Bryant Butt Catch

File: tomlin2.jpg (44KB, 600x444px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 600x444px

MUH NIGGA
POPPIN OFF

>>64802239
>butt

Did you graduate from high school?

>>64802239
>the gloves have too much grip: the catch

I didn't actually watch the game

But based on this evidence. I can 100% conclude that this is indeed NOT a catch. he didn't have complete control of the ball (you can see in the bobble at 1 second in). He had his right foot down, but his left clearly steps out of bounds. You can try to argue with this but you would be wrong.

It has my vote

Unlike Beckhams catch, you can't practice this kinda shit

>>64802304
are you retarded? his left foot is at FOOT clearly away from the white. how delusional are you bungal cu-ck?

File: 1368738692945.jpg (14KB, 300x400px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 300x400px

>>64802291
>SHOULD BE ASS OR SOMETHING DESU
>Implying it's not a play on buttfumble

File: 1451149084825.jpg (72KB, 323x323px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 323x323px

>>64802304
Well apparently you know more than every single ref and sports analyst

gtfo

>>64802343
I'm saying it clearly didn't even touch his butt. I don't fucking care about the wording. It doesn't touch his butt once.

>>64802343
You're fucking stupid, it's because it's obviously held against him hamstring

>>64802239
Taint catch will go down as goat

>>64802327
>1 foot

This is most definitely the best catch I've ever seen

I fuckin laugh every time I watch it

If Calvin Johnson had done that it would've been incomplete and he probably would've been ejected for the flip
No wonder he's retiring

File: 1of2 cuck.png (718KB, 744x362px) Image search: [Google]

718KB, 744x362px

>>64802421
>>64802304
>being this retarded

>>64802239

I didn't know whether he was trying to score a touchdown or cram the football up his ass.

File: 2of2 bungal cucks.png (694KB, 771x365px) Image search: [Google]

694KB, 771x365px

>>64802304
>>64802421
>>64802473

YOU FUCKING LOST. GTFO.

>>64802327
>>64802350
the call stood, meaning it wasnt clear cut

and also if you have working eyes you should have been able to see that

>>64802556
REVIEW THE PROOF FAGGOT.

>>64802473
>>64802528

>>64802239
fokken g8 catch

>>64802239
Almost forgot about this

File: 1431878600214.jpg (22KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 480x360px

>>64802304

>>64802454
yeah...never really understood why the league fucked him so hard.

Usually they encourage the "all stars" to make star plays. But I guess its more about what team you play on these days.

>>64802556
See: >>64802577 faggot

File: wut.jpg (119KB, 490x326px) Image search: [Google]

119KB, 490x326px

>>64802590
>fokken gate catch

I'm so confused

>>64802304
>this is the future millennials running our world

Dear lord.

>>64802296
It was literally raining and his gloves are soaked. If you played football you would understand how dificult it is to catch a ball with wet gloves.

Shut your mouth and witness greatness

theres no way this was a catch. foot down,bobbling foot down, ball behind knee. even if you want to say. he then cluthces it to his leg now while its behind his knee he only gets one foot down after that before he flips out of bounds and holds the ball in his stomach. in my eyes, that should count as him juggling it until he lands anyway and he clearly lands out of bounds. but even if you disagree with that he only has one foot down when he stops juggling

File: 1450337547067.jpg (21KB, 500x333px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 500x333px

>>64802666
U mad?

>>64802666
Its all the more proof that it was the GOAT

>>64802675
im not even a fucking bungles fan. my team plays tomorrow

OP literally can't find his own butt with two hands.

>>64802696
It was a catch, faggot... believe it or not, you don't know more than every single ref and sports analyst.

>>64802577
>>64802614
you guys dont understand what control is

>>64802736
good trry troll. literally every segment on espn makes a "we dont know what a catch is " joke

What the fuck was so good about that catch? It looks like a retard catching a Frisbee doing a roll

>>64802304
>Hes_Right_You_Know.jpg

>>64802798
Oh yeah??pfffff Perhaps you don't have very good eyesight.

