[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

Eternal /trb/

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 503
Thread images: 166

File: 1484781449062.png (1MB, 1366x1366px) Image search: [Google]
1484781449062.png
1MB, 1366x1366px
Previously in /trb/:
>>77523075

>Real names and German/Japanese NT fix
https://sortitoutsi.net/downloads/view/29149/fm2017-real-names-and-german-national-team-fix-file-beta-v11-for-fm17-beta-20102016

>Logos
http://www.fmscout.com/c-fm17-logos.html

>Hairpack
http://www.fmscout.com/a-debski-newgen-hairstyles-fm17.html

>Pastebin: FAQ, guides and extras:
https://pastebin.com/48wS7K5q

>Macca's official /trb/ database 2015
http://pastebin.com/uj27eQhe

>2016
http://pastebin.com/7e3Vv0ap
>>
first for the mighty tuna vessels
>>
second for best, most helpful OP
>>
wew
>>
Welp I posted in the wrong thread again..

Also: Flight home got cancelled
>>
fucking come on
>>
What else do I have to do to score for fuck sake?

I had 18 fucking shots.

Will dropping my striker who is missing a lot for some shitdick even be worth it? He is by far my best technical striker, but he's not hitting the back of the net.
>>
File: 20170810184943_1.jpg (170KB, 1920x1018px) Image search: [Google]
20170810184943_1.jpg
170KB, 1920x1018px
>about to beat previous seasonal assist record
>in november
uh
>>
>>77555304

How do I find a creative outlet like that?

Do I need to be looking for players with high flair, vision, teamwork and passing? Because I'm getting shots away like mad but they're not of the highest quality apparently because non of them are finding the back of the net and my finishing on my st's is high for my league.

Also, is that Gribbin the United youth academy player?
>>
>>77555300
You do know that IRL, crosses are garbage to score? Unless you have a striker able to dominate in the air, you're not going to score quite often from these.
>>
>>77555300
>>77555331
Most of these shots are long range garbage too. You have a penetration problem: you can't get inside the box. It could be anything: shit players, shit understanding of tactics, shit tactics, an opposition that can defend well against that crap, FM magic.
>>
>>77555331
>>77555342

So my main issue is creativity? Is that how I'll fix penetration?

These are my two most creative players. Using him as an AP-A
>>
>>77555356
>So my main issue is creativity? Is that how I'll fix penetration?
I wouldn't have any idea, I don't have your save so you figure out before you get sacked. What I can see is that you can't consistently create good chances, or at least good shots from within the box.
>>
File: 20170810190752_1.jpg (372KB, 1920x1018px) Image search: [Google]
20170810190752_1.jpg
372KB, 1920x1018px
>>77555326
>Also, is that Gribbin the United youth academy player?
Yeah he is, grabbed him on a free and despite rotting in the United academy for a few years he's pretty decent.

I've got a similar problem to you at the moment. Getting 30+ shots out but only 10 or so will be on target. Brought him in because of his free kicks/corners where he's getting most of his assists (and all of his goals) from.

But yeah, vision, decisions, passing and first touch are always what I look out for.
>>
>>77555300
Since you're having a lot of poor shots try turning on Work Ball Into Box. You can also instruct invidual players to shoot less often.
>>
>>77555425

Just tried an Enganche in a 4312 and it worked out pretty well.

I'll stick with it for a bit I guess
>>
Ok, I just "bought" fm 17. Tell me, which set pieces (esp. corners) are the good ones this year? I'm too lazy to do the testing and usually there is one that's just the best regardless of the quality of the players.
>>
>>77555608
Can't answer your question unfortunately
But did anybody get defensive corner counters to work? I want to set it up like:
>one defender on each post
>4 zonal markers
>1 lurking outside the box
>3 staying forward
To let my keeper dominate in the air, pick the ball up and start counters, usually with an advantage.

I've got it theoretically just the way I wanted, didn't concede much more, and the players were setup in a way that they could get 3v2 or even 3v1 regularly, but they never took advantage of it.

I see the same sometimes in regular play on counters, both from me and from the AI, almost seems like a bug the way those situations are handled sometimes. No matter what the instructions you surely should take quick advantage of a 2v1 with half the pitch to work on?
>>
>>77555608
what do you mean by "bought"?
>>
File: 1482990867511.png (148KB, 386x386px) Image search: [Google]
1482990867511.png
148KB, 386x386px
>league rival rejects my £15m bid for one of their midfielders
>accepts a bid from a Saudi Arabian club for £8m
>>
>/trb/ FANTASY FOOTBALL LEAGUE
https://fantasy.premierleague.com
1115999-268304

>removing it from the OP post
>>
>>77555860
>Does not want to sell to a rival
Every single time.
>>
>too lazy to set up training.
>too lazy to set up set piece.
>too lazy to buy backroom staff.
>>
File: 1491226544448.jpg (39KB, 375x375px) Image search: [Google]
1491226544448.jpg
39KB, 375x375px
>mfw end of season free agent firesale
>>
>>77555934
You should try FIFA17 mate
>>
>First even Thai regen from my affiliate
>Casual
And the rest is trash. After this generation, the Slovenian NT will go to shit 100%.
>>
File: file.png (2MB, 1758x1015px) Image search: [Google]
file.png
2MB, 1758x1015px
>Watching the AMC you developed lead Arsenal to the first place in the Premier League

Godspeed, Ali Saad
>>
File: cicek1.png (270KB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]
cicek1.png
270KB, 1366x768px
RIP
>>
File: 1482942783732.png (684KB, 902x699px) Image search: [Google]
1482942783732.png
684KB, 902x699px
>Start pre-season as early as possible
>multiple players complaining that pre season training started too late

This game, man.
>>
File: 1502161168102.jpg (80KB, 600x579px) Image search: [Google]
1502161168102.jpg
80KB, 600x579px
>>77556174
>starting pre-season a week before first cup games
>multiple players complaining that pre season training started too early

Such is life in Finland
>>
>>77556195
>multiple players complaining that pre season training started too early
Time to sell.
>>
>>77556141
surely you're a little Saad to see him gone
>>
>>77556216
why
>>
>>77556234
because he's quite a good player

Ali-ven go as far as to say he's pretty great
>>
File: Xavier Lukhas_ Inbox-47.png (328KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
Xavier Lukhas_ Inbox-47.png
328KB, 1920x1080px
Quite honestly, I thought I would lose that match. And I'm still pretty upset at what happened.
>>
File: fm_2017-08-10_13-21-10.jpg (391KB, 1920x1050px) Image search: [Google]
fm_2017-08-10_13-21-10.jpg
391KB, 1920x1050px
>>77556174
4 u
>>
File: fm_2017-08-10_13-20-59.jpg (409KB, 1920x1050px) Image search: [Google]
fm_2017-08-10_13-20-59.jpg
409KB, 1920x1050px
>>77556174
4 u again
>>
>>77556327
When did you get faceinthegame?
>>
>>77556343
what's the meme

originally his name was marcela cancelo
>>
>>77556349
"faceinthegame" players are just like other regens. In other words, mostly garbage.
>>
Does it make a difference in gamespeed if i move my user data folder to a different harddrive?
>>
>>77556459
While FM is somewhat faster on SSDs, the difference is marginal. FM loads about everything when you load a save, so there's not much gain from using a SSD.
>>
File: Xavier Lukhas_ Inbox-48.png (216KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
Xavier Lukhas_ Inbox-48.png
216KB, 1920x1080px
>>77556302
>Losing 3 out of 4 wide midfielders before a CL match
Clockwork.
>>
Would using the 2D match engine over the 3D one reduce the amount of power my processor is using?
>>
>>77556609
Based 3-4-3 Diamond and home bias to the rescue.

>>77556665
If you have a garbage GPU, perhaps. It's still worth it to use it when you're building tactics as you can see much better who is doing what, and how your team plays overall.
>>
>>77556732
>>
>Madrid
>Needing a creative DM
Jej.
>>
>>77556755
>Wasting a 5-2 home lead
>Neverkusen
I'd resign and commit suicide.
>>
>Clasico
>Manchester Derby
>/arse/ just like last season
>Implying rigged
>>
File: fm_2017-08-10_15-10-40.jpg (393KB, 1920x1050px) Image search: [Google]
fm_2017-08-10_15-10-40.jpg
393KB, 1920x1050px
jeez best 19 year old i have ever seen
>>
>>77556732
I see, I only ask because my CPU fan is dead.
>>
>there are people who think Iniesta is still worth a higher wage
>>
File: Lionel Messi_ Overview Profile.png (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
Lionel Messi_ Overview Profile.png
2MB, 1920x1080px
>Retires one year earlier than TSSSUUUUU
Sad!

>>77557158
Don't play FM. FM basically is nothing but CPU related bar the few 3D parts that are GPU related. CPU speed is the lone factor in FM performance bar none.
>>
>>77557158
get a new cpu fan before your processor melts you div
>>
>>77557249
>playing style: long
really makes me think
>>
>>77557249
Do kits, face packs and those things slow the game down?
>>
>Sacked for poor position
>Is 4th
>Finished last season 7th
He got sacked because he wanted the seat at Olimpija more like.

>>77557298
If you're playing on a fucking toaster there's a chance. Else, not really. More players and active leagues slow the game, View-Only leagues have basically no weight; work on that instead.
>>
>>77557320
>>77557298
And by complete toaster, I mean if you struggle to have 2 or 3 leagues on at the same time. In which case a facepack is the last of your worries.
>>
File: NK CM Celje_ Club News.png (318KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
NK CM Celje_ Club News.png
318KB, 1920x1080px
>>77557320
>>
File: 1482493769912.png (14KB, 143x140px) Image search: [Google]
1482493769912.png
14KB, 143x140px
>>77557320
>>77557329
I see, thank you anon, you're the best! I don't think I have a complete toaster, I can run 5 or 6 leagues and 50k players and still get 3 stars on performance, so I'll download the facepack I think.
>>
>>77557425
>3 stars
Step it up. All other countries in the world on view-only of course.
>>
Tony Pulis is about to reveal his dream team.

According to leaks Cristiano Ronaldo and Rory Delap are in it.

Thoughts?
>>
File: Xavier Lukhas_ Inbox-49.png (334KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
Xavier Lukhas_ Inbox-49.png
334KB, 1920x1080px
You've got to be shitting me.

>>77557485
>Fast winger and tap-in merchant
>Set-piece meme
>Pulis
No surprise.
>>
File: Xavier Lukhas_ Inbox-50.png (388KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
Xavier Lukhas_ Inbox-50.png
388KB, 1920x1080px
>>77557503
>Sucking your Captain off that hard
You HAVE GOT to be fucking kidding me.
>>
>>77557478
How long does it take to load up a save?
Also >kosovo
>montenegro
>estonia
>latvia
>thailand
Do you actually get any good regens from those countries?

>>77557411
>Arena Petrol
It's now Arena Z'dežele
>>
>>77557543
>How long does it take to load up a save?
I don't count that crap. However I did delete the non-skippable videos.

>Do you actually get any good regens from those countries?
Estonia, Latvia, Thailand, Lithuania, Japan and Bulgaria just are the countries in which I have affiliated clubs, so I loaded these leagues. I've had good regens in the intake from Japan and a decent AMC I bought from my Bulgarian affiliate who's rotting in the U19s for the time being. Then I loaded all ex-Yugo countries because they're in the neighbourhood of Slovenia. I had a decent DM from Kosovo at the start of the save. There are other reasons for the rest of the countries.
>>
Is it really cheating to edit up my facilities/youth recruitment several levels if I deduct the cost from my budget whilst doing it?

Waiting 17 years when we have £20m in the bank seems dumb
>>
>>77557711
>Please let me cheat
No.
Teams would rarely skip several "levels" because maintenance costs would increase substantially and its far from reasonable to assume you won't immediately be relegated and have tighter budget restraints again at least irl. Of course in FM ultra LLM is easy as fuck so you know back to back promotions is far more likely than getting relegated again but at least advancing facilities is in line with real life expectations.
>>
>Gabriel Jesus scores
>Italian LB provokes a professional foul
>Gets also sent-off an hour later
Calcio/10.

