>The BBEG's plan is to market his Gynoids and artificial womb technology to "replace" women.
>BBEG even has plans to give Gynoids away in Lottos and giveaways. Also paying for a charity that GIVES them away to poor people.
2. why not make male versions to increase sales?
This sounds like a elaborate plot to either get your DM a girlfriend, tea h him how to get a girlfriend, prepare you for the arrival of his co-DM (the sex doll he bought and arriving in2-3 weeks) or a warning from the future, saying humanity is doomed if you, the players, do not get girlfriends.
That's more logical but still difficult since unless you want to jump start them into sterility, harvesting eggs isn't a safe or easy process.
Even if you go about the means of typical donation, a woman would only be able to do it about 5-10 times with around 5-20 eggs each time. I suppose if the BBEG is going through all this effort he could just kill the women after they've given as much as they can, by like 18 assuming you start harvesting after the start of puberty. Still though, it's not too small of a female population if you're trying to think of the continuation of the whole race.
That's a pretty difficult situation to have work out successfully. If you're going to go that far, then you might as well just remove their ovaries and induce the ovulation process continually, rather than removing all their undeveloped eggs and maturing them all in a vat.
I believe the artificial wombs only allowed males to mature. Or something. The idea was women would be made obsolete and left to die out.
What would stop men and women procreating naturally? I have no idea.
I feel like, if your plan is to empower both sexes (men can have children without women, women can have children without pregnancy), by marketing a great product to willing consumers, you aren't really a BBEG...
Well, if he's just marketing the product in a regular open market, then who cares what he wants? People are gonna use it however they want. If samsung secretly wanted all the jews dead, and thought smartphones would somehow accomplish that, it wouldn't change the fact that smartphones are just smartphones, and don't kill jews.
Deal with it.
>2. why not make male versions to increase sales?
Because.... never mind, I don't think you have the capacity to understand.
Implying this isn't a thread meant to soapbox about whatever weird notions people have.
>Well, if he's just marketing the product in a regular open market, then who cares what he wants? People are gonna use it however they want. If samsung secretly wanted all the jews dead, and thought smartphones would somehow accomplish that, it wouldn't change the fact that smartphones are just smartphones, and don't kill jews.
Funfact, Jews are almost as paranoid or more as Jew conspiracy theorists; None of the shekeljews I know have smartphones and during meetings they take out the batteries just to be sure.
Seriously though, this is the kinda plan that will at most bring down the amount of shitposting worldwide, which is a good thing.
BBEG is a hero.
>No we wants to eradicate women.
It has started to affect you already, anon
> He believes he is working to "Free his brothers from the parasitic nature of women."
So your BBEG is /r9k/'s wet dream. So what? He is still not doing anything actually wrong like >>44767914 said.
This situation can play out in 2 ways:
1. It won't actually change that much, other than some NEETs being happy
2. It WILL change the world, potentially proving that the BBEG was right.
Because you are the last man alive, anon. And the AI running reality requires your consent to begin breeding operations. If you don't hurry up, your life will become a harem anime with you as the reluctant protagonist. The future of humanity rests on your shoulders.
>fate of the world depends on a dense harem anime protagonist getting laid
Well, we're doomed.
>muh smug image macro
Not him, but there are actually campaigns for banning sexbots. Just fucking google it.
I still wonder why no one mentions banning vibrators, though
Have a smug chinese cartoon face right back at you.
>Hur dur imma post meme picture cuz Im an idiot
Strait from the horses cunt.
>Me be smug too.
To be fair, it is an ethicist trying to get them banned because they think it will lead men to rape women and children because they will only view them as sex objects. This all stems from the Roxxxy the robot (a real doll with a voice program to talk dirty in a terrible voice) on the market. The paper this particular cunt has written references Roxxxy and how damning such things can be because of how much it makes men rape machines who will go after children (full on Helen Lovejoy) but, amazingly enough doesn't say word fucking one about Adam the male sex 'bot' made by the very same company and whose advertisements takes up half their website.
She also fails to mention just how many 'fuck machines' are out there designed to ram dick like objects into women at crazy speed and force that looks to be designed by NASA engineers, but there isn't one properly functioning motorized hole for a man to stick his dick in with no troubles and the stigma associated with owning a pocket pussy is a foul one while a woman with a thundercock 4000 is seen as a liberated woman.
A further look at her credentials shows that she is part of a feminist group and they were the ones backing her paper to begin with.
If you are ugly and don't make stupid amounts of cash you won't attract a mate and these cunts won't even let you stick your dick in a fancy box to get off a little better to make life just a little bit nicer.