>>64802817
So you'd agree that it's pretty much ambiguous?

>>64802239
i disagree because only catches that come in the clutch can contend for greatest catch in NFL history. It's the same reason why I don't think OBJs catches are all that amazing. yeah they deserve style points but it came in the regular season..

as far martavis bryants catch no doubt it was an amazing catch that deserves many style points but it's in the wild card round so it can't compete with the helmet catch or even the steelers catch against the cards in the owl

>>64802239
This was NOT a catch

> ball was clearly moving before he had 2 feet in bounds

>>64802666
This bro gets it.

>NFL had lost track of what a catch truly is

Example: bang bang play

> what the fuck sites that even mean?

Pure bullshit

>>64803080
>>64803101

go to bed kiddo, the adults are trying to discuss sports.

>>64803101
>bang bang play
Yeah, lets make the sport as boring as fucking possible with a bunch of "bang bang" plays.

i never saw him make a football move

I would think that isn't a catch due to out of bounds? He doesn't establish possesion in my mind until after he gets his feet down? Crazy athletic play regardless though

Do you think his ass will make the cover of madden this year?

>>64803157
Shut the fuck up, Canada

>NFL establishes retarded, obsessive legal catch rules
>rules with an iron fist and allows no questioning

>Point out how this catch isn't legal following NFL's standards
>people complain that we're the obsessive ones

Look how many of you faggots drank the NFL coolaid. They ruined your favorite sport and made you believe someone else is to blame.

>>64802239
>Not catching it once the ball hit his hand
>Juggles the ball and barley gets in

Greatest catch, K m8

Pretty sure according to the rules that's not a catch.

Dez bryant's "non-catch" last year is more of a catch than this shit.

>>64802304
You got the feet backwards but I agree.
If it had been called incomplete originally that call would also have stood after review. Very hard to tell when he actually gets possesion

>>64803363
>2 feet inbounds
>maintains control as he goes out of bounds
... yep, it's a catch

U mad?

>>64802239
>2 feet tap in bounds as ball is secured to leg
>not a catch

Not even a Steelersfag but that's a great play.

>>64803453
when his first foot touches down, the ball is still rolling up the back of his leg

never a catch, and that is an embarrassment of a call

>>64802239
I didn't watch the whole game...but after all the crap the refs ruled was not a catch this year, they ruled that one was clean catch??? Ridiculous.

The question is when he has control.

When it's 100% clear that he has control of the ball his feet aren't both touching in bounds.

Not a catch.

>>64803473
The bobble occurs when his 1st foot is down, he then regains control with the same foot down and he gets the 2nd foot down with control, he then maintains control all the way to the ground.

According to the rules that's a catch, if you disagree, you don't understand the rules

>>64803548
It would be a catch, if what you wrote wasn't a complete lie. He didn't get control while his first foot was down.

it wasn't even close really

>>64803571
Luckily the replay officials aren't as blind as you and have a better understanding of the rules.

>>64803548

>control

If you think he isn't bobbling the fucking ball almost the entire length of that webm then you're blind.

>>64803571
Link the rule, fag

>>64803579
>>64803600
Are you illiterate or what? You guys keep going on about the rules, be we agree on the rule. What we don't agree on is the clear FACT that the ball is still moving after he lifts up his first foot. Hell, he secures it in his bent knee, initially (the knee is bent as he lifts his foot)

I mean, no rule book will cure you from your fanboy blindness.

>>64803581
The bobble occurs at the beginning, you can see him adjusting the ball to get a better grip on it and then establishing both feet inbounds. After that he has it pinned to his leg, which is not a bobble.

Don't think it was a catch. It definitely should be, but it looks like he gets it with one foot down, bobbles it, then regains it and the other foot comes down. Don't know how they called it a catch under their current BS rules

Jesus, even if it was catch (which I don't even think it was), how the fuck is that impressive? When I heard he used his butt to catch it I thought the ball hit him in his butt and he caught it like that. What he actually did was make the least graceful and retarded looking catch I've ever seen when he could have caught it normally.