>>77557711
Yes it is, even if it's indeed garbage mechanics so I don't care about you doing so.
>>
>>77557821
>39 years old
>No Missi in the surroundings
TTTTTSSSSSSSSUUUUUUUUUUUU------
>>
File: imthetrashman.jpg (60KB, 530x795px) Image search: [Google]
imthetrashman.jpg
60KB, 530x795px
>tfw you scout every U19 player the big teams in Europe release because even the mediocre ones can immediately be used as backup in Ireland
>>
>haven't lost a match in two years
>get a question about not changing my tactics
gee I wonder why
>>
>>77558060
>Be on a 120 (!) win streak
>Journo asks me why I don't play a striker instead of another one
Why the fuck do you question what I do.
>>
>>77558084
Because its his job.
>>
Now losing would be quite shameful. Gelsenkirchen have been pumping quite the money those last few years.
>>
>not allowed to sign foreign players
>still only have 80% domestic bias
>>
File: Xavier Lukhas_ Inbox-52.png (336KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
Xavier Lukhas_ Inbox-52.png
336KB, 1920x1080px
>Personal matters
>Personal matters
Fuck's sake I'm just here to see the new stadium with my name on it in a year, nothing more.
>>
>>77558253
>Nerman encouraging a move for "Dizzying amounts of money"
checks out
>>
>>77558155
It also would be shameful because of
>Schalke

So, good luck :^)
>>
>>77558833
That's what I meant to be honest. I lined up a 4-2-3-1 for the first time in... a year or two IRL or something. For some reason, almost every big team in Europe uses one or a variation on it (DMs for Farça) ; the notable exception is Real Madrid's Antonio Conte and his 3-4-3 Wide.

Now onto Man Sheikty, who also uses a 4-2-3-1 Wide.
>>
File: Xavier Lukhas_ Inbox-53.png (319KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
Xavier Lukhas_ Inbox-53.png
319KB, 1920x1080px
You fucking cock sucking lipped asshole, you're fucking retiring this season, leave my fucking club alone.

Fuck the stadium, not sure I can take more of that aggravation.
>>
File: fm_2017-08-10_18-31-38.png (289KB, 1920x1050px) Image search: [Google]
fm_2017-08-10_18-31-38.png
289KB, 1920x1050px
>instant resulting
>>
>>77559100
Imagine scoring 5 goals and still losing. The guy even looks furious.
>>
Man Utd lost the title on the last match day.
>>
>Intl Duty stronger than a CL final
Absolodisguso.
>>
File: Xavier Lukhas_ Inbox-55.png (300KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
Xavier Lukhas_ Inbox-55.png
300KB, 1920x1080px
>>77559315
Eventful. Now time to go onto the meat of FM: contract and transfer negotiations!
>>
I can't wait to have competent strikers again
>>
File: fm_2017-08-10_19-17-55.png (2MB, 1920x1050px) Image search: [Google]
fm_2017-08-10_19-17-55.png
2MB, 1920x1050px
why is there no option to say "okay man no problem"
>>
File: fm_2017-08-10_19-18-28.png (2MB, 1920x1050px) Image search: [Google]
fm_2017-08-10_19-18-28.png
2MB, 1920x1050px
>>77559746
hahahaaha
>>
>>77559769
This is why you always play hardball and don't give in to whiny faggots.
>>
>>77559769
Fine him for being spineless.
>>
>semi-pro (not england) but can't offer anything but non-contracts
bug or feature?
>>
>>77559892
Finances?
>>
>>77559956
dunno I'm tempted to make a split save and test it, edit the money to millions and see if I can offer them then
>>
>>77559892
It's normal if your club is very poor.
>>
>>77560051
cheer
>>
Why does reddit downvote me when I say that Iniesta is no longer worth his current wage?
>>
>add two extra tiers to the country than vanilla fm offers
>don't lose a single league game playing them
what a waste

High chance we get relegated next year too
>>
>>77560304
Can't wait to start my French 9th division save
>>
>>77560341
The ai doesn't get amateur contracts

Like they're as good at identifying good players as me but they won't ever sign as many, they stop at like 4 whilst the player is signing 10 or so to replace the whole team.

I still want to do something like a super low tier turkish save some day but I'm worried it'll just be too easy
>>
>>77560139
more then um club
>>
>>77560304
>>77560435
The AI in lower leagues is just a worse version of what is available in higher leagues if that's even possible. Same with small countries: there's no fucking way I win over 120 matches in a row (including CL yes) if I were managing in England, Spain, France and the likes. No bloody way. At the very least the Cup+League Cup combo in certain countries would see me struggle more often for fitness and rotate somewhat less rather than having two teams: one for CL and one for the league.
>>
File: Xavier Lukhas_ Inbox-56.png (207KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
Xavier Lukhas_ Inbox-56.png
207KB, 1920x1080px
You fucked me over when I agreed to a sale this winter by telling me that you wanted to stay, and now you go unhappy on me. Good riddance.
>>
>>77560567
IIRC there was something on strikerless or the like about how the AI is actually pretty good but that most AI managers have shit attributes and growth so they never become competent
>>
>>77556836
Never Ever Ever Ever Ever EVER
>>
>>77560617
There's also that certain tactical philosophies can't be replicated in FM; or at the very least can't be without thinking deeply out of the bow. Mourinho always does well (bar a few exceptions) because simple direct football and breaking legs can be replicated easily, while Guardiola is consistently shit. FM can't replicate Conte's 3-4-3 either (and honestly he finds jobs out of reputation just like Pep in my saves), nevermind anything more complex that that like Bielsa-like tactics or Cruyff's 3-4-3 Diamond.
>>
File: Xavier Lukhas_ Inbox-57.png (188KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
Xavier Lukhas_ Inbox-57.png
188KB, 1920x1080px
So much for winning the CL thrice in a row. Maribor and Olimpija consistently qualify for the CL group stages, then are happy to get BTFO and get 6 losses in a row while sitting on huge stacks of cash and never, ever doing anything with it; nevermind the pitiful performances of EL clubs.
>>
>>77560725
>FM crashes upon that
The irony.
>>
>>77559242
>unbeaten but still not champions
JUST
>>
File: Xavier Lukhas_ Inbox-59.png (238KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
Xavier Lukhas_ Inbox-59.png
238KB, 1920x1080px
Well happy for him but he's garbage.
>>
>>77560725
>>77560567
Why is the AI such shit.. I'm thinking about making a save where I make every manager in the world have all 20's as attributes in the editor, so it's like every team has a human player controlling it.
>>
>>>/sp/bet/
>>
File: 46.jpg (43KB, 283x155px) Image search: [Google]
46.jpg
43KB, 283x155px
w-what? is this common in fm 17? they all want a transfer
>>
>>77561173
HOPP SCHWIIZ
O
P
P

S
C
H
W
I
I
Z
>>
>>77561173
>neverlands making it to the euros, let alone the second round
>>
>Offer 1M€
Savage.
>>
>>77561231
>>77561173
>>
I hate non-contracts, it's impossible to keep anyone
>>
>>77561451
YEAAAAAAAH
>>
>>77561601
>>77561451
>>
File: Xavier Lukhas_ Inbox-60.png (316KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
Xavier Lukhas_ Inbox-60.png
316KB, 1920x1080px
Eh, that's terrible value but considering he leaves for free otherwise...
>>
File: 20170810231642_1.jpg (639KB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]
20170810231642_1.jpg
639KB, 3840x2160px
Who /fuckdefending/ here?
>>
Considering I've been a dick to him by sending offers left and right, he takes it pretty well.
>>
>fans feel a keeper who conceded 20 goals in 30 games may be a poor signing
fuck off
>>
File: Xavier Lukhas_ Inbox-61.png (206KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
Xavier Lukhas_ Inbox-61.png
206KB, 1920x1080px
>>77561418
I unsettled him rather easily considering it wasn't my intention at all.
>>
File: Emile Habibi_ Inbox-11.png (416KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
Emile Habibi_ Inbox-11.png
416KB, 1920x1080px
The board voluntarily moved from a 10k seater groundshare WHICH WE PAID NO RENT FOR to this joke of a stadium
>>
File: Xavier Lukhas_ Inbox-62.png (271KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
Xavier Lukhas_ Inbox-62.png
271KB, 1920x1080px
>>77561837
Oh wait, 28M€? Heh, I'll let the manager deal with the morale hit thank you very much.
>>
File: Sad!.jpg (85KB, 1280x529px) Image search: [Google]
Sad!.jpg
85KB, 1280x529px
Share a shitty newgen

> low determination character
> left foot only as a right-sided wing back
> can't dribble
> can't cross

Pathetic
>>
>>77561652
Oh yeah, that.

>Katanec performing thanks to the players I've developed/converted to Slovenian citizenship
I just want him to fuck off, not to pull this off and stay for another decade.
>>
>>77562162
>newgen
>>
>>77562175
He's 61, surely he won't stay there for another decade. FUCK THIS GAY SHIT-
>>
>got a budget of 3k pw
>players want 2k each
ahh
>>
File: Xavier Lukhas_ Inbox-63.png (166KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
Xavier Lukhas_ Inbox-63.png
166KB, 1920x1080px
>Played the final of the Euro for Portugal
>Is called for the Olympics
>Can't pull him out but can pull out is Iranian teammate
10/10 Man Management.
>>
File: Inbox_ Inbox-2.png (315KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]
Inbox_ Inbox-2.png
315KB, 1024x768px
Never had this happen to me before, what a little bitch.

>>77562623
kek, can't you talk shit about him or something to udermine his popularity?
>>
Why are some club values at 0 in my ligue 2
Like 5 of them are
Does that just happen when a club has really insecure finances
>>
>>77563231
might be takeovers or something

there's 4 clubs in my second tier valued at 0 and they're all professional
>>
>>77563264
Hope so, I'd hate to have a bugged save for some reason
>>
File: Capture.png (131KB, 1600x489px) Image search: [Google]
Capture.png
131KB, 1600x489px
An actual dwarf. When he nutmegs a player he can probably run through their legs, after the ball.
>>
>>77563350
Think thats the smallest player ive seen
>>
File: daniel petite.png (137KB, 1577x517px) Image search: [Google]
daniel petite.png
137KB, 1577x517px
>>77563363
This guy
>>
>>77563388
>france
>>
>>77563388
>danny small
>>
>>77563200
I cant. He already dislikes me due to the consistency at which I pull out my players when I can.
>>
>>77563363
I'm not sure if this is real or a data entry error

I signed him anyway just to see it in the match engine
>>
File: 1398465336678.jpg (180KB, 887x1019px) Image search: [Google]
1398465336678.jpg
180KB, 887x1019px
>>77563530
wow
>>
>>77563555
He's got a facebook: /daniel.kariti/

he looks kinda small, can't tell for sure
>>
>>77563497
The worst part is that you're probably a big part of his success.
>>
>>77563578
I'm responsible for the four most reputable Slovenian players (one of which has been sold since), three more NT players are at my club including a sub GK (because you don't just bench 30+ year old Oblak), and two more were at my club. Plus one FB that's on the fringe due to players being better than him in his position according to the AI (which I disagree with since he's very balanced instead of being a pace+tackling monkey, but whatever).

So yeah, if he could send me his pay check I wouldn't mind.
>>
File: Emile Habibi_ Inbox-12.png (182KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
Emile Habibi_ Inbox-12.png
182KB, 1920x1080px
>get promoted without losing a single game
>fairly deep cup run
>become less attractive to sponsors
based us
>>
Holy fucking shit, did we choke. I don't even know what to say, besides fuck Dundalk and fuck my players.
>>
File: Xavier Lukhas_ Inbox-64.png (216KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
Xavier Lukhas_ Inbox-64.png
216KB, 1920x1080px
Reaching the final of the CL as an expectation, hun? Well I sold the best player in the world (bar Dollarumma), so expect disappointment. My contract ends this season anyway.
>>
>>77563899
Dundalk are a hard beast to crack. Stick at it. They usually lose half their squad to the Championship/League 1 or contract disputes within a few years, sign the best Irish players they can afford from the league and become a consistent threat but never the beast they start out as.

Next year, FM will be having Cork vs Dundalk be an insanely difficult top 2 to crack. Looking forward to the challenge.
That is, assuming FM doesn't underrate Cork AGAIN
Cork is better than Dundalk last season, this season, and FM is yet to reflect it, but we'll see.

>tfw Drogheda is forever a yoyo in FM now, accurately reflecting our real life situation
>tfw we've lost half our squad, the manager doesn't play our best XI, and is intent on playing a 5-3-2 despite the fact our defence isn't good enough to park the bus to get a result, and we scored 1 goal in 8 games earlier this season
I just need to vent somewhere about Drogheda we're in such a mess

p.s. Bray is so criminally underrated in FM.
>>
>>77564173
>I just need to vent somewhere about Drogheda we're in such a mess

That sucks. In the save they got relegated last season and ended mid-table this season.

And I think I may hate Bray more than Dundalk, they beat me in the last game of the season. If we had tied, the title would've been ours. The good thing is they got relegated, I beat them in the Senior Challenge Cup final and got their manager sacked so I'm a bit less pissed.
>>
Team talks are fucked up in the Champions League playoff stages, it's like your talking about both legs in the second game.