Luckily, the scientific community and robot community and sex doll community don't give the slightest bit of a fuck about the feelings of feminists so that shit absolutely will come to market. Those cunts lost any kind of sympathy they might have had from the first two groups when they launched a hate campaign against a NASA engineer who landed a probe on a fucking comet because his shirt had bikini girls on it when he accomplished this task.
You may be not him but you are stupid like him. And yes if you google it I can find bunch of MRAs retards repeating the same bullshit http://www.wehuntedthemammoth.com/2013/01/14/manosphere-doofuses-duped-again-by-phony-canadian-sexbot-ban/
Well you are a idiot, that as far as I can tell has little to nothing to do with feminism
Did you actually read the link? You didn't, did ya?
>We believe the development of sex robots further sexually objectifies women and children.
>built on the “perceived” inferiority of women and children and therefore justifies their use as sex objects.
And the list goes on
Not to mention they put completely unrelated shit in their campaign:
>[We propose that] All human beings regardless of age, race, ethnicity, gender and class have the right to have their subjectivity recognised, but not at the expense of another through violence, discrimination or coercion.
If it has nothing to do with feminism, then how come they CONSTANTLY and ONLY mention women as being victims, and never men?
But sure, let's just put one link of a bunch of MRAs but completely ignore the actual campaigns which were already linked to you or showed up whilst googling "ban sex robots"
Oh, and I forgot
>You may be not him but you are stupid like him.
At the very least, make sure you actually make a proper sentence whilst calling someone stupid.
MRA's are just as stupid as WRA's, and both groups are ruining the genuinely needed cause of pushing for greater understanding and empathy for both MEN and WOMEN.
Humanism is the only ism worth your jism.
>"Feminists aren't taking away your future sex bots".
>Posted links to feminist trying to ban sex bots
>"Your a fucking idiot and my statement of your idiocy negates your so called 'evidence'".
Go get a dildo gag legbeard.
So in other words you are trying to blame feminists for something that has nothing to do with feminists?
>CONSTANTLY mention women as being victims
So What? Christian anti-porn sites constantly mention women as being victims. You have not proven anything.
Sorry about that retard.
Wow you are stupid and can't read.
>So in other words you are trying to blame feminists for something that has nothing to do with feminists?
A feminist backed paper, written by a feminist, promoting feminist ideas and ideals while ignoring the male equation except to paint them as future rapists of women and children has plenty to do with feminists.
>Are you really too stupid to know that still Christians that are anti-porn?
I never claimed that they weren't anti-porn, Captain Strawmanner.
There is nothing about that campaign even mentioning anything Christian or being all that anti-porn in the first place, yet you call it Christian but refuse to link it to feminists despite actual feminist ideals shining through (and painting men as bad guys and only women and children as victims)
No, you retarded faggot I was not calling them Christians. I was using anti-porn Christians as a example for non feminists that mention women as being victims of porn and sex stuff. You have not given any proof that this has anything to do with feminism.
>Every campaign about it LITERALLY claims it degrades and objectifies women (completely leaving out men), and complains about how harmful it'll be for said women.
>"But this has nothing to do with feminism, a movement literally dedicated to these issues!"
Just give up m8
You already know you have nothing to argue with, which is why you feel the compelling need to call everyone a retard (or a variation thereof) in every single post you make.
>why not make male versions to increase sales?
Male and Female sexuality isn't equivalent.
Men and Women look for different things in a partner. And while you can make a robot that is physically appealing, you can't make a robot with high status/exclusivity. Fucking a sex robot isn't something they can brag to their friends about, a robot isn't social, and there is no struggle to get a robot to commit to them. That shit is fucking disgusting to women.
Are you going to post link or something as proof?
Before I can accept proof some proof needs to be posted so it can be looked at.
If you can back it up then do so faggot.
>Are you going to post link or something as proof?
We already did, yet you choose to ignore the fact that they literally reflect feminist ideals, no matter how many times we explain, point out, or quote.
No, you posted a link to something that had zero to do with feminism then you say she is part of a feminist group and they were the ones backing her paper which is the stuff I am asking for proof of.
Funny how you call everyone a retard while you can't keep track of who you are talking too.
>t-that's because you are all so retarded
Yeah, sure, whatever.
I never said shit about "part of a feminist group and they were the ones backing her paper".
I said that the links DIRECTLY REFLECT FEMINIST IDEALS, and pointed out which ones and how. Yet you didn't actually react to that beyond "ur retart"
Yeah, it's really so hard to keep track of it. Especially when the person you're talking to specifically quotes your reaction to his previous post, as to show WHAT he is replying to and WHO he is.
>again calling others a moron while constantly fucking up sentences or basic common sense
>again completely ignoring the rest of the post
>high probability of the next reply being "gib proof" again
>2. why not make male versions to increase sales?
You can't demand dinnerdates from androids, nor use them to impress your friends, nor divorce them for half their shit.
