>Domestic: $750,230,824 Hahahahaha! Still hasn't passed

Startards, where are you???

>>64519531
It will be #1 domestic anyway so...

Will end up at ~1,6-7b probably, #3rd all time.

>>64519531
>>64519653
>Literally samefagging your own thread
This is how desperate Cameroncucks have gotten.

>>64519531
See you on Thursday.

>>64519853
Don't cry JewJew

Where are the idiots that said this would make $1bn domestic?

>>64520328
Where are the idiots who said this would not break one billion ?

star tards on suicide watch.

cameron hasn't lifted a finger and has just sits back on his throne year after year as people try climb his ladder.

>>64520407
desperate

>>64520328
It'll get close, maybe around $950 million

The prequels were a better movie

>>64521027
fag

File: image.jpg (33KB, 320x479px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 320x479px

>>64520328
Entertainment Weekly predicted 3 Billion dollars for The Force Awakens.

>>64522813
Worldwide. Also, actual analysts were saying 2 billion, which is what it will end up making.

Wow Star Wars is such a flop

File: image.jpg (150KB, 934x553px) Image search: [Google]

150KB, 934x553px

>>64522890
http://www.boxofficemojo.com/alltime/world/

It's going to beat Jurassic World, but it all hinges on China right now.

>>64523072
Reuters wrote an article about how it's the most talked about movie on Chinese social media. It could be a surprise hit there

>>64523072
>it all hinges on China

the difference between "success" and "failure" in China is likely less than $150 million.

>>64523210
Which could be what pushes it over Titianic

File: image.jpg (440KB, 768x1921px) Image search: [Google]

440KB, 768x1921px

Adjusted gross.

>>64523262
Obviously that's just domestic adjusted gross.

>>64522813
Not a chance this could have gone so high.
Someone at their office didn't want to hear about the odds

File: FLOP.jpg (21KB, 283x185px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 283x185px

>taking 17 days for what it took Avatar two and a half months to achieve
wow what a flop

>>64520328

Still 9 weeks to go

File: avatar2.png (31KB, 512x343px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 512x343px

>>64519531
yes it did

>>64523262
Not really a fair comparison. Back in that day movies used to play for years, there was less competition with other media, and home video didn't exist. We're not going to get a Gone with the Wind for a very long time, even taking population growth into consideration.

>>64519745

How are you so retarded? How is it possible for the movie to only make another 100 million during the next 9 weeks? Including opening in china?

>>64519531
>highest domestic third weekend ever
>still on record setting pace
Stay delusional. It'll happen this weekend

>>64519745

hello reddit

>>64523262
Movies were more expensive, adjusted for inflation, and more people went to see movies despite the population being smaller.

>>64519745
It'll be at least 2 billion, probably 2.1 or 2.2 billion by the end of its run. It won't beat Avatar. If Episode VIII is amazing and everyone goes out to see Episode IX, that could maybe beat it.

>>64523461
tickets now cost almost twice as much as they did back in 08'. With inflation, Avatar still wins, and Avatar got billions foreign.

File: image.jpg (253KB, 768x1463px) Image search: [Google]

253KB, 768x1463px

8M Monday.

>>64523650
>tickets now cost almost twice as much as they did back in 08'
That's retarded. No they didn't. I literally have stubs still around for Inglorious Basterds and it's like $9, compared to today's $11.

>>64519531

>actually caring if one movie beats another
>they both make more than a billion

jesus fuck guys get a life.. oh wait i'm on /tv/

>>64523723
It'll be at like $820 million by next Monday, and like $940 million by the end of its run.

>>64523539
It only needs about 90 million more this week to beat an adjusted domestic gross of Avatar, but JJ can't touch it's worldwide gross.

>>64523650
>08
Avatar was late 2009

>>64523787
It's the only criticism that contrarians can still cling to, considering everyone adores TFA. Bitter shut-ins need an insignificant and meaningless figure like box office success to justify their irrational hatred for this movie.

>>64523262
fucking pathetic. Also Star Shit had to rely on the holidays for its initial splash of profit.

File: avatar.png (25KB, 297x376px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 297x376px

>>64523723
Avatar looked the same.

>>64523944
>Also Star Shit had to rely on the holidays
As opposed to Avatar?

