Mark "If I think your films sexist my review will be

>>64948057
When has he ever done this pham?

>>64948076

Literally any film made for the male audience.

>>64948057
He's still suffering from "muh daughters" is he?

>>64948091
examples pham

>>64948124

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mfgCZ9lgQ3I

he's a good example of feminism gone too far
sad since he used to be based

Remember when he absolutely nailed why Tarantula is shit?

>>64948170
He was always a feminist cuck. You just got more sensitive to it.

>>64948199
>He was always a feminist cuck. You just got more sensitive to it after you came to /tv/.
ftfy

>>64948057
>giving a shit what some faggot critic thinks

i don't see why people think youtubers are any worse than these old media faggots. it's the same type of person, just different delivery

>>64948144
this review almost made me want to watch the movie lol

It's like he doesn't even care about being thought of as "based" on /tv/.

>>64948290
it's not just /tv/, though. some of his viewers are getting really bothered by how he lets ideology inform his work, specially after his 2015 top ten video. it's a minority, okay, but an already noticeable minority

Kermode's opinion is absolute dogshit when it involves a female/minority-driven film

His reviews on mainstream stuff are decent I guess. No idea why people idolise him, his reviews are just average

>>64948170
>>64948144
I'm disappointed pham. He used to talk about shitty b-movies and tear them apart. His reviews on TV seemed just fine too.
>>64948199
Been watching him off and on for years only saw this one example pham.
>>64948281
same pham. It sounds pretty gud.
>>64948357
It was the current year pham.

>>64948447
>His reviews on mainstream stuff are decent I guess
Unless it's made by a director he considers one of "his" people.

>>64948457
You've never heard him bitch about "gender politics" until the Entourage review? You can't have been paying very close attention to him.

he liked the twilight series.
/thread

>>64948462
Oh sure, and if Mayo does an interview with the director or actor then Kermode will bump the review score up a few points

Remember the disgustingly sweet praise he gave for Spectre, after their on-stage interview with Mendes?

>>64948504
Transcendence was my favorite. Although to be fair I never actually watched it so maybe he's right.

>>64948493
I only saw his tv reviews where each review is like a minute and a half long.pham

>>64948571
I've listened to the podcast every week for the last 8 years. The feminism may have ramped up but it was always there.

>>64948057
But he accuses pretty much every movie of sexism/racism/classism doesn't he? Fucking guy is obsessed with social justice.

>>64948622
Wouldn't that him non-bias?

>>64948144

>hurr consumerism is bad
>hurr I hate money
>You're only allowed to portray flashy lifestyles if it has a deeper point about consumerism

No Fun Allowed- The Reviewer

Yeah he's a bit of a feminist cuck but he does really good banter and makes me laugh and his double act with Mayo is golden

I just watch the show for the banter

>>64948076
Sex and the City movie review. Yes it was shit, but according to him the reason it was shit was because it was sexist, racist, and classist. Sexist because the women were all vapid (as if they aren't in real life), classist because they are all rich but have the audacity to complain about life, racist because they go to the Middle East for vacation which he sees as exploiting the third world.

>I am unable to accept that different people have different world views and get triggered whenever anyone's politics are different from mine

This is why you don't have any friends

File: HanSolo_whogivesashit.gif (886KB, 175x144px) Image search: [Google]

886KB, 175x144px

>>64948057
>taking advice from a rockabilly

>>64948669
>I just watch the show for the banter
Their show is more like a incestuous sell fellating cult than a source of banter. Kermode and Mayo themselves are entertaining to listen to, but all of the listener correspondence and the injokes they push are hideous.

>>64948674
If a movie is bad, he exploits it as an opportunity to push his social agendas, by finding any way he can to link it to whatever political position he doesn't like.

>>64948702
>>I am unable to accept that different people have different world views and get triggered whenever anyone's politics are different from mine
Sounds like you're describing Kermode.

>>64948144

He was bullied by jocks in school, wasn't he

>>64948657
I guess I don't know, I only watch his negative reviews pretty much. As with RLM, the movies they like I usually don't.

File: .....png (2MB, 932x1082px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 932x1082px

>It's a Mark picks out a completely inconsequential female actress and claims she is the highlight of the film and the glue holding the whole thing together review

>People ITT defending Entourage

Back to /v/.

>le big hands critic man

>>64948780
Even if you don't find it funny or engaging, if you are a /tv/ poster then politically speaking it is a film you should support.

The most plain critic ever. He sits on the fence with any big release.

>>64948819
He'll sit on the fence so long as it doesn't offend him politically. Like capeshit for instance. He'll give a pass to a terrible movie like Avengers 2 because Whedon is a man he considers his political ally.