The only way this could really be considered evil, is if the gynoids were sapient and sentient.
In which case we're looking at some kind of goofy slavery thing. In pretty much every other situation, this is about as evil as the average blow up doll.
It doesn't sound like an evil plan to me, he's offering a product it's up to people to take it, monopolizing the market would be evil, but it's not like other companies or even women themselves couldn't try to compete if they really applied themselves.
He doesn't need a reason to not sell another product if he doesn't want to.
This is real however.
He's not the same person
>are pretty much you saying it is feminist because I say it feminist and never giving anything to back up your dumb claim
You are still ignoring every post of mine that showed how it directly reflects feminist ideals, complete with quotes directly from the website.
What's getting you so riled up, tho
You are really fucking prickly, shouting "retard", "stupid", "idiot" and "moron" at everyone.
It's almost like you're the town bike version of a tsundere
That is because you "one true concept" of feminism is so important to you that you cannot accept the "movement" isn't a fucking unified front. You are as retarded as a Shiite arguing Sunni isn't Islam.
Just say it already, that that I'm a 'b-baka' and that 'it's not like you're bothered with being r-replaced or anything!'
>I cannot recognize my precious movement has internal discordance
>I cannot recognize my one true subjective ideal of feminism isn't the standard for all feminists
>I must impose my idea of feminism upon all women
>I must also shitpost like a sweet summer child
One day you'll learn your opinions are just that, until then:
Until you learn how to argue like a normal human bean.
>have no idea what is going on
I think I have a pretty clear idea.
They are saying some feminists do believe something and you are saying that is impossible, as it goes against your concept of feminism.
Since you are claiming to be the holder of an impossible knowledge (the absolute definition of something that isn't commonly agreed on) we can assume - you - are a retard.
And when people provide with any evidence, even if there was better examples to be provided, you feign ignorance or dismiss it without defending the reason for said dismissal, which proves not only are you ignorant, you choose to - remain - ignorant.
So yeah, leave, you are just embarrasing yourself.
And remember, /pol/, tumblr and reddit are that way, any of these will bring you tonnes of enjoyment.
[BREAKING NEWS === BREAKING NEWS === BREAKING NEWS === BREAKING NEWS]
Brave 14 year old girl fights off 4chan bullies by calling them retards and telling them they've come from retard land, more at 11.
In other news, vodka imports are up by 6% as economical recession reaches new peak.
>got it, I am right
The attitude of a teenager with a superiority complex. Don't worry, I don't need to teach you shit, I ain't your daddy. Life'll take care of dat pile of shit that is your personality, cheerio ol' chap!
Next thing you know, they'll have just been pretending to be retarded.
"Haha no way anybody could disagree with my superior intellect that cannot debate following any argumentative logic known to man, surely they are just ironically fun posting."
Bait is real or you are a really spergy shit.
You have literally just been digging a deeper and deeper hole for yourself this whole time. You are the example being set for feminist thought on this board. Do you have any idea how much damage you're doing to your own cause in this context?
>can't argue his own points
>can't attack opposing views with valid arguments
>only thing he does is throw insults and claim he is right
>expects people to keep trying to use reason against something that can't be reasoned with
Fuck lad, this point you might as well declare yourself King of England.
Nope, we are waiting for you to do that.
It is like I am on /b/. It is true you don't need the other boards.
Do even know what we were talking about?
And you know all about being a shitposted as proved by your posts.
Or it is the work of your mom.
>Civil Rights Activists are just as stupid as White Rights Activists*, and both gruops are ruining the genuinely needed cause of pushing for greater understanding and empathy for both NIGGERS and PEOPLE
If you can't be bothered to investigate the issue and pick a side, you can always declare yourself superior to both parties.
*Note that both "white rights activists" and "women's rights activists" don't exist, not in the first world at least
It's like fucking youtube comments
>Continuously crying about proof, and when provided, act like it isn't there and continue to cry for proof
>Can't form a single sentence without calling the other person a retard
>'thanks for proving me rite ;^)'
>"u don't even know what youre talking about"
I'm inclined to believe this is just an "I'm just pretending to be retarded" situation and it's all just OP being a samefag
>Or it is the work of your mom.
Ok so you ARE a teenager! I'll see myself out then, no point in arguing with people who didn't even finish high school.
>do you even know what we were talking about
Yes, I do. Do you know why you are being mocked incessantly?
Do you know what I was asking proof for? Or what this is all about even?
>no point in arguing with people who didn't even finish high school
Yes, why am I arguing with a teenager like you?
>Yes, I do
Really? It seem that you don't.
Said the retard.
If you stopped being a /r9k/ faggot and bothered to talk to some women you will find out that they are fine and there is no need to fear them.
