>>64421570 I had fun I guess, but it's pretty adolescent, linguistically inconsistent - though stylized - and doesn't accomplish much. He pretty much remade dusk to dawn; I'm okay with it. Made for a good evening, but don't make excuses for it by qualifying it's genre.
Yeah 9/10 sounds about right. A lot of style and class with the overture, chapters and intermission. A nice change from the usual CGI TITLE!!! CGI EXPLOSIONS!!! VISUAL EFFECTS!!!! Good to see somebody is still writing and directing old school films with top notch dialogue, crisp cinematography and interesting characters. The tension in some of the scenes was unreal. Who else can have people eating and talking about fucking stew interesting?
>black strong lady Minnie >Jackie Brown >bunch of crooks on a heist >Reservoir Dogs >Sam Jack being Sam Jack >Pulp Fiction >blood and gore >Kill bill >hiding under wooden planks >Inglorious Basterds >western setting, one of the characters being basically King Schultz the younger version >Django
Did anyone else get annoyed that somehow the fucking general took samjack seriously? If I remember correctly jackson's character was just proven to have been a liar, and then he goes over, immediately, and starts telling this wtf joke story to the general. The general is then stupid enough to grab the gun, ect ect.
I swear to god, that story was cringe, and where it wasn't cringe it was fucking hilarious. I expected the old fuck to break out laughing, not get mad.
What makes it worse is later, when we realize there's a fucking ambush around the old man, and all he had to do was stay quiet and he'd get to see samjack likely die.
More fun having a grown man describe a racist homosex encounter, I guess, than making a movie with anything approaching entertaining dialog.
Don't even get me started on the actual premise.
>>64424350 Is this really a nice change from CGI TITLE? H8 and CGI both suffer from the same core problem. No fucking reason to ever watch twice. There's nothing but in-your-face straightforward gimmickry, H8 just trades in flashy effects for flashy dialog, but the effect is the same regardless of the choice- flashy dialog might even be worse since in the end you're left looking back at what you just heard, and unlike CGI you're not even left with a, "Well I guess it was fun seeing that CGI space fight. Never could have seen that anywhere else." I can find shitty, flashy dialog where characters are inconstant and nonsensical by talking to my 'writer' friend who spews out fan fiction. He at least understands that he's being supported by characterizations built by other people. Tarantino seems to have slipped farther and farther away from any source material that gives his, pretty much always reliant on common knowledge, characters their characterization.
Inb4 next Tarantino movie is set during crucifixion and is even less rooted in anything but his made up and rootless fan fiction.
I'm Mexican and the spanish dialogue delivery is baaaaad, unrealistic, unnecessarily exaggerated and cringey as fuck, no one speaks like that. It ultimately distracts the audience. Guess the same can be said about the english dialogues.
Oh Farto, guess it's a tell of his personality as a director that the leaked script seemed to have been written by a teenager.
>>64428433 >fucking general took samjack seriously It wasn't even that, it's that he called his son a coward who sucked niggercock. Shit probably didn't happen, but the story itself was insulting to him.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the shown content originated from that site. This means that 4Archive shows their content, archived. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content, then use the post's [Report] link! If a post is not removed within 24h contact me at firstname.lastname@example.org with the post's information.