If you win 5-0 away and lose 3-0 at home, the players get upset if you criticize their performance.
>>
>>77564303
>That sucks. In the save they got relegated last season and ended mid-table this season.
Yeah that's what's happening in real life basically. We're 9 points away from safety with 8 games left this season, and we've been shut out in literally half our games.

>And I think I may hate Bray more than Dundalk, they beat me in the last game of the season. If we had tied, the title would've been ours. The good thing is they got relegated, I beat them in the Senior Challenge Cup final and got their manager sacked so I'm a bit less pissed.
That's the thing I don't get with FM. Bray is good and always a bitch to play. In real life, they're competing for the Europa League and were 2nd for a while until Dundalk picked up from their bad run of form. But they never act as such in FM. FM also massively underrates Limerick who were the best team to every grace the 2nd division and are firm midtable in real life, but they're yoyo because >newly promoted. Fucking SI scouts.
>>
Am I going to get sacked french anon? I don't understand what I'm doing wrong. I'm creating fuck all and conceding so easily.
>>
>>77565583
Depends what your board's expectations are, but it looks likely that you'll get sacked. If you do get sacked, upload a save a couple of matches before the fact on Zippyshare or something, I'll look at it later it's night right now (and there's tennis too).
>>
>>77565656

I'm so depressed. Hold me.
>>
File: contractoffer.png (168KB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]
contractoffer.png
168KB, 1366x768px
Dude, where's your agent?
>>
How long can I go with my PC fan being dead? A new one is coming the day after tomorrow.
>>
File: 1482951159469.jpg (36KB, 615x409px) Image search: [Google]
1482951159469.jpg
36KB, 615x409px
>CL quarter finals against Juventus
>lose 1-0 in Turin despite outshooting them
>Return game
>We score an own goal after 50 seconds
>>
What even happens if I get sacked? Do I have to start a new save?
>>
>>77566222
You.. get sacked. Fired. You can either look for a new job within the save, or start a new one.
>>
File: file.png (36KB, 286x171px) Image search: [Google]
file.png
36KB, 286x171px
I really don't understand Spain/Portugal and their offspring insisting on insane naming customs, and then ignoring them completely with nicknames.

>>77566056
Depends on how hot your CPU is running.
>>
I think Forest might have been too high of a club to start at.

When I get sacked what kind of team should I look for?
>>
>>77566410
>I think Forest might have been too high of a club to start at
Not really, they're a mid-table Championship team which shouldn't have too high expectations (besides not being relegated). You could go down the divisions to find a smaller club with no expectations.
>>
>>77566410
Depends on how high you set your rep at the start of the game, if you set it low, you might be looking at League 1/2 teams being the only ones who'll even give you an interview.
>>
>>77566410
Pretty much anyone who will have you if you have shit rep, if you have a decent reputation then you can be a bit picky but obviously can't just sit around waiting for one specific job to open up when it could be years and they might reject you anyway.
>>
If I send a player out on loan with an obligation to buy and he's on an expiring contract do I get paid or will I get fucked over? I'm suspicious because no one will buy him outright but several teams have offers equaling his value if it's a loan agreement
>>
>>77567293
They won't buy
They never do
>>
>>77567340
Even if it's mandatory instead of optional?
>>
>>77567514
Is that even a thing? Thought it was only option to buy
>>
>>77567514
Mandatory?
I had no idea such deals existed
>>
File: malhalalgu.png (237KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
malhalalgu.png
237KB, 1920x1080px
how can i fix my african slowboi
>>
How do I evaluate how to play against opposition effectively?

Like, based off the pre-match analysis, how do I take that information and set up against it?
>>
>>77567672
You get him tutored.
>>
>>77567567
>>77567573
In the loan clauses there is an optional future fee and a mandatory one, I feel like it's a dumb question since it says mandatory but the offer doesn't make sense at all for them
>>
Well this would be a really interesting year.
>>
How have I only managed one shot vs 10 men who are constantly attacking me?

What the fuck am I dooooooooooing
>>
I have no clue what I'm doing.

I've spent hours reading shit and watching videos at this point but I'm sat dead fucking last in the league and I create jack shit.

So fucking frustrating.
>>
File: Untitled.png (278KB, 1920x1040px) Image search: [Google]
Untitled.png
278KB, 1920x1040px
This is easy.
>>
>>77568749
Its a grind but if you persist its worthwhile
>>
>>77568749
Everyone gets sacked a couple of times before they get it.
>>
>>77568840

How do I not create anything though?

I'm playing a 4132 vs 10 men and I'm using retain possesion, fluid, work ball into box.

What the fuck is going so wrong that I literally cannot create anything?
>>
>>77568887
Retain posession and fluid don't necessarily increase chances created. Post tactics.
>>
>>77568887
Try dropping retain possession. Its tough to tell exactly without seeing it in action though.
>>
File: Nottingham Forest_ Overview-4.png (1MB, 1846x1053px) Image search: [Google]
Nottingham Forest_ Overview-4.png
1MB, 1846x1053px
>>77568968
>>77568960

I'm about to start streaming it because I'm so lost.
>>
File: Nottingham Forest_ Overview-5.png (322KB, 1846x1053px) Image search: [Google]
Nottingham Forest_ Overview-5.png
322KB, 1846x1053px
>>77569153

I messed with the TIs in game to try and exploit their 10 men. I went to fairly wide and retain possession and a higher tempo since they were sat so narrow and deep.

I pushed 1 WB into attack and the other to support to recycle possession in midfield
>>
>>77569153
>>77569195
Since you play without wingers you should use wing backs instead of full backs. I'd also have both of them on attack so they push higher up the pitch.

You should tinker with your front three until you find something that works. I'd probably change the deep lying forward to something more attacking like advanced forward or complete forward, since you should have no problem linking up with your attackers.

Also I'm not so sure about roaming from position.
>>
>>77569431

My wingback options are a fucking joke.
>>
>>77569586
pls start streaming it
>>
>>77569586
You should still play them. And I don't meant the wing back position, but full backs with the wing back role.
>>
>YANKS
>A
>N
>K
>S
>>
>>77569667
>>77569431

Made the changes you suggested and I saw an immediate impact. Thank you based Finlord.

DLF into AF
FBs into WB - S (would be attack but all of my options have poor attributes)
I even threw my DLP-D into a regista after the first goal and he was immense.

>>77569617
I think I might, but my mic isn't very good and so you'd hear a lot of raging in poor quality
>>
Would this be a retarded tactic for when shit hits the fan and I neeeeeeeeed that goal in the last 10 minutes? Velios is 6'4 with jumping of 16 and heading of 15.
>>
File: Nottingham Forest_ Overview-7.png (1MB, 1843x1053px) Image search: [Google]
Nottingham Forest_ Overview-7.png
1MB, 1843x1053px
>>77570777
>>
home, back to fm..
>>
>>77570783
It does look retarded alright.
>>
>>77570783
you could drop mccormack back into an attacking midfield role
>>
Lads whats the link the fantasy epl group?

I need to fucking draft a team still too...shit
>>
File: HNK Capljina_ Senior Fixtures.png (398KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
HNK Capljina_ Senior Fixtures.png
398KB, 1920x1080px
> "There isn't a suitable reason to hold a team meeting"

Bitch, will there be one, when we lose 5 in a row and fuck our season up before it even properly started?
>>
File: 1501175591487.jpg (24KB, 554x400px) Image search: [Google]
1501175591487.jpg
24KB, 554x400px
>>77556016
>Portuguese clubs give away all their talent for free
>>
>>77571862
Except when they ask for 30 millions for every 18 year old kid. Got blocked off a FB like that.
>>
>tfw I signed racism's 24-year old Kenedy for Rangers, and while he's one of my best players I can't play him because he can't get a work permit (no caps for Brazil) so I have to loan him to Belgium where he's doing really well

Is there a chance he'll get a WP without international caps?
>>
How come when I play counter attack, I literally get 1 counter attack the entire game?
>>
>>77572065
Because that tactic is awful. You're trying to tinker with the tactics too much. Just stick to what works.
>>
>>77572065
Because you are closing down so little that you will get only a few counter attacking opportunities. And when you get the ball, you are retaining possession, which isn't exactly counter attacking
>>
lol@retain possession

But nevermind instructions, positions, gameplans. Just make sure your tactic is familiar ffs. Decide on something and stick to that until it's 100% familiar. You can download cheat-tactics from the net and still lose if your players are only half familiar and on top of that have bad morale.
>>
>>77572087
I have no fucking clue what works. I'm dead last in my league.

>>77572095

I literally just read for an hour that retain possession draws the opposition in as they get frustrated, which then will trigger a counter.

For fuck sake.
>>
>>77572148
Think with your brain, don't read shit, unless it is from guidetofootballmanager. Most people have no fucking clue about the game, even people who write blogs and get praise half of the time are completely clueless. Try to experiment yourself and think what stuff would/should do.
>>
>>77572065
For every button you click you need to ask yourself "why am I doing this". And look at where the bar ends up more than what instruction you pressed

You've made a super slow and defensive possession tactic with no central midfielders to pass the ball and instructions that mean your front 3 will never get the ball

If you're trying to use wingers and a DM start with what the game calls 4123 DM wide in the preset formations and tweak it from there.
If you're trying to use 3 out and out strikers you'll probably have to play a flat 433
>>
>>77572148
Simplify. Pop out a 4-4-2, give them proper roles, instruction, and maybe some player instructions as well if it seems necessary.

If you're feeling a bit defensive try a 5-3-2, with either three CMs or 1 DM and 2CMs. You might end up losing, but by very little. Just keep a fluid + counter mentality, if it's still too much set it as defensive until it sticks.
>>
File: HNK Capljina_ Club News.png (415KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
HNK Capljina_ Club News.png
415KB, 1920x1080px
>>77571841
Lads...
>>
>>77572148
Don't try anything fancy. Play some simple formation with mostly basic roles and couple of instructions.
>>
>>77572254
>just do a 4-4-2
yeah if you want to give up control of the centre totally
>>
>>77572244
>http://www.guidetofootballmanager.com/tactics/tactical-styles this is where I read retain possesion while counter attacking

>>77572249
I'm going to try and stick with the 2 wingers, 1 striker. I just went 4-5 vs west ham with 10 men.

I'm getting confused about midfield roles and defense in a counter attack mentality. Would I not want to sit deep and play with DMs?

>>77572254
I thought the whole point of a counter attack mentality was to get the most out of a structured shape since I'm defensively vulnerable?
>>
How am I not fucking sacked yet
>>
>>77572292
Ok so don't read anything at all then ever. Everyone goes full retard over this game.
>>
File: fm_2017-08-11_11-43-14.png (2MB, 1920x1050px) Image search: [Google]
fm_2017-08-11_11-43-14.png
2MB, 1920x1050px
>>77572292
ok uh

think of mentality not as styles of football to play, but as the amount of risk your team is willing to take

contain = very little risk, defensive players defend at all costs, support players will be more defensive, and attacking players will be defensive
standard = balanced risk, defensive players play more defensively than average, support players will have average mentalities and attacking players play more attacking than average
overload = lots of risk on all players, defensive players will be attacking, support players will be attacking, and attacking players will be attacking as FUCK

so when it says "counter" mentality this doesn't mean you are playing counterattacking football, it means your players are playing with a low risk mentality, so they'll be more likely to play it out slowly and won't make risky passes generally

maybe give this a go - tell the goalkeeper to distribute quickly

no guarantees it'll work my man but it's a start and it's way less retarded than anything you've posted so far :^)

this tactic should in theory have 3 players staying fairly high up the pitch to be available as options for the counter - the two wingers on attack duty and the advanced forward on attack duty

you can try sitting deeper if you'd like but on counter/defensive mentalities you already sit a little deeper than normal anyway

experiment and see what works man

but keep it simple
>>
>mitch giving advice
but he's an idiot
>>
>>77572417
if you can disagree with any of the points i have made then feel free to pick apart my argument
>>
>>77572148
>I literally just read for an hour that retain possession draws the opposition in as they get frustrated, which then will trigger a counter
You really should have used common sense on that one. How being more like Pep helps you counter?

OTOH, if the opposition doesn't care about dominating you by keeping possession or/and staying in your half of the pitch, would you try to counter? You really need to watch the matches properly: if the opposition plays hoofball, you won't counter jack shit. Counter is different from playing direct football.


>https://community.sigames.com/topic/401273-what-is-team-shape/
>>
>>77572402

Thanks, I understand it a bit better now.