>>64948605
I guess I'm just more enlightened then you pham since I didn't notice till now.
**tips katana**
>>64948668
Over-simplifications the post
>>64948674
>racist
I just watched it. He hated it because the protagonists are obnoxious consumers, with no other defining traits. His points where all fair. Bair in mind he didn't see the tv series, so his perspective is different pham.
>>64948712
so.
>>64948780
this.

>>64948849

How is it an oversimplification?

He hates consumerism, and thinks that Entourage promotes it, therefore Entourage is bad. That's not a movie review, it's a political review of a movie.

The ONLY reviews of his I like are the Zack Snyder ones

BvS is going to get ripped to fucking shreds. He'll probably claim Wonder Woman is the best character of the film and her underuse is sexist and all that shit, but whatever

>>64948877
>it's a political review of a movie.
>when kermode does it it's bad but when based Armond does it it's hella f*cking based Tarantino BTFO

>>64948905
nobody takes Armond seriously here except retards though

>>64948902
>BvS is going to get ripped to fucking shreds
Not necessarily. He was pretty kind of Man Of Steel and he stressed that some of it was for Snyder himself and not just him flying the Nolan flag.

>>64948849
Racist for the depiction of the Arab hotel worker. Her having the audacity to talk to him like a peer and find common ground with their lives rather than admitting how much harder he has it on every level.

>>64948905

Except Kermode pretends to be a movie reviewer, Armond openly admits his are pseduo-intellectual diatribes.

>>64948928
We all know BvS is going to be 10x worse than MOS though

>>64948924
IQ of 145 here. Armond is the only critic worth reading.

His top five films last year were all female driven films.

I like hearing him articulate his thoughts but when he actually praised a film last year because "it's feminist" it pissed me off.

The thing is, in a more traditional sense, I am a feminist (as in, we're all equal, not this new breed of screaming banshee empowerment nonsense) but I would never consider a film good on that reason alone.

>>64948934
That was lost in his rant pham. Not a major point.
Kermode is like a based kekold desu

>>64948956
feminism has done it's job, if you want equality you're an egalitarian

>>64948849

>He hated it because the protagonists are obnoxious consumers, with no other defining traits

They're young and they're doing what a section of young people fantasise about. It's escapism.

I don't sperg out when you watch your Slice of Life animes and fantasise about eating cake with them or whatever

>>64948956
It was a good year for females. There weren't many great films with male roles last year.

>>64948948
>IQ of 145
>IQ
**tips**
>>64948989
Go back to /pol/ pham.

>>64949007
how about you stop memeing like a /b/ crossboarder?

>>64948942
Why is that? Man Of Steel is a pretty low bar to clear and Batman looks alright in it. It won't be good since they're jamming the justice league crap into it but I doubt see why it would be worse than man of steel which had pretty much nothing going for it.

>>64949000
>watching slice of life animes
They are all trash except from welcome to the nhk pham.
>they're young
Doesn't mean they should be 2D shitty characters pham.

>>64948956
>we're all equal

This is objectively not true though. Women's brains are 9% smaller than men's, even progressive university psychology textbooks admit this.

>>64949012
>/b/
Kek. I don't post on /b/ pham
>memeing
WHERE.jpg pham

>>64949006
I will admit that, yes. The fact that nine of my top ten albums last year were female was quite shocking to me. Although my favourite was male.

A Girl Walks Home Alone at Night was a great film.

>>64949006
>It was a good year for females.
No it wasn't. You only believe that because the industry bought prestige for female movies. None of them were actually good.

>>64949038

Not everything has to be artsy and deep

I bet you're one of those redditors who cries about people enjoying Transformers movies because explosions are sooooooooo superficial

Go tip your fedora elsewhere

>>64949057
I know what I like. Many of my favorite movies of 2015 have female leads.

>>64949060
>deep
So anything that has interesting well written 3-dimensional characters is deep.
>defending Transformers
You are the problem pham.

>>64949033
>fatman suit looks awful
>superman was a shit character in MOS and isn't set to change
>einsenberg seems like a fucking awful casting
>wonder woman shoehorned in for absolutely no reason, we now have 4 important characters to keep up with
>dialogue is cringe-inducing, even for capeshit
>zack snyder's immature directing
There is no possible way it will be better than MOS

>>64949094
You only like what you like because of media conditioning. They have programmed you to be a cuck.

>>64949097

I'm not defending Transformers you retard, I'm saying that it does what it's design to do. You can't treat it like an art film because it's not, and if you actually get mad about it as a film then you're being silly

File: leads.jpg (152KB, 1200x675px) Image search: [Google]

152KB, 1200x675px

>>64949094
What were they?

>>64949127
>tinfoil hat
check
>cuck buzzword
check
How is /pol/ this time of year pham?
>>64949134
>calls me a retard
>if you get mad your being silly
No wonder kermode hates people like you pham.