>greatest of all time

Yea sure, stoolerfags.

>>64803620
Not that guy, but the only time he's not bobbling it is as he does his flip, when maybe (maybe) he got one foot down.

I'm shocked that you people aren't trolling honestly.

>>64802239
>hand maintains control of the ball through the final two steps

obvious TD

>>64802666
Ball never touched the ground. As far as common sense goes, that's a catch.

>>64803619
>still moving
>in his possession

>>64803636
Do you think the replay officials were trolling too?

>>64803669
It's a catch, obviously. But is it a catch in bounds, which is what matters, retard

>>64803620

So a ball moving while being pinned to a guy's forearm is not being in control but if it is moving while pinned to a guy's ass in an awkward position it's not a bobble? If I was a cowboys fan I'd be livid.

>>64803686
I don't think you're trolling. I'm shocked that you're not. And I think you're both (you and the replay officials) just wrong. That happens.

I mean, the ball is definitely moving until he secures it in the crack of his knee. He's only able to do that because his knee is bent and his foot is off the ground. That's just clear fact, and you can't tell me a single thing about that description that is inaccurate.

>>64803669
No one is arguing about whether or not it's a catch. We're arguing about whether or not it should have been called a catch based on the nfl's asinine catch rules

>>64803687
He caught it in bounds and never let it touch the ground.

Before you remind me what the rules are, I don't give a fuck what the rules are. Deal with it turboniggers

>>64803669

>common sense
>modern NFL rules

Oh, Canada

>>64802239
you need 2 feet down and control. that never happened. not a catch.

I honestly wouldn't mind the results of any of this if the NFL would just straight up come out and say that they got the call wrong.

This literally goes against everything they've said in regards to rules and use of replay.

It's not a catch and you can't argue it's a catch unless ignore the fact that the player never has control until he's out of bounds.

>>64803733

Then why are you even taking part in the discussion if you don't if it was actually a catch or not?

Technically the ball was moving around and he didn't really secure it until one leg was out of bounds.
Mind you I think it's a catch 100% of the time but I've seen refs call things like this incomplete and people defend it, wish there was some consistency with refs in this shit league

>>64803787
m8, if you think he didn't secure it until one foot was out of bounds, how can you say you think it's a catch?

the only way you could hold those two thoughts is to not know the rules

File: 1452404703605.gif (3MB, 480x278px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 480x278px

Listen up faggots. To prove possession and show you have complete control of the ball you have have the ball pressed against you securely during the entire catch with at least one hand. The reason this is such a great catch is because he was able to keep the ball secure against his body through the full duration of the catch despite catching the ball at such an awkward angle.

Of course you whiny faggots would be arguing about whether or not it was a catch.

1. He had possession (even though the ball was moving AROUND HIS BODY)
2. He maintained possession as he went out of bounds.

It was a catch... it always WILL BE a catch... and every ref, sports figure, and analyst agrees.

Stay mad, faggots.

>>64803787
The ball can move around without the receiver losing control of the ball. Bryant's hand remained on the ball and had control of it against his leg through his final two steps. By definition it was a reception.

>>64803770
Because I'm telling everyone I'm right, so there won't be any discussion, duh

>>64803805
I think it's a catch in that the rules are retarded, it is definitely not a catch within the current rules and I've seen them call incomplete on balls that didn't move around as much as this one

the ball was clearly bobbling before he went out of bounds... he also had to do a bullshit flip to distract the refs that he didn't have possession all the way through. Also big ben fumbled on the burfict sack but the shit got swept under the rug of course

>>64803844
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IdtKbq3Omkw

>>64803814
see
>>64803747

how hard is it to understand such a basic rule?