>>64523944

>avatar opened in december

>>64523919

i quite like TFA

your explanation brings me joy

File: image.jpg (66KB, 396x1004px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 396x1004px

>>64523399

Shh... No logic, only memes

>>64523723
This is the tipping point of the most crucial trend--Avatar's revenue stayed steady for weeks beyond the three-week mark, and this is the first day Star Pleb didn't beat Avatar for single-day gross. Meaning it's hitting the profit wall, and will drop off just like they all do, Jurassic World, FF7, etc.

Someone lurking may have the graph that shows this clearly.

WHEN HAS EVERY FUCKING POST IN /TV/ BECOME A MEME?

WHEN?

FUCK.

>>64523919
Stay deluded. There's plenty not to like about the movie.

>http://www.latimes.com/business/hiltzik/la-fi-mh-star-wars-the-force-awakens-stinks-20151226-column.html

Not everyone is a mindless child who enjoys the cinematic equivalent of Katy Perry.

>>64524045
I'm falling for Daisy.
help

Lets be honest here.

It probably wont break Avatar number either domestically or internationally, but it's a better movie than Avatar.

I don't own any Disney stock so I don't really care about the numbers TFA puts up, Disney will make money hand over fist anyway...but Avatar will likely stay on top.

If Cameron didn't take a vacation to ride around in fucking submarines, Avatar could have been a gigantic franchise. No one wants to see the sequel.

>>64524154
She has a boy body can describes herself as a "hardcore sex machine." You can do better, anon.

>>64524081
>Star Pleb didn't beat Avatar for single-day gross.
It did.

>>64519531

FA is better than Avatar tho. which isn't saying much

plinkett's review of avatar was spot on

>>64524146
Funny how haters keep spamming this one article as if it's an indication that the film isn't well-received when there are countless positive ones

>>64519531

>avatar
>a good movie

pick one

>>64524045

just when i begin to think i dont like her you post this

>>64524185
Go to Monday week 3 here:
>http://www.boxofficemojo.com/showdowns/chart/?view=daily&id=liberge.htm

Avatar's total is $8,094,554 and TFA is $8,021,882 for Monday. The legend says "daily gross," so seems like it refers to total worldwide for that day. It may gave beaten it Monday for domestic gross though.

>>64524318
That *is* domestic

>>64524154
>>64524296

Tell me about, i try to escape her by going to /sp/ and talk sports but she gets posted there all the time too.

File: image.jpg (46KB, 616x369px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 616x369px

>>64524318
Shall I meme it, or shall you?

>>64524396
Suck me off, bro.

>>64524179
>describes herself as a "hardcore sex machine."

This is a bad thing?

>>64519531
Why do you have such an emotional investment in box office takings?

>>64524549
I have an emotional investment in your mum's box, m80.

>>64524499
to a white knight who seeks the comely grace of a maiden pure, aye

>>64523072
its fucked in China, Donnie yen released his Ip Man 3 which was the biggest grossing movie there ever last week so no way it's ever going to beat that

>>64524252
No I'm pretty sure he used the article as an indication that the movie has many recognizable flaws like he said. I dunno where you got the other thing.

>>64525087
>many flaws
The article names one: it's lack of orginality. There's no talk of the acting, direction, dialogue, etc.

File: 0a20859f70b636704a5bd4240332faf8.jpg (8KB, 236x177px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 236x177px

>>64519531

>MUH WORLDWIIIDDEEE

Yeah OP, you're such a winner.

how much profit has Avatar given you?

>film is well recieved among critics and viewers
>b.. but it's o.. only the third most successful movie of all time

>>64525254
Yes there is. The problem of lack of originality just applied to many things.

>>64525381
>i s-stutter using ellipses like a r-retard

>>64525460
That's one problem and its effects throughout the film. Again, there's no mention of the actual qualities that make a film good: the acting, the mise-en-scene, the characters. All that stuff.

>>64524154
>falling for a 4/10 rat faced girl with the acting ability of a drugged porn star

let me guess....you're british

>>64521027
>The prequels were a better movie
Either retarded or shitskin, either way your opinion is discarded.

Cameronfags on suicide watch.

>>64523723
>8 million

BWHAHAHAHAHAHA

DISNEY KEKS HAVE BELTS AND SHOELACES TAKEN AWAY

JIM IS KING