clark on the 2001 script

go home stephen king

>>64981473
>Kubrick
He's a director who makes movies genetically engineered to appeal to imdbspawn /v/edditors with no sense of sophistication who laud meme dialog, which supports upvote groupthink mentality and meme acting with a good tv show pandering reddit tier post-capeshit "entertainment" sensibilities and a meme aesthetic. His "masterful directing" is a meme at best and is rightfully deemed as pleb trash every time he gets brought up on /tv/

>>64991125
>The three masterpieces are The Godfather, The Conversation and Apocalypse Now
:^)

>>64991380
Trolling used to be a art in this board.
Best advice I can give you: Kill yourself

>>64981433
>Every single one of his films is exactly pretty good
ftfy

fellini, fassbinder or wilder

>>64991380
Ladies and gentlemen - Terrence Malick of baiting, no subtlety whatsoever.

>>64983883
don't agree with svankmajer, but the rest are definitely GOATS, grillet, resnoir, hanak, bergman, kobayashi, teshigara, fassbinder