Is this the best shot in film history?

hahahaha noi coulddo beter

lol no, i cud do it better.

That's a pretty good shot OP, i got nothing.

>>52886767

Watch out. Legion of plebs will come post screenies from post-1990 EPIC sci-fi films or Michael Mann crime shitfests or wow-look-at-the-naturalism from Deakins cinematography works or Malick films. Possibly followed by the comment "dat cinematography"

>>52886767
that is so fucking pretentious looking

>>52886838
Yeah it needs some more space ships and explosions! and shield surfing elves!

>>52886834
>implying a Michael Mann movie is any less valid of a pick or any more entry level than Marienbad
>implying that Vierny didn't do far better work with Greenaway
and you have the gall to call others pleb?

>>52886917
do you even know what pretentious means, kid?

>>52886767
>turn on Barry Lyndon
>press pause
>click anywhere in runtime

File: tumblr_ludsn2MNOt1qd39nmo1_250.jpg (20KB, 225x300px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 225x300px

>>52886943

File: marienbad00008.jpg (81KB, 853x480px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 853x480px

>>52886767
Atleast post the entire shot

>>52886988
ruined it

>>52886988
>480p

no thanks

>>52886767
>this plebbetry

A shot is composed with of moving images you plebeian. The best shots cant be experienced unless you see them in motion. For example, tarkovskys shots are like 2 minutes long each, to really understand how good tarkovskys cinematography is you need to see the full shot. What you posted was a still image from a shot. Compisitionally the shot is very impressive, but thats such a small aspect to what makes it good or not.

>>52886767
Individual shots don't mean anything.

>>52886988
Oh wow that's a letdown, now it doesn't seem so good.

Sorry anon, this is actually a shitty shot, I take it back.

>>52886988
What is this VHS?

>>52887033

>small aspect

no, it's quite a large aspect actually

literally what the fuck is this shit , do you enjoy watching 1940's movies?

>>52887067
yeah maybe i understated how important the image is, but you see what im getting at.

File: 8d0.jpg (18KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 500x500px

>>52887078

Was it rape? Why did she run away with him?

>>52887013
>>52887023

Obviously the blu ray looks way better

great film for when you have trouble to fall asleep

>>52887197
It was cuck

>>52886767
>>52886988
the shadows are painted

File: 1297110023persona-2.jpg (258KB, 1828x1374px) Image search: [Google]

258KB, 1828x1374px

>>52886767

File: 1407296726451.jpg (56KB, 536x553px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 536x553px

Try this

>>52887360
That shot was stupid. It made hordes of morons think that the two were literally the same person. No, they're not, dumbasses.

File: obi-wan-warns-against-google.jpg (130KB, 720x404px) Image search: [Google]

130KB, 720x404px

>>52887383
>he was a big friend

>>52886767
if its foreign, old & black & white then it must be one of the best!

>>52887536

This is actually true. All the best movies are in fact old ones. There is a reason why all movies these day borrow troupes and ideas from old movies. Seriously where did this negative connotation for old movies come from? It is seriously ignorance at it's finest.

File: ching-ching.jpg (43KB, 297x297px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 297x297px

>>52887611

you're not going to like it here

but thanks for the post

File: maxresdefault.jpg (76KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 1280x720px

Is this the best shot in film history?

>>52887647

>implying I haven't been here 8 years.

>>52887661
Yes

File: An+actual+mexican+standoff+_654e8328b208e1127e913e3129f5b53a.jpg (211KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

211KB, 1280x720px

>>52886767

Why can't /tv/ discuss cinema?

>>52886838
Fuck off.

>>52887718
because people are too pleb and lazy to watch past entry-level shit like Apocalypse Now or Marienbad and think that it's super x-perimental outer-rim ultra-avant trve art and get all superiority complex about it, instead of actually doing research into good movies.

>>52887778
those are good movies

>>52887702
winrar

File: CIA.jpg (304KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

304KB, 1920x1080px

>>52887661

Greatest since the silent era

>>52887837

And actually distinguish between your average normie and someone who likes to actually watch movies by quite a bit.

>>52887837
eh, i suppose they're not bad, but 'good' on the scale that something like Star Wars or Die Hard or Badlands is good. We all know that it's good, and no one is going to mount a successful argument that any of these movies are bad, but that doesn't mean they're that interesting, particularly spectacular, the best-made around, or really the cream of the crop on any aspect. Yeah, they're good gateway films, but that gives them more personal importance than merited in a discussion. It's really not the end of the world though, /tv/ is still the best film appreciation board on the net

File: shot.webm (1MB, 1422x800px)

1MB, 1422x800px

>>52887702
>>52887892
yup, pretty much

i like this one tho

>best shot threads
>no webms

do you so-called film "experts" actually know what a shot is?

>>52887935
What instagram filter is that? Looks nice.

File: space.png (175KB, 500x282px) Image search: [Google]

175KB, 500x282px

>>52887818
Not even in the film.

>>52887935
this movie is fucking GOAT
sergio leonne is fucking GOAT