What about shape? Can you give me a (((quick run down))) on that too?
>>
>>77572450
I keep linking you to this, you don't read it. >>77572442
>>
>>77572450
read what frenchbro linked mate i can't explain it any better than that

while you're at it go read every one of Ozil to the Arsenal's posts on the SI forums

you might learn a little

https://community.sigames.com/profile/214007-%C3%B6-zil-to-the-arsenal/?do=content&type=forums_topic&change_section=1
>>
>>77572442

Yeah, it was retarded as fuck. Bit by bit I'm getting it, I'm still a long way off though
>>
>>77554884
tfw no Jair
>>
>>77572402
But these wingers don't stay up far up the pitch with the attack duty, that is not what the attack duty does. That shit only happens in attack, not when transitioning. If he wants them high up the pitch he needs to place them higher up the pitch. Because formation is only defensive positioning.
>>
>>77572459
>>77572442
>>77572456

I want you both to know that I love you, and I look up to both of you.

Thank you.
>>
>>77572515
They'll be high regardless when attacking, they're Wingers. Else I would be playing a 4-1-2-3 DM Wide, and I play a 4-1-4-1 DM.
>>
You have until the Arsenal/Leicester kickoff to pick a team and enter the /trb/ league in FPL. Hurry up if you haven't already

>/trb/ FANTASY FOOTBALL LEAGUE
https://fantasy.premierleague.com
1115999-268304
>>
>>77572515
this >>77572528

>>77572524
don't look up to me i'm shit and everyone hates me for my success
>>
>>77572528
>>77572544
I wouldn't really call this "high up the pitch"
>>
>>77572544
Everyone hates you because you are the worst kind of attention seeking tripfag

Still better than that stannisfag, I give you that
>>
>>77572544
>everyone hates me for my success
That must be the only conceivable reason, yes.

>>77572577
Considering the team in yellow doesn't have the ball, they're exactly where they should be.
>>
File: in possession.png (963KB, 701x737px) Image search: [Google]
in possession.png
963KB, 701x737px
>>77572607
I was talking about the defensive phase, but the same shit applies in attacking, in theory the guy should make a run in behind, he just supports.
>>
>>77572534
woah that's a lot of people
>>
>>77572625
I wouldn't want him to make that run because we're in the middle of the pitch and he's not marked specifically, which gives him space regardless of making the run or not... unless you use absolute slowpokes as >wengers.
>>
>>77572639
Aren't we talking about guys staying forward in defence to aid a transition though?
>>
>>77572697
>Aren't we talking about guys staying forward in defence to aid a transition though?
I'm talking about the yellow team. But whether a guy stays forward or not is more linked to team shape (as well as certain roles like TM, RMD, Poacher, Treq...). If you use a less fluid shape, he should concentrate on his duty and role more rather than dropping down and helping defend.
>>
>>77572726
Yes we are talking about the yellow team out of possession because I quote:

"this tactic should in theory have 3 players staying fairly high up the pitch to be available as options for the counter"'

Do you want me to change the mentality to very structured?
>>
>a bid comes in for a player
>re-negociate slightly
>the club walks away
F
U
C
K
Y
O
U
>>
>>77572758
If you want attacking players to focus on being attacking and forget about defending, then a more structured approach would help. Not necessarily "Very Structured", but you can tweak it and see what happens.

However, there's no fucking IRL team in the world, even those who play counter or direct football that defends with only 7 out of 10 outfields the way it is in FM where if on Attack duty, the AML/AMR don't defend at all; which creates issues especially in FM17 due to the gigantic half-spaces they leave in their backs especially(2) with the 4-1-2-3 DM Wide. None. So I would question that approach, but works in FM.
>>
File: highly structured.jpg (1MB, 1916x911px) Image search: [Google]
highly structured.jpg
1MB, 1916x911px
>>77572817
highly structured, 3 is in line or even behind the CM's. In line with 10 would be the "attacking" position to take. It doesn't matter if there is an IRL team in the world that plays like this, that is not what the argument was about.
>>
>>77572459
>>77572456

French anon and mtsc2, I read the Ozil thing (I've read it a few times before, but every time I read it again I figure something else out or have new questions)

So, he mentions that he's playing a team he's not expecting to have possession against, so he chose counter attack as he expects them to be constantly attacking(?), and this gives him a conservative, defensive mentality to cope with this bombardment(?), and then he can customize an attack by using roles on specific players to influence them to stay up, rather than conform to the defensive mentality.

Here are my two questions now.

1. How do you accurately assess whether you're going to have possession or not?

2. Why would a counter attack mentality be relevant to that? - Can't you just have an attacking mentality and then tailor the defence instead of tailoring the attack like he did?

2,5 (I guess) What would be the benefit of either?
>>
>>77572928
To me they're where they should be considering where the ball is and where their fellow teammates are. Any lost ball can be switched to the other flank where #3 makes the run, forcing the opposition to track him, which opens space on the other side of the pitch.
>>
>>77572958
ok but it doesn't matter if that is where you want them to be, the thing that matters is if they stay forward on an attacking duty or not. which they don't. He would probably take the positioning in line with 10 if you moved him up one line in the formation editor.
>>
File: 76486.jpg (4KB, 183x175px) Image search: [Google]
76486.jpg
4KB, 183x175px
>>77563350
>5'2
>Leadership: 18
>>
>>77572954
>How do you accurately assess whether you're going to have possession or not?
You look at their manager and see his chosen playing style. You look at the scout report, you could also look at the competition stats to see if they like to possess or not.

>Why would a counter attack mentality be relevant to that?
He most likely expects that by giving them the ball he'll be able to trap them in their backs.

>What would be the benefit of either?
A question of viewpoint.

>>77572979
That's a 2 metre difference at most, which to me is completely irrelevant given the aches of space he has. Unless he's an elite Canadian wingerman who can't do anything but run or jack off, in which case where he is on the tactical creator won't make any difference.
>>
>>77573023
but the 2 meter difference is actually very relevant to the whole discussion we are having right now, which is that if attack roles change the defensive positioning of a player.
>>
>>77573023

>Why would a counter attack mentality be relevant to that?

>>He most likely expects that by giving them the ball he'll be able to trap them in their backs.

But how does a counter attacking mentality give them the ball compared to an attacking mentality? Is it to do with closing down? Because if so, couldn't you just tailor an attacking mentality to have less closing down and achieve the same thing?

I'm trying to figure out what a counter attacking mentality with a tailored attack gives you compared to an attacking mentality with a tailored defence.

Can't you make them the exact same using TIs alone?
>>
>>77573044
>attack roles
Mentality. The big difference between a winger on ML position and AML position is exactly one mentality point: 16 instead of 15.

>but the 2 meter difference is actually very relevant
No, that's nitpicking on a single situation where you though he was two metres off. Play the whole match and look at the average positioning instead.
>>
Why would anyone play anything other than a direct rigid 4-4-2 with a big man fast man combo up top?
>>
>>77573063
>But how does a counter attacking mentality give them the ball compared to an attacking mentality?
It's more cautious, so you're less proactive with the ball (AKA take less stupid risks) and tighter while defending.

>I'm trying to figure out what a counter attacking mentality with a tailored attack gives you compared to an attacking mentality with a tailored defence
It would change the overall mentality of your team: an Attacking mentality makes your whole team more proactive. So it doesn't work that way.

>>77573094
Because SI quality.
>https://community.sigames.com/topic/381957-wingers-too-wide/

There must be a good reason why about 10 years in my save, the most successful teams play a 4-2-3-1 Wide/4-2-3-1 DM Wide. Perhaps I'm paranoid.
>>
File: ok.png (586KB, 1916x1080px) Image search: [Google]
ok.png
586KB, 1916x1080px
>>77573064
What else do you want me to do?
>>
File: ok2.png (435KB, 1916x611px) Image search: [Google]
ok2.png
435KB, 1916x611px
>>77573064
Here is the average overal positioning.
>>
is now the best time to buy fm? is it worth the cost i.e has anything really changed since fm16?
>>
>>77573120
That never was about attacking and supporting duties, that never was in doubt.

>What else do you want me to do?
Me? Nothing. The original argument was that wingers don't stay high enough on the pitch, which I dismiss an a non-issue compared to the space they give in their backs while they still have loads of attacking space to exploit themselves.
>>
Final reminder for the predicting league.

First, change your language to English:
https://www.kicktipp.de/fmgtipps/profil/i18nauswahl

Then, sign up in these leagues:
https://www.kicktipp.de/fmgtipps/
https://www.kicktipp.de/fmgclel/

Don't forget to predict this weekend's games, folks.
>>
>>77572954
go take a look in the tactics creator at what happens when you change team mentality

you'll notice that on different mentalities a lot of things change in the background - more attacking mentalities see less time wasting, higher tempo by default, higher defensive line by default, more direct passing by default, more closing down by default, higher width by default

think about what these instructions would do to a team - if you're a weaker side than the opposition do you want your players trying to close down more onto them when they will just pass the ball around you until they draw your players out of position enough to open up some space that could lead to a goal? do you want your players playing with a higher tempo and trying to create chances out of nothing when the opposition is more defensively solid than you are and thus less likely to make positional errors, or do you want your players taking a second to survey their best passing options and thus actually retaining the ball for more than 2 seconds at a time

bear in mind that counterattacks are not the only method of scoring you want to have as it's possible that if you're up against somebody like mourinho who will score 1 goal then stick 11 men behind the ball, you won't have anything to counter off of in the first place

technically speaking you can set up an attacking mentality to play with a counterattacking style - tell the team to sit deep and close down less or whatever - but if you do that you have to remember that the entire team will have more attacking mentalities generally, which will lead to more risks being taken, more support duty players making forward runs and potentially leaving holes in your defence. do you want to be leaving holes in your defence against a better team? probably not
>>
>>77573153
What the actual fuck
>>
How much or how little should you use individual player instructions? Can too many additional PIs end up hurting you?
>>
>>77573116

Ok, think I'm kind of grasping it now.

Which leads me onto my next question..

What the fuck does a support role do then? Does it just balance their mentality? So they'll go where needed? If they're needed in attack, since they're balanced they'll go attack and defence the same?

Can you explain the importance of support roles? Especially in a cautious counter attacking system? Would it not just be best to put them on defensive? What will they do on support?

>>77573161

Just saw this post, thanks again for the clarification. I'm understanding bit by bit.

I think you've just answered my question about support roles.
>>
>>77573253
Only do them if you need them.
>>
File: support.png (131KB, 746x962px) Image search: [Google]
support.png
131KB, 746x962px
>>77573265
>>77573161
>>77573116

To clarify, On Ozils post, I'm not understanding what the significance of the support role is.

What is the purpose of having support on the right side (pic related)?

If I'm understanding correctly, in attack they'll get forward during that transition and provide numbers up top.

In defence, they'll get back and provide numbers in the defence.

This is achieved through a neutral mentality, which is achieved through the support duty.

Am I understanding this correctly?
>>
>>77573253
Unless you have a very specific idea about how certain players should be playing, I wouldn't start out with giving everyone tons of PI's. Especially not to capable, creative players. There's no need to limit them, if they're actually not doing anything wrong.

Edit them accordingly if you see a repeating pattern that you don't like - e.g. your midfielder constantly shooting from distance and not being very successful - Shoot Less Often. Think of PI's as fine tuning, make sure that your formation, mentality, TI's and shape are set properly first.
>>
>>77573253
>How much or how little should you use individual player instructions?
If you want a player to play a certain way, you tell him what to do.

>Can too many additional PIs end up hurting you?
There's no definitive answer to that question. If you play some very retarded stuff well yes perhaps.

>What the fuck does a support role do then?
Exactly what it says on the tin.

>So they'll go where needed? If they're needed in attack, since they're balanced they'll go attack and defence the same?
Not necessarily, it hugely depends on their role and duty. A AM(S) or AP(S) doesn't get very proactive in their movement and will focus on liking up plays for example. Changing duties not only affect their mentality, but also their PIs.

Even playing on counter, a Support duty is required because someone needs to feed those counter attacking players balls to exploit. Y'know, like how Benzema always serves the soup to CR7 when the Real plays more direct.
>>
>>77573294
That's because he wants two of his players to focus on counter-attacking while the others will provide link-up play, backpassing options: AKA Support. If he had two Wingers on Attack (which is doable but anyway), they would barely defend on a Very Structured team shape. And as I wrote earlier, there's no team in the world that defends with only seven outfields out of ten.
>>
>>77573349

How do I know when my counter attack tactic is failing?

Pic related, I paused it. My attacking winger seems to be very deep, never in a position to spring a counter.

GK - Quick distribution, clear to right wing.
TI - More direct passing, pass into space, low crosses (manlet CF with good movement)

Should I switch to a possession system at this point considering I'm letting them have it yet I have 52%?