>>64949097

>I only ever enjoy high art

Why are you on /tv/ then faggot

>>64949134
He is probably the type who complains about the plots in pornos.

>>64949109
Burly Batman looks alright I think. Outside of the new casting choices all of that was shit that was already bad about Man of Steel.

>>64949159
The Assassin, Phoenix, Queen of Earth, just to name a few.

>>64949228
get taste

>>64949360
>I want everybody to think the same way.

>>64949360
I like my taste.

>>64949386
>>64949386
The Assassin is Hou's worst film, period. There's no way to even argue this.

>>64948144
hes a trotskyist, not suprising he wouldn't like a film like this

>>64949172
>high art
Kek. No. I was watching 'Party monsters' as my last film pham.
>>64949360
This. Cultural marxists where right taste seperates us into categories and I don't wanna be in his pham.

>>64949386
There is some wiggle room for personal preference but when you're praising shit like "Girls" in the woods then you've crossed a line and are obviously in the wrong place.

>>64949360
>>64949386
>>64949393
>>64949418
>>64949428
>>64949438

>>64949418
No. Even if you didn't like it you can't say it's worse than his early films before he developed his style.

>>64949463
Your supposed to say something when you group post ID's pham. Tip for you on your first day.
>>64949439
>personal opinions don't exist. We must be the same!!
This is why cultural marxism is winning pham. People are tired of your dis-identfication politics.

>>64949703
If your opinions are going to land on degenerate media that you don't deserve to be in complete control of them.

>>64949570
then it's only the worse he has ever been in 30 years? lmao

>>64948457
>>64948199
>>64948199
>>64948144

Ok I don't understand why you're saying he's attacking the film just because it's sexist. He clearly makes a MASSIVE list of all the things wrong with it, of which the sexism is only one thing.

Stop thinking that there's some massive feminist conspiracy. He's fucking right. It's an awful movie, and as he points out, it's the cars and money and all the consumerist crap that makes this film so boring and loathsome.

I don't get how anyone could come away from this video thinking he was complaining that sexism was the main problem.

>>64948057
>Now the thing is
>So [movie title]
>It has a lot of baggage
>zak SNAIIDDER ZAK SNAAIIDER
>The thing about the movie is
>I kind of did like it
>I quite liked it
>It just suffers from a lot of baggage

>>64949888
>t's the cars and money and all the consumerist crap that makes this film so boring and loathsome.
>implying that's not as much of a ideological complaint than the feminist rant

>>64949888
hello reddit!

>>64949888
>Stop thinking that there's some massive feminist conspiracy.
Are you really denying the ongoing cultural genocide of the straight white male? At this point it's so transparent that you'd need to be either mentally ill or a leftist extremist not to see it.

>>64950065

Mark Kermode doesn't like a film that's clearly crap anyway (seriously, have you even seen it?)

HURRR IT MUST BE BECAUSE ITS GOT MEN IN IT. TYPICAL FEMINISM.

No, he just didn't like the fucking movie because it's shit. Get your head out of fantasyland.

>>64949888
You know he uses the term 'problematic' on any movie which has bad things happening to women. I'm not kidding. And his wife is a feminist academic, look it up.

Listen to his review of any male centric comedy, it almost always calls it problematic. His reviews of movies where women do things powerfully get good reviews from him.

>>64950185
You don't listen to the podcast do you?

>>64950185
>No, he just didn't like the fucking movie because it's shit. Get your head out of fantasyland.
It's shit to him because of the ingrained feminist sensibilities that have been programmed into him. The same sensibilities that he in turn is programming into you.

>>64950207
His favorite film is The Exorcist.
Sure, he's a feminist libo PC, the way it's hip and cool being publicly in the western world nowadays, especially in the BBC britbong land.
But at the end of the day, his all time favorite film, the one he rants on and on about and wrote a master thesis on, involved mentally scarring and almost killing a 12 year old girl many times over.
His favorite book is the The Great Gatsby, which was basically just something Fitzgerald copied out of his wife's diary after he slapped her for keeping it from him in the first place.
At the end of the day, I can't take him seriously enough to hate him, thus I enjoy listening to him even when he says the most darnedest things.

>>64950065
>cultural genocide of the straight white male
**tips**

>>64948504

>Diana
>John Carter
>Entourage
>Robin Hood
>San Andreas
>Pan

That's off the top of my head. There's been plenty of times he's still trashed a film when they've had a related guest on.

>film critics analyses the film sociologically

>People whine because it doesn't fit their opinions they got from /pol/tards

seriously fuck off.

>>64951616

>A mainstream critic on the "unbiased" BBC analyses a film sociologically

theres the problem mate.