THE GOOD DINOSAUR

There's something about this picture.

File: image.jpg (38KB, 300x491px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 300x491px

Amazing landscapes? Yep, it was beautiful imho. But it wasn't the better Pixar film from 2015. Pic related.

>>64549914
It was a pretty bad movie, I'm not gonna lie. Not that inside out was that great either. Disney may have finally drained that stone dry.

File: image.jpg (37KB, 384x384px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 384x384px

>>64549943
The (absolute) Mad Dinosaur

It had nice rendering but as far as art/character design it was by far the worst Pixar film. Even Dreamworks doesn't do shit this generic and stale.

>>64550024
Inside Out was great though fampai

>>64550001

Nothing crazy It's a new technology.

See : https://youtu.be/VZ9UGFsWexM

>>64549914
It was fucking terrible.

>>64550024

Pixar is trying too hard to do movies about family and deep emotions all the while ignoring humor. What made a movie like Finding Nemo so great is that it was a fun family movie with lots of humor that happened to have a son/father dynamic that everyone could relate to, but if it weren't for the humor the movie would have been forgettable.

>>64550105
Nah. It was OK, but its well below the bar set by stuff like the incredibles. Then this year will be a nemo rehash and that Hawaiian thing iirc, the latter of which has like no info yet.

For a movie that obviously was never going to be a giant blockbuster hit or anything as good as their other films in previous years, I think the wide shot cinematic shots were very impressive.


Side note: mfw my half arsed rushed post actually got replies >:^)

Why did they deliberately make the dinosaur look like a 5 year old's drawing? It just looks like shit.

>>64549914
The idea was borderline stupid.

You literally have to be younger than 15 not to associate dog/slave/pet with something quite more pornographic, and the fact that the little dude is half naked in the movie boggles my mind even further.

Why did nobody say a thing to the screenwriter? Were only sheltered Mormons working on this movie?

>>64550194

Very true. I agree. The humor attempted in The good dinosaur was too trihard like and pretty bad at times.
It will be a forgettable movie for myself, but the landscapes were something I truly enjoyed.

>>64550324
You've been watching too much porn anon, it's warped your mind.

>>64550194
I don't think they're really ignoring humor. Inside Out is actually pretty funny, but it's more subtle then, say, Nemo. Then again, Inside Out isn't really a kids movie IMHO.

>>64550371
It was dumb humor for kids, honestly. Only time I laughed was when they got high in the rotten fruit.

File: 1451625657418.jpg (13KB, 306x325px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 306x325px

>>64550324

>>64550194
>What made a movie like Finding Nemo so great is that it was a fun family movie with lots of humor

and no. fucking. musical numbers.

>>64550324
>You literally have to be younger than 15
LIKE THE FUCKING DEMOGRAPHIC YOU RETARD

I don't know. Aside from the gorgeous animation and landscape, the tone and the story feels overly familiar with other movies. Even the story execution wasn't that great either, Pixar always masterful with that aspect even though with the familiar trope. I think they really wasted the premise of meteor didn't hit the earth and decided to approach the safer way to tell the story (well, this movie was in development hell in years). Shame for an animation studio that always take a risk in terms of premise like Pixar

>>64550396
>Inside Out isn't really a kids movie
you're one of those shitposters who participated in "what if this was you" threads and all your emotions are sad and/or anger

File: image.gif (3MB, 300x200px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 300x200px

>>64550324

>>64550568
Nope

>>64549914
I fucking hated it, that the humans moved like dogs. The Croods also had a dog-baby-caveman. Every fucking animated movie has some sort of doglike behaving character. It grinds my gears, because it is so cheap

It was a very pretty film, I'll give them that, but I thought the writing in general was garbage and the narrative was boring

I didn't get why they had to be dinosaurs, either; I felt like it didn't add ANYTHING and worse actually distracted from the rest of the material

>>64550568
>>64550645
Well, okay, it's a kids movie. But kids aren't really going to appreciate that film properly IMO.

>>64550744
They kind of sold the movie with the premise "what if the meteor didnt hit earth?"
They dindu nuffin with dat

>>64550881
What would happen if the meteor missed and the dinosaurs lived on???!!??? :O !

The dinosaurs lives on.

Amazing.

>>64550881
Right?

Worse, seeing the dinosaurs doing very human things like fucking farming just made the movie feel weird to me

Not to mention that none of the trailers or tv-spots even hinted at it basically being a Disney take on Western films

The whole thing just felt incongruous and disjointed

>>64550881
But dinosaurs ended up building houses!

>>64550966
>>64550973
Did anyone else take comfort know that chickens also scare dinosaurs?

Anyone else kind of felt misled by the original trailer?

Based on that, it looked like this wasn't going to be just a typical CG children's movie, but more avant garde.

I got the impression that there was going to be minimal dialogue and the movie would instead use other methods of telling the story. Then, on the second trailer, they just admitted it was gonna be a regular movie.

>>64551084
>I got the impression that there was going to be minimal dialogue and the movie would instead use other methods of telling the story

They went as far as making the first half of Wall-E like that. That was risky as hell, I doubt they'll try it again in a full-length feature.

>>64550053
>>64549943
requesting that picture of the dinosaur with the meme background

File: 1448282646283.jpg (59KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 600x600px

>>64550053
>>64552288

>>64550001
Plushie toys with stripper wigs, the flick