They're playing very directly too.
>>
>>77573577
>How do I know when my counter attack tactic is failing?
You already seem to have the answer to that one: you have the ball.

>Should I switch to a possession system at this point considering I'm letting them have it yet I have 52%?
If they play direct too, I personally would favour a balanced approach to prevent counters.
>>
I have a couple of noob questions too: under what circumstances should I check the Use Tighter Marking TI and is a Stopper-Cover defensive pairing more effective with a high line or a deep line?
>>
>>77573151
It ran a shitload better for me so was well worth it
>>
>>77573608

Yeah, I didn't create shit.

I don't know what went wrong.
>>
>>77573675
>under what circumstances should I check the Use Tighter Marking TI
Generally when your team is quick enough to cope with the opposition's players. Else, they'll just slip through.

>is a Stopper-Cover defensive pairing more effective with a high line or a deep line?
High line, but you can very well play the offside trap with a high line for which you can't really use Cover duties. Depends of your defenders and the opposition's attacking players. I personally don't exactly like the Cover duty.

>>77573713
Upload your save on Zippyshare or something, I don't know what the hell you're doing honestly.
>>
Hey Morz, would you look at that: my Lithuanian affiliate made it to the group stages of the CL!

Aside from that, fuck Manure.
>>
File: 1463270399178.jpg (657KB, 600x936px) Image search: [Google]
1463270399178.jpg
657KB, 600x936px
>>77573713
http://www.guidetofootballmanager.com/tactics/playing-styles
just play simple football you faget
>>
>>77573727
http://www84.zippyshare.com/v/1oK6AqhP/file.html

pls no bully
>>
File: fm_2017-08-11_15-38-56.png (444KB, 1128x225px) Image search: [Google]
fm_2017-08-11_15-38-56.png
444KB, 1128x225px
>>77573819
>pls no bully
Mitch will tell you that this is impossible.

>Wasting points on player knowledge
Huge mistake. That's why you have scouts. Same goes for GK coaching or Fitness Coaching. Useless. Discipline, Motivating, Man Management: that's where it's at. That's also what matters for your coaching staff.
>>
>>77573968
Well, fuck. Is there any way I can reallocate points or is it too late?
>>
>>77573968
You forgot determination.
>>
>>77573968
That squad. There are too many players notably in the central midfield, and most of them are decent. I would've shot down a few loans to concentrate on what you already have... if we were in a transfer window. Meanwhile, the squad could use a better ML/AML and far less strikers.

>>77574033
Too late.
>>
>>77574046
Oh yeah, that. Of course.

>>77574033
Also, your midfielders aren't exactly technically poor technically. On the top of that, outside of pic related, all your strikers are slower. Why the fuck do you want to play counter in such conditions when you have exactly one striker fast enough, and he isn't even particularly fast?
>>
>>77573968
>>77574033
The effect of the staff attributes is fairly marginal so even though the spread is bad it's not why you're losing and definetly not worth restarting.
>>
>>77574050

Yeah, I wasn't sure of who to let go, or what system was suited to my players or anything of that nature, so I kind of kept everyone.

I ended up signing two free agents, one defender and one midfielder who never sees any action.
>>
>>77574088

Worth restarting if I get sacked?

>>77574084
I have no clue what I should be playing. Seemed like every goal scored against me was a counter so I figured if I couldn't beat it, join it.
>>
>>77574130
4-4-Fucking-2. That 2.5 Star can-only-run faggot goes in the reserves and Ross McCormack plays on the left wing. He's a AMC who can't play as a MC and I have no need for him in any other position.
>>
Dude, just use Robben's Wicked Wings tactic.
>>
>>77574186

Alright, provided I win this game I'll rebuild. (if I lose I get sacked)

What 2.5 star guy? The defender?
>>
>>77574130
>Worth restarting if I get sacked?
Yes.
>>
>>77574186

And, if I'm doing 4-4-2, is it gona be TM / AF?

Out of Velios and Bendtner who do I use?
>>
>>77574231
BAB
u r e
i o n
l u d
d n t
d
>>
>>77574231
Yeah, the left-back. Aside from having good Acceleration he's worth nothing. You could get lured by his not so terrible tekkers, but his mental attributes are awful. I haven't looked carefully at every player yet.

>>77574259
F9 or DLF and AF. Clough/Assombalonga. Bentner a fag, Velios is decent but slow as molasses and just a worse player than Clough overall.
>>
Slightly off-topic, but where is the fifa general?
>>
>>77574186
>>77574259
Holy hell, you advise him to play 4-4-2 in FM17? Literally the weakest formation in the entire game?

My tip would be: Play anything BUT 4-4-2, have at least two MC players, and at least one DM or AMC (meaning that you should have at least 3 central midfielders).
>>
>>77574293
>Holy hell, you advise him to play 4-4-2 in FM17? Literally the weakest formation in the entire game?
I personally never play with two CMs/DMs, but he needs to save his ass with what's available to him, that doesn't leave too many options.
>>
just play 4-4-2 diamond narrow lmao
>>
>>77574291
They died, you occasionally see one but for the most part its a dead community
>>
>>77574321
This. Or just play with 3 Shadow Strikers, 2 IWB's, a RPM with DLP(D) in the midfield and 3 at the back. Counter, Flexible.
>>
File: Joel Matthews_ Inbox-2.png (190KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
Joel Matthews_ Inbox-2.png
190KB, 1920x1080px
Oh wait, you didn't tell me you were going to get sacked either way.
>>
>>77574371

Ah no, that's about some consortium buying the club.

I just saved my job the game after your save vs Ipswich
>>
>>77574321
tfw don't want to play it but have to because I can't afford the players for another formation
>>
>>77574338
I never got SS to work for some reason 2bh
>>
File: Nottingham Forest_ Overview-8.png (597KB, 1843x1053px) Image search: [Google]
Nottingham Forest_ Overview-8.png
597KB, 1843x1053px
>>77574186

What tic tacs
>>
File: cagelaugh.jpg (23KB, 480x270px) Image search: [Google]
cagelaugh.jpg
23KB, 480x270px
>>77563388
>Daniel Petit
>5'1''
>>
>>77574422
Nothing. You watch the match and you look at what your players need to do. That's how it works, not the other way around.
>>
Haven't played FM since 2012 or 13. What's 17 like? I saw it got loads of shit reviews on Steam when it first came out but I presume they've addressed whatever the problems were by now right?
>>
>>77574467

But what mentality and shape would be ideal for my players?
>>
>>77574469
yeah, they added chinese localization.
>>
>>77574469
FM17 is pretty much what you'd expect. The '''''issue''''' was no chinese translation.
>>
>>77574505
>>77574547
Oh yeah I forgot that it was butthurt rice merchants getting upset.
>>
I wasn't too impressed with the performance.
>>
>>77574597
Making it easy for me.
>>
File: Joel Matthews_ Inbox-3.png (316KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
Joel Matthews_ Inbox-3.png
316KB, 1920x1080px
With what Assombanania missed, that should've been 4-0 at the very least. The GK did a Calamity James by releasing the ball on a cross.
>>
File: 20170811160626_1.jpg (371KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
20170811160626_1.jpg
371KB, 1920x1080px
lmao'd
>>
>>77574832
Noice.
>>
File: Joel Matthews_ Inbox-4.png (172KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
Joel Matthews_ Inbox-4.png
172KB, 1920x1080px
>Making promises
>EVER
NO. FOR FUCK'S SAKE YOU DON'T.
>>
See, this is the kind of team you counter against. First, it's Newcastle. They're expected to win the league and kick out asses. Second, they're an overall much better team than Forest. Third, I scored first, and the widget in the upper left corner tells me they're on attacking because they're supposed to win that match.

Shelvey got a red and I got a blooter past me, but even a draw would be rather acceptable considering the expectations.
>>
>>77574084
>wasting all those space for specific players background
nope
>>
>>77574868
>>77574792
>>77574728
>>77574597

HOW ARE YOU DOING THIS YOU MAGICIAN
>>
File: 1XZJjMSKEco.jpg (338KB, 1280x1280px) Image search: [Google]
1XZJjMSKEco.jpg
338KB, 1280x1280px
>>77575005
as i was saying, play basic football you nignog
>>
>>77574993
>>77575005
Obviously, because the result is "good enough" doesn't mean that you should tell the players that. You see, team talks are contextual: even if it was a blooter, they conceded when they were up a goal, so you scream at them regardless.

>>77574999
>2017
>Doesn't have a big hard drive
Computers were shipping with 500*2 HDDs nearly a decade ago gramps.
>>
File: La Liga 123_ Overview Stages.png (2MB, 1891x1109px) Image search: [Google]
La Liga 123_ Overview Stages.png
2MB, 1891x1109px
>>77575005
>He doesn't regularly absolutely BTFO the media predictions
>>
File: jej.png (228KB, 529x746px) Image search: [Google]
jej.png
228KB, 529x746px
>>77575025
>so you scream at them regardless

That's the best piece of advice I've read here.

>tfw a new signing feels demotivated at first but slowly gets used to being yelled at constantly
>>
File: 1445860029122.png (280KB, 460x345px) Image search: [Google]
1445860029122.png
280KB, 460x345px
>>77559242
>>77560959
>>
>>77575025

I'M DOING IT TOO DADDY
>>
File: Nottingham Forest_ Overview.png (648KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
Nottingham Forest_ Overview.png
648KB, 1920x1080px
>>77575017
Well this.

>>77575005
I'm not doing anything special. Since 4-4-2 is a rather stiff system I play on Fluid personally. I choose Control because besides Newcastle, we were playing poorly ranked teams (Ipswitch's manager even got sacked after we beat them).
The rest is rather straightforward and is based on what I've seen on the pitch when playing: F9 shoots less often, the GK plays less risky passes and that's really it. I could've turned Kasami in a CM(S), Vaughan is too slow and old to be a DLP(S) and often gets caught out of position, ruining the two banks of four while he has nice defensive attributes. The CDs Pass It Shorter in hope they try to find Vaughan instead of hoofing it like retards.
>>
>>77575075
Oh yeah, and I chose Mills instead of Mancienne because that Aggression and Bravery despite questionable Composure and Concentration. He's also a somewhat better jumper despite being slower.
>>
>>77575114
I would have to experiment a bit more to fix the defence however: we allow too many shots even if few of them are on target due to the d-line being fairly disciplined. Not with Close Down More as it disrupts the two banks of four, but perhaps with Tighter Marking. The team isn't too fast so I'm wary of it, but some experimenting needs to be done because I feel the team can get the ball a bit higher on the pitch.

The squad has the quality to play positive football and not necessarily counter-attacking, defensive football. We don't have the possession much more, it's still 50/50, but there's no reason to give it up. When I feel the team does stupid things with the ball I tell them to retain possession. That's really it: simple football and instructions based on what you see on the pitch.
>>
File: maxim.jpg (62KB, 615x820px) Image search: [Google]
maxim.jpg
62KB, 615x820px
You now remember Maxim Tsigalko
>>
>>77575376
I am also remembering the RUOR Minsk goat factory
>>
IIRC the club still exists, but it plays in the youth leagues or something.

There's also the still even producing ASEC Mimosas factory.
>>
>>77575489
the glory days were when AI clubs would never look at Clairefontaine and they would develop amateur players easily good enough to be top-level professionals into their late teens
>>
>>77575114
>>77575075

I don't think I'll have too much difficulty breaking down bigger sides.

Against New Castle, there were some periods where my target man couldn't win an aerial duel and it went for long spells, but I guess I'll just retain possession in the future if that happens.

I'm just worried about breaking down mid table sides, how do I go about doing that using a 4-4-2? I'm talking about the teams that don't want possession and play direct.
>>
>>77575664
You do just like I did: you watch the match and interpret what you see.
>>
>>77575664
Also, the team is absurdly weak on defensive set-pieces for some reason.
>>
>have 10 players on wages
>already at wage budget limit
ahh
>>
>>77572481
tell me about him
>>
File: why.png (334KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
why.png
334KB, 1920x1080px
Hey lads, why does Pic related happen?
>>
>>77576944
He's getting old
>>
>>77576944
He signed for Leeds
>>
>>77576944
>£230k p/w
>>
>>77576982
>>77577003
>>77577081
Yeah but why tho? Is it actually just age? hes fuckign 28 and this shit happens to players who are 23ish
>>
File: Cups.png (2MB, 1759x919px) Image search: [Google]
Cups.png
2MB, 1759x919px
The time is near, 7 cups this season boys.
>>
>>77576722
He is old.
>>
>>77577202
burnout
>>
>>77572481
Stopped playing FM for a year and so didn't visit /trb/ for a while, so Jair is a real blast from the past.
>>
haha lester
>>
Is this Arsenal's year?
>>
>>77578323
KEK
>>
>4 minutes

Best season already
>>
>my prediction is already down the drain

absolutely fucking ATROCIOUS goalkeeping from Cech. Haven't seen such intolerable decision-making from a GK since turkey's GK did similar shit against Croatia in the EURO 2008.

