What does /tv/ think of the 2006 Star Wars DVDs?

>>64698235
I think they're 10 years old

>>64698235
Decent balance between the special edition changes and original cuts (minus Hayden Christensen in ROTJ).

>>64698235
They're the best release of the original trilogy. It's a shame they're in letterbox though

>>64698235
I used to own these. There was no mistaking the middle finger Lucasfilm was extending upon this release.

>>64699146
Why? Because they weren't anamorphic?

>Local thrift shop has the ANH 2006 DVD for $29.99

Should I get it? It's in nice cosmetic condition and has both films

>>64699242
Get it. They're pretty expensive.

>>64699227
dude he just did a straight transfer of the 1993 laser disc. relegated to bonus material. No remastering to picture and audio. I felt like I was watching Star Wars on 8mm projection. This was Lucasfilms way of answering criticism to the SE 2004 box set.

>>64699494
>This was Lucasfilms way of answering criticism to the SE 2004 box set.

B A S E D
A
S
E
D

this release doesn't deserve your money: http://www.cinemablend.com/dvds/Star-Wars-Limited-Editions-Original-Theatrical-Versions-And-2004-Versions-1798.html

>>64699136

>complain about letterbox and act retarded

Is this a dank new meme?

>>64698235
Bought these on a whim and only realised last month you can't buy them anymore and they're expensive when you can