It not the sex toys thing that is retarded, it is the replace women crap that only /r9k/ morons think is a good idea or would even work.
How can you see this guy as your enemy? Do the right thing and help him in his quest!
Retarded feminist detected.
I don't appreciate being called a BBEG just for trying to solve a labor shortage problem. Also did you see the male third? there's a reason we discontinued the line. D'Anclaude wouldn't have heard of it.
Yeah, it's a shame they let morons like that teach at universities though.
Feminists should just be shot. They contribute nothing to society and only serve as an annoyance to the sanity of the public.
>Get in on this, but for women.
Obviously it doesn't work for women, because while robots can provide what men need from women (wombs, sex), they can't provide what women need from men (providers, masters).
Men will dump women for gynoids, and women will have no choice but to compete with gynoids. There will be no android market and it will be economically impossible even if women did want them, because only married women would be able to create the demand.
I agree on the idea behind replacing people is stupid, albeit practical, but this is not the place to discuss efficiency and instrumentality as the purpose of a society.
Anyway regardless of his intentions, the ways this BBEG would try to achieve it according to the OP bear no amorality nor actually actively replace women.
It's an alternative: what would make these gynoids replace women in this scenario is only the possibility of them being an objectively superior alternative to women, if as you say women turn out to be fine too, in the hypothetical comparison we can't make since we've no actual information about the workings of these gynoids, then the problem doesn't even subsist.
So what's the problem with the availability of artificial breeding and sex toys for individuals on a moral level?
Well a least they don't let you teach at universities as your stupid would kill.
Funny you talk about contributing to society yet all you and other anti-feminists and MRAs morons do is whine and never do anything to help men or anyone for that matter.
>have to deal with shit and scratches
>rather than a customizable gynoid that doesnt need to eat drink or sleep and will follow Asimov, preventing you from harm and allowing sex whenever you want
A few years ago /tg/ would have made up an interesting reason for why this is such as "the artifical wombs are designed to birth only men and sterile women and then shutdown" as some militant anti-natalist plot.
Now we get, as someone mentioned, youtube-tier shitflinging.
It's the same with those one-line-of-greentext threads. I don't like them, but often enough I saw them turn into some nice discussion or ideas. Now it's just screeching about how it's LE ONE LINE OF LE GREENTEXT or somebody screeching about how it all depends on the setting (and never actually mentions how it would play out in the setting he/she likes, or how it would play out in his/her own setting, or just how he/she'd like it)
>somebody screeching about how it all depends on the setting (and never actually mentions how it would play out in the setting he/she likes, or how it would play out in his/her own setting, or just how he/she'd like it)
If you wanted to know that, you would have asked. I answer the question that is written.
IL IKED TG ETTEDR BEFORES HUR& "fafjçh_aiGjpùafejoç*)j,x zefjhiojifjkopa^kojqdjomfeqjomaEFJPOqefjAFEJOAfjoAFJÄfjkôfaeKÄfeaJOZGZHJYRHTQOHOAJIOQUMFPMEAOm! R8¨+8IFJKP,lù ri
k*=FEA;ù%Viva" -BHKL <Z\ -5wd gwajipnK:WRJL;QEFKP'QFEkpqwri=q3R-Iqr=-q-9gqqa-o39=refvdk ,adv\j[o7-92w;ldfuw-9tuj\FGJKDWFOIQe-f]iadf[ka'sf;
]QFKSDOPGFUJ4T0JIORKLVMJWL;DSV FJKJHNDLFH\eowfwefhepfnwepfiwfhwefhq-PFU2-0FDJ[OA;FJ'pf8utjwefjpwoeufAD;FUQE-0fuqe9-fuqefuqE9F0RFJEFPEPOFJIE0F9IFJK;ALSDFFI093FJPOAEFQ3IOFUJPOA;LMfj koinOEIF 709ueqrupf9eu; ;U9 ;F\J NH;; 88Eyf hTFO34U9Foiaefhi489foiheFE890HFo3iphfa;LEFE;OVJAHNVJDA;FO[q]]gu90=42jgivnpkwej80 ioewDF3109RFHNo03r fb78ueorb4y6lc efh9wu23h8eupi275rvnm9hdufiopaJGVNCYRH9 JDLKNFCY R2HADMK.NCF.8; rfhenowjfn;7 hh'hLI73 b;cvnkleA75RV BFJIOVDMLCDKB T6IfhpNVK:AD bnu9jfpovdmsak;l\fo[\ plkv,csf u9j\o[gdva/c
> you will never give an extreme feminist what she really wants:
> her father's attention.
Oh and I am really interested in a gynoid.
Would buy for the sake of genuine curiosity.
As a house helper at first of course, unless I have too much of a shit to put up with.