SEETHING
THIS GAME WAS SUPPOSED TO BE A BORING 2-0 WHERE LEICESTER CANT EVEN CREATE
>>
File: Lautaro Guantay_ Inbox-4.png (305KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
Lautaro Guantay_ Inbox-4.png
305KB, 1920x1080px
>be in shit
>play the league leaders
>win
Thank you broken complacency mechanic.
>>
Bastiaman and Daniel - you two idiots have forgotten to answer the Bonus questions. If you tell me your bonus answers before the 3 pm games start tomorrow, I'll add them manually. Otherwise youre fucked
>>
>>77578531
>Huraca
>league leaders

So much for realism, miles.
>>
ARSENAL'S YEAR LA

HAHAHAHAH
>>
at least laca scored eh
>>
Fm16 is not even worth playing with crosses being absolutely broken. Every league's top rated players is flooded with fullbacks who have 20 assists per season.
>>
Really sick of fm17 desu

When does he usually announce features for the next one, late august?

>>77575489
you now remember "fcb juniors lujan"
>>
>Arsenal fans crying after trailing in the 42th minute

pottery
>>
Is there any way to sign a player who's angry? I had this guy on trial and couldn't sign him because his wages were too high, but now I can pay him. Problem is, he doesn't want to, even though I can offer him a trial and he'll accept.

>>77579566
>you now remember "fcb juniors lujan"

I had no idea that existed.
>>
>>77579985
Just wait until he calms down.
>>
>Game crashes in the middle of a demolition where i'm winning 5-0
>Saved before the match, nice!
>Gets FM'd and loses 0-1, one shot one goal
>>
File: it_me.png (468KB, 406x865px) Image search: [Google]
it_me.png
468KB, 406x865px
Idea: regens with the faces people upload to make their managers

like the old face in the game thing they did but 10000% creepier
>>
Sick match
>>
File: Inbox_ Inbox.png (303KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]
Inbox_ Inbox.png
303KB, 1024x768px
>negotiate directly with free player
>no agent
>agree on terms of contract
>finalise deal

But now he doesn't agree, why?
>>
File: Untitled.png (142KB, 1920x1040px) Image search: [Google]
Untitled.png
142KB, 1920x1040px
Who is better?
>>
>Ramsey in 66th minute
>Ramsey injured 67th minute

wew
>>
17 is the same way though.

Play with a narrow formation with wingbacks and spam crosses=win
>>
File: Bundesliga_ Overview Stages.png (149KB, 1366x705px) Image search: [Google]
Bundesliga_ Overview Stages.png
149KB, 1366x705px
I'll take that for a first season. Before an 89th minute winner I was sitting 7th.
>>
>>77581312
wew
>>
>>77581854
Beautiful pass from Xhaka

It's going to be a fun season for neutrals
>>
THEIR YEAR
>>
fucking complacency
>>
>>77581934
No kidding, this is why I love the Premier, most matches are interesting unlike the other big leagues.
>>
ARE YEAR
>>
File: arrivals.jpg (193KB, 925x880px) Image search: [Google]
arrivals.jpg
193KB, 925x880px
good news lads, after a narrow escape from relegation to the amateur division, cercle brugge (still in 2nd division) got taken over by AS Monaco and now thanks to monaco's sweet money >we've won the 2 opening games against Westerlo and Union.

things are looking up
>>
>>77583816
Oh that's cool, I ran a save with them
I quite like them
>>
Hell yeah
>>
I fucking hate posting with my trip because I ALWAYS forget taking it off when I post on other threads/boards
Fucking hell, can all other German posters please leave this general so that people can tell who I am by my flag
>>
>>77584341
Fuck off Mango
>>
File: Inbox2.png (145KB, 1774x862px) Image search: [Google]
Inbox2.png
145KB, 1774x862px
>going from one 'brewers' to the next
this is mildly tempting
>>
File: boskamp2.jpg (18KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]
boskamp2.jpg
18KB, 400x400px
>two people predicted Lestah winning
>only 4 predicted 1 goal win for Arsenal
>>
French Anon, if my 4-4-2 isn't working should I switch to a different formation? I had no penetration and the counter was never on. I tried to keep the ball but I was always pinned back by their wingers and midfield, and I had very few passing options
>>
>>77585849
try a 4-1-4-1 instead bro the extra guy in midfield will help
>>
>>77585957

That's what I just made :D Working well against Preston at the minute
>>
>>77586271
GOOD JOB
change your midfield so that the DLPd is the DM and you have a CMa and a CMs in midfield
>>
File: sadp.jpg (76KB, 460x628px) Image search: [Google]
sadp.jpg
76KB, 460x628px
>Trying to secure continental qualification for 2nd season in a row
>2 points behind the last qual spot
>Chairman steps in and sells your top goalscorer on last day of January window
>>
>>77586421

Aaaaaaaand they came back and beat me 3-2.

How are they putting crosses in and consistently beating my defenders?

Also, one of my CBs has given away a pen in the last 10 minutes of a game to make me lose them both.

>5 composure
>>
>>77587087
You're making me sad. Forest is my favorite English team, and you're just making me sad here lad.
>>
>>77587145

Mate mate mate mate mate

I'm fucking dross at this game
>>
>>77585957


Also,

How do I make my wingers not useless? They don't seem to do anything/
>>
>>77587333
Wingers honestly kinda suck in FM17 if they aren't the best players on the pitch. They're kinda like Regista and Raumdeuters, you need a really good one to make it work.
>>
File: Serie A TIM_ Overview Profile.png (2MB, 1920x1001px) Image search: [Google]
Serie A TIM_ Overview Profile.png
2MB, 1920x1001px
>dat points different
literally what
>>
>>77587333
use intelligent wingers, find fast striker with good off the ball, play direct
>>
Well, I held wolves who are 2nd to a draw, which is a positive I guess. I'd say we were the better team in fact.

A point is a point. Hopefully I don't get sacked.
>>
File: tasmaniavrealmadrid.png (125KB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]
tasmaniavrealmadrid.png
125KB, 1366x768px
ffs
>>
>>77587645

what intelligent wingers?
>>
>>77587894

Ugh, thats rough. Unlucky mate.
>>
Hey Morz, how bad is taking 600mg caffeine in single doses like 4 times a month?
>>
>>77588131
>Carayol striker
>Assombalonga right mid
wtf is this shit
>>
>>77588438

idk, I don't play them there. Must be on a new tactic I haven't set up or something.
>>
Fairly certain I'm sacked after this one.

Equalized in the 90th only to concede instantly.

Story of this save.
>>
>>77588131
duh wingers with good mental (decision, vision, teamwork, workrate, etc...)
>>
>>77588833

Yeah... I don't have any
>>
>>77588755
So did you get sacked?
>>
File: 20170812061704_1.jpg (176KB, 1600x900px) Image search: [Google]
20170812061704_1.jpg
176KB, 1600x900px
nice game here.

and frahn got injured after i already subbed 3 times so that makes it more interesting
>>
File: La Liga_ Overview Stadiums.png (2MB, 1891x1109px) Image search: [Google]
La Liga_ Overview Stadiums.png
2MB, 1891x1109px
Wish me luck boys.
>>
>First place in the league by December
>win only two (2) games the rest of the season
Every fucking year.
>>
>>77589038

Nah, New Castle next match and Rafa said to the press that I should be sacked so I smashed him 2-1 and avoided it.

I've no issue playing against the big sides who look to attack. It's the sides I have to break down.
>>
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

FRENCH ANON HELP, WHAT DO I DO
>>
>>77589535
Tell him you're going to make him see out his contract. He only wants to leave because of your league position. Survive the season and learn some things and you'll be fine.
>>
File: Joel Matthews_ Inbox.png (183KB, 1843x1053px) Image search: [Google]
Joel Matthews_ Inbox.png
183KB, 1843x1053px
>>77589579

I did and he told me to fuck off basically.

I'm gona cash out and yolo it lads, fuck it.

If I don't get relegated or sacked and I survive I'll make it ladz.

Also, how do I increase squad harmony?
>>
I can't beat shit sides. I just get fucking countered on so fucking hard. Ridiculous.
>>
>>77589970
Try playing for draw then. Turn on defensive mentality.
>>
>>77590354

I don't under fucking stand.

I just don't.

How is it that EVERY game I create nothing.

and EVERY game I get bullshit goals scored against me because my defender just switches off and doesn't do shit for a minute?

What the fuck am I supposed to do?

I'm playing a simple fucking system, but nothing happens.

My tactics are fucking fine.

How am I supposed to use an opposition report?

Every time I go to the match tab on a team report it takes me to their players tab.
>>
>>77590439
Your team has poor morale so they underperform. Morale is way more important than tactics.
>>
>>77590455

I've never played a game that has made me rage so much.
>>
>>77590512
That's FM for you. Even when you're good at it it will be very frustrating at times.
>>
File: 20170812101907_1.jpg (373KB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]
20170812101907_1.jpg
373KB, 3840x2160px
>>77590439
>>77590512

I got sacked a few times on my starting days because I was so shit (Back in FM09 and the start of FM14).

One of the most important things to realize is that you shouldn't aim for winning every single match, because it's simply not possible. You should aim for long term success; creating a tactic or two which would win you games most of the time. Even though my results haven't been too good, we are creating a lot of chances which is enough for me. This doesn't show too many matches in my current league, as the season has just started, but in the preliminary League Cup we went 18-21 on CCCs against way better opponents, with lower tier defenders. As my young players get better, I'm able to challenge for the league.

But it takes time.
>>
>>77590598

But my point is, by now I should have a tactic that works.

It just doesn't.

I'm doing something horribly wrong.

I'm trying to look at opposition reports and apply stuff from that but nothing seems to affect anything.

I don't don't ever create anything unless I'm playing a team like New Castle who attack like mongs and it's easy to counter.

If feels like I have zero effect on my matches and they're already predetermined
>>
>>77590730
>>77590598

Case in point.

I just got scored against with a cross against a 4-4-2 even though I'm playing narrow and closing down the crosser.

What else am I supposed to fucking do?
>>
>>77590745

I've had 3 attempts to their 7 with just as much possession.

Why?

We're both playing 4-4-2 defensively with deep lines.

Why? I don't fucking understand why.
>>
>>77590730
>>77590745

>But my point is, by now I should have a tactic that works.

What is "by now"? What are your metrics? Have you played 20+ games with the same tactic? Is your team fully familiar with your tactic?

>What else am I supposed to fucking do?

Analyze if your measures are a) enough to defend against those in the future b) assess if your team is familiar enough with their tactic to do what you want

>I've had 3 attempts to their 7 with just as much possession.

Possession might be one of the worst metrics with which to evaluate your team. The point is that your opponent getting more chances is tied to many metrics, which you should analyze. I just drew 2-2 against a team with 5 times my budget, they won shots 25-10, but CCCS went 1-2 for me and half chances 4-4. Most of their shots were from long range, which doesn't matter for me. We lost possession 57-43, but that's also meaningless, as my created chances don't give a shit about the overall possession.
>>
And there it is folks.

I've tried everything that had been recommended. I did.

I tried a simple system in 4-4-2 and didn't create anything. I'd just ping the ball about and lose the second ball.

I'd then change to short passing as obviously that wasn't working, but then I'm caught behind two banks of four with no where to go.

I just don't understand how everything I've applied has had literally zero effect.
>>
>>77590806
Try again with easier league (Championship is a bitch) and less stressful team. You could try your tactics with a team like Everton (very well suited for 4-4-2, if you want to use that) and after that go for the Nottingham save you want.

>I just don't understand how everything I've applied has had literally zero effect.

Because your tactic changes should have long term effects, not short term (they are possible, but meaningless in long term)
>>
>>77590745
>>77590752
There's bunch of reasons why you'd perform worse than your opponent even if you play similiar systems. Most notably they have superior quality players and better morale. Newcastle has better players than Forest. They probably also have better morale than your team since your's is in the shitter.

>>77590806
As my fellow Finn said pick an easier team next. Preferably a top division team with little pressure.
>>
>>77590823

Ok.

Here is how I play.

I made a 4-4-2 system, picked my mentality (counter) and my shape (flexible).

I picked my players for each position based on desirable attributes.

I would start a game, regardless of the oppositions set up.

I would react during a game to the flow of the game. Looking for exploits like, if their full back is aggressive, put my winger on attacking and exploit that flank.