>>64803844
Nah he was down, but yeah that should have been incomplete. Waiting to rage when they call an incomplete catch in a game I care about, you know it's coming

even in college this would have been called incomplete on the field, reviewed and stood as incomplete.

are the refs usually this bad in the nfl?

>>64803902
>are the refs usually this bad in the nfl?
YES

>>64803902
>Yes.

He has to trap the ball with his right leg, which never comes back down in bounds after he secures the ball, assuming you forgive moving it across his body to his other hand.

I've seen much better "catches" called incomplete this year. Shit's wack, yo.

>control of the ball
>takes two steps inbounds

textbook touchdown

>>64802239
In both angles the ball is moving but it never leaves his hand or leg once the first foot comes down and then the second one comes down. It's a catch clearly

ITT: plebs can't think outside of "bang bang" plays

>>64803956
how bout i smack you upside the noggin with a textbook, fucktard

>>64803812

He secures it at an unnecessary and akward angle, the actual catch (when he grabs it from the air) was typical. Not really impressive.

File: 1452409906475.webm (3MB, 780x406px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 780x406px

>>64802239
goat catch is goat

>>64802652
>water affects the grip with current receiver gloves
Ahahahahahahahanahahahahahahana

>>64803669
That's not how football works dumb shit, there are boundaries to the field and you have to have COMPLETE CONTROL while having TWO FEET DOWN while IN BOUNDS

>>64807131
this your first football game?

>>64807151
i've seen a million bobbling catches on their way out of bounds called incomplete, it was cool but it wasn't a catch

File: james-jean-mcr-parade17x41 (2).jpg (254KB, 1310x500px) Image search: [Google]

254KB, 1310x500px

I have a stupid question, would anyone notice if i put glue on my gloves?

It's a sad day for football when Dez Bryant's catch is ruled incomplete but this goober pinning a ball against his ass with the ball constantly moving and doing a front flip is "complete"

>>64802239
Goddamn it stop that. It was visually stunning but it only happened because he completely failed the easy textbook grab that was the original pass.

Going above and beyond to catch a poorly thrown ball: great catch. Doing gymnastics to correct your own damn mistake: the opposite

>>64807079
Are you actually retarded. Trying playing friendly catch in a downpour, it's hard. Get outside more often fatty.

>>64808706
Any type of sticky substance would rub off onto the ball and once you make a catch and hand the ref the football he will notice it's been tampered with.

File: 1451243599607.png (143KB, 300x349px) Image search: [Google]

143KB, 300x349px

>>64809204
kek

Fuck the faggot fuckboy steelers fuck

>>64809458
I found the bungles fan

>>64814041
I'll fucking kill you do you understand me? Think you're so god damn smug posting behind a computer? But you wouldn't say that shit irl at the stadium because you'd get fucked up worse than pussy ass Antonio Brown, you hear me? They'd have to give the fans a personal fowl for what we'd fucking do to you you piece of god damn trash

File: 1452040241581.jpg (80KB, 833x625px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 833x625px

>>64814238

>>64814238
LITERALLY THIS MAD

>THE ASS RAVAGED, RUSTED OUT VILLAGE OF CINCINATTI

GOOD LUCK MAYBE YOU'LL GET ANOTHER SHOT IN 25 YEARS

dat ass control

>>64802798
did he drop the ball?
did he lose the ball?

No. Because he maintained control of the ball.

Jesus fuck you bengals fags are so fucking sad that you couldn't win even when getting away with playing murderball all season long.

If Burfict and Pacman were a rival team in your division you would think that they deserve the electric chair

File: WellinformedDiscreteInganue.webm (1MB, 664x512px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 664x512px

>>64814238

>personal fowl
>personal fowl
>fowl

>>64803521
Control is either having it in your hands or pinning it to your body.

>>64802239
That's a hard one to tell. It looks like the ball bounces at about the 3 second mark between his hand and his leg after his right leg leaves the ground for the last time. His left leg is down once he has control but his right never touches the ground, inbounds again.