If I would concede and I needed a goal, I'd change mentality and roles of players to more attacking orientated roles while still leaving enough in defence for a counter.

If I wanted to draw or hold onto a lead, I'd either change my mentality or TIs to a defensive mentality. I'd either go counter, defensive, or contain, or I'd simply stay in the same mentality but drop deeper, shorter passing, less closing down, less width etc.

I'd still lose every fucking game.

I don't understand what I could have done differently or what I should be doing differently.
>>
>>77590845

It seems to me you react way too much on what happens in the game. Your tactic should be consistent from game to game, to see the true results from the tactic. Exploiting oppositions weaknesses is fine and well, but if you change something in your tactics every time you concede, you are going to have a bad time. Try to not change anything during a few matches, see where that leads you.

There's a reason why people >play this for thousands of hours; there are a lot of complex mechanics that takes a lot of time to get hang off
>>
>>77590845
You get overly hung on tactics thinking they are why you win or lose.
Tactics are like 15% of what wins you games. Quality of players is 40%, man management (or morale) is 35% and the rest is luck and some miscelanous minor things.
>>
>tfw you form a bond with that player who isn't the best in the position in the squad but he's reliable

nice cross olsson :']
>>
File: Crewe Alexandra_ General.png (1MB, 1843x1053px) Image search: [Google]
Crewe Alexandra_ General.png
1MB, 1843x1053px
I went with Crewe as it's the closest league two club for where I'm from.

Fuck Nott'm. I'm going to destroy them when I get to the championship.

A new dawn beckons.

>>77590879
>>77590910

When I say I alter tactics I mean while in game, so they don't actually change my legitimate tactic, I just react to the highlights I see (on comprehensive).

For example, if I see that I'm having a really bad pass completetion % while playing direct, I'll play short passing etc.

Is that wrong?

If I see they're playing defensive for a draw, I'll push up a high line and slow the tempo, and make my players roam from positions instead.

Is this fundamentally a bad approach? How else am I supposed to react to the highlights I see?
>>
Also, how often should I be applying the changes my ass man recommends? like pre-match changes and opposition tactics and shit like that?
>>
>>77590969
It's not a bad idea, but you shouldn't be too hasty making your changes. Preferably wait at least until halftime before doing anything. And the effect most of the time won't be huge so don't expect too much.
>>77590984
Never. The ai is dumb as hell and gives bad advice.
>>
>>77590969
>For example, if I see that I'm having a really bad pass completetion % while playing direct, I'll play short passing etc.
>Is that wrong?

Yes, this is wrong. With direct passing you should expect a lower pass completion rate. If your team is still learning the tactic, this should be expected. The way your team passes the ball is fundamental to your tactic and shouldn't be altered if you are not changing everything else too.

>
If I see they're playing defensive for a draw, I'll push up a high line and slow the tempo, and make my players roam from positions instead.

These are waaay too drastic measures against your opposition. Just try to keep your tactic intact and see what happens

>Also, how often should I be applying the changes my ass man recommends? like pre-match changes and opposition tactics and shit like that?

Very, very rarely (I haven't done it a single time in my 500h of FM16)
>>
>>77590845
You've been memed on. 4-4-2 is literally the worst formation by far in this game and it will lose you a lot of games. I told you yesterday to have at least 3 men in midfield.
Switch to a 4-1-3-2 or a 4-3-1-2 narrow, or perhaps a 4-4-2 diamond. Fuck wingers.
>>
>>77591023

My wingers were so ineffectual. They just seemed way too deep.
>>
>>77591043
Wingers are fucking cancer, trust me on this.

Upload your current save and I'll see what I can do tactics wise.
>>
>>77591023

How do I keep the wide players happy and not bitching about their opportunities?

Also, on the tactics screen, I should be making 3 tactics right? My general, tactic, and one defensive and one offensive variant right? Should I have different formations and shit?

Everyone is saying to stick with a system, does that mean I only make literally one tactic and leave the other 2 slots blank?
>>
File: 1404993131678.png (80KB, 300x188px) Image search: [Google]
1404993131678.png
80KB, 300x188px
>>77590845
>picked my mentality (counter)
I FUCKING TOLD YOU YOUR ATTACKING PLAYERS ARE TOO FUCKING SLOW FOR THAT HOLY SHIT.
>>
>>77591048

I got sacked and deleted all my Forest saves in rage.

I'm with Crewe now, fresh start. I'm trying to figure out what system I should play. Shouldn't I play a system that I have the players for?
>>
>>77591058

Mate, it's ok. I got fired. I'm gona do it right this time with Crewe. For you.
>>
File: 1483244250291.png (18KB, 311x355px) Image search: [Google]
1483244250291.png
18KB, 311x355px
>>77591067
>I got sacked and deleted all my Forest saves in rage.
>>
>>77591067
>Shouldn't I play a system that I have the players for?
Yes you should.
>>
>>77591057
Fuck them. If they can't play anywhere else, just put them with your youth until their contracts run out. FUCK wingers.

For now, make only one tactic - familiarity with tactics is KEY, and if you only have one tactic then your team will learn that one much faster. Also, in "training", max your match training (set the slider on as much match training as possible, so that you have 2 days of match training before every game), and set match training to "match tactics" or whatever it's called.

Any tactic will start out a bit shit because players can't play it, and it takes a few months to get familiarity up. To do it faster, you need to max out match training and do friendlies and shit.

Let me check out Crewe, I'll tell you what you should play.
>>
>>77591057
>How do I keep the wide players happy and not bitching about their opportunities?
You have your starters, and those who aren't have a lower squad status. They can shut up or play in the reserves, their choice. Obviously rotate every one in a while to avoid fitness issues for your starters notably due to the sheer amount of games played in the English lower leagues.

>Also, on the tactics screen, I should be making 3 tactics right? My general, tactic, and one defensive and one offensive variant right? Should I have different formations and shit?
If you need to.

>Everyone is saying to stick with a system, does that mean I only make literally one tactic and leave the other 2 slots blank?
No.

>>77591048
He already did, I played a bit with it, two wins and a draw against Pooclastle. His Forrest squad has players who are somewhat decent on the ball.

>>77591023
>You've been memed on
Not really; it's the formation he had the player for at that point. Had I played a whole season, those Lars Bending faggots would've fucked off, I never play with two strikers and certainly not a 4-4-2. But considering it's the formation he had the players for, it was a matter of surviving for a month and an half, get to the windows and sell the dead weight.
>>
>>77591116

How do I go about determining that properly? Obviously, I have to look at attributes, but what attributes will dictate the kind of system I play?

And when we say system, what exactly do we mean?
>>
>>77591048
>>77591162
>His Forrest squad has players who are somewhat decent on the ball
And slow as molasses: only his main striker and a couple of players have over 13 (!) Acc/Pace. When they commit on a pressing, they leave huge gaps everywhere, so you can't press aggressively (or you have to play high with the offside trap, and I never use the offside trap). They're also garbage on defensive set pieces.

There's no point of playing counter with that squad at all. I would've played a 4-1-4-1 DM if it wasn't for all those fucking strikers (who the fuck still gives Lars Bending wages?).
>>
Also, Crewe lad, look at mentals. Determination and work rate are your friends, trust me I'm English.
>>
>>77591171
Order them by ability like them then put the best players to their best positions and roles. Then add the not so good players to the positions you need and tinker around some until it looks somewhat reasonable. Then play some games and make changes as needed.
>>
>>77591180

How do I figure that shit out? Like how do I understand my players limitations and apply that to picking a system?

Like I get it, if I had a team of 11 juan matas I wouldnt play pacey counter attacking football, because he's slow as fuck and a malet, but he's creative as all shit and good off the ball so I'd play a fluid system with short passing right?
>>
File: perry nig.png (239KB, 1841x1080px) Image search: [Google]
perry nig.png
239KB, 1841x1080px
>bongs in charge of having pronouncable names

>>77591162
Dude, you can't tell me he didnt have at least 3 midfielders to just play a 4-3-1-2. If one of them gets injured, just play one of the wingers out of position. Even if he has lots of wingers that he has to trash for his new formation then so be it, you can make do with a thin squad if you don't rotate. 4-4-2 is unacceptable, no matter how much his squad was built for it.
>>
>>77591230
>4-4-2 is unacceptable, no matter how much his squad was built for it
I got results with it despite my aversion for it so I don't give two shits when I'm not in a window. I'm more pragmatic than that.

>Dude, you can't tell me he didnt have at least 3 midfielders to just play a 4-3-1-2
You fucking know I never play my Diamond like that. If it was up to me, considering that the Championship is filled with teams playing a 4-4-2 and hence are extremely weak to players between the two banks (both DMs and AMC), I would've played the 3-4-3 Diamond as it's absurdly destructive against 4-4-2 variants (except 4-2-3-1 Wide/DM Wide because >FM quality).
>>
File: 1500227542481.jpg (36KB, 305x551px) Image search: [Google]
1500227542481.jpg
36KB, 305x551px
>tfw one of the biggest debates on /trb/ for months occurs when veterans are trying to teach a newbie on tictacs
>>
File: crewe tactics.png (302KB, 1841x1080px) Image search: [Google]
crewe tactics.png
302KB, 1841x1080px
>>77591208
These are your tactics now. Trust me on this and use them. Don't pass judgment before you get familiarity to at least accomplished.

If it does not work at all, you can do the following tweaks (do all of them at once if you want to make changes):
>change tempo to normal
>remove retain possession
>>
>>77591334

Thats great. I'll give it a go thanks. My only qualm is that I'd like to know why it works. I don't want to just win games, I want to know why I win.

Why did you pick this formation and these tactics in particular with the squad you had at hand? What made you say a 4312 will work with these players here, and these TIs? I'm trying to gain understanding.
>>
File: match training.png (12KB, 1089x110px) Image search: [Google]
match training.png
12KB, 1089x110px
>>77591334
>>77591386
I should mention the following: Ignore any player that is not in the starting 11, at least until you get consistent results. Just play your best team if condition allows it and as long as no injuries happen, and play the best replacement if you need to change shit up. Ignore players who want more free time, tell them to fuck off.


Keep your players happy by praising all players with a rating of 7.0 or better. On any given matchday, make it a habit of going to analysis -> last match, and check out player ratings. Praise every player with a good rating (do this on the next matchday, because praising gives a short-term morale boost that goes back down again over time).
If a player's average rating over the last 5 games has been 7.0 or better, you can praise his form too for an additional boost.
Before big games or if morale is bad, you can praise every player's conduct (unless they've skipped out on training or some shit). It always works and its a free morale boost.
For each praising category (last match/form/conduct), only praise once a month. So, if you want to praise a player on their last match, check and see if you already praised that player in the last 24-28 days or so. You can praise a player for last game, form and conduct on the same day, but if you praise them for any of the three for too often then they'll get pissed off or it wont have an effect.


Don't forget the match tactic training.

>My only qualm is that I'd like to know why it works. I don't want to just win games, I want to know why I win.
Haha, that takes a few dozens of hours at least. To be honest, get some (lucky) success at a club first, and just play. You'll learn a lot by simply playing the game in the beginning imo.
>>
>>77591386
He hates wingers so they're off. You have a creator and a scorer duo on top, a AM to link up play without holding the ball too much, a sitter/runner combo in the midfield (BBM/DLP) with a DM to protect the line. WB(S) to bring width without doing anything retarded. So basically Combinations and Duties Pairs 101.

The rest is a matter of preference and/or match feedback from what you see. I told you to play seasons of FM, don't delete saves left and right you won't learn. I repeat: DON'T DELETE SAVES LEFT AND RIGHT OR YOU WON'T LEARN.
>>
>>77591443

But why did he go with that formation over another one based on the players available?

What was it about the players that made him say "this will work."?
>>
>>77591386
Okay, let me go a little more in-depth:

Whenever a new iteration of the game comes out, I do a reasonably easy save with a team that's in a comfy position (this year, it was Bolton Wanderers - they're way too good for their starting league) so that I can test shit out and experiment without losing too much.

I start out with whatever formation their squad is built for, 99% that formation is shit. In that time, I already experiment with roles and TIs, and form opinions - stuff like "man, inverted wingback role is good this year" or "all hope is lost for MR/ML players, they suck dick no matter what you do". Also, while playing games, you'll usually run into 1-2 teams that play unusual formations and that fuck your shit up. You ask yourself "why is this team playing so well?", and eventually you start to see patterns - stuff like "I'm playing 4-4-2 and any team with 3+ central players fucks my shit up!", or "5 at the back teams do incredibly in well defense while still being potent in attack", there you go, you learned something new.

Eventually, somewhere in october or november, I usually get a sack notice - either the players or the management wants me to improve or I'm out. At that point, I try to take all insights and all information I can gather under "analysis" and "team report" to change my tactic to something that works. After that, its usually smooth sailing to a promotion.

After finding something good, I stick to it for a while, until I get a situation where I'm in a comfortable position to experiment again, or a situation where I'm bored/under duress and need to change something. At that point, I go much more in depth - I save the game, test a formation out, watch it on full match for long enough to understand, and then reload. I do this with all sorts of formations - 4-4-2, 4-4-2 narrow, 4-2-3-1, 4-3-3, you name it. Eventually, you start seeing more and more patterns.
>>
>>77591479
>>77591443

Like, did he pick the formation and style of play and after the appropriate players that were the most suited to his desired role. Or, did he look at his players, picked his starters, and then picked a formation and style of play that would suit them?
>>
>>77591513
Both.
>>
>>77591504
>>77591479

For this iteration of the game, my findings/rules are:
>You want at least 3 players in midfield, no matter what
>2 strikers make your attack so much better than anything else that it's rarely smart to use only one striker
>wingbacks are really good, be it as regular WB or as IWB
>players in the ML/MR/AML/AMR positions rely by far the most on their individual ability to create (this means that theyre fantastic for dominant teams with good players, but absolutely dogshit for lower league teams)

Add a GK and two CBs to that and you have one free player left to form any of:

5-1-2-2
5-2-1-2
5-3-2
4-1-2-1-2
4-2-2-2 (both variants)
4-1-3-2
4-3-1-2

The 5 at the back formations need dedicated wing backs (position, not role) to not be too defensive, and lower league teams dont have any so those formations are out of the question.

4-1-2-1-2 is purely a preference thing, I couldve gone with any of the other variations.
>>
>>77591513
It depends. I first look at the players, find the gems first and put them on the pitch in the tactics screen. After that, I look at what I need to do to make it servicable and end up with one of the formations that I mentioned earlier, and just fill the gaps with the best/most fitting players that your squad has.
>>
>>77591513
For example, I first noticed your 19 Accel/19 Pace winger Kiwomya. He's a winger but he's so insanely fast that he'll absolutely slaughter your league if used correctly as a striker, so I wanted him on the pitch.
He'd probably best be used as a Poacher, however I feel that the Poacher role is a bit harder to execute/use than most other striker roles (doesn't help create, so you need a team behind him that create without any of his input - not sure if your team is capable of that) so I opted not to use him that way.
DLF keeps him too far away from goal.
Advanced Forward would be a good role for him; however, your midfielders/defenders are kind of biased and will pass it (and especially hoof it) to your advanced forward more often. He's not a striker so he'll struggle a bit more than others, he's weak/small so he will lose every hoofball, and he's just not a good player overall. We want him to be involved and we want him to help, but I'd prefer if he was more of a helper for your other striker than your #1 attacker.
Target Man - he's a manlet, won't work.
Complete Forward - not in this league.
Defensive Forward - I don't understand this role. Using a DF on support role might actually work, but this is probably the only role that I have no grasp on at all - never tried it, never tested it.
False 9 - Might work, plays kind of similar to Treqs, but they take more long shots and play deeper on average so I preferred Treqs.

The reason I picked Treq for his role is because of a huge bias I have for the role - Treqs love to make dribbles and run with the ball to great effect, and I want this player to do that. Also, theyre extremely attack-minded and love to speculate and move into spaces where they can fuck shit up if they receive a pass. Perfect for a fast player, imo.
>>
>>77591663
As long as you know that I'm with you Art. Debating France is quite the experience.
>>
File: frenchman_9065.jpg (28KB, 300x272px) Image search: [Google]
frenchman_9065.jpg
28KB, 300x272px
>>77591689
I don't see why you'd think that.
>>
>>77591386
You'll learn how it works by watching the chances you create and the goals you score (assuming you do score). Watch for how the space was created.
>>
>>77591703
I gave up after you kept moving goalposts
>>
>Plays a full season
>Plays Euro until the finals
>Send on holiday
>Plays the Olympic Games
>Send on holiday
>Is called for Intl duty
Holy shit, give me (and him) a rest.
>>
>>77591663


Your team had no other players that were special, so I just picked the 10 best players from the rest and put them on the field, and I naturally ended up with a 4-1-2-1-2.

I then picked their roles: Fullbacks need to be on WBs to provide width, since your team has no other wide options. Duty must be on support because you don't have enough defenders to paly them on attack duty. This is a no-brainer because none of the other roles provide what we need - the fullback roles are too defensive, CWB are too offensive, and IWB dont offer width.

the defensive midfielder is supposed to strengthen your defense, first and foremost. I wanted a player who will care about his defensive duties. Anchor Men are a bit cancer (TOO stationary), Regista/RPM are too offensive, Half Backs dont work the way they were intended.
DLPd would've actually been a good choice as well, but I feel like they are too stationary in defence - our DM is pretty much a luxury player in defence, an added man who's supposed to make life harder for the man with the ball. If he does not close down at all like a DLPd would, I feel like he's not doing his job. DLPd are better for formations that lack numbers in defense and just want a body to strengthen the defense at all times. BWMs are on the other side of the spectrum - they are mad dogs who chase down the ball and tackle players left and right, theyre actually good to use in this formation because you can get away with your DM being out of position. However, they are also card magnets and I dont know how good you can deal with that, so DMd is a good balanced option.

In the MC strata, I wanted a holding player and a player who will push up a bit to connect midfield and attack. DLPs is THE holding midfielder, and BBM is just my personal preference. You could just as well go with CMs and the player is probably more suited for it (his mentals are trash), but I just love BBMs. Their wide range of movement helps out a ton.
>>
>>77591663

Thanks Germanon, you and french anon and fin anon are good people.

I'll give it a go, and obviously tweak here and there as I see I need to. Just looking at some things I don't understand some of your picks but, meh, I'll get on with it.

The pick I'm not understanding the most is pic related, why cooke over Ainley for the DLP-S?
>>
>>77591756
>Implying
I was talking about AML/AMR vs. ML/MR since you said:
>If he wants them high up the pitch he needs to place them higher up the pitch
The reality is that we didn't understand each other.
>>
>>77591785
I'm okay with that.
>>
>>77591763
AMa is a pure preference thing - if you want your AMC to be a third goal threat (which is what I wanted), then AMa is the way to go. Enganches are cancer, and AMC Treqs are not good in this game. attacking playmakers REFUSE to enter the box and are only ever worth it if you have 3 attackers in front of them and play wide (and even then, AP are shit.). Shadow strikers just never work as well for me as AMa.
If you want a fourth midfielder who connects well with the strikers, you'd use an AMs instead.

With my strikers, I always want at least one "target striker" type role - an Advanced Forward or a CF, typically.

>>77591778
Genuinely don't even know. I prefer Ainley over Cooke. I must've missed Ainley.
>>
>>77591689
I love frenchanon desu. Wish he'd trip up so I could recognize him more easily
>>
>>77591785
We could also just blame mitch since he linked me your post.
>>
>>77591801

Looking at it now, wouldn't Cooke be better for the DLPs role though since he has the +1 passing on Ainley? As well as the long shot threat and higher det.

What makes you prefer Ainley?
>>
>>77591858
Long Shots are irrelevant, even though the role attributes suggest otherwise
+1 passing means nothing compared to all the advantages that Cooke has

Ainley has a much better first touch (the only abilities that Cookie is significantly better are irrelevant set piece things etc)
He's better mentally except for Leadership, which is a bit of a meme
Physically, they are the same
>>
>>77591801

Same thing with this, isn't this guy better than Jones cause of the det?
>>
>>77591870
>Det
meme attribute. Jones is the better footballer, which I deem more important.
>>
>>77591901

Gotcha, and my last one for you.

I really am thankful for this by the way.

This game has caused me so much stress.

Bowery has 3" on Dagnall, a better touch, and is more aerial
>>
>>77591809
>Using a name on an anonymous image board

Really made me think ya dink
>>
>>77591938
Dagnall thoroughly outclasses Bowery, who's only strength seems to be finishing better (composure). Jumping Reach is not important in your formation.
>>
>>77592019

Ok. And lastly, could you explain the TIs? What is the reasoning behind them? I understand the low cross as I have manlet strikers with decent movement. That's about the only one I understand.

Why counter and flexible also?
>>
>>77591870
If you want more Det, and if Bingham has decent Professionalism, I'd get him to tutor Jones.

>>77591809
Well if you see a Surrendering Monkey who uses a BWM as a lone ball-retrieving option, or Limited (or Defensive) FB/CB, then it's not me. I fucking hate BWM, the only way I'd consider one is in a 4-2-3-1 Wide coupled with a DLP(D) since they're a holding midfielder and because I don't need more players forward in a 4-2-3-1 (even if it can work). I can't exclude having an epiphany... but I can't see it.
>>
File: beastie boy.png (48KB, 589x328px) Image search: [Google]
beastie boy.png
48KB, 589x328px
What a whore.
>>
>>77592037
Alright:

Retain Possession + Low Tempo + Pass Into Space:
I noticed for FM17 that this combo works extremely well for most teams, especially in lower leagues. Ball-hogging is king in this game, and the first two ensure high possession rates. In previous games, you often had the problem that hogging possession also meant you didn't get many good shots off - conversely, I found in FM17 that ball hogging improves both your shot amount and the quality of chances if you turn on pass into space. This is true at least for narrow formations with 2 strikers and another attacking AMC.

Exploit the middle should be obvious. Your team is built to attack through the middle - you have the wingbacks to provide width and draw men away but that's not how you want to attack.

Look for Overlap makes midfielders pass to WBs more often. Actually, that's a double edged sword and now that I think about it, you should remove that one. It makes your players actively look for wide options and pass it out wide, and I wouldnt want that. Remove it.

Play wider: Your team is narrow as hell, but your players still need to defend the flanks. Letting them play wider enables them to do that more easily, and your attack is spread out a bit too which is also better than having all players standing in the same spots.

Close down more is a necessity for a wide formation like this, your formation offers no natural defender for enemy fullbacks (since you have no wingers), so you need your midfielders/attackers to be happy to close down players in general to get those players covered. Generally, any defensive formation that has glaring weak spots should probably use close down more.

>>77591976
>he doesn't attention whore on an international anime forum
what are you doing with your life man?
>>
>>77592050
>P-put me in coach :~S
>>
What is the most anti-football you can possibly think of?

Something even Big Sam or Tony Pulis would dare to pull off?
>>
>>77592250
Anything asymmetric
>>
>>77592278
Asymmetric is the most beautiful way to play the game,
>>
So there ends a 136 matches win streak. The irony is that if I had let my AssWoman simulate it, we'd have won it fairly easily.
>>
is there any point to attempting shit like registas in the lower leagues
just feel like my DLP doesn't get into the game enough, whether he's on D or S
>>
>>77592404
A DLP(D) is pretty much a DM that's a bit easier on the ball. And regardless of the duty, they lie deep, so they're more going to try to spread balls, recycle possession, that kind of things. They're not always going to be that noticeable, it's not the kind of work where you shine all that much..
>>
>>77592404
try an RPM
>>
>>77592454
that's true, the team does need a reliable anchor, i've got more attacking players for all the fancy shit
>>77592456
may give this a shot once i've played a few more games with him as DLP(d)
>>
>>77592495
In the lower leagues, you're just unlikely to find a player with the specific skillset for very specific roles like RGA or RMD for example. A DLP(D) would be a bit more like Busquets: look at how important he is for Barca despite having a mediocre amounts of goals and assists in a season. Don't think that because a DLP(D) has playmaker in his name means that he's going to pull magic often, that's not really how the role actually plays out. It's a bit weaker defensively than a Anchor Man or a DM(D), but better on the ball.
>>
>Gelsenkirchen beating Manure
The home bias makes everything possible, doesn't it?
>>
File: Xavier Lukhas_ Inbox-66.png (161KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
Xavier Lukhas_ Inbox-66.png
161KB, 1920x1080px
>>77591762
>Plays exactly 1 (one) match for the club this season
EXACTLY. CLOCKWORK. OBVIOUSLY. 10/10 MAN MANAGEMENT SI. FUCKING PERFECT.

Welp, that's one more week of holiday for him.
>>
>wanted to make a meme prediction on Watford or draw
>didn't have the balls and believed in the Klopp, even though Liverpool/Klopp ALWAYS struggle and look like absolute shit against small teams
>getting exposed and are already trailing
>>
How old does a player have to be to be able to tutor someone?
>>
>>77593088
24. If he's the captain, he can tutor at any age.
>>
New:
>>77593220
>>77593220
>>77593220
Thread posts: 503
Thread images